Rubinstein 1966

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		17	0.80	40	0.00	23	0.06	25	0.22	29	0.20	13	0.21
Ashkenazy 1981		26	0.77	21	0.00	34	0.05	39	0.05	39	0.07	41	0.06
Beliavsky 2004		42	0.73	44	0.00	32	0.06	32	0.12	32	0.12	25	0.12
BenOr 1989		20	0.79	24	0.00	19	0.07	13	0.38	53	0.05	21	0.14
Biret 1990		10	0.81	13	0.01	7	0.18	10	0.49	8	0.53	4	0.51
Blet 2003		34	0.75	36	0.00	28	0.07	30	0.17	55	0.04	35	0.08
Block 1995		61	0.64	49	0.00	63	0.06	34	0.06	40	0.07	40	0.06
Brailowsky 1960		15	0.80	28	0.00	26	0.07	27	0.20	27	0.19	16	0.19
Chiu 1999		62	0.63	33	0.00	36	0.04	45	0.04	47	0.06	43	0.05
Clidat 1994		36	0.74	18	0.00	20	0.06	22	0.25	56	0.05	32	0.11
Cohen 1997		59	0.67	14	0.01	40	0.04	53	0.04	14	0.37	27	0.12
Coop 1987		53	0.71	20	0.00	43	0.04	59	0.04	54	0.05	57	0.04
Cortot 1951		43	0.72	22	0.00	60	0.03	61	0.03	48	0.05	65	0.04
Czerny 1949		49	0.71	51	0.00	50	0.05	38	0.05	57	0.04	62	0.04
Czerny 1949b		38	0.74	48	0.00	49	0.05	41	0.05	48	0.05	45	0.05
Ezaki 2006		54	0.71	43	0.00	55	0.03	62	0.03	47	0.07	42	0.05
Falvay 1989		56	0.69	47	0.00	62	0.06	35	0.06	55	0.05	44	0.05
Ferenczy 1958		47	0.72	45	0.00	52	0.04	48	0.04	59	0.04	60	0.04
Fiorentino 1962		32	0.75	17	0.00	30	0.06	28	0.18	47	0.06	33	0.10
Fliere 1977		11	0.81	32	0.00	14	0.14	15	0.35	53	0.05	22	0.13
Fou 1978		27	0.77	11	0.01	21	0.06	19	0.28	58	0.05	24	0.12
Francois 1956		50	0.71	23	0.00	51	0.04	55	0.04	43	0.06	51	0.05
Hatto 1997		13	0.80	54	0.00	44	0.03	63	0.03	49	0.05	59	0.04
Horowitz 1971		9	0.81	35	0.00	12	0.18	12	0.38	14	0.41	9	0.39
Horowitz 1985		22	0.78	60	0.00	18	0.06	23	0.24	6	0.60	10	0.38
Indjic 2001		12	0.80	55	0.00	45	0.05	36	0.05	48	0.05	50	0.05
Kapell 1951		37	0.74	42	0.00	46	0.04	44	0.04	57	0.05	56	0.04
Kiepura 1999		31	0.75	52	0.00	35	0.05	42	0.05	33	0.09	36	0.07
Kilenyi 1937		55	0.69	46	0.00	57	0.04	54	0.04	60	0.04	61	0.04
Kissin 1993		18	0.79	8	0.02	13	0.20	9	0.52	49	0.06	17	0.18
Kitain 1937		63	0.47	15	0.01	61	0.04	46	0.04	3	0.58	19	0.15
Kushner 1990		6	0.83	3	0.14	4	0.22	7	0.62	11	0.39	5	0.49
Levy 1951		44	0.72	38	0.00	33	0.05	37	0.05	25	0.23	29	0.11
Luisada 1990		21	0.78	7	0.03	17	0.08	18	0.29	48	0.05	26	0.12
Lushtak 2004		19	0.79	26	0.00	16	0.10	11	0.42	45	0.06	18	0.16
Lympany 1968		24	0.77	39	0.00	25	0.06	21	0.26	43	0.05	28	0.11
Magaloff 1977		29	0.77	50	0.00	48	0.06	33	0.06	54	0.05	47	0.05
Magaloff 1977b		28	0.77	30	0.00	47	0.04	51	0.04	53	0.05	63	0.04
Magin 1975		41	0.73	61	0.00	56	0.04	58	0.04	56	0.05	54	0.04
Milkina 1970		1	0.90	6	0.04	5	0.27	5	0.67	3	0.62	3	0.64
Mohovich 1999		14	0.80	9	0.02	9	0.29	6	0.62	16	0.38	6	0.49
Nadelmann 1956		7	0.82	63	0.00	10	0.19	14	0.38	19	0.32	12	0.35
Ohlsson 1999		52	0.71	27	0.00	38	0.04	43	0.04	38	0.06	46	0.05
Olejniczac 1990		33	0.75	29	0.00	31	0.07	29	0.18	51	0.05	34	0.09
Olejniczak 1991		23	0.78	59	0.00	27	0.08	24	0.23	49	0.05	30	0.11
Osinska 1989		4	0.87	4	0.06	3	0.22	4	0.72	19	0.28	7	0.45
Paderewski 1912		46	0.72	53	0.00	42	0.05	40	0.05	51	0.05	48	0.05
Perahia 1994		45	0.72	12	0.01	11	0.15	16	0.34	6	0.56	8	0.44
Perlemuter 1986		39	0.74	10	0.02	15	0.11	17	0.31	42	0.06	20	0.14
Poblocka 1999		40	0.74	41	0.00	54	0.04	50	0.04	57	0.04	52	0.04
Rangell 2001		48	0.72	56	0.00	37	0.04	52	0.04	56	0.04	64	0.04
Risler 1920		60	0.66	16	0.00	58	0.03	64	0.03	51	0.05	53	0.04
Rosen 1989		35	0.74	37	0.00	41	0.04	49	0.04	41	0.06	49	0.05
Rubinstein 1939		2	0.88	1	0.37	1	0.36	3	0.73	1	0.88	1	0.80
Rubinstein 1952		3	0.87	2	0.18	2	0.22	2	0.74	2	0.71	2	0.72
Rubinstein 1966		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rummel 1943		57	0.68	62	0.00	53	0.04	47	0.04	31	0.14	39	0.07
Shebanova 2002		16	0.80	34	0.00	24	0.06	26	0.21	43	0.06	31	0.11
Smith 1975		8	0.82	57	0.00	8	0.20	8	0.56	24	0.25	11	0.37
Szpilman 1948		30	0.76	25	0.00	22	0.06	20	0.28	49	0.05	23	0.12
Uninsky 1971		51	0.71	31	0.00	39	0.04	56	0.04	52	0.05	58	0.04
Wasowski 1980		25	0.77	19	0.00	29	0.06	31	0.12	15	0.35	14	0.20
Weissenberg 1971		58	0.67	58	0.00	59	0.04	60	0.04	49	0.05	55	0.04
Average		5	0.85	5	0.04	6	0.25	1	0.81	52	0.05	15	0.20
Random 1		65	-0.06	64	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	20	0.23	37	0.07
Random 2		64	0.10	65	0.00	64	0.04	57	0.04	27	0.13	38	0.07
Random 3		66	-0.10	66	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	50	0.03	66	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).