Random 1

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		24	0.02	13	0.01	11	0.09	9	0.34	50	0.03	10	0.10
Bacha 1997		17	0.03	42	0.00	41	0.04	41	0.04	51	0.03	35	0.03
Barbosa 1983		49	-0.02	28	0.00	44	0.04	36	0.04	51	0.02	45	0.03
Biret 1990		8	0.04	52	0.00	25	0.06	25	0.12	50	0.03	24	0.06
Block 1995		43	0.00	15	0.01	32	0.04	40	0.04	50	0.04	31	0.04
Brailowsky 1960		19	0.03	29	0.00	9	0.10	5	0.38	50	0.03	5	0.11
Chiu 1999		29	0.01	8	0.01	18	0.08	20	0.19	50	0.04	14	0.09
Clidat 1994		33	0.01	6	0.02	23	0.06	23	0.13	50	0.03	23	0.06
Cohen 1997		52	-0.03	36	0.00	52	0.02	52	0.02	51	0.02	51	0.02
Cortot 1951		7	0.05	20	0.00	22	0.08	19	0.19	50	0.03	20	0.08
Csalog 1996		22	0.02	37	0.00	24	0.06	22	0.14	50	0.03	25	0.06
Czerny 1990		10	0.04	44	0.00	21	0.07	21	0.18	51	0.03	21	0.07
Ezaki 2006		36	0.00	34	0.00	31	0.05	31	0.05	51	0.02	34	0.03
Ferenczy 1958		45	0.00	33	0.00	48	0.03	48	0.03	50	0.02	47	0.02
Fliere 1977		41	0.00	4	0.02	12	0.09	14	0.26	50	0.03	13	0.09
Fou 1978		46	-0.01	41	0.00	43	0.04	42	0.04	50	0.02	38	0.03
Francois 1956		25	0.02	32	0.00	40	0.04	43	0.04	51	0.03	46	0.03
Grinberg 1951		39	0.00	50	0.00	51	0.02	50	0.02	52	0.02	49	0.02
Hatto 1993		27	0.02	40	0.00	47	0.04	45	0.04	51	0.02	43	0.03
Hatto 1997		23	0.02	43	0.00	46	0.04	39	0.04	51	0.02	36	0.03
Indjic 2001		28	0.02	48	0.00	49	0.03	49	0.03	51	0.02	50	0.02
Jonas 1947		5	0.06	10	0.01	10	0.11	10	0.30	50	0.03	16	0.09
Kapell 1951		32	0.01	25	0.00	37	0.04	46	0.04	50	0.03	41	0.03
Kiepura 1999		20	0.03	12	0.01	28	0.05	28	0.05	51	0.03	27	0.04
Kushner 1989		13	0.03	21	0.00	35	0.05	32	0.05	50	0.02	40	0.03
Luisada 1991		9	0.04	17	0.01	17	0.08	16	0.24	50	0.04	8	0.10
Lushtak 2004		34	0.01	18	0.01	33	0.04	38	0.04	50	0.04	30	0.04
Magaloff 1978		37	0.00	26	0.00	20	0.07	24	0.12	50	0.03	22	0.06
Meguri 1997		6	0.05	9	0.01	15	0.08	15	0.25	50	0.03	19	0.09
Milkina 1970		44	0.00	24	0.00	45	0.04	35	0.04	50	0.03	42	0.03
Mohovich 1999		31	0.01	27	0.00	38	0.04	37	0.04	51	0.02	39	0.03
Niedzielski 1931		4	0.06	19	0.01	16	0.08	13	0.27	50	0.03	15	0.09
Ohlsson 1999		18	0.03	5	0.02	13	0.10	11	0.30	50	0.03	17	0.09
Olejniczak 1990		42	0.00	39	0.00	42	0.03	47	0.03	51	0.02	52	0.02
Osinska 1989		40	0.00	51	0.00	39	0.04	34	0.04	50	0.03	37	0.03
Rangell 2001		51	-0.03	30	0.00	30	0.04	33	0.04	50	0.04	33	0.04
Richter 1976		12	0.03	22	0.00	6	0.12	6	0.37	51	0.03	6	0.11
Rubinstein 1938		48	-0.02	11	0.01	19	0.08	18	0.19	49	0.04	18	0.09
Rubinstein 1952		15	0.03	31	0.00	7	0.10	12	0.29	50	0.04	7	0.11
Rubinstein 1961		26	0.02	16	0.01	4	0.15	3	0.51	50	0.04	3	0.14
Rubinstein 1966		38	0.00	23	0.00	14	0.10	17	0.23	50	0.04	12	0.10
Shebanova 2002		35	0.01	35	0.00	27	0.05	27	0.05	51	0.03	29	0.04
Smidowicz 1948		21	0.02	45	0.00	36	0.05	29	0.05	51	0.03	32	0.04
Smidowicz 1948b		14	0.03	46	0.00	26	0.07	26	0.07	51	0.03	26	0.05
Smith 1975		50	-0.02	3	0.06	3	0.13	8	0.36	50	0.03	9	0.10
Sofronitsky 1949		47	-0.01	49	0.00	50	0.02	51	0.02	51	0.02	48	0.02
Sztompka 1959		16	0.03	7	0.02	8	0.10	7	0.36	50	0.03	11	0.10
Tomsic 1995		3	0.07	14	0.01	5	0.11	4	0.44	50	0.04	4	0.13
Uninsky 1971		30	0.01	38	0.00	34	0.04	44	0.04	50	0.03	44	0.03
Wasowski 1980		11	0.04	47	0.00	29	0.05	30	0.05	50	0.03	28	0.04
Random 1		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Random 2		1	0.19	1	0.54	1	0.53	1	0.75	1	0.77	1	0.76
Random 3		2	0.14	2	0.15	2	0.34	2	0.55	4	0.53	2	0.54

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).