Wasowski 1980

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		38	0.82	41	0.00	36	0.07	42	0.07	37	0.09	45	0.08
Bacha 1997		23	0.87	18	0.00	25	0.10	25	0.18	25	0.18	25	0.18
Barbosa 1983		34	0.83	48	0.00	33	0.08	35	0.08	47	0.06	49	0.07
Biret 1990		24	0.86	24	0.00	22	0.11	20	0.25	24	0.29	14	0.27
Block 1995		41	0.81	31	0.00	41	0.05	47	0.05	19	0.34	34	0.13
Brailowsky 1960		27	0.85	39	0.00	27	0.09	29	0.09	27	0.13	36	0.11
Chiu 1999		15	0.88	9	0.02	17	0.10	19	0.26	11	0.44	10	0.34
Clidat 1994		6	0.90	14	0.01	7	0.18	10	0.52	16	0.30	9	0.39
Cohen 1997		26	0.86	13	0.01	24	0.09	23	0.19	5	0.52	12	0.31
Cortot 1951		31	0.84	23	0.00	32	0.09	33	0.09	28	0.11	39	0.10
Csalog 1996		7	0.89	35	0.00	10	0.18	9	0.53	28	0.13	17	0.26
Czerny 1990		22	0.87	42	0.00	16	0.13	15	0.39	23	0.22	13	0.29
Ezaki 2006		20	0.87	25	0.00	19	0.07	21	0.21	26	0.12	28	0.16
Ferenczy 1958		32	0.84	5	0.07	18	0.11	24	0.19	18	0.30	20	0.24
Fliere 1977		3	0.91	11	0.01	4	0.22	4	0.63	4	0.69	3	0.66
Fou 1978		33	0.84	21	0.00	34	0.09	34	0.09	13	0.51	22	0.21
Francois 1956		35	0.83	40	0.00	37	0.09	32	0.09	37	0.09	44	0.09
Grinberg 1951		40	0.82	26	0.00	40	0.05	45	0.05	26	0.16	40	0.09
Hatto 1993		8	0.89	28	0.00	11	0.20	11	0.52	28	0.13	16	0.26
Hatto 1997		9	0.89	29	0.00	9	0.18	8	0.53	29	0.13	15	0.26
Indjic 2001		5	0.90	50	0.00	6	0.22	6	0.55	35	0.11	18	0.25
Jonas 1947		12	0.89	12	0.01	14	0.12	14	0.41	30	0.11	21	0.21
Kapell 1951		16	0.88	22	0.00	23	0.09	22	0.20	34	0.10	32	0.14
Kiepura 1999		42	0.80	51	0.00	42	0.07	39	0.07	14	0.34	31	0.15
Kushner 1989		2	0.91	2	0.16	2	0.22	5	0.58	9	0.55	4	0.56
Luisada 1991		36	0.83	38	0.00	38	0.08	36	0.08	26	0.12	37	0.10
Lushtak 2004		25	0.86	19	0.00	30	0.10	27	0.10	17	0.33	26	0.18
Magaloff 1978		44	0.77	33	0.00	43	0.07	38	0.07	35	0.07	47	0.07
Meguri 1997		14	0.88	30	0.00	15	0.15	13	0.43	26	0.15	19	0.25
Milkina 1970		28	0.85	4	0.08	13	0.12	18	0.27	4	0.68	8	0.43
Mohovich 1999		29	0.85	49	0.00	31	0.09	30	0.09	30	0.09	42	0.09
Niedzielski 1931		30	0.84	52	0.00	29	0.10	28	0.10	36	0.09	41	0.09
Ohlsson 1999		10	0.89	3	0.11	8	0.22	1	0.69	4	0.73	2	0.71
Olejniczak 1990		4	0.90	6	0.05	3	0.22	7	0.54	11	0.52	6	0.53
Osinska 1989		11	0.89	7	0.04	5	0.24	3	0.66	3	0.76	1	0.71
Rangell 2001		47	0.73	20	0.00	45	0.05	48	0.05	12	0.54	29	0.16
Richter 1976		37	0.83	8	0.02	35	0.08	37	0.08	23	0.25	33	0.14
Rubinstein 1938		48	0.72	46	0.00	47	0.04	49	0.04	35	0.07	51	0.05
Rubinstein 1952		43	0.77	34	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.06	14	0.44	30	0.16
Rubinstein 1961		46	0.74	37	0.00	48	0.07	40	0.07	11	0.58	24	0.20
Rubinstein 1966		45	0.75	27	0.00	46	0.05	46	0.05	9	0.61	27	0.17
Shebanova 2002		13	0.88	10	0.02	12	0.20	12	0.51	15	0.41	7	0.46
Smidowicz 1948		19	0.87	47	0.00	20	0.08	16	0.35	27	0.12	23	0.20
Smidowicz 1948b		21	0.87	43	0.00	26	0.14	26	0.14	28	0.11	35	0.12
Smith 1975		49	0.65	16	0.01	49	0.07	41	0.07	28	0.13	38	0.10
Sofronitsky 1949		39	0.82	36	0.00	39	0.06	43	0.06	32	0.09	48	0.07
Sztompka 1959		17	0.88	15	0.01	21	0.09	17	0.27	14	0.44	11	0.34
Tomsic 1995		1	0.92	1	0.35	1	0.34	2	0.69	16	0.40	5	0.53
Uninsky 1971		18	0.88	17	0.01	28	0.09	31	0.09	27	0.09	43	0.09
Wasowski 1980		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Random 1		50	0.04	44	0.00	50	0.03	50	0.03	30	0.05	52	0.04
Random 2		52	-0.01	32	0.00	52	0.02	52	0.02	20	0.27	46	0.07
Random 3		51	0.03	45	0.00	51	0.03	51	0.03	29	0.08	50	0.05

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).