Rudanovskaya 2007

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		2	0.52	1	0.20	1	0.20	1	0.68	28	0.23	1	0.40
Ax 1995		8	0.48	9	0.03	6	0.16	2	0.63	47	0.08	5	0.22
Bacha 1998		52	0.34	51	0.00	41	0.06	42	0.06	50	0.06	37	0.06
Barbosa 1983		44	0.37	46	0.00	51	0.04	61	0.04	60	0.04	59	0.04
BenOr 1989		17	0.45	22	0.01	26	0.09	26	0.28	53	0.07	21	0.14
Biret 1990		25	0.42	39	0.00	28	0.07	28	0.23	58	0.04	31	0.10
Brailowsky 1960		20	0.44	47	0.00	24	0.10	16	0.41	48	0.07	12	0.17
Chiu 1999		29	0.41	28	0.00	34	0.07	34	0.07	38	0.06	36	0.06
Clidat 1994		7	0.48	5	0.05	9	0.18	8	0.55	58	0.04	18	0.15
Cohen 1997		61	0.27	32	0.00	59	0.04	56	0.04	28	0.14	34	0.07
Cortot 1951		63	0.19	60	0.00	63	0.05	49	0.05	60	0.03	63	0.04
Csalog 1996		11	0.47	10	0.02	12	0.15	14	0.44	31	0.15	3	0.26
Czerny 1989		27	0.41	49	0.00	27	0.09	24	0.33	59	0.05	23	0.13
Ezaki 2006		43	0.37	23	0.00	43	0.06	45	0.06	62	0.04	42	0.05
Falvay 1989		3	0.50	11	0.02	10	0.14	10	0.51	57	0.06	13	0.17
Fiorentino 1962		35	0.39	26	0.00	36	0.06	40	0.06	61	0.04	53	0.05
Fliere 1977		10	0.47	4	0.08	4	0.15	9	0.53	39	0.08	7	0.21
Fou 1978		9	0.48	8	0.03	5	0.19	6	0.58	43	0.07	8	0.20
Francois 1956		37	0.39	30	0.00	31	0.09	30	0.20	54	0.06	28	0.11
Goldenweiser 1946		31	0.40	20	0.01	47	0.05	48	0.05	57	0.05	44	0.05
Gornostaeva 1994		45	0.37	64	0.00	52	0.04	55	0.04	57	0.04	62	0.04
Groot 1988		5	0.49	6	0.04	7	0.26	3	0.62	41	0.09	4	0.24
Hatto 1993		22	0.43	25	0.00	16	0.10	15	0.42	59	0.05	22	0.14
Hatto 1997		14	0.45	35	0.00	15	0.17	13	0.46	49	0.07	10	0.18
Horszowski 1983		60	0.27	56	0.00	60	0.04	57	0.04	56	0.04	55	0.04
Indjic 2001		15	0.45	12	0.01	13	0.17	12	0.48	58	0.05	19	0.15
Katin 1996		46	0.36	34	0.00	40	0.06	44	0.06	58	0.04	49	0.05
Kiepura 1999		32	0.39	33	0.00	49	0.06	43	0.06	58	0.05	43	0.05
Korecka 1992		39	0.38	54	0.00	42	0.06	46	0.06	43	0.08	33	0.07
Kushner 1990		6	0.49	7	0.03	8	0.19	7	0.57	60	0.04	17	0.15
Lilamand 2001		54	0.34	31	0.00	50	0.04	63	0.04	41	0.06	50	0.05
Luisada 1990		57	0.31	62	0.00	58	0.07	37	0.07	59	0.05	41	0.06
Luisada 2008		48	0.35	37	0.00	54	0.04	58	0.04	60	0.04	60	0.04
Lushtak 2004		30	0.40	52	0.00	32	0.08	32	0.15	58	0.05	32	0.09
Malcuzynski 1951		36	0.39	55	0.00	39	0.06	39	0.06	61	0.05	54	0.05
Malcuzynski 1961		49	0.35	43	0.00	46	0.05	54	0.05	60	0.05	48	0.05
Magaloff 1977		58	0.30	50	0.00	53	0.04	62	0.04	60	0.04	61	0.04
Magin 1975		55	0.33	58	0.00	56	0.05	51	0.05	55	0.06	47	0.05
Meguri 1997		42	0.38	27	0.00	33	0.07	35	0.07	46	0.05	38	0.06
Milkina 1970		41	0.38	61	0.00	21	0.07	19	0.39	54	0.06	15	0.15
Mohovich 1999		24	0.42	14	0.01	29	0.09	27	0.24	50	0.06	26	0.12
Nezu 2005		38	0.38	59	0.00	38	0.07	36	0.07	61	0.04	52	0.05
Ohlsson 1999		26	0.41	42	0.00	20	0.09	25	0.32	59	0.04	27	0.11
Olejniczak 1990		4	0.49	2	0.18	3	0.21	5	0.60	41	0.08	6	0.22
Osinska 1989		18	0.44	15	0.01	18	0.08	20	0.38	47	0.08	11	0.17
Perlemuter 1992		56	0.32	48	0.00	55	0.04	60	0.04	53	0.04	56	0.04
Poblocka 1999		51	0.35	44	0.00	57	0.05	50	0.05	59	0.05	45	0.05
Rangell 2001		59	0.29	45	0.00	61	0.04	59	0.04	63	0.03	65	0.03
Richter 1960		34	0.39	63	0.00	48	0.06	41	0.06	63	0.04	51	0.05
Richter 1961		40	0.38	16	0.01	44	0.05	53	0.05	37	0.07	35	0.06
Rosen 1989		23	0.43	40	0.00	23	0.08	23	0.33	58	0.05	24	0.13
Rubinstein 1939		53	0.34	19	0.01	37	0.06	38	0.06	62	0.03	57	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		28	0.41	38	0.00	22	0.07	22	0.36	56	0.05	25	0.13
Rubinstein 1966		47	0.36	29	0.00	35	0.08	33	0.08	56	0.05	39	0.06
Rudanovskaya 2007		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Shebanova 2002		16	0.45	13	0.01	14	0.15	17	0.41	31	0.27	2	0.33
Smith 1975		50	0.35	57	0.00	45	0.05	52	0.05	52	0.06	46	0.05
Sztompka 1959		62	0.24	65	0.00	62	0.05	47	0.05	61	0.04	58	0.04
Tanyel 1992		13	0.46	21	0.01	11	0.12	11	0.49	52	0.06	14	0.17
Tsujii 2005		1	0.52	3	0.18	2	0.28	4	0.60	48	0.07	9	0.20
Uninsky 1959		21	0.43	36	0.00	25	0.09	21	0.36	47	0.06	16	0.15
Vardi 1988		12	0.46	18	0.01	17	0.08	18	0.39	51	0.05	20	0.14
Wasowski 1980		33	0.39	17	0.01	19	0.06	31	0.15	48	0.07	29	0.10
Zimerman 1975		19	0.44	24	0.00	30	0.09	29	0.21	58	0.05	30	0.10
Random 1		66	-0.06	41	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	48	0.04	66	0.02
Random 2		64	-0.04	66	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	28	0.18	40	0.06
Random 3		65	-0.06	53	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	52	0.04	64	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).