Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
Similarity Measurements in Chopin Mazurka Performances
  • Craig Stuart Sapp
  • C4DM Seminar, 11 July 2007
  • Queen Mary, University of London


2
Mazurka Project
3
Expressive Audio Features (Piano)
4
Expressive Performance Features
5
Data Extraction (1)
6
Data Extraction (2)
7
Data Extraction (3)
8
Data Extraction (4)
9
Data Extraction (5)
10
Data Extraction (6)
11
Well-Behaved
12
Misbehaved
13
Extracted Feature Data
14
Beat-Tempo Graphs
15
Beat-Dynamics Graphs
16
Pearson Correlation
17
Shape Matching
18
Correlation & Fourier Analysis
19
Correlation & Fourier Analysis (2)
20
Performance Tempo Correlations
21
Correlation Maps – Nearest Neighbor
22
Absolute Correlation Map
23
Scape Plotting Domain
24
Scape Plotting Example
25
Average-Tempo Timescapes
26
Arch Correlation Scapes
27
Composite Features
28
Binary Correlation Scapes
29
Scapes Are 3D Plots
30
Scapes of Multiple Performances
31
Perormance Correlation Scapes
32
Maps and Scapes
33
Map and Photos of the Forest
34
Boring Timescape Pictures
35
Boring Timescape Pictures?
36
Beat-Event Timing Differences
37
Timing Difference Probability
38
Same Performer Over Time
39
Including the Average
40
Mutual Best Matches
41
Significance of Similarity
42
Phrenology
43
Significant or Not?
44
Purely Random Matching
45
Including Average Performance
46
What Is Significant?
47
Best Matching Not Mutual
48
Performance Map Schematic
49
Strong Interpretive Influences
50
Performance Ranking
51
0th-Order Similarity Rank
52
1st-Order Scape Rank
53
Scape Layers
54
Peeling the Layers
55
2nd-Order Scape Rank
56
3rd-Order Scape Rank
57
3rd-Order Rankings
58
Proportional Noise
59
Real Data (1)
60
Real Data (2)
61
Distance to the Noise Floor
62
Cortot Performance Ranking