Richter 1976

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		30	0.82	50	0.00	28	0.09	31	0.09	33	0.10	42	0.09
Bacha 1997		38	0.79	47	0.00	38	0.07	36	0.07	33	0.12	40	0.09
Barbosa 1983		16	0.85	18	0.00	10	0.12	13	0.49	17	0.35	8	0.41
Biret 1990		40	0.78	48	0.00	41	0.06	43	0.06	34	0.10	46	0.08
Block 1995		41	0.76	40	0.00	44	0.05	49	0.05	25	0.18	41	0.09
Brailowsky 1960		36	0.79	39	0.00	40	0.06	44	0.06	37	0.08	49	0.07
Chiu 1999		31	0.82	26	0.00	33	0.11	28	0.11	41	0.06	44	0.08
Clidat 1994		15	0.86	11	0.01	12	0.12	11	0.52	32	0.09	18	0.22
Cohen 1997		29	0.82	16	0.00	26	0.10	26	0.19	20	0.21	20	0.20
Cortot 1951		46	0.73	20	0.00	45	0.05	46	0.05	47	0.05	53	0.05
Csalog 1996		27	0.83	30	0.00	27	0.12	27	0.12	30	0.13	33	0.12
Czerny 1990		11	0.86	42	0.00	7	0.16	8	0.59	25	0.21	10	0.35
Ezaki 2006		2	0.90	2	0.16	2	0.24	4	0.68	7	0.55	5	0.61
Ferenczy 1958		9	0.87	27	0.00	14	0.13	16	0.46	17	0.30	9	0.37
Fliere 1977		7	0.88	14	0.01	15	0.17	10	0.53	26	0.14	14	0.27
Fou 1978		23	0.84	21	0.00	23	0.11	21	0.33	9	0.56	7	0.43
Francois 1956		35	0.80	46	0.00	36	0.05	48	0.05	33	0.11	50	0.07
Grinberg 1951		21	0.84	12	0.01	29	0.11	29	0.11	28	0.14	32	0.12
Hatto 1993		18	0.84	49	0.00	17	0.11	18	0.40	39	0.10	21	0.20
Hatto 1997		25	0.83	51	0.00	24	0.10	23	0.27	39	0.10	28	0.16
Indjic 2001		24	0.84	52	0.00	19	0.09	19	0.35	39	0.10	24	0.19
Jonas 1947		26	0.83	22	0.00	22	0.14	17	0.42	29	0.12	19	0.22
Kapell 1951		14	0.86	33	0.00	16	0.20	12	0.51	34	0.10	16	0.23
Kiepura 1999		45	0.75	29	0.00	43	0.07	39	0.07	32	0.08	47	0.07
Kushner 1989		34	0.80	41	0.00	37	0.06	42	0.06	30	0.11	45	0.08
Luisada 1991		37	0.79	53	0.00	39	0.05	50	0.05	30	0.10	48	0.07
Lushtak 2004		39	0.78	37	0.00	42	0.05	47	0.05	45	0.05	52	0.05
Magaloff 1978		32	0.82	35	0.00	32	0.10	30	0.10	12	0.49	17	0.22
Meguri 1997		33	0.81	43	0.00	31	0.09	32	0.09	31	0.11	38	0.10
Milkina 1970		22	0.84	36	0.00	30	0.09	33	0.09	16	0.38	25	0.18
Mohovich 1999		3	0.90	5	0.06	3	0.32	2	0.77	3	0.65	1	0.71
Niedzielski 1931		43	0.75	24	0.00	34	0.08	34	0.08	27	0.13	37	0.10
Ohlsson 1999		13	0.86	19	0.00	18	0.10	22	0.30	24	0.23	15	0.26
Olejniczak 1990		20	0.84	28	0.00	25	0.10	25	0.22	31	0.11	29	0.16
Osinska 1989		5	0.89	4	0.08	5	0.22	6	0.63	8	0.67	2	0.65
Rangell 2001		44	0.75	44	0.00	46	0.05	45	0.05	15	0.47	30	0.15
Richter 1976		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rubinstein 1938		48	0.70	25	0.00	48	0.06	41	0.06	41	0.06	51	0.06
Rubinstein 1952		42	0.76	15	0.01	35	0.08	35	0.08	13	0.51	22	0.20
Rubinstein 1961		50	0.68	23	0.00	50	0.07	38	0.07	29	0.16	36	0.11
Rubinstein 1966		49	0.69	31	0.00	49	0.07	40	0.07	28	0.15	39	0.10
Shebanova 2002		1	0.91	1	0.35	1	0.35	3	0.70	7	0.55	4	0.62
Smidowicz 1948		8	0.88	3	0.12	8	0.17	7	0.60	26	0.18	12	0.33
Smidowicz 1948b		10	0.87	7	0.04	9	0.15	9	0.55	25	0.17	13	0.31
Smith 1975		47	0.73	38	0.00	47	0.07	37	0.07	9	0.53	23	0.19
Sofronitsky 1949		17	0.85	13	0.01	11	0.13	15	0.48	13	0.44	6	0.46
Sztompka 1959		6	0.88	9	0.02	6	0.15	5	0.67	5	0.62	3	0.64
Tomsic 1995		19	0.84	8	0.02	20	0.09	20	0.33	37	0.09	26	0.17
Uninsky 1971		12	0.86	17	0.00	13	0.15	14	0.48	44	0.06	27	0.17
Wasowski 1980		28	0.83	10	0.01	21	0.11	24	0.25	38	0.07	31	0.13
Average Tempo		4	0.90	6	0.04	4	0.32	1	0.79	27	0.14	11	0.33
Random 1		52	0.03	34	0.00	51	0.03	52	0.03	6	0.38	34	0.11
Random 2		53	0.00	32	0.00	53	0.02	53	0.02	18	0.31	43	0.08
Random 3		51	0.05	45	0.00	52	0.03	51	0.03	11	0.42	35	0.11

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).