Ohlsson 1999

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		20	0.85	15	0.00	15	0.10	19	0.35	22	0.23	14	0.28
Bacha 1997		36	0.81	28	0.00	32	0.09	31	0.09	25	0.21	32	0.14
Barbosa 1983		35	0.82	26	0.00	29	0.11	28	0.11	39	0.07	41	0.09
Biret 1990		42	0.78	36	0.00	44	0.05	47	0.05	39	0.09	49	0.07
Block 1995		38	0.80	40	0.00	43	0.04	48	0.04	13	0.45	35	0.13
Brailowsky 1960		44	0.78	51	0.00	46	0.06	43	0.06	50	0.05	52	0.05
Chiu 1999		3	0.92	1	0.34	1	0.33	3	0.74	2	0.84	2	0.79
Clidat 1994		11	0.87	18	0.00	12	0.15	14	0.47	25	0.17	13	0.28
Cohen 1997		18	0.85	34	0.00	27	0.08	33	0.08	17	0.25	33	0.14
Cortot 1951		48	0.76	23	0.00	47	0.07	35	0.07	45	0.05	51	0.06
Csalog 1996		12	0.87	10	0.01	10	0.22	9	0.59	23	0.22	12	0.36
Czerny 1990		32	0.82	12	0.00	21	0.09	21	0.31	32	0.09	27	0.17
Ezaki 2006		10	0.88	38	0.00	13	0.15	18	0.40	33	0.07	26	0.17
Ferenczy 1958		6	0.90	5	0.04	6	0.27	8	0.68	4	0.66	5	0.67
Fliere 1977		2	0.92	6	0.03	4	0.29	4	0.74	3	0.77	3	0.75
Fou 1978		25	0.84	17	0.00	36	0.07	34	0.07	19	0.44	25	0.18
Francois 1956		40	0.79	43	0.00	39	0.06	41	0.06	30	0.14	43	0.09
Grinberg 1951		37	0.80	52	0.00	40	0.06	42	0.06	33	0.10	45	0.08
Hatto 1993		14	0.86	31	0.00	19	0.17	17	0.43	36	0.11	22	0.22
Hatto 1997		16	0.86	27	0.00	17	0.16	16	0.44	31	0.12	18	0.23
Indjic 2001		17	0.86	33	0.00	18	0.19	15	0.46	31	0.12	19	0.23
Jonas 1947		23	0.84	11	0.01	20	0.15	11	0.51	30	0.11	17	0.24
Kapell 1951		21	0.85	29	0.00	23	0.09	20	0.31	27	0.17	20	0.23
Kiepura 1999		50	0.72	41	0.00	50	0.07	39	0.07	43	0.05	50	0.06
Kushner 1989		19	0.85	24	0.00	14	0.11	10	0.53	24	0.26	11	0.37
Luisada 1991		30	0.83	39	0.00	37	0.07	36	0.07	23	0.21	36	0.12
Lushtak 2004		28	0.83	44	0.00	35	0.06	44	0.06	33	0.08	47	0.07
Magaloff 1978		27	0.83	14	0.00	16	0.10	23	0.28	4	0.63	9	0.42
Meguri 1997		26	0.84	37	0.00	24	0.11	22	0.30	34	0.09	31	0.16
Milkina 1970		1	0.92	4	0.08	3	0.22	2	0.77	2	0.86	1	0.81
Mohovich 1999		29	0.83	42	0.00	26	0.07	26	0.13	28	0.10	37	0.11
Niedzielski 1931		46	0.78	45	0.00	38	0.08	32	0.08	44	0.07	48	0.07
Ohlsson 1999		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Olejniczak 1990		24	0.84	22	0.00	28	0.11	29	0.11	38	0.08	42	0.09
Osinska 1989		8	0.89	19	0.00	9	0.17	12	0.50	6	0.69	7	0.59
Rangell 2001		43	0.78	25	0.00	34	0.06	40	0.06	8	0.60	23	0.19
Richter 1976		15	0.86	47	0.00	25	0.11	24	0.23	22	0.30	16	0.26
Rubinstein 1938		45	0.78	49	0.00	45	0.04	50	0.04	9	0.48	34	0.14
Rubinstein 1952		47	0.77	32	0.00	48	0.07	38	0.07	20	0.40	28	0.17
Rubinstein 1961		41	0.79	30	0.00	42	0.05	46	0.05	5	0.70	24	0.19
Rubinstein 1966		39	0.80	9	0.01	41	0.04	49	0.04	4	0.71	29	0.17
Shebanova 2002		9	0.88	20	0.00	8	0.13	13	0.50	23	0.29	10	0.38
Smidowicz 1948		31	0.83	13	0.00	30	0.13	27	0.13	33	0.09	38	0.11
Smidowicz 1948b		33	0.82	46	0.00	31	0.10	30	0.10	34	0.09	40	0.09
Smith 1975		49	0.74	16	0.00	49	0.05	45	0.05	13	0.51	30	0.16
Sofronitsky 1949		34	0.82	50	0.00	33	0.07	37	0.07	43	0.07	46	0.07
Sztompka 1959		22	0.84	7	0.02	22	0.10	25	0.21	21	0.26	21	0.23
Tomsic 1995		13	0.87	21	0.00	11	0.21	7	0.70	30	0.10	15	0.26
Uninsky 1971		5	0.90	8	0.01	5	0.33	6	0.70	3	0.60	6	0.65
Wasowski 1980		7	0.89	3	0.09	7	0.27	5	0.73	2	0.69	4	0.71
Average Tempo		4	0.92	2	0.32	2	0.46	1	0.90	20	0.32	8	0.54
Random 1		51	0.03	48	0.00	51	0.03	51	0.03	11	0.31	39	0.10
Random 2		53	0.00	35	0.00	53	0.02	53	0.02	14	0.35	44	0.08
Random 3		52	0.01	53	0.00	52	0.02	52	0.02	41	0.05	53	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).