AverageTempo

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		29	0.92	36	0.00	28	0.07	40	0.07	X	AverageTempo	29	0.00
Bacha 1997		19	0.94	43	0.00	25	0.12	22	0.30	X	AverageTempo	2	0.00
Barbosa 1983		28	0.92	33	0.00	27	0.10	31	0.10	X	AverageTempo	47	0.00
Biret 1990		25	0.93	49	0.00	30	0.08	36	0.08	X	AverageTempo	40	0.00
Block 1995		42	0.85	29	0.00	44	0.09	33	0.09	X	AverageTempo	20	0.00
Brailowsky 1960		24	0.93	45	0.00	31	0.10	32	0.10	X	AverageTempo	11	0.00
Chiu 1999		26	0.92	24	0.00	32	0.06	43	0.06	X	AverageTempo	13	0.00
Clidat 1994		11	0.95	28	0.00	11	0.15	10	0.54	X	AverageTempo	15	0.00
Cohen 1997		39	0.89	26	0.00	36	0.08	35	0.08	X	AverageTempo	30	0.00
Cortot 1951		30	0.92	40	0.00	33	0.07	41	0.07	X	AverageTempo	43	0.00
Csalog 1996		9	0.96	12	0.02	7	0.20	11	0.54	X	AverageTempo	51	0.00
Czerny 1990		22	0.93	14	0.01	14	0.15	15	0.50	X	AverageTempo	36	0.00
Ezaki 2006		16	0.94	27	0.00	16	0.12	16	0.44	X	AverageTempo	1	0.00
Ferenczy 1958		21	0.93	5	0.06	17	0.09	25	0.26	X	AverageTempo	8	0.00
Fliere 1977		13	0.94	19	0.01	15	0.17	4	0.65	X	AverageTempo	7	0.00
Fou 1978		41	0.87	23	0.00	41	0.10	28	0.10	X	AverageTempo	25	0.00
Francois 1956		23	0.93	50	0.00	29	0.07	38	0.07	X	AverageTempo	53	0.00
Grinberg 1951		33	0.91	38	0.00	37	0.06	45	0.06	X	AverageTempo	19	0.00
Hatto 1993		4	0.96	44	0.00	5	0.22	8	0.57	X	AverageTempo	42	0.00
Hatto 1997		6	0.96	51	0.00	6	0.20	12	0.54	X	AverageTempo	6	0.00
Indjic 2001		5	0.96	4	0.07	3	0.23	6	0.59	X	AverageTempo	24	0.00
Jonas 1947		2	0.96	2	0.12	2	0.26	1	0.80	X	AverageTempo	22	0.00
Kapell 1951		3	0.96	15	0.01	8	0.27	9	0.56	X	AverageTempo	31	0.00
Kiepura 1999		43	0.85	30	0.00	42	0.06	46	0.06	X	AverageTempo	3	0.00
Kushner 1989		14	0.94	18	0.01	19	0.12	19	0.34	X	AverageTempo	28	0.00
Luisada 1991		35	0.91	31	0.00	39	0.09	34	0.09	X	AverageTempo	4	0.00
Lushtak 2004		27	0.92	35	0.00	35	0.10	29	0.10	X	AverageTempo	18	0.00
Magaloff 1978		44	0.83	41	0.00	43	0.05	48	0.05	X	AverageTempo	14	0.00
Meguri 1997		8	0.96	3	0.11	4	0.24	7	0.59	X	AverageTempo	48	0.00
Milkina 1970		40	0.88	8	0.04	22	0.11	26	0.25	X	AverageTempo	32	0.00
Mohovich 1999		20	0.93	16	0.01	18	0.09	18	0.40	X	AverageTempo	26	0.00
Niedzielski 1931		32	0.92	46	0.00	26	0.14	23	0.27	X	AverageTempo	21	0.00
Ohlsson 1999		31	0.92	13	0.02	23	0.15	20	0.32	X	AverageTempo	41	0.00
Olejniczak 1990		15	0.94	39	0.00	24	0.10	21	0.32	X	AverageTempo	49	0.00
Osinska 1989		38	0.90	7	0.04	21	0.10	24	0.26	X	AverageTempo	10	0.00
Rangell 2001		47	0.76	20	0.00	47	0.07	42	0.07	X	AverageTempo	38	0.00
Richter 1976		37	0.90	37	0.00	40	0.14	27	0.14	X	AverageTempo	37	0.00
Rubinstein 1938		46	0.77	52	0.00	45	0.05	47	0.05	X	AverageTempo	44	0.00
Rubinstein 1952		45	0.78	25	0.00	46	0.08	37	0.08	X	AverageTempo	50	0.00
Rubinstein 1961		49	0.72	21	0.00	50	0.07	39	0.07	X	AverageTempo	46	0.00
Rubinstein 1966		48	0.72	17	0.01	49	0.05	50	0.05	X	AverageTempo	52	0.00
Shebanova 2002		18	0.94	11	0.02	13	0.12	5	0.60	X	AverageTempo	9	0.00
Smidowicz 1948		10	0.95	9	0.03	10	0.24	13	0.54	X	AverageTempo	35	0.00
Smidowicz 1948b		12	0.95	34	0.00	12	0.20	14	0.51	X	AverageTempo	34	0.00
Smith 1975		50	0.72	32	0.00	48	0.05	49	0.05	X	AverageTempo	16	0.00
Sofronitsky 1949		36	0.91	42	0.00	38	0.06	44	0.06	X	AverageTempo	17	0.00
Sztompka 1959		34	0.91	22	0.00	34	0.10	30	0.10	X	AverageTempo	39	0.00
Tomsic 1995		1	0.97	1	0.31	1	0.30	2	0.79	X	AverageTempo	33	0.00
Uninsky 1971		7	0.96	6	0.05	9	0.17	3	0.75	X	AverageTempo	45	0.00
Wasowski 1980		17	0.94	10	0.03	20	0.09	17	0.43	X	AverageTempo	5	0.00
Average Tempo		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	X	AverageTempo	target	target
Random 1		51	0.02	47	0.00	51	0.03	51	0.03	X	AverageTempo	23	0.00
Random 2		53	-0.03	48	0.00	53	0.02	53	0.02	X	AverageTempo	12	0.00
Random 3		52	0.02	53	0.00	52	0.03	52	0.03	X	AverageTempo	27	0.00

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).