AverageTempo

Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Ashkenazy 1981   29  0.9236  0.0028  0.0740  0.07X  AverageTempo29  0.00
Bacha 1997   19  0.9443  0.0025  0.1222  0.30X  AverageTempo2  0.00
Barbosa 1983   28  0.9233  0.0027  0.1031  0.10X  AverageTempo47  0.00
Biret 1990   25  0.9349  0.0030  0.0836  0.08X  AverageTempo40  0.00
Block 1995   42  0.8529  0.0044  0.0933  0.09X  AverageTempo20  0.00
Brailowsky 1960   24  0.9345  0.0031  0.1032  0.10X  AverageTempo11  0.00
Chiu 1999   26  0.9224  0.0032  0.0643  0.06X  AverageTempo13  0.00
Clidat 1994   11  0.9528  0.0011  0.1510  0.54X  AverageTempo15  0.00
Cohen 1997   39  0.8926  0.0036  0.0835  0.08X  AverageTempo30  0.00
Cortot 1951   30  0.9240  0.0033  0.0741  0.07X  AverageTempo43  0.00
Csalog 1996   9  0.9612  0.027  0.2011  0.54X  AverageTempo51  0.00
Czerny 1990   22  0.9314  0.0114  0.1515  0.50X  AverageTempo36  0.00
Ezaki 2006   16  0.9427  0.0016  0.1216  0.44X  AverageTempo1  0.00
Ferenczy 1958   21  0.935  0.0617  0.0925  0.26X  AverageTempo8  0.00
Fliere 1977   13  0.9419  0.0115  0.174  0.65X  AverageTempo7  0.00
Fou 1978   41  0.8723  0.0041  0.1028  0.10X  AverageTempo25  0.00
Francois 1956   23  0.9350  0.0029  0.0738  0.07X  AverageTempo53  0.00
Grinberg 1951   33  0.9138  0.0037  0.0645  0.06X  AverageTempo19  0.00
Hatto 1993   4  0.9644  0.005  0.228  0.57X  AverageTempo42  0.00
Hatto 1997   6  0.9651  0.006  0.2012  0.54X  AverageTempo6  0.00
Indjic 2001   5  0.964  0.073  0.236  0.59X  AverageTempo24  0.00
Jonas 1947   2  0.962  0.122  0.261  0.80X  AverageTempo22  0.00
Kapell 1951   3  0.9615  0.018  0.279  0.56X  AverageTempo31  0.00
Kiepura 1999   43  0.8530  0.0042  0.0646  0.06X  AverageTempo3  0.00
Kushner 1989   14  0.9418  0.0119  0.1219  0.34X  AverageTempo28  0.00
Luisada 1991   35  0.9131  0.0039  0.0934  0.09X  AverageTempo4  0.00
Lushtak 2004   27  0.9235  0.0035  0.1029  0.10X  AverageTempo18  0.00
Magaloff 1978   44  0.8341  0.0043  0.0548  0.05X  AverageTempo14  0.00
Meguri 1997   8  0.963  0.114  0.247  0.59X  AverageTempo48  0.00
Milkina 1970   40  0.888  0.0422  0.1126  0.25X  AverageTempo32  0.00
Mohovich 1999   20  0.9316  0.0118  0.0918  0.40X  AverageTempo26  0.00
Niedzielski 1931   32  0.9246  0.0026  0.1423  0.27X  AverageTempo21  0.00
Ohlsson 1999   31  0.9213  0.0223  0.1520  0.32X  AverageTempo41  0.00
Olejniczak 1990   15  0.9439  0.0024  0.1021  0.32X  AverageTempo49  0.00
Osinska 1989   38  0.907  0.0421  0.1024  0.26X  AverageTempo10  0.00
Rangell 2001   47  0.7620  0.0047  0.0742  0.07X  AverageTempo38  0.00
Richter 1976   37  0.9037  0.0040  0.1427  0.14X  AverageTempo37  0.00
Rubinstein 1938   46  0.7752  0.0045  0.0547  0.05X  AverageTempo44  0.00
Rubinstein 1952   45  0.7825  0.0046  0.0837  0.08X  AverageTempo50  0.00
Rubinstein 1961   49  0.7221  0.0050  0.0739  0.07X  AverageTempo46  0.00
Rubinstein 1966   48  0.7217  0.0149  0.0550  0.05X  AverageTempo52  0.00
Shebanova 2002   18  0.9411  0.0213  0.125  0.60X  AverageTempo9  0.00
Smidowicz 1948   10  0.959  0.0310  0.2413  0.54X  AverageTempo35  0.00
Smidowicz 1948b   12  0.9534  0.0012  0.2014  0.51X  AverageTempo34  0.00
Smith 1975   50  0.7232  0.0048  0.0549  0.05X  AverageTempo16  0.00
Sofronitsky 1949   36  0.9142  0.0038  0.0644  0.06X  AverageTempo17  0.00
Sztompka 1959   34  0.9122  0.0034  0.1030  0.10X  AverageTempo39  0.00
Tomsic 1995   1  0.971  0.311  0.302  0.79X  AverageTempo33  0.00
Uninsky 1971   7  0.966  0.059  0.173  0.75X  AverageTempo45  0.00
Wasowski 1980   17  0.9410  0.0320  0.0917  0.43X  AverageTempo5  0.00
Average Tempo   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targetX  AverageTempotarget  target
Random 1   51  0.0247  0.0051  0.0351  0.03X  AverageTempo23  0.00
Random 2   53  -0.0348  0.0053  0.0253  0.02X  AverageTempo12  0.00
Random 3   52  0.0253  0.0052  0.0352  0.03X  AverageTempo27  0.00

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).