Block 1995

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		51	-0.01	52	0.00	50	0.04	51	0.04	49	0.04	51	0.04
Bacha 1997		49	0.12	42	0.00	49	0.05	45	0.05	41	0.06	40	0.05
Barbosa 1983		46	0.19	30	0.00	44	0.06	42	0.06	44	0.05	49	0.05
Biret 1990		43	0.23	53	0.00	45	0.06	43	0.06	40	0.06	35	0.06
Block 1995		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Brailowsky 1960		44	0.20	22	0.00	42	0.06	41	0.06	47	0.05	43	0.05
Chiu 1999		27	0.37	32	0.00	28	0.12	28	0.12	30	0.08	27	0.10
Clidat 1994		35	0.32	49	0.00	38	0.08	34	0.08	41	0.07	31	0.07
Cohen 1997		29	0.36	17	0.00	32	0.09	31	0.09	45	0.05	32	0.07
Cortot 1951		28	0.37	10	0.01	26	0.16	26	0.30	35	0.07	26	0.14
Csalog 1996		24	0.45	31	0.00	22	0.13	22	0.51	28	0.07	21	0.19
Czerny 1990		25	0.43	40	0.00	25	0.20	25	0.42	44	0.05	25	0.14
Ezaki 2006		12	0.53	7	0.03	9	0.21	13	0.67	23	0.17	11	0.34
Ferenczy 1958		22	0.46	14	0.01	16	0.12	23	0.51	38	0.06	22	0.17
Fliere 1977		31	0.35	39	0.00	30	0.10	30	0.10	48	0.05	30	0.07
Fou 1978		16	0.50	20	0.00	19	0.16	18	0.56	40	0.08	17	0.21
Francois 1956		45	0.20	50	0.00	48	0.06	40	0.06	41	0.06	39	0.06
Grinberg 1951		30	0.35	18	0.00	29	0.11	29	0.11	48	0.06	29	0.08
Hatto 1993		37	0.31	43	0.00	36	0.07	36	0.07	50	0.05	36	0.06
Hatto 1997		40	0.28	44	0.00	40	0.05	46	0.05	49	0.04	50	0.04
Indjic 2001		36	0.32	45	0.00	33	0.08	35	0.08	49	0.05	34	0.06
Jonas 1947		23	0.46	15	0.01	24	0.21	16	0.59	48	0.05	23	0.17
Kapell 1951		19	0.48	8	0.02	18	0.19	19	0.56	49	0.04	24	0.15
Kiepura 1999		39	0.29	46	0.00	35	0.07	38	0.07	50	0.04	41	0.05
Kushner 1989		13	0.51	47	0.00	15	0.12	12	0.68	31	0.09	14	0.25
Luisada 1991		32	0.34	16	0.00	37	0.06	39	0.06	41	0.05	42	0.05
Lushtak 2004		14	0.51	9	0.01	13	0.16	14	0.61	21	0.39	9	0.49
Magaloff 1978		41	0.25	19	0.00	41	0.06	44	0.06	48	0.04	44	0.05
Meguri 1997		38	0.31	48	0.00	39	0.08	32	0.08	50	0.04	37	0.06
Milkina 1970		1	0.63	2	0.24	2	0.46	6	0.79	15	0.51	5	0.63
Mohovich 1999		7	0.59	13	0.01	8	0.30	8	0.77	20	0.44	7	0.58
Niedzielski 1931		42	0.23	38	0.00	43	0.04	48	0.04	44	0.06	47	0.05
Ohlsson 1999		20	0.47	25	0.00	17	0.14	15	0.59	42	0.06	20	0.19
Olejniczak 1990		33	0.33	34	0.00	34	0.07	37	0.07	46	0.05	38	0.06
Osinska 1989		5	0.61	6	0.03	5	0.20	2	0.81	41	0.07	15	0.24
Rangell 2001		8	0.59	1	0.35	1	0.34	5	0.80	5	0.73	2	0.76
Richter 1976		17	0.50	28	0.00	20	0.20	20	0.55	31	0.08	18	0.21
Rubinstein 1938		15	0.50	24	0.00	14	0.19	21	0.54	5	0.59	8	0.56
Rubinstein 1952		11	0.56	21	0.00	12	0.22	11	0.71	23	0.33	10	0.48
Rubinstein 1961		9	0.57	12	0.01	10	0.17	7	0.78	21	0.51	6	0.63
Rubinstein 1966		4	0.61	4	0.08	6	0.26	4	0.80	13	0.62	4	0.70
Shebanova 2002		34	0.33	36	0.00	31	0.08	33	0.08	49	0.05	33	0.06
Smidowicz 1948		3	0.61	3	0.08	4	0.24	3	0.81	8	0.76	1	0.78
Smidowicz 1948b		6	0.59	5	0.07	7	0.23	9	0.75	8	0.73	3	0.74
Smith 1975		47	0.18	29	0.00	46	0.05	47	0.05	42	0.06	45	0.05
Sofronitsky 1949		48	0.14	37	0.00	47	0.04	49	0.04	46	0.06	46	0.05
Sztompka 1959		18	0.48	27	0.00	21	0.13	24	0.47	25	0.21	12	0.31
Tomsic 1995		21	0.47	23	0.00	23	0.19	17	0.58	46	0.06	19	0.19
Uninsky 1971		10	0.56	26	0.00	11	0.18	10	0.73	27	0.12	13	0.30
Wasowski 1980		26	0.42	33	0.00	27	0.18	27	0.18	46	0.05	28	0.09
Average Tempo		2	0.61	11	0.01	3	0.25	1	0.85	37	0.07	16	0.24
Random 1		50	0.04	35	0.00	51	0.04	50	0.04	27	0.06	48	0.05
Random 2		52	-0.04	41	0.00	52	0.02	52	0.02	51	0.02	52	0.02
Random 3		53	-0.08	51	0.00	53	0.02	53	0.02	51	0.03	53	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).