Mohovich 1999

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		52	0.03	46	0.00	49	0.04	49	0.04	49	0.04	52	0.04
Bacha 1997		36	0.39	43	0.00	42	0.07	44	0.07	25	0.18	35	0.11
Barbosa 1983		44	0.34	31	0.00	36	0.07	40	0.07	37	0.06	49	0.06
Biret 1990		29	0.48	40	0.00	32	0.08	36	0.08	18	0.35	28	0.17
Block 1995		16	0.59	11	0.01	20	0.17	19	0.44	7	0.77	14	0.58
Brailowsky 1960		46	0.27	37	0.00	46	0.07	42	0.07	33	0.07	43	0.07
Chiu 1999		34	0.41	26	0.00	35	0.08	34	0.08	34	0.07	44	0.07
Clidat 1994		23	0.52	38	0.00	25	0.15	25	0.28	23	0.18	24	0.22
Cohen 1997		40	0.39	16	0.00	29	0.09	31	0.09	23	0.17	34	0.12
Cortot 1951		28	0.48	27	0.00	31	0.10	28	0.10	8	0.53	22	0.23
Csalog 1996		8	0.63	39	0.00	7	0.16	12	0.62	11	0.49	15	0.55
Czerny 1990		17	0.58	22	0.00	17	0.15	15	0.55	8	0.54	16	0.54
Ezaki 2006		3	0.74	4	0.07	2	0.40	1	0.88	2	0.76	3	0.82
Ferenczy 1958		35	0.40	20	0.00	40	0.06	47	0.06	39	0.06	46	0.06
Fliere 1977		38	0.39	47	0.00	41	0.07	38	0.07	32	0.07	42	0.07
Fou 1978		26	0.49	32	0.00	28	0.10	27	0.10	8	0.45	25	0.21
Francois 1956		30	0.47	28	0.00	33	0.11	26	0.11	10	0.50	23	0.23
Grinberg 1951		13	0.61	13	0.00	14	0.17	14	0.57	1	0.72	12	0.64
Hatto 1993		32	0.44	35	0.00	30	0.10	30	0.10	23	0.21	32	0.14
Hatto 1997		41	0.38	24	0.00	34	0.08	32	0.08	33	0.09	39	0.08
Indjic 2001		31	0.44	36	0.00	26	0.10	29	0.10	22	0.22	31	0.15
Jonas 1947		24	0.51	34	0.00	21	0.12	23	0.33	27	0.11	26	0.19
Kapell 1951		15	0.60	23	0.00	9	0.18	18	0.50	17	0.43	19	0.46
Kiepura 1999		37	0.39	21	0.00	37	0.08	35	0.08	27	0.11	37	0.09
Kushner 1989		1	0.76	1	0.44	1	0.43	2	0.87	2	0.73	4	0.80
Luisada 1991		39	0.39	15	0.00	43	0.07	39	0.07	17	0.24	33	0.13
Lushtak 2004		19	0.56	18	0.00	22	0.14	21	0.36	11	0.66	17	0.49
Magaloff 1978		42	0.37	41	0.00	38	0.06	45	0.06	35	0.07	48	0.06
Meguri 1997		20	0.55	19	0.00	18	0.14	20	0.44	23	0.34	21	0.39
Milkina 1970		18	0.57	17	0.00	19	0.17	17	0.51	24	0.34	20	0.42
Mohovich 1999		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Niedzielski 1931		45	0.32	42	0.00	45	0.07	37	0.07	32	0.10	40	0.08
Ohlsson 1999		27	0.48	48	0.00	27	0.08	33	0.08	28	0.11	38	0.09
Olejniczak 1990		43	0.36	44	0.00	44	0.07	41	0.07	29	0.10	41	0.08
Osinska 1989		6	0.71	2	0.21	3	0.35	4	0.83	5	0.67	6	0.75
Rangell 2001		22	0.55	5	0.05	13	0.19	16	0.51	8	0.68	13	0.59
Richter 1976		5	0.71	9	0.01	6	0.30	5	0.79	1	0.82	5	0.80
Rubinstein 1938		33	0.42	25	0.00	39	0.06	46	0.06	12	0.46	29	0.17
Rubinstein 1952		12	0.62	14	0.00	15	0.18	10	0.67	3	0.64	11	0.65
Rubinstein 1961		9	0.63	8	0.02	11	0.18	8	0.73	7	0.75	8	0.74
Rubinstein 1966		7	0.65	10	0.01	10	0.17	7	0.74	7	0.76	7	0.75
Shebanova 2002		25	0.51	33	0.00	24	0.11	24	0.30	32	0.09	30	0.16
Smidowicz 1948		2	0.76	3	0.09	4	0.49	3	0.86	2	0.90	1	0.88
Smidowicz 1948b		4	0.72	6	0.03	5	0.22	6	0.79	2	0.88	2	0.83
Smith 1975		48	0.15	45	0.00	48	0.05	48	0.05	42	0.05	50	0.05
Sofronitsky 1949		47	0.21	49	0.00	47	0.07	43	0.07	33	0.08	45	0.07
Sztompka 1959		14	0.61	12	0.00	16	0.20	13	0.59	4	0.72	10	0.65
Tomsic 1995		10	0.62	30	0.00	12	0.22	11	0.65	15	0.35	18	0.48
Uninsky 1971		11	0.62	7	0.03	8	0.18	9	0.71	4	0.61	9	0.66
Wasowski 1980		21	0.55	50	0.00	23	0.13	22	0.36	31	0.09	27	0.18
Random 1		50	0.06	29	0.00	51	0.02	51	0.02	23	0.13	51	0.05
Random 2		51	0.04	51	0.00	52	0.02	52	0.02	21	0.21	47	0.06
Random 3		49	0.09	52	0.00	50	0.03	50	0.03	13	0.33	36	0.10

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).