Jonas 1947

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		45	0.38	10	0.01	26	0.09	29	0.09	18	0.51	26	0.21
Bacha 1997		34	0.45	36	0.00	39	0.06	40	0.06	31	0.09	44	0.07
Barbosa 1983		38	0.43	31	0.00	33	0.05	49	0.05	34	0.07	49	0.06
Biret 1990		40	0.43	26	0.00	42	0.06	44	0.06	28	0.10	42	0.08
Block 1995		32	0.46	21	0.00	40	0.05	47	0.05	15	0.59	32	0.17
Brailowsky 1960		48	0.32	43	0.00	47	0.06	45	0.06	35	0.07	46	0.06
Chiu 1999		22	0.54	11	0.01	22	0.11	20	0.27	24	0.25	24	0.26
Clidat 1994		7	0.63	44	0.00	8	0.15	13	0.42	10	0.37	15	0.39
Cohen 1997		35	0.44	47	0.00	35	0.06	39	0.06	40	0.06	47	0.06
Cortot 1951		43	0.40	29	0.00	45	0.06	37	0.06	32	0.08	45	0.07
Csalog 1996		15	0.57	4	0.07	16	0.16	8	0.50	15	0.43	11	0.46
Czerny 1990		10	0.61	7	0.02	7	0.12	12	0.46	5	0.57	7	0.51
Ezaki 2006		4	0.64	25	0.00	9	0.25	9	0.49	10	0.52	8	0.50
Ferenczy 1958		28	0.49	5	0.05	5	0.14	21	0.22	22	0.30	23	0.26
Fliere 1977		14	0.57	6	0.03	15	0.16	11	0.47	10	0.53	9	0.50
Fou 1978		26	0.49	38	0.00	30	0.08	32	0.08	19	0.27	36	0.15
Francois 1956		30	0.47	20	0.00	32	0.05	48	0.05	13	0.49	34	0.16
Grinberg 1951		37	0.44	40	0.00	41	0.06	42	0.06	16	0.36	35	0.15
Hatto 1993		21	0.54	34	0.00	27	0.09	30	0.09	36	0.08	43	0.08
Hatto 1997		17	0.56	30	0.00	19	0.08	19	0.28	19	0.35	21	0.31
Indjic 2001		12	0.58	33	0.00	14	0.19	17	0.35	20	0.31	17	0.33
Jonas 1947		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Kapell 1951		3	0.67	14	0.01	3	0.30	7	0.52	5	0.54	4	0.53
Kiepura 1999		46	0.33	39	0.00	48	0.06	41	0.06	48	0.05	51	0.05
Kushner 1989		6	0.63	13	0.01	10	0.20	5	0.55	12	0.53	3	0.54
Luisada 1991		31	0.47	48	0.00	38	0.10	28	0.10	11	0.39	27	0.20
Lushtak 2004		36	0.44	9	0.01	31	0.09	31	0.09	23	0.35	31	0.18
Magaloff 1978		44	0.39	49	0.00	43	0.07	35	0.07	26	0.11	40	0.09
Meguri 1997		23	0.54	27	0.00	28	0.11	26	0.11	25	0.18	38	0.14
Milkina 1970		9	0.62	8	0.02	11	0.24	3	0.58	19	0.48	5	0.53
Mohovich 1999		24	0.51	37	0.00	29	0.11	27	0.11	23	0.33	28	0.19
Niedzielski 1931		39	0.43	50	0.00	34	0.06	38	0.06	27	0.12	41	0.08
Ohlsson 1999		2	0.68	3	0.11	2	0.33	2	0.71	4	0.66	2	0.68
Olejniczak 1990		25	0.51	41	0.00	23	0.10	22	0.22	21	0.27	25	0.24
Osinska 1989		11	0.58	2	0.15	4	0.17	10	0.48	20	0.28	16	0.37
Rangell 2001		29	0.48	12	0.01	18	0.09	23	0.20	17	0.52	19	0.32
Richter 1976		18	0.55	22	0.00	20	0.10	18	0.34	15	0.49	14	0.41
Rubinstein 1938		49	0.31	45	0.00	49	0.07	33	0.07	36	0.06	48	0.06
Rubinstein 1952		41	0.42	42	0.00	44	0.06	46	0.06	44	0.06	50	0.06
Rubinstein 1961		20	0.54	19	0.01	24	0.10	24	0.20	21	0.50	20	0.32
Rubinstein 1966		16	0.57	24	0.00	21	0.11	16	0.36	16	0.56	12	0.45
Shebanova 2002		5	0.64	17	0.01	6	0.12	4	0.57	13	0.48	6	0.52
Smidowicz 1948		27	0.49	18	0.01	25	0.09	25	0.17	11	0.60	18	0.32
Smidowicz 1948b		33	0.45	28	0.00	36	0.07	34	0.07	11	0.52	29	0.19
Smith 1975		47	0.32	23	0.00	46	0.06	43	0.06	5	0.56	30	0.18
Sofronitsky 1949		42	0.41	35	0.00	37	0.06	36	0.06	12	0.44	33	0.16
Sztompka 1959		19	0.55	16	0.01	12	0.19	14	0.42	12	0.60	10	0.50
Tomsic 1995		1	0.74	1	0.41	1	0.40	1	0.78	1	0.73	1	0.75
Uninsky 1971		13	0.58	32	0.00	17	0.11	15	0.40	21	0.24	22	0.31
Wasowski 1980		8	0.62	15	0.01	13	0.18	6	0.53	18	0.34	13	0.42
Random 1		50	0.10	46	0.00	50	0.04	50	0.04	3	0.52	37	0.14
Random 2		51	0.05	51	0.00	51	0.03	51	0.03	17	0.30	39	0.09
Random 3		52	0.00	52	0.00	52	0.02	52	0.02	29	0.07	52	0.04

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).