Ferenczy 1958

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		40	0.35	45	0.00	43	0.06	40	0.06	21	0.36	28	0.15
Bacha 1997		23	0.50	28	0.00	24	0.10	23	0.22	15	0.44	16	0.31
Barbosa 1983		32	0.44	21	0.00	32	0.09	28	0.09	25	0.14	30	0.11
Biret 1990		49	0.23	46	0.00	39	0.04	49	0.04	43	0.06	49	0.05
Block 1995		30	0.46	29	0.00	28	0.06	37	0.06	22	0.51	27	0.17
Brailowsky 1960		41	0.35	51	0.00	44	0.06	38	0.06	42	0.05	44	0.05
Chiu 1999		9	0.61	7	0.03	10	0.23	5	0.67	9	0.57	5	0.62
Clidat 1994		17	0.54	13	0.01	19	0.11	20	0.32	29	0.10	26	0.18
Cohen 1997		29	0.47	48	0.00	31	0.10	26	0.10	30	0.08	32	0.09
Cortot 1951		31	0.45	31	0.00	27	0.10	27	0.10	12	0.47	24	0.22
Csalog 1996		15	0.55	8	0.02	18	0.12	16	0.36	23	0.24	17	0.29
Czerny 1990		34	0.42	25	0.00	35	0.07	35	0.07	47	0.04	47	0.05
Ezaki 2006		16	0.54	26	0.00	21	0.13	18	0.35	25	0.15	22	0.23
Ferenczy 1958		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Fliere 1977		1	0.73	1	0.45	1	0.44	1	0.87	1	0.81	1	0.84
Fou 1978		22	0.51	32	0.00	15	0.12	17	0.35	22	0.22	18	0.28
Francois 1956		46	0.25	38	0.00	49	0.07	33	0.07	44	0.05	42	0.06
Grinberg 1951		39	0.36	18	0.00	41	0.05	45	0.05	30	0.09	36	0.07
Hatto 1993		5	0.64	23	0.00	6	0.16	8	0.63	6	0.59	6	0.61
Hatto 1997		6	0.64	17	0.00	7	0.26	6	0.67	7	0.61	4	0.64
Indjic 2001		8	0.62	30	0.00	9	0.17	7	0.66	12	0.53	8	0.59
Jonas 1947		25	0.49	3	0.06	16	0.11	22	0.30	21	0.22	21	0.26
Kapell 1951		11	0.59	10	0.01	12	0.33	12	0.57	18	0.43	10	0.50
Kiepura 1999		26	0.48	39	0.00	23	0.09	24	0.21	17	0.32	20	0.26
Kushner 1989		19	0.53	14	0.01	22	0.14	21	0.32	28	0.11	25	0.19
Luisada 1991		35	0.41	36	0.00	42	0.05	43	0.05	34	0.06	43	0.05
Lushtak 2004		20	0.52	24	0.00	20	0.11	19	0.34	15	0.47	13	0.40
Magaloff 1978		33	0.43	37	0.00	34	0.08	31	0.08	28	0.09	34	0.08
Meguri 1997		12	0.59	12	0.01	13	0.22	11	0.58	19	0.39	11	0.48
Milkina 1970		2	0.70	5	0.05	2	0.38	2	0.80	9	0.67	2	0.73
Mohovich 1999		36	0.40	27	0.00	36	0.06	39	0.06	47	0.06	40	0.06
Niedzielski 1931		44	0.32	52	0.00	37	0.05	44	0.05	37	0.08	39	0.06
Ohlsson 1999		3	0.69	2	0.19	3	0.27	4	0.74	10	0.61	3	0.67
Olejniczak 1990		38	0.37	49	0.00	38	0.04	48	0.04	34	0.08	41	0.06
Osinska 1989		7	0.63	19	0.00	8	0.24	9	0.61	24	0.18	14	0.33
Rangell 2001		14	0.55	4	0.05	5	0.12	13	0.53	5	0.69	7	0.60
Richter 1976		27	0.48	16	0.01	25	0.10	25	0.19	35	0.07	29	0.12
Rubinstein 1938		42	0.34	41	0.00	45	0.07	34	0.07	35	0.07	37	0.07
Rubinstein 1952		24	0.49	42	0.00	30	0.08	32	0.08	27	0.09	35	0.08
Rubinstein 1961		28	0.47	22	0.00	33	0.08	30	0.08	31	0.13	31	0.10
Rubinstein 1966		21	0.51	35	0.00	29	0.06	36	0.06	29	0.14	33	0.09
Shebanova 2002		4	0.65	6	0.04	4	0.21	3	0.75	15	0.43	9	0.57
Smidowicz 1948		47	0.25	34	0.00	46	0.06	41	0.06	46	0.04	46	0.05
Smidowicz 1948b		48	0.23	40	0.00	47	0.04	47	0.04	35	0.07	45	0.05
Smith 1975		43	0.33	20	0.00	26	0.09	29	0.09	6	0.54	23	0.22
Sofronitsky 1949		37	0.39	47	0.00	40	0.05	46	0.05	46	0.07	38	0.06
Sztompka 1959		45	0.29	43	0.00	48	0.05	42	0.05	44	0.05	48	0.05
Tomsic 1995		18	0.54	15	0.01	17	0.13	15	0.39	24	0.19	19	0.27
Uninsky 1971		10	0.59	9	0.01	11	0.18	10	0.58	18	0.35	12	0.45
Wasowski 1980		13	0.57	11	0.01	14	0.11	14	0.48	24	0.21	15	0.32
Random 1		50	0.01	50	0.00	50	0.03	50	0.03	34	0.05	50	0.04
Random 2		52	0.00	44	0.00	51	0.02	51	0.02	33	0.05	51	0.03
Random 3		51	0.00	33	0.00	52	0.02	52	0.02	44	0.05	52	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).