Random 1

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		70	-0.13	63	0.00	71	0.03	68	0.03	91	0.01	62	0.02
Anderszewski 2003		20	-0.06	2	0.11	3	0.11	6	0.48	90	0.02	8	0.10
Ashkenazy 1981		89	-0.18	62	0.00	91	0.01	91	0.01	91	0.01	89	0.01
Bacha 2000		90	-0.20	43	0.00	73	0.02	75	0.02	91	0.01	73	0.01
Badura 1965		12	-0.03	29	0.01	14	0.12	7	0.48	89	0.02	9	0.10
Barbosa 1983		4	-0.01	13	0.03	23	0.07	22	0.28	90	0.01	32	0.05
Biret 1990		65	-0.12	82	0.00	63	0.03	66	0.03	91	0.01	68	0.02
Blet 2003		18	-0.05	8	0.03	9	0.10	21	0.30	89	0.02	18	0.08
Block 1995		10	-0.02	4	0.08	5	0.11	5	0.50	89	0.02	10	0.10
Blumental 1952		74	-0.14	60	0.00	75	0.02	82	0.02	91	0.01	88	0.01
Boshniakovich 1969		32	-0.08	83	0.00	28	0.08	26	0.23	90	0.01	37	0.05
Brailowsky 1960		87	-0.17	47	0.00	85	0.02	84	0.02	91	0.01	76	0.01
Bunin 1987		8	-0.02	15	0.02	11	0.18	10	0.46	89	0.02	11	0.10
Bunin 1987b		9	-0.02	16	0.02	10	0.11	9	0.47	89	0.02	5	0.10
Chiu 1999		85	-0.16	40	0.00	79	0.02	74	0.02	91	0.01	78	0.01
Cohen 1997		40	-0.08	65	0.00	56	0.03	58	0.03	91	0.01	67	0.02
Cortot 1951		2	0.00	3	0.09	2	0.14	1	0.57	89	0.01	20	0.08
Csalog 1996		52	-0.10	69	0.00	30	0.06	41	0.12	89	0.02	33	0.05
Czerny 1949		1	0.00	14	0.02	4	0.10	2	0.57	89	0.02	3	0.11
Czerny 1990		53	-0.10	48	0.00	35	0.04	29	0.18	89	0.01	42	0.04
Duchoud 2007		66	-0.12	45	0.00	62	0.03	62	0.03	91	0.01	64	0.02
Ezaki 2006		33	-0.08	89	0.00	46	0.04	48	0.04	90	0.01	50	0.02
Falvay 1989		81	-0.15	33	0.00	69	0.03	71	0.03	91	0.01	52	0.02
Farrell 1958		62	-0.12	34	0.00	40	0.04	42	0.12	91	0.01	46	0.03
Ferenczy 1958		50	-0.10	11	0.03	37	0.04	35	0.15	89	0.02	35	0.05
Fliere 1977		49	-0.10	87	0.00	47	0.04	47	0.04	90	0.01	51	0.02
Fou 1978		27	-0.07	25	0.01	26	0.08	30	0.18	90	0.02	25	0.06
Francois 1956		51	-0.10	79	0.00	77	0.03	67	0.03	91	0.01	71	0.02
Friedman 1923		68	-0.13	5	0.04	38	0.04	36	0.15	89	0.02	38	0.05
Friedman 1923b		69	-0.13	37	0.00	39	0.05	33	0.17	89	0.02	26	0.06
Friedman 1930		83	-0.16	41	0.00	44	0.06	43	0.11	89	0.02	34	0.05
Garcia 2007		79	-0.15	71	0.00	65	0.03	70	0.03	90	0.01	65	0.02
Garcia 2007b		86	-0.16	38	0.00	78	0.03	61	0.03	90	0.01	72	0.02
Gierzod 1998		42	-0.09	72	0.00	59	0.03	59	0.03	91	0.01	63	0.02
Gornostaeva 1994		16	-0.05	17	0.02	24	0.07	24	0.26	89	0.02	22	0.07
Groot 1988		73	-0.14	90	0.00	76	0.02	78	0.02	90	0.01	90	0.01
Harasiewicz 1955		21	-0.06	88	0.00	33	0.05	38	0.14	90	0.01	43	0.04
Hatto 1993		71	-0.13	66	0.00	82	0.02	81	0.02	90	0.01	91	0.01
Hatto 1997		76	-0.14	76	0.00	86	0.02	83	0.02	90	0.01	85	0.01
Horowitz 1949		48	-0.10	49	0.00	57	0.04	49	0.04	90	0.02	47	0.03
Indjic 1988		67	-0.13	58	0.00	80	0.02	72	0.02	90	0.01	83	0.01
Kapell 1951		11	-0.03	10	0.03	8	0.10	4	0.50	90	0.02	4	0.10
Kissin 1993		39	-0.08	50	0.00	61	0.03	57	0.03	89	0.01	57	0.02
Kushner 1989		23	-0.06	39	0.00	32	0.05	37	0.14	89	0.02	30	0.05
Luisada 1991		58	-0.11	52	0.00	84	0.02	86	0.02	91	0.01	74	0.01
Lushtak 2004		88	-0.17	54	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	91	0.01	87	0.01
Malcuzynski 1961		17	-0.05	9	0.03	7	0.12	8	0.47	89	0.02	6	0.10
Magaloff 1978		72	-0.13	64	0.00	74	0.02	79	0.02	91	0.01	79	0.01
Magin 1975		64	-0.12	77	0.00	58	0.03	60	0.03	91	0.01	53	0.02
Michalowski 1933		30	-0.08	35	0.00	19	0.07	15	0.40	90	0.02	15	0.09
Milkina 1970		15	-0.05	36	0.00	15	0.09	13	0.42	89	0.02	14	0.09
Mohovich 1999		44	-0.09	67	0.00	60	0.03	63	0.03	91	0.01	66	0.02
Moravec 1969		29	-0.08	24	0.01	17	0.08	11	0.45	89	0.02	12	0.09
Morozova 2008		61	-0.11	57	0.00	64	0.03	65	0.03	91	0.01	59	0.02
Neighaus 1950		57	-0.10	73	0.00	53	0.04	50	0.04	90	0.02	49	0.03
Niedzielski 1931		47	-0.09	30	0.01	50	0.04	53	0.04	89	0.02	45	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		77	-0.14	59	0.00	66	0.02	76	0.02	91	0.01	82	0.01
Osinska 1989		25	-0.07	55	0.00	41	0.05	32	0.17	89	0.01	39	0.04
Pachmann 1927		37	-0.08	23	0.01	20	0.07	25	0.24	91	0.01	31	0.05
Paderewski 1930		80	-0.15	44	0.00	72	0.02	80	0.02	90	0.01	81	0.01
Perlemuter 1992		54	-0.10	68	0.00	81	0.02	77	0.02	91	0.01	75	0.01
Pierdomenico 2008		84	-0.16	53	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	91	0.01	80	0.01
Poblocka 1999		19	-0.05	42	0.00	36	0.04	39	0.13	90	0.01	40	0.04
Rabcewiczowa 1932		59	-0.11	80	0.00	55	0.05	46	0.05	90	0.01	54	0.02
Rachmaninoff 1923		43	-0.09	56	0.00	45	0.05	45	0.09	91	0.01	44	0.03
Rangell 2001		24	-0.07	6	0.04	13	0.11	16	0.39	89	0.01	27	0.06
Richter 1976		3	-0.01	7	0.04	6	0.13	3	0.54	87	0.02	7	0.10
Rosen 1989		56	-0.10	12	0.03	29	0.07	27	0.23	89	0.01	36	0.05
Rosenthal 1930		31	-0.08	28	0.01	21	0.07	19	0.31	89	0.02	19	0.08
Rosenthal 1931		63	-0.12	74	0.00	67	0.02	73	0.02	90	0.02	58	0.02
Rosenthal 1931b		60	-0.11	70	0.00	68	0.03	64	0.03	90	0.02	69	0.02
Rosenthal 1931c		55	-0.10	27	0.01	27	0.07	31	0.17	90	0.02	28	0.06
Rosenthal 1931d		45	-0.09	61	0.00	54	0.04	56	0.04	90	0.02	48	0.03
Rossi 2007		91	-0.20	85	0.00	88	0.01	88	0.01	91	0.01	77	0.01
Rubinstein 1939		5	-0.01	19	0.01	18	0.07	12	0.44	89	0.02	13	0.09
Rubinstein 1952		35	-0.08	32	0.00	51	0.04	51	0.04	89	0.01	70	0.02
Rubinstein 1966		78	-0.15	75	0.00	87	0.01	87	0.01	91	0.01	84	0.01
Schilhawsky 1960		7	-0.02	51	0.00	22	0.07	17	0.37	89	0.02	16	0.09
Shebanova 2002		82	-0.15	84	0.00	83	0.02	85	0.02	91	0.01	86	0.01
Smith 1975		46	-0.09	22	0.01	43	0.05	40	0.12	90	0.02	29	0.05
Sokolov 2002		22	-0.06	21	0.01	12	0.11	14	0.41	90	0.01	24	0.06
Sztompka 1959		41	-0.09	81	0.00	31	0.05	28	0.20	90	0.01	41	0.04
Tomsic 1995		13	-0.04	31	0.00	16	0.10	20	0.30	89	0.02	17	0.08
Uninsky 1932		34	-0.08	18	0.02	48	0.04	55	0.04	91	0.01	61	0.02
Uninsky 1971		14	-0.04	46	0.00	25	0.07	23	0.28	89	0.02	21	0.07
Wasowski 1980		28	-0.08	20	0.01	42	0.05	34	0.16	90	0.02	23	0.06
Zak 1937		38	-0.08	86	0.00	52	0.04	52	0.04	91	0.01	55	0.02
Zak 1951		36	-0.08	78	0.00	49	0.04	54	0.04	91	0.01	56	0.02
Average		75	-0.14	91	0.00	70	0.03	69	0.03	91	0.01	60	0.02
Random 1		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Random 2		26	-0.07	26	0.01	34	0.05	44	0.09	35	0.16	2	0.12
Random 3		6	-0.02	1	0.15	1	0.15	18	0.36	7	0.37	1	0.36

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).