Bunin 1987b

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		83	0.22	42	0.00	86	0.03	86	0.03	88	0.02	88	0.02
Anderszewski 2003		6	0.49	43	0.00	4	0.12	6	0.60	40	0.23	7	0.37
Ashkenazy 1981		58	0.34	44	0.00	67	0.04	72	0.04	46	0.07	61	0.05
Bacha 2000		51	0.36	4	0.00	37	0.06	38	0.17	24	0.33	16	0.24
Badura 1965		45	0.37	12	0.00	14	0.12	18	0.40	22	0.37	5	0.38
Barbosa 1983		8	0.48	45	0.00	7	0.13	8	0.57	48	0.08	19	0.21
Biret 1990		46	0.37	23	0.00	52	0.06	49	0.06	74	0.03	75	0.04
Blet 2003		47	0.37	24	0.00	36	0.06	33	0.23	21	0.26	17	0.24
Block 1995		72	0.28	15	0.00	71	0.04	70	0.04	82	0.03	84	0.03
Blumental 1952		36	0.38	46	0.00	51	0.05	58	0.05	71	0.05	60	0.05
Boshniakovich 1969		12	0.45	16	0.00	13	0.13	12	0.50	57	0.06	24	0.17
Brailowsky 1960		68	0.29	47	0.00	76	0.05	63	0.05	75	0.04	63	0.04
Bunin 1987		1	0.97	1	0.99	1	0.98	1	1.00	1	1.00	1	1.00
Bunin 1987b		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Chiu 1999		60	0.33	13	0.00	46	0.06	52	0.06	42	0.13	45	0.09
Cohen 1997		66	0.29	14	0.00	43	0.06	39	0.16	31	0.18	25	0.17
Cortot 1951		85	0.17	48	0.00	87	0.03	85	0.03	80	0.02	91	0.02
Csalog 1996		34	0.39	49	0.00	38	0.06	29	0.28	56	0.05	35	0.12
Czerny 1949		11	0.45	25	0.00	28	0.05	25	0.32	53	0.07	28	0.15
Czerny 1990		37	0.38	50	0.00	48	0.06	48	0.06	70	0.04	62	0.05
Duchoud 2007		80	0.24	51	0.00	22	0.06	41	0.13	28	0.44	18	0.24
Ezaki 2006		10	0.47	10	0.00	9	0.12	7	0.57	38	0.21	8	0.35
Falvay 1989		14	0.44	26	0.00	8	0.11	9	0.56	44	0.16	11	0.30
Farrell 1958		61	0.33	52	0.00	66	0.04	71	0.04	61	0.05	68	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		56	0.35	17	0.00	62	0.04	75	0.04	62	0.05	72	0.04
Fliere 1977		16	0.44	27	0.00	12	0.12	16	0.43	46	0.06	26	0.16
Fou 1978		79	0.25	53	0.00	83	0.03	83	0.03	83	0.03	79	0.03
Francois 1956		75	0.26	28	0.00	70	0.04	69	0.04	57	0.05	77	0.04
Friedman 1923		87	0.14	54	0.00	80	0.03	81	0.03	78	0.04	85	0.03
Friedman 1923b		86	0.16	55	0.00	79	0.03	88	0.03	62	0.05	74	0.04
Friedman 1930		77	0.25	56	0.00	49	0.05	59	0.05	45	0.14	47	0.08
Garcia 2007		54	0.36	57	0.00	50	0.05	57	0.05	35	0.27	37	0.12
Garcia 2007b		43	0.37	6	0.00	27	0.05	36	0.19	53	0.06	40	0.11
Gierzod 1998		15	0.44	58	0.00	29	0.06	32	0.24	69	0.04	44	0.10
Gornostaeva 1994		7	0.48	59	0.00	10	0.14	10	0.56	28	0.37	3	0.46
Groot 1988		21	0.42	18	0.00	17	0.09	20	0.40	41	0.11	20	0.21
Harasiewicz 1955		55	0.35	19	0.00	68	0.05	55	0.05	80	0.03	76	0.04
Hatto 1993		17	0.43	60	0.00	21	0.07	21	0.39	65	0.04	38	0.12
Hatto 1997		26	0.41	61	0.00	26	0.05	24	0.35	64	0.04	36	0.12
Horowitz 1949		38	0.38	62	0.00	56	0.04	66	0.04	32	0.25	42	0.10
Indjic 1988		23	0.42	63	0.00	25	0.05	23	0.37	66	0.04	34	0.12
Kapell 1951		9	0.47	29	0.00	15	0.09	17	0.42	47	0.08	23	0.18
Kissin 1993		70	0.28	64	0.00	82	0.03	76	0.03	79	0.04	82	0.03
Kushner 1989		13	0.45	65	0.00	19	0.12	13	0.45	54	0.06	27	0.16
Luisada 1991		33	0.39	66	0.00	54	0.07	46	0.07	45	0.14	41	0.10
Lushtak 2004		25	0.41	2	0.00	11	0.12	11	0.52	41	0.21	9	0.33
Malcuzynski 1961		4	0.50	30	0.00	3	0.25	3	0.71	28	0.41	2	0.54
Magaloff 1978		53	0.36	67	0.00	59	0.05	64	0.05	67	0.03	66	0.04
Magin 1975		27	0.41	8	0.00	47	0.07	47	0.07	70	0.04	58	0.05
Michalowski 1933		88	0.13	68	0.00	88	0.03	79	0.03	75	0.03	81	0.03
Milkina 1970		3	0.51	69	0.00	6	0.17	5	0.62	44	0.11	14	0.26
Mohovich 1999		19	0.42	9	0.00	18	0.11	22	0.38	46	0.06	29	0.15
Moravec 1969		22	0.42	70	0.00	35	0.06	27	0.29	53	0.07	30	0.14
Morozova 2008		18	0.43	71	0.00	20	0.10	14	0.45	35	0.22	10	0.31
Neighaus 1950		67	0.29	72	0.00	39	0.05	45	0.10	64	0.04	52	0.06
Niedzielski 1931		78	0.25	73	0.00	73	0.05	54	0.05	58	0.05	57	0.05
Ohlsson 1999		50	0.37	74	0.00	16	0.09	15	0.44	34	0.31	6	0.37
Osinska 1989		5	0.49	3	0.00	5	0.15	4	0.62	40	0.23	4	0.38
Pachmann 1927		76	0.26	31	0.00	63	0.03	78	0.03	52	0.05	71	0.04
Paderewski 1930		82	0.22	5	0.00	78	0.03	84	0.03	51	0.05	70	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		40	0.38	32	0.00	34	0.06	34	0.23	28	0.32	13	0.27
Pierdomenico 2008		81	0.23	75	0.00	77	0.03	82	0.03	73	0.03	78	0.03
Poblocka 1999		48	0.37	76	0.00	61	0.05	60	0.05	63	0.06	55	0.05
Rabcewiczowa 1932		20	0.42	33	0.00	24	0.05	28	0.28	56	0.05	33	0.12
Rachmaninoff 1923		74	0.27	77	0.00	57	0.04	67	0.04	56	0.05	67	0.04
Rangell 2001		49	0.37	34	0.00	40	0.05	37	0.18	43	0.10	32	0.13
Richter 1976		64	0.32	35	0.00	60	0.05	56	0.05	63	0.04	69	0.04
Rosen 1989		52	0.36	78	0.00	42	0.06	40	0.13	55	0.04	50	0.07
Rosenthal 1930		71	0.28	79	0.00	81	0.03	80	0.03	61	0.04	83	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		63	0.32	36	0.00	72	0.05	61	0.05	56	0.05	59	0.05
Rosenthal 1931b		59	0.34	20	0.00	64	0.03	77	0.03	32	0.24	48	0.08
Rosenthal 1931c		35	0.38	37	0.00	45	0.05	44	0.11	39	0.18	31	0.14
Rosenthal 1931d		62	0.33	7	0.00	65	0.04	74	0.04	37	0.21	46	0.09
Rossi 2007		57	0.34	38	0.00	69	0.04	65	0.04	53	0.05	65	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		32	0.39	21	0.00	58	0.05	62	0.05	53	0.05	56	0.05
Rubinstein 1952		42	0.37	80	0.00	31	0.06	43	0.11	73	0.03	53	0.06
Rubinstein 1966		29	0.40	81	0.00	30	0.05	35	0.19	67	0.05	43	0.10
Schilhawsky 1960		28	0.40	82	0.00	32	0.06	30	0.26	38	0.25	15	0.25
Shebanova 2002		31	0.40	22	0.00	23	0.05	19	0.40	36	0.21	12	0.29
Smith 1975		84	0.20	39	0.00	85	0.03	87	0.03	86	0.02	86	0.02
Sokolov 2002		65	0.30	83	0.00	74	0.06	50	0.06	78	0.03	64	0.04
Sztompka 1959		73	0.27	84	0.00	84	0.04	73	0.04	85	0.03	80	0.03
Tomsic 1995		30	0.40	11	0.00	41	0.07	31	0.24	42	0.15	22	0.19
Uninsky 1932		69	0.28	85	0.00	75	0.04	68	0.04	54	0.05	73	0.04
Uninsky 1971		44	0.37	86	0.00	53	0.06	53	0.06	52	0.06	51	0.06
Wasowski 1980		41	0.38	87	0.00	55	0.06	51	0.06	80	0.04	54	0.05
Zak 1937		39	0.38	88	0.00	44	0.06	42	0.13	75	0.04	49	0.07
Zak 1951		24	0.41	40	0.00	33	0.06	26	0.31	64	0.04	39	0.11
Average		2	0.58	89	0.00	2	0.53	2	0.79	61	0.05	21	0.20
Random 1		90	-0.04	90	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	46	0.06	89	0.02
Random 2		89	0.00	41	0.00	91	0.01	91	0.01	69	0.03	87	0.02
Random 3		91	-0.04	91	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	49	0.05	90	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).