Wasowski 1980

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		60	0.38	67	0.00	55	0.05	71	0.05	21	0.40	44	0.14
Anderszewski 2003		20	0.50	23	0.01	21	0.09	19	0.48	31	0.36	21	0.42
Ashkenazy 1981		83	0.24	84	0.00	83	0.03	82	0.03	63	0.03	84	0.03
Bacha 2000		82	0.25	81	0.00	80	0.05	76	0.05	53	0.04	77	0.04
Badura 1965		62	0.37	82	0.00	64	0.06	51	0.06	52	0.06	64	0.06
Barbosa 1983		4	0.57	1	0.16	1	0.15	1	0.68	15	0.60	1	0.64
Biret 1990		30	0.47	7	0.05	13	0.09	12	0.53	30	0.36	19	0.44
Blet 2003		55	0.39	42	0.00	60	0.07	48	0.07	42	0.13	55	0.10
Block 1995		48	0.43	47	0.00	31	0.07	32	0.34	19	0.46	24	0.40
Blumental 1952		17	0.52	9	0.04	14	0.11	8	0.55	17	0.57	3	0.56
Boshniakovich 1969		19	0.50	34	0.00	9	0.14	11	0.54	19	0.38	17	0.45
Brailowsky 1960		33	0.47	10	0.03	36	0.09	37	0.23	28	0.42	30	0.31
Bunin 1987		58	0.38	40	0.00	69	0.05	70	0.05	57	0.05	75	0.05
Bunin 1987b		61	0.38	45	0.00	68	0.04	79	0.04	50	0.06	71	0.05
Chiu 1999		57	0.39	22	0.01	52	0.06	55	0.06	25	0.29	47	0.13
Cohen 1997		59	0.38	28	0.00	57	0.05	75	0.05	19	0.27	53	0.12
Cortot 1951		71	0.32	31	0.00	66	0.06	57	0.06	34	0.26	54	0.12
Csalog 1996		64	0.36	32	0.00	59	0.06	58	0.06	52	0.05	72	0.05
Czerny 1949		24	0.49	69	0.00	24	0.08	25	0.41	37	0.34	26	0.37
Czerny 1990		6	0.55	12	0.03	10	0.15	13	0.53	34	0.46	11	0.49
Duchoud 2007		86	0.18	38	0.00	84	0.03	84	0.03	73	0.03	83	0.03
Ezaki 2006		35	0.47	27	0.00	42	0.08	42	0.16	68	0.05	57	0.09
Falvay 1989		8	0.55	17	0.02	17	0.13	7	0.56	34	0.38	15	0.46
Farrell 1958		67	0.34	68	0.00	73	0.05	74	0.05	53	0.05	69	0.05
Ferenczy 1958		50	0.42	70	0.00	56	0.06	56	0.06	28	0.39	42	0.15
Fliere 1977		21	0.50	37	0.00	20	0.07	20	0.47	50	0.06	38	0.17
Fou 1978		34	0.47	71	0.00	38	0.10	34	0.29	54	0.05	51	0.12
Francois 1956		75	0.30	83	0.00	77	0.05	62	0.05	64	0.04	82	0.04
Friedman 1923		69	0.33	53	0.00	65	0.07	49	0.07	31	0.28	46	0.14
Friedman 1923b		66	0.34	55	0.00	61	0.05	63	0.05	26	0.37	45	0.14
Friedman 1930		52	0.41	6	0.05	34	0.10	30	0.35	9	0.53	20	0.43
Garcia 2007		63	0.37	88	0.00	58	0.05	64	0.05	27	0.36	49	0.13
Garcia 2007b		41	0.44	29	0.00	39	0.07	39	0.18	32	0.31	34	0.24
Gierzod 1998		1	0.59	3	0.09	3	0.18	5	0.59	19	0.48	8	0.53
Gornostaeva 1994		12	0.54	35	0.00	15	0.10	17	0.49	12	0.55	9	0.52
Groot 1988		54	0.41	46	0.00	32	0.07	35	0.28	33	0.18	35	0.22
Harasiewicz 1955		2	0.58	5	0.07	5	0.13	4	0.61	25	0.52	4	0.56
Hatto 1993		26	0.49	57	0.00	28	0.07	29	0.36	42	0.17	33	0.25
Hatto 1997		16	0.52	26	0.01	12	0.11	16	0.50	21	0.45	14	0.47
Horowitz 1949		72	0.32	60	0.00	76	0.05	77	0.05	42	0.14	59	0.08
Indjic 1988		22	0.50	54	0.00	23	0.11	23	0.42	36	0.25	29	0.32
Kapell 1951		13	0.54	8	0.04	11	0.13	18	0.49	30	0.41	16	0.45
Kissin 1993		14	0.52	15	0.02	7	0.11	14	0.53	15	0.55	7	0.54
Kushner 1989		7	0.55	21	0.01	8	0.11	6	0.58	35	0.33	18	0.44
Luisada 1991		11	0.54	11	0.03	18	0.20	9	0.55	5	0.62	2	0.58
Lushtak 2004		18	0.51	14	0.02	19	0.12	22	0.44	30	0.36	23	0.40
Malcuzynski 1961		25	0.49	30	0.00	29	0.07	28	0.37	47	0.08	39	0.17
Magaloff 1978		32	0.47	24	0.01	33	0.07	36	0.27	32	0.32	31	0.29
Magin 1975		37	0.46	25	0.01	40	0.08	38	0.21	43	0.12	40	0.16
Michalowski 1933		87	0.14	72	0.00	87	0.02	86	0.02	70	0.03	86	0.02
Milkina 1970		5	0.56	2	0.10	2	0.14	2	0.65	29	0.39	10	0.50
Mohovich 1999		38	0.46	33	0.00	41	0.07	41	0.17	46	0.06	56	0.10
Moravec 1969		31	0.47	73	0.00	48	0.07	46	0.07	57	0.06	60	0.06
Morozova 2008		47	0.43	61	0.00	47	0.06	52	0.06	49	0.07	63	0.06
Neighaus 1950		56	0.39	58	0.00	62	0.05	66	0.05	27	0.32	50	0.13
Niedzielski 1931		74	0.30	56	0.00	72	0.05	72	0.05	50	0.06	68	0.05
Ohlsson 1999		42	0.44	43	0.00	45	0.05	65	0.05	32	0.32	48	0.13
Osinska 1989		3	0.58	16	0.02	6	0.10	3	0.64	29	0.45	6	0.54
Pachmann 1927		79	0.28	85	0.00	78	0.03	83	0.03	47	0.06	79	0.04
Paderewski 1930		81	0.27	41	0.00	63	0.06	60	0.06	11	0.44	41	0.16
Perlemuter 1992		40	0.45	39	0.00	37	0.07	40	0.18	3	0.57	28	0.32
Pierdomenico 2008		73	0.31	77	0.00	74	0.06	54	0.06	47	0.05	66	0.05
Poblocka 1999		10	0.54	18	0.01	16	0.10	15	0.51	22	0.46	12	0.48
Rabcewiczowa 1932		44	0.44	19	0.01	25	0.07	27	0.38	36	0.17	32	0.25
Rachmaninoff 1923		68	0.33	64	0.00	67	0.05	69	0.05	57	0.05	65	0.05
Rangell 2001		23	0.49	65	0.00	26	0.06	31	0.34	17	0.49	22	0.41
Richter 1976		45	0.44	74	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.10	28	0.37	37	0.19
Rosen 1989		43	0.44	20	0.01	35	0.10	33	0.32	25	0.34	27	0.33
Rosenthal 1930		76	0.30	75	0.00	81	0.04	81	0.04	69	0.04	81	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		80	0.28	59	0.00	82	0.04	80	0.04	56	0.05	80	0.04
Rosenthal 1931b		85	0.20	89	0.00	86	0.03	85	0.03	84	0.02	89	0.02
Rosenthal 1931c		77	0.29	80	0.00	79	0.04	78	0.04	77	0.03	85	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		84	0.21	51	0.00	85	0.02	88	0.02	81	0.03	88	0.02
Rossi 2007		78	0.29	86	0.00	75	0.06	59	0.06	50	0.06	61	0.06
Rubinstein 1939		49	0.43	62	0.00	51	0.06	50	0.06	63	0.04	67	0.05
Rubinstein 1952		29	0.48	87	0.00	46	0.06	53	0.06	57	0.05	76	0.05
Rubinstein 1966		15	0.52	48	0.00	22	0.10	24	0.42	45	0.10	36	0.20
Schilhawsky 1960		46	0.44	52	0.00	54	0.05	67	0.05	50	0.05	73	0.05
Shebanova 2002		39	0.45	36	0.00	43	0.06	43	0.12	38	0.19	43	0.15
Smith 1975		27	0.48	66	0.00	30	0.09	21	0.44	13	0.52	13	0.48
Sokolov 2002		65	0.36	63	0.00	71	0.05	61	0.05	59	0.04	78	0.04
Sztompka 1959		9	0.55	4	0.08	4	0.17	10	0.54	17	0.57	5	0.55
Tomsic 1995		36	0.46	13	0.02	49	0.07	45	0.07	34	0.22	52	0.12
Uninsky 1932		70	0.33	78	0.00	70	0.05	68	0.05	55	0.05	74	0.05
Uninsky 1971		28	0.48	50	0.00	27	0.07	26	0.40	31	0.36	25	0.38
Wasowski 1980		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Zak 1937		53	0.41	90	0.00	53	0.05	73	0.05	51	0.05	70	0.05
Zak 1951		51	0.42	76	0.00	50	0.07	47	0.07	57	0.05	62	0.06
Random 1		89	-0.06	79	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	66	0.02	87	0.02
Random 2		90	-0.07	49	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	89	0.01	90	0.01
Random 3		88	-0.03	44	0.00	88	0.02	87	0.02	10	0.41	58	0.09

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).