Uninsky 1971

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		41	0.46	30	0.00	51	0.05	61	0.05	16	0.43	43	0.15
Anderszewski 2003		28	0.49	25	0.00	21	0.17	21	0.50	34	0.32	22	0.40
Ashkenazy 1981		70	0.36	46	0.00	78	0.04	72	0.04	64	0.03	88	0.03
Bacha 2000		60	0.39	23	0.00	36	0.07	41	0.17	7	0.51	32	0.29
Badura 1965		57	0.40	42	0.00	58	0.06	49	0.06	28	0.27	47	0.13
Barbosa 1983		7	0.56	2	0.12	2	0.20	3	0.72	14	0.60	3	0.66
Biret 1990		27	0.49	47	0.00	19	0.11	20	0.50	34	0.29	25	0.38
Blet 2003		71	0.36	68	0.00	75	0.04	68	0.04	66	0.04	77	0.04
Block 1995		52	0.42	13	0.01	47	0.07	48	0.07	35	0.23	48	0.13
Blumental 1952		9	0.54	19	0.00	9	0.18	11	0.59	16	0.57	9	0.58
Boshniakovich 1969		31	0.48	18	0.00	15	0.12	16	0.52	29	0.28	24	0.38
Brailowsky 1960		30	0.49	55	0.00	31	0.09	34	0.35	23	0.48	20	0.41
Bunin 1987		64	0.37	83	0.00	65	0.06	54	0.06	62	0.04	68	0.05
Bunin 1987b		68	0.37	58	0.00	54	0.06	51	0.06	52	0.06	64	0.06
Chiu 1999		55	0.41	52	0.00	45	0.06	55	0.06	19	0.35	44	0.14
Cohen 1997		54	0.41	70	0.00	57	0.07	46	0.07	8	0.46	39	0.18
Cortot 1951		62	0.38	84	0.00	59	0.07	45	0.07	12	0.55	37	0.20
Csalog 1996		67	0.37	16	0.01	71	0.04	73	0.04	70	0.04	76	0.04
Czerny 1949		14	0.54	24	0.00	22	0.11	18	0.52	27	0.51	15	0.51
Czerny 1990		1	0.62	1	0.28	1	0.28	1	0.83	8	0.76	1	0.79
Duchoud 2007		86	0.22	63	0.00	85	0.03	84	0.03	67	0.04	86	0.03
Ezaki 2006		19	0.52	76	0.00	30	0.07	32	0.35	47	0.07	41	0.16
Falvay 1989		25	0.50	74	0.00	32	0.09	26	0.38	49	0.05	45	0.14
Farrell 1958		51	0.43	31	0.00	40	0.08	37	0.27	26	0.40	28	0.33
Ferenczy 1958		38	0.46	41	0.00	50	0.07	47	0.07	24	0.44	38	0.18
Fliere 1977		6	0.56	20	0.00	11	0.15	12	0.59	34	0.31	17	0.43
Fou 1978		33	0.48	44	0.00	29	0.07	29	0.37	31	0.25	31	0.30
Francois 1956		69	0.37	43	0.00	69	0.05	62	0.05	46	0.06	72	0.05
Friedman 1923		76	0.30	77	0.00	76	0.04	78	0.04	61	0.05	81	0.04
Friedman 1923b		77	0.30	78	0.00	74	0.04	70	0.04	48	0.06	69	0.05
Friedman 1930		81	0.26	59	0.00	79	0.03	79	0.03	66	0.04	84	0.03
Garcia 2007		80	0.26	49	0.00	80	0.03	80	0.03	54	0.05	78	0.04
Garcia 2007b		61	0.39	60	0.00	46	0.06	52	0.06	43	0.11	61	0.08
Gierzod 1998		2	0.61	5	0.06	3	0.23	2	0.76	17	0.52	4	0.63
Gornostaeva 1994		50	0.43	22	0.00	63	0.05	66	0.05	59	0.05	70	0.05
Groot 1988		24	0.50	34	0.00	10	0.11	15	0.53	11	0.50	16	0.51
Harasiewicz 1955		4	0.57	8	0.03	8	0.16	5	0.66	27	0.49	11	0.57
Hatto 1993		17	0.53	3	0.12	5	0.32	7	0.63	11	0.55	8	0.59
Hatto 1997		16	0.53	32	0.00	7	0.29	9	0.62	13	0.52	10	0.57
Horowitz 1949		75	0.32	75	0.00	77	0.04	75	0.04	36	0.18	60	0.08
Indjic 1988		13	0.54	7	0.04	6	0.31	6	0.63	12	0.55	7	0.59
Kapell 1951		22	0.51	33	0.00	35	0.07	36	0.30	38	0.20	34	0.24
Kissin 1993		18	0.52	38	0.00	17	0.10	19	0.51	18	0.54	14	0.52
Kushner 1989		35	0.48	80	0.00	28	0.07	33	0.35	55	0.05	46	0.13
Luisada 1991		47	0.45	39	0.00	56	0.05	56	0.05	32	0.25	51	0.11
Lushtak 2004		42	0.45	17	0.00	41	0.07	39	0.26	47	0.06	50	0.12
Malcuzynski 1961		32	0.48	27	0.00	33	0.09	27	0.38	52	0.06	42	0.15
Magaloff 1978		15	0.53	12	0.01	20	0.13	14	0.54	8	0.57	12	0.55
Magin 1975		59	0.40	37	0.00	64	0.04	71	0.04	63	0.04	74	0.04
Michalowski 1933		87	0.18	87	0.00	87	0.03	81	0.03	50	0.04	83	0.03
Milkina 1970		3	0.59	4	0.12	4	0.27	4	0.70	18	0.50	6	0.59
Mohovich 1999		34	0.48	21	0.00	38	0.07	38	0.27	47	0.06	49	0.13
Moravec 1969		23	0.50	28	0.00	24	0.10	23	0.44	25	0.38	19	0.41
Morozova 2008		49	0.43	64	0.00	52	0.05	64	0.05	46	0.09	63	0.07
Neighaus 1950		58	0.40	54	0.00	66	0.04	77	0.04	26	0.32	55	0.11
Niedzielski 1931		74	0.34	69	0.00	60	0.05	59	0.05	30	0.24	52	0.11
Ohlsson 1999		45	0.45	71	0.00	27	0.07	28	0.37	18	0.44	21	0.40
Osinska 1989		10	0.54	35	0.00	18	0.11	13	0.54	41	0.20	27	0.33
Pachmann 1927		84	0.23	67	0.00	86	0.03	82	0.03	68	0.03	82	0.03
Paderewski 1930		83	0.24	50	0.00	68	0.04	74	0.04	25	0.31	53	0.11
Perlemuter 1992		65	0.37	56	0.00	73	0.05	63	0.05	42	0.13	59	0.08
Pierdomenico 2008		73	0.35	79	0.00	61	0.04	67	0.04	62	0.04	73	0.04
Poblocka 1999		21	0.51	11	0.02	26	0.07	30	0.36	43	0.14	35	0.22
Rabcewiczowa 1932		53	0.41	36	0.00	44	0.08	43	0.16	58	0.05	58	0.09
Rachmaninoff 1923		40	0.46	9	0.03	25	0.08	25	0.40	21	0.44	18	0.42
Rangell 2001		56	0.41	88	0.00	67	0.05	60	0.05	62	0.06	71	0.05
Richter 1976		8	0.55	6	0.05	13	0.12	22	0.48	13	0.60	13	0.54
Rosen 1989		26	0.50	85	0.00	39	0.07	35	0.31	23	0.36	30	0.33
Rosenthal 1930		72	0.36	89	0.00	70	0.04	76	0.04	35	0.28	54	0.11
Rosenthal 1931		79	0.26	73	0.00	83	0.03	86	0.03	58	0.05	75	0.04
Rosenthal 1931b		82	0.25	81	0.00	82	0.03	85	0.03	51	0.05	79	0.04
Rosenthal 1931c		78	0.30	86	0.00	81	0.03	83	0.03	63	0.05	80	0.04
Rosenthal 1931d		85	0.23	90	0.00	84	0.02	87	0.02	64	0.04	89	0.03
Rossi 2007		66	0.37	45	0.00	72	0.04	69	0.04	42	0.11	62	0.07
Rubinstein 1939		46	0.45	57	0.00	53	0.05	57	0.05	47	0.06	67	0.05
Rubinstein 1952		20	0.52	15	0.01	23	0.09	24	0.43	40	0.19	33	0.29
Rubinstein 1966		11	0.54	82	0.00	16	0.11	17	0.52	38	0.27	26	0.37
Schilhawsky 1960		29	0.49	40	0.00	37	0.08	40	0.25	24	0.44	29	0.33
Shebanova 2002		37	0.47	61	0.00	42	0.07	42	0.16	31	0.27	36	0.21
Smith 1975		43	0.45	26	0.00	55	0.05	58	0.05	44	0.16	57	0.09
Sokolov 2002		63	0.38	29	0.00	62	0.05	65	0.05	49	0.06	66	0.05
Sztompka 1959		12	0.54	14	0.01	14	0.11	10	0.59	10	0.63	5	0.61
Tomsic 1995		44	0.45	51	0.00	49	0.06	53	0.06	38	0.18	56	0.10
Uninsky 1932		5	0.56	10	0.02	12	0.12	8	0.62	2	0.74	2	0.68
Uninsky 1971		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Wasowski 1980		36	0.48	48	0.00	34	0.09	31	0.36	26	0.40	23	0.38
Zak 1937		39	0.46	65	0.00	43	0.07	44	0.15	39	0.19	40	0.17
Zak 1951		48	0.43	66	0.00	48	0.06	50	0.06	45	0.07	65	0.06
Random 1		89	-0.06	53	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	48	0.04	90	0.02
Random 2		88	0.00	72	0.00	89	0.02	88	0.02	45	0.05	85	0.03
Random 3		90	-0.08	62	0.00	88	0.01	89	0.01	41	0.12	87	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).