Smith 1975

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		31	0.47	33	0.00	39	0.07	39	0.23	10	0.51	19	0.34
Anderszewski 2003		30	0.47	52	0.00	26	0.06	32	0.29	50	0.07	40	0.14
Ashkenazy 1981		52	0.37	63	0.00	51	0.09	45	0.09	42	0.13	47	0.11
Bacha 2000		63	0.33	68	0.00	73	0.04	74	0.04	50	0.04	69	0.04
Badura 1965		62	0.34	32	0.00	66	0.05	63	0.05	59	0.05	65	0.05
Barbosa 1983		11	0.51	17	0.01	10	0.13	9	0.58	39	0.18	22	0.32
Biret 1990		7	0.53	2	0.16	2	0.20	5	0.65	19	0.47	5	0.55
Blet 2003		39	0.43	45	0.00	43	0.08	43	0.17	11	0.40	30	0.26
Block 1995		56	0.36	27	0.00	62	0.05	59	0.05	74	0.04	76	0.04
Blumental 1952		8	0.52	35	0.00	16	0.11	14	0.52	27	0.45	9	0.48
Boshniakovich 1969		21	0.49	4	0.09	6	0.15	7	0.60	22	0.35	10	0.46
Brailowsky 1960		1	0.61	1	0.25	1	0.25	1	0.72	3	0.73	1	0.72
Bunin 1987		80	0.23	88	0.00	80	0.03	77	0.03	76	0.03	85	0.03
Bunin 1987b		84	0.20	89	0.00	85	0.02	85	0.02	86	0.03	86	0.02
Chiu 1999		59	0.35	79	0.00	67	0.04	67	0.04	55	0.06	61	0.05
Cohen 1997		71	0.32	73	0.00	72	0.03	79	0.03	47	0.06	77	0.04
Cortot 1951		77	0.27	75	0.00	79	0.05	60	0.05	50	0.07	59	0.06
Csalog 1996		53	0.37	43	0.00	40	0.06	42	0.19	40	0.16	34	0.17
Czerny 1949		19	0.50	7	0.03	9	0.12	8	0.59	26	0.51	4	0.55
Czerny 1990		6	0.55	19	0.01	7	0.18	3	0.67	29	0.51	3	0.58
Duchoud 2007		83	0.20	56	0.00	84	0.02	86	0.02	74	0.03	90	0.02
Ezaki 2006		26	0.48	11	0.02	45	0.08	48	0.08	65	0.05	56	0.06
Falvay 1989		2	0.57	3	0.09	4	0.13	10	0.55	35	0.37	11	0.45
Farrell 1958		68	0.32	83	0.00	57	0.05	61	0.05	70	0.04	71	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		49	0.39	47	0.00	58	0.05	55	0.05	40	0.15	50	0.09
Fliere 1977		4	0.56	6	0.04	5	0.14	4	0.65	23	0.43	7	0.53
Fou 1978		17	0.50	12	0.02	20	0.08	21	0.45	40	0.16	27	0.27
Francois 1956		75	0.29	76	0.00	75	0.04	73	0.04	63	0.04	78	0.04
Friedman 1923		45	0.42	28	0.00	36	0.06	36	0.27	10	0.54	17	0.38
Friedman 1923b		40	0.43	36	0.00	31	0.08	27	0.35	5	0.58	12	0.45
Friedman 1930		50	0.38	31	0.00	35	0.06	40	0.23	20	0.42	24	0.31
Garcia 2007		82	0.21	74	0.00	82	0.03	76	0.03	48	0.06	75	0.04
Garcia 2007b		54	0.37	29	0.00	48	0.07	49	0.07	50	0.06	60	0.06
Gierzod 1998		5	0.56	13	0.01	8	0.24	6	0.63	35	0.28	15	0.42
Gornostaeva 1994		28	0.48	58	0.00	22	0.08	20	0.45	32	0.29	18	0.36
Groot 1988		41	0.42	69	0.00	28	0.06	29	0.34	35	0.16	31	0.23
Harasiewicz 1955		9	0.52	9	0.03	13	0.13	17	0.47	43	0.16	28	0.27
Hatto 1993		27	0.48	90	0.00	29	0.07	24	0.40	51	0.05	41	0.14
Hatto 1997		23	0.48	66	0.00	34	0.06	28	0.35	50	0.05	43	0.13
Horowitz 1949		72	0.32	84	0.00	69	0.03	80	0.03	34	0.18	55	0.07
Indjic 1988		15	0.51	80	0.00	23	0.08	19	0.45	44	0.15	29	0.26
Kapell 1951		48	0.40	46	0.00	54	0.08	46	0.08	62	0.05	58	0.06
Kissin 1993		47	0.41	51	0.00	61	0.04	64	0.04	58	0.05	72	0.04
Kushner 1989		13	0.51	8	0.03	11	0.15	12	0.54	44	0.15	26	0.28
Luisada 1991		14	0.51	10	0.02	14	0.13	15	0.51	11	0.55	6	0.53
Lushtak 2004		37	0.45	20	0.01	33	0.06	33	0.29	50	0.05	44	0.12
Malcuzynski 1961		69	0.32	85	0.00	71	0.03	82	0.03	74	0.03	83	0.03
Magaloff 1978		16	0.50	49	0.00	17	0.11	16	0.47	24	0.39	14	0.43
Magin 1975		3	0.57	5	0.08	3	0.19	2	0.71	5	0.64	2	0.67
Michalowski 1933		76	0.28	57	0.00	77	0.04	68	0.04	20	0.40	42	0.13
Milkina 1970		12	0.51	14	0.01	12	0.15	11	0.54	46	0.08	32	0.21
Mohovich 1999		42	0.42	53	0.00	52	0.06	53	0.06	71	0.04	67	0.05
Moravec 1969		33	0.46	86	0.00	37	0.08	35	0.27	48	0.09	37	0.16
Morozova 2008		67	0.33	81	0.00	55	0.04	65	0.04	56	0.06	64	0.05
Neighaus 1950		60	0.35	42	0.00	49	0.07	52	0.07	17	0.43	36	0.17
Niedzielski 1931		86	0.16	77	0.00	86	0.03	84	0.03	77	0.03	82	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		66	0.33	64	0.00	60	0.05	58	0.05	50	0.05	63	0.05
Osinska 1989		24	0.48	34	0.00	32	0.06	31	0.29	47	0.07	39	0.14
Pachmann 1927		81	0.22	87	0.00	83	0.02	88	0.02	70	0.03	88	0.02
Paderewski 1930		87	0.16	37	0.00	64	0.04	71	0.04	34	0.17	52	0.08
Perlemuter 1992		73	0.32	70	0.00	76	0.04	70	0.04	55	0.05	70	0.04
Pierdomenico 2008		78	0.25	55	0.00	81	0.03	83	0.03	69	0.04	81	0.03
Poblocka 1999		10	0.52	25	0.00	19	0.09	18	0.46	36	0.24	20	0.33
Rabcewiczowa 1932		55	0.36	30	0.00	30	0.07	38	0.24	50	0.05	46	0.11
Rachmaninoff 1923		29	0.48	15	0.01	21	0.07	22	0.42	18	0.47	13	0.44
Rangell 2001		74	0.30	59	0.00	78	0.05	57	0.05	66	0.05	68	0.05
Richter 1976		34	0.46	18	0.01	27	0.07	30	0.32	33	0.29	25	0.30
Rosen 1989		35	0.45	26	0.00	53	0.07	50	0.07	68	0.04	66	0.05
Rosenthal 1930		46	0.41	21	0.00	42	0.08	41	0.22	19	0.49	21	0.33
Rosenthal 1931		64	0.33	54	0.00	74	0.04	69	0.04	57	0.05	73	0.04
Rosenthal 1931b		65	0.33	62	0.00	68	0.03	75	0.03	33	0.22	54	0.08
Rosenthal 1931c		44	0.42	24	0.00	41	0.07	34	0.28	23	0.37	23	0.32
Rosenthal 1931d		58	0.35	71	0.00	56	0.04	66	0.04	25	0.35	45	0.12
Rossi 2007		85	0.20	48	0.00	87	0.03	78	0.03	79	0.03	80	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		43	0.42	44	0.00	47	0.07	51	0.07	46	0.06	57	0.06
Rubinstein 1952		18	0.50	41	0.00	24	0.07	23	0.41	51	0.06	38	0.16
Rubinstein 1966		22	0.49	16	0.01	25	0.09	26	0.39	48	0.07	35	0.17
Schilhawsky 1960		20	0.49	23	0.00	18	0.07	25	0.39	27	0.40	16	0.39
Shebanova 2002		57	0.35	67	0.00	59	0.05	62	0.05	63	0.04	74	0.04
Smith 1975		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Sokolov 2002		70	0.32	82	0.00	65	0.04	72	0.04	72	0.03	79	0.03
Sztompka 1959		51	0.38	60	0.00	50	0.08	47	0.08	44	0.10	48	0.09
Tomsic 1995		79	0.23	78	0.00	70	0.03	81	0.03	83	0.02	87	0.02
Uninsky 1932		61	0.34	40	0.00	63	0.05	56	0.05	39	0.14	53	0.08
Uninsky 1971		36	0.45	22	0.00	44	0.08	44	0.16	58	0.05	49	0.09
Wasowski 1980		25	0.48	39	0.00	15	0.12	13	0.52	21	0.44	8	0.48
Zak 1937		38	0.44	38	0.00	46	0.06	54	0.06	63	0.04	62	0.05
Zak 1951		32	0.47	50	0.00	38	0.07	37	0.25	33	0.17	33	0.21
Random 1		88	0.01	61	0.00	88	0.02	87	0.02	13	0.39	51	0.09
Random 2		89	-0.03	72	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	78	0.03	89	0.02
Random 3		90	-0.05	65	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	46	0.07	84	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).