Rubinstein 1952

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		70	0.38	9	0.01	79	0.03	79	0.03	83	0.03	87	0.03
Anderszewski 2003		22	0.56	32	0.00	21	0.09	18	0.53	15	0.56	19	0.54
Ashkenazy 1981		60	0.42	36	0.00	68	0.03	80	0.03	38	0.18	71	0.07
Bacha 2000		62	0.41	74	0.00	63	0.05	55	0.05	16	0.41	55	0.14
Badura 1965		76	0.35	67	0.00	62	0.04	60	0.04	34	0.19	67	0.09
Barbosa 1983		15	0.59	24	0.00	12	0.13	9	0.63	8	0.66	11	0.64
Biret 1990		30	0.52	64	0.00	30	0.10	28	0.37	27	0.37	32	0.37
Blet 2003		81	0.32	75	0.00	82	0.04	69	0.04	63	0.04	83	0.04
Block 1995		54	0.45	68	0.00	45	0.06	50	0.06	13	0.50	47	0.17
Blumental 1952		35	0.50	40	0.00	42	0.06	42	0.15	33	0.33	44	0.22
Boshniakovich 1969		40	0.49	57	0.00	34	0.08	34	0.26	25	0.32	40	0.29
Brailowsky 1960		32	0.51	35	0.00	35	0.07	35	0.25	24	0.47	34	0.34
Bunin 1987		64	0.40	51	0.00	65	0.03	73	0.03	33	0.17	72	0.07
Bunin 1987b		73	0.37	76	0.00	69	0.03	72	0.03	42	0.11	76	0.06
Chiu 1999		61	0.42	33	0.00	73	0.04	64	0.04	53	0.06	80	0.05
Cohen 1997		57	0.42	41	0.00	67	0.03	78	0.03	10	0.39	64	0.11
Cortot 1951		82	0.29	80	0.00	64	0.04	67	0.04	36	0.25	65	0.10
Csalog 1996		42	0.49	60	0.00	46	0.07	48	0.07	26	0.32	51	0.15
Czerny 1949		9	0.60	23	0.00	5	0.11	11	0.62	12	0.69	9	0.65
Czerny 1990		4	0.63	26	0.00	13	0.16	7	0.65	12	0.70	6	0.67
Duchoud 2007		72	0.38	71	0.00	66	0.03	75	0.03	11	0.54	61	0.13
Ezaki 2006		14	0.59	48	0.00	20	0.08	14	0.56	13	0.55	17	0.55
Falvay 1989		6	0.62	19	0.00	18	0.10	21	0.51	24	0.51	22	0.51
Farrell 1958		26	0.53	21	0.00	8	0.11	12	0.58	3	0.74	7	0.66
Ferenczy 1958		75	0.36	69	0.00	77	0.02	87	0.02	50	0.06	85	0.03
Fliere 1977		19	0.58	10	0.01	23	0.10	16	0.54	15	0.50	21	0.52
Fou 1978		16	0.58	12	0.00	17	0.11	19	0.53	3	0.62	16	0.57
Francois 1956		58	0.42	77	0.00	55	0.04	68	0.04	7	0.53	54	0.15
Friedman 1923		55	0.43	6	0.02	43	0.05	43	0.14	3	0.66	38	0.30
Friedman 1923b		63	0.41	49	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.12	3	0.62	41	0.27
Friedman 1930		78	0.35	46	0.00	70	0.04	70	0.04	38	0.20	66	0.09
Garcia 2007		74	0.36	61	0.00	57	0.04	65	0.04	19	0.47	58	0.14
Garcia 2007b		39	0.50	52	0.00	31	0.09	32	0.31	6	0.62	27	0.44
Gierzod 1998		10	0.60	28	0.00	22	0.10	22	0.48	29	0.35	29	0.41
Gornostaeva 1994		51	0.46	43	0.00	52	0.05	59	0.05	39	0.18	68	0.09
Groot 1988		53	0.45	4	0.02	36	0.08	38	0.20	19	0.35	43	0.26
Harasiewicz 1955		20	0.57	11	0.01	9	0.12	20	0.51	18	0.57	20	0.54
Hatto 1993		44	0.48	50	0.00	29	0.07	29	0.36	28	0.35	33	0.35
Hatto 1997		38	0.50	84	0.00	19	0.09	24	0.45	22	0.45	26	0.45
Horowitz 1949		84	0.28	37	0.00	84	0.03	83	0.03	52	0.06	81	0.04
Indjic 1988		43	0.49	55	0.00	28	0.11	26	0.39	25	0.38	31	0.38
Kapell 1951		5	0.63	8	0.01	10	0.13	10	0.62	8	0.67	10	0.64
Kissin 1993		17	0.58	29	0.00	24	0.13	23	0.48	7	0.69	14	0.58
Kushner 1989		3	0.65	18	0.00	3	0.28	3	0.71	6	0.65	5	0.68
Luisada 1991		56	0.43	27	0.00	72	0.03	76	0.03	42	0.14	75	0.06
Lushtak 2004		12	0.59	31	0.00	4	0.15	4	0.68	2	0.73	3	0.70
Malcuzynski 1961		27	0.53	34	0.00	16	0.14	17	0.54	14	0.55	18	0.54
Magaloff 1978		29	0.52	16	0.00	38	0.06	41	0.16	21	0.41	42	0.26
Magin 1975		18	0.58	3	0.03	6	0.11	15	0.54	6	0.64	13	0.59
Michalowski 1933		85	0.20	81	0.00	85	0.02	85	0.02	34	0.18	77	0.06
Milkina 1970		7	0.62	25	0.00	7	0.11	6	0.67	6	0.64	8	0.65
Mohovich 1999		8	0.61	20	0.00	11	0.12	5	0.67	2	0.71	4	0.69
Moravec 1969		37	0.50	14	0.00	61	0.05	56	0.05	58	0.06	78	0.05
Morozova 2008		50	0.47	39	0.00	41	0.10	39	0.20	17	0.50	36	0.32
Neighaus 1950		66	0.40	85	0.00	74	0.06	54	0.06	20	0.42	50	0.16
Niedzielski 1931		86	0.19	86	0.00	87	0.03	74	0.03	75	0.04	84	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		49	0.47	53	0.00	48	0.06	52	0.06	17	0.45	49	0.16
Osinska 1989		13	0.59	54	0.00	14	0.21	13	0.57	19	0.57	15	0.57
Pachmann 1927		80	0.32	44	0.00	76	0.04	63	0.04	22	0.41	60	0.13
Paderewski 1930		87	0.17	87	0.00	86	0.03	81	0.03	48	0.05	82	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		65	0.40	56	0.00	78	0.02	86	0.02	37	0.22	70	0.07
Pierdomenico 2008		68	0.39	70	0.00	58	0.06	53	0.06	23	0.46	46	0.17
Poblocka 1999		11	0.60	5	0.02	15	0.14	8	0.63	9	0.62	12	0.62
Rabcewiczowa 1932		47	0.48	62	0.00	25	0.08	30	0.33	10	0.45	30	0.39
Rachmaninoff 1923		69	0.39	7	0.01	51	0.07	49	0.07	32	0.26	59	0.13
Rangell 2001		45	0.48	22	0.00	54	0.05	58	0.05	20	0.46	53	0.15
Richter 1976		25	0.54	82	0.00	32	0.07	31	0.32	17	0.58	28	0.43
Rosen 1989		33	0.50	72	0.00	50	0.07	45	0.07	29	0.31	52	0.15
Rosenthal 1930		83	0.29	58	0.00	83	0.02	84	0.02	75	0.03	89	0.02
Rosenthal 1931		71	0.38	88	0.00	75	0.04	62	0.04	30	0.28	63	0.11
Rosenthal 1931b		77	0.35	83	0.00	80	0.03	82	0.03	41	0.15	73	0.07
Rosenthal 1931c		67	0.39	63	0.00	71	0.03	77	0.03	41	0.17	74	0.07
Rosenthal 1931d		79	0.34	78	0.00	81	0.03	71	0.03	37	0.20	69	0.08
Rossi 2007		59	0.42	65	0.00	53	0.04	66	0.04	8	0.51	57	0.14
Rubinstein 1939		2	0.68	2	0.21	2	0.58	2	0.74	1	0.80	2	0.77
Rubinstein 1952		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rubinstein 1966		1	0.76	1	0.57	1	0.57	1	0.86	1	0.86	1	0.86
Schilhawsky 1960		34	0.50	47	0.00	40	0.07	37	0.21	11	0.56	35	0.34
Shebanova 2002		28	0.52	30	0.00	37	0.07	36	0.22	15	0.46	37	0.32
Smith 1975		36	0.50	15	0.00	49	0.06	51	0.06	23	0.41	48	0.16
Sokolov 2002		52	0.46	66	0.00	56	0.04	61	0.04	20	0.47	56	0.14
Sztompka 1959		24	0.55	17	0.00	33	0.09	33	0.31	9	0.64	25	0.45
Tomsic 1995		41	0.49	42	0.00	60	0.07	46	0.07	35	0.21	62	0.12
Uninsky 1932		48	0.47	73	0.00	47	0.07	47	0.07	12	0.63	45	0.21
Uninsky 1971		31	0.52	59	0.00	39	0.07	40	0.19	24	0.43	39	0.29
Wasowski 1980		46	0.48	38	0.00	59	0.05	57	0.05	53	0.06	79	0.05
Zak 1937		23	0.56	13	0.00	27	0.09	27	0.39	14	0.56	24	0.47
Zak 1951		21	0.57	45	0.00	26	0.08	25	0.44	12	0.59	23	0.51
Random 1		89	-0.06	89	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	43	0.11	88	0.03
Random 2		88	0.02	90	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	49	0.04	86	0.03
Random 3		90	-0.06	79	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	67	0.03	90	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).