Rubinstein 1939

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		67	0.36	16	0.01	77	0.04	62	0.04	63	0.04	74	0.04
Anderszewski 2003		19	0.49	33	0.00	19	0.11	19	0.46	35	0.31	20	0.38
Ashkenazy 1981		55	0.39	22	0.00	75	0.04	70	0.04	65	0.03	85	0.03
Bacha 2000		39	0.44	37	0.00	39	0.08	39	0.18	6	0.54	28	0.31
Badura 1965		69	0.35	51	0.00	54	0.04	59	0.04	36	0.19	52	0.09
Barbosa 1983		10	0.52	42	0.00	15	0.11	16	0.49	42	0.16	30	0.28
Biret 1990		21	0.49	55	0.00	23	0.09	23	0.42	41	0.12	31	0.22
Blet 2003		82	0.26	49	0.00	83	0.02	88	0.02	84	0.03	87	0.02
Block 1995		68	0.35	72	0.00	56	0.04	66	0.04	44	0.13	57	0.07
Blumental 1952		46	0.42	73	0.00	48	0.05	48	0.05	47	0.07	60	0.06
Boshniakovich 1969		15	0.50	25	0.00	16	0.09	17	0.49	32	0.26	23	0.36
Brailowsky 1960		57	0.38	34	0.00	42	0.05	43	0.09	53	0.06	55	0.07
Bunin 1987		48	0.42	32	0.00	63	0.04	65	0.04	44	0.10	61	0.06
Bunin 1987b		52	0.39	82	0.00	69	0.05	52	0.05	61	0.05	64	0.05
Chiu 1999		73	0.33	71	0.00	73	0.03	77	0.03	67	0.04	78	0.03
Cohen 1997		75	0.32	87	0.00	72	0.03	79	0.03	51	0.05	75	0.04
Cortot 1951		54	0.39	61	0.00	28	0.08	38	0.18	7	0.63	26	0.34
Csalog 1996		58	0.38	74	0.00	58	0.03	74	0.03	71	0.04	81	0.03
Czerny 1949		3	0.62	7	0.02	3	0.46	2	0.70	13	0.68	3	0.69
Czerny 1990		12	0.51	59	0.00	9	0.17	14	0.52	35	0.43	14	0.47
Duchoud 2007		71	0.34	30	0.00	68	0.04	69	0.04	22	0.45	42	0.13
Ezaki 2006		26	0.48	52	0.00	27	0.10	25	0.39	44	0.11	32	0.21
Falvay 1989		41	0.44	40	0.00	59	0.04	56	0.04	76	0.04	70	0.04
Farrell 1958		22	0.49	57	0.00	7	0.18	7	0.59	9	0.65	4	0.62
Ferenczy 1958		80	0.29	75	0.00	82	0.02	87	0.02	84	0.03	88	0.02
Fliere 1977		20	0.49	81	0.00	26	0.10	26	0.38	64	0.05	38	0.14
Fou 1978		23	0.49	24	0.00	17	0.11	15	0.49	18	0.42	15	0.45
Francois 1956		77	0.31	83	0.00	70	0.04	57	0.04	52	0.05	77	0.04
Friedman 1923		62	0.38	43	0.00	53	0.05	53	0.05	20	0.46	37	0.15
Friedman 1923b		64	0.38	63	0.00	52	0.05	50	0.05	20	0.44	36	0.15
Friedman 1930		84	0.25	36	0.00	79	0.04	58	0.04	76	0.03	82	0.03
Garcia 2007		72	0.34	20	0.00	51	0.04	61	0.04	25	0.41	43	0.13
Garcia 2007b		44	0.43	53	0.00	25	0.08	27	0.35	19	0.47	18	0.41
Gierzod 1998		17	0.49	84	0.00	33	0.06	33	0.30	62	0.04	47	0.11
Gornostaeva 1994		40	0.44	65	0.00	45	0.06	45	0.06	61	0.04	67	0.05
Groot 1988		61	0.38	21	0.00	32	0.07	37	0.20	54	0.05	48	0.10
Harasiewicz 1955		8	0.53	10	0.01	13	0.15	9	0.55	29	0.45	12	0.50
Hatto 1993		27	0.48	28	0.00	21	0.12	21	0.43	33	0.27	25	0.34
Hatto 1997		11	0.52	3	0.02	11	0.19	10	0.54	23	0.43	13	0.48
Horowitz 1949		83	0.26	6	0.02	81	0.02	85	0.02	61	0.05	80	0.03
Indjic 1988		18	0.49	31	0.00	20	0.14	20	0.45	30	0.30	22	0.37
Kapell 1951		7	0.53	5	0.02	12	0.14	11	0.54	24	0.50	10	0.52
Kissin 1993		24	0.48	46	0.00	24	0.09	24	0.42	33	0.40	17	0.41
Kushner 1989		5	0.57	47	0.00	5	0.20	6	0.62	20	0.46	9	0.53
Luisada 1991		65	0.37	38	0.00	74	0.04	68	0.04	69	0.04	68	0.04
Lushtak 2004		37	0.45	39	0.00	22	0.10	22	0.42	36	0.28	24	0.34
Malcuzynski 1961		4	0.58	2	0.11	4	0.34	4	0.67	11	0.58	5	0.62
Magaloff 1978		25	0.48	12	0.01	30	0.08	30	0.33	36	0.25	29	0.29
Magin 1975		31	0.47	85	0.00	37	0.09	34	0.27	49	0.06	41	0.13
Michalowski 1933		86	0.17	62	0.00	84	0.03	84	0.03	35	0.15	56	0.07
Milkina 1970		6	0.57	14	0.01	6	0.18	5	0.64	24	0.43	11	0.52
Mohovich 1999		16	0.49	50	0.00	18	0.09	18	0.47	31	0.31	21	0.38
Moravec 1969		42	0.43	23	0.00	49	0.05	51	0.05	49	0.08	58	0.06
Morozova 2008		13	0.51	35	0.00	14	0.15	13	0.52	11	0.56	8	0.54
Neighaus 1950		63	0.38	13	0.01	65	0.04	71	0.04	22	0.37	46	0.12
Niedzielski 1931		87	0.16	67	0.00	87	0.03	83	0.03	80	0.03	79	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		49	0.41	29	0.00	60	0.05	55	0.05	63	0.04	71	0.04
Osinska 1989		33	0.46	77	0.00	35	0.09	32	0.32	58	0.06	39	0.14
Pachmann 1927		53	0.39	60	0.00	57	0.04	64	0.04	7	0.58	35	0.15
Paderewski 1930		76	0.31	64	0.00	64	0.03	80	0.03	9	0.51	45	0.12
Perlemuter 1992		79	0.30	78	0.00	85	0.03	76	0.03	53	0.05	69	0.04
Pierdomenico 2008		66	0.37	41	0.00	71	0.05	49	0.05	33	0.32	40	0.13
Poblocka 1999		28	0.47	86	0.00	34	0.09	29	0.33	46	0.11	34	0.19
Rabcewiczowa 1932		14	0.51	11	0.01	8	0.15	8	0.58	4	0.56	7	0.57
Rachmaninoff 1923		59	0.38	17	0.00	41	0.06	40	0.15	53	0.05	50	0.09
Rangell 2001		9	0.52	54	0.00	10	0.20	12	0.53	3	0.67	6	0.60
Richter 1976		34	0.45	79	0.00	44	0.04	44	0.09	41	0.17	44	0.12
Rosen 1989		50	0.41	44	0.00	62	0.04	73	0.04	77	0.03	84	0.03
Rosenthal 1930		85	0.24	88	0.00	86	0.03	81	0.03	78	0.03	83	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		78	0.31	89	0.00	78	0.03	78	0.03	48	0.05	72	0.04
Rosenthal 1931b		81	0.28	68	0.00	80	0.03	82	0.03	64	0.04	86	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		60	0.38	19	0.00	67	0.04	60	0.04	45	0.10	62	0.06
Rosenthal 1931d		74	0.33	26	0.00	76	0.03	75	0.03	48	0.06	76	0.04
Rossi 2007		70	0.34	76	0.00	55	0.04	72	0.04	34	0.21	49	0.09
Rubinstein 1939		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rubinstein 1952		1	0.68	1	0.66	1	0.65	1	0.80	2	0.74	1	0.77
Rubinstein 1966		2	0.63	4	0.02	2	0.32	3	0.70	8	0.68	2	0.69
Schilhawsky 1960		35	0.45	80	0.00	36	0.08	35	0.26	28	0.39	27	0.32
Shebanova 2002		51	0.40	27	0.00	66	0.04	67	0.04	74	0.04	73	0.04
Smith 1975		47	0.42	48	0.00	50	0.06	46	0.06	51	0.07	59	0.06
Sokolov 2002		43	0.43	66	0.00	43	0.04	42	0.10	26	0.40	33	0.20
Sztompka 1959		29	0.47	9	0.01	31	0.08	31	0.32	22	0.48	19	0.39
Tomsic 1995		56	0.39	45	0.00	61	0.05	54	0.05	62	0.05	65	0.05
Uninsky 1932		36	0.45	18	0.00	29	0.07	28	0.35	17	0.57	16	0.45
Uninsky 1971		38	0.45	56	0.00	46	0.06	47	0.06	57	0.05	66	0.05
Wasowski 1980		45	0.43	58	0.00	47	0.04	63	0.04	50	0.06	63	0.05
Zak 1937		32	0.46	15	0.01	40	0.06	41	0.12	47	0.06	54	0.08
Zak 1951		30	0.47	8	0.01	38	0.08	36	0.22	73	0.04	51	0.09
Random 1		88	0.03	69	0.00	88	0.02	86	0.02	15	0.37	53	0.09
Random 2		89	-0.04	70	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	71	0.03	89	0.02
Random 3		90	-0.08	90	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	62	0.03	90	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).