Rossi 2007

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		32	0.37	28	0.00	46	0.05	53	0.05	49	0.05	51	0.05
Anderszewski 2003		59	0.28	56	0.00	53	0.05	51	0.05	77	0.03	59	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981		46	0.33	35	0.00	66	0.06	45	0.06	51	0.04	52	0.05
Bacha 2000		51	0.32	83	0.00	55	0.04	66	0.04	79	0.03	69	0.03
Badura 1965		66	0.25	43	0.00	60	0.04	62	0.04	69	0.03	78	0.03
Barbosa 1983		65	0.26	61	0.00	54	0.05	60	0.05	79	0.03	58	0.04
Biret 1990		52	0.31	48	0.00	41	0.05	37	0.15	68	0.04	40	0.08
Blet 2003		53	0.31	49	0.00	63	0.05	57	0.05	79	0.03	60	0.04
Block 1995		79	0.19	24	0.00	37	0.05	43	0.10	77	0.04	49	0.06
Blumental 1952		68	0.25	84	0.00	75	0.04	65	0.04	71	0.05	66	0.04
Boshniakovich 1969		21	0.39	55	0.00	23	0.08	21	0.40	64	0.04	28	0.13
Brailowsky 1960		87	0.07	85	0.00	88	0.02	89	0.02	87	0.01	88	0.01
Bunin 1987		48	0.33	68	0.00	51	0.06	47	0.06	56	0.05	53	0.05
Bunin 1987b		45	0.34	40	0.00	50	0.05	52	0.05	64	0.04	55	0.04
Chiu 1999		26	0.38	51	0.00	34	0.09	30	0.26	64	0.05	31	0.11
Cohen 1997		31	0.37	31	0.00	25	0.06	32	0.23	21	0.27	10	0.25
Cortot 1951		81	0.18	63	0.00	78	0.02	84	0.02	62	0.04	83	0.03
Csalog 1996		25	0.38	12	0.01	9	0.14	10	0.48	44	0.11	12	0.23
Czerny 1949		10	0.42	30	0.00	21	0.10	11	0.47	46	0.08	15	0.19
Czerny 1990		44	0.34	23	0.00	52	0.05	59	0.05	66	0.04	67	0.04
Duchoud 2007		40	0.34	25	0.00	36	0.06	35	0.19	26	0.44	9	0.29
Ezaki 2006		29	0.37	21	0.01	30	0.08	27	0.29	67	0.05	29	0.12
Falvay 1989		23	0.39	8	0.02	12	0.10	19	0.41	77	0.04	25	0.13
Farrell 1958		36	0.36	11	0.01	7	0.10	7	0.53	38	0.24	7	0.36
Ferenczy 1958		60	0.27	69	0.00	72	0.03	76	0.03	69	0.04	77	0.03
Fliere 1977		14	0.42	78	0.00	17	0.09	20	0.40	70	0.05	23	0.14
Fou 1978		15	0.41	15	0.01	13	0.09	23	0.35	57	0.05	26	0.13
Francois 1956		49	0.33	16	0.01	39	0.04	40	0.12	53	0.05	41	0.08
Friedman 1923		83	0.17	81	0.00	80	0.03	83	0.03	82	0.03	85	0.03
Friedman 1923b		82	0.18	74	0.00	81	0.03	73	0.03	83	0.03	79	0.03
Friedman 1930		75	0.22	62	0.00	76	0.05	55	0.05	68	0.04	61	0.04
Garcia 2007		1	0.50	1	0.33	1	0.33	1	0.71	2	0.74	1	0.72
Garcia 2007b		2	0.50	2	0.27	2	0.41	2	0.70	11	0.58	2	0.64
Gierzod 1998		4	0.48	38	0.00	4	0.09	5	0.54	64	0.04	22	0.15
Gornostaeva 1994		16	0.41	46	0.00	29	0.07	26	0.30	60	0.04	34	0.11
Groot 1988		74	0.22	86	0.00	70	0.03	74	0.03	84	0.03	81	0.03
Harasiewicz 1955		34	0.37	54	0.00	31	0.06	33	0.23	60	0.05	35	0.11
Hatto 1993		71	0.24	65	0.00	64	0.05	58	0.05	63	0.04	68	0.04
Hatto 1997		63	0.27	75	0.00	56	0.04	67	0.04	61	0.04	62	0.04
Horowitz 1949		86	0.10	70	0.00	87	0.02	88	0.02	87	0.02	86	0.02
Indjic 1988		64	0.26	52	0.00	59	0.04	68	0.04	62	0.04	57	0.04
Kapell 1951		7	0.43	34	0.00	6	0.10	6	0.54	44	0.11	11	0.24
Kissin 1993		24	0.38	57	0.00	33	0.08	25	0.32	51	0.08	19	0.16
Kushner 1989		22	0.39	20	0.01	27	0.07	22	0.39	74	0.04	30	0.12
Luisada 1991		61	0.27	87	0.00	74	0.04	72	0.04	67	0.04	54	0.04
Lushtak 2004		62	0.27	53	0.00	57	0.04	70	0.04	71	0.04	64	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961		11	0.42	9	0.02	8	0.13	9	0.50	56	0.06	17	0.17
Magaloff 1978		56	0.30	33	0.00	68	0.04	63	0.04	85	0.02	73	0.03
Magin 1975		27	0.38	64	0.00	38	0.05	36	0.15	86	0.03	42	0.07
Michalowski 1933		67	0.25	19	0.01	61	0.04	64	0.04	27	0.26	37	0.10
Milkina 1970		17	0.41	27	0.00	26	0.07	13	0.45	70	0.05	20	0.15
Mohovich 1999		55	0.30	47	0.00	42	0.04	44	0.10	52	0.05	45	0.07
Moravec 1969		54	0.30	79	0.00	71	0.03	81	0.03	79	0.03	70	0.03
Morozova 2008		38	0.35	71	0.00	40	0.05	39	0.12	67	0.05	39	0.08
Neighaus 1950		69	0.24	60	0.00	73	0.03	77	0.03	76	0.03	82	0.03
Niedzielski 1931		58	0.28	10	0.01	24	0.07	38	0.14	43	0.09	32	0.11
Ohlsson 1999		47	0.33	14	0.01	20	0.08	28	0.29	70	0.04	33	0.11
Osinska 1989		8	0.43	17	0.01	14	0.09	12	0.47	59	0.06	16	0.17
Pachmann 1927		42	0.34	22	0.00	48	0.06	48	0.06	33	0.30	27	0.13
Paderewski 1930		28	0.38	7	0.03	15	0.08	24	0.33	5	0.59	5	0.44
Perlemuter 1992		12	0.42	6	0.03	16	0.07	16	0.44	21	0.40	6	0.42
Pierdomenico 2008		3	0.49	5	0.03	3	0.13	3	0.55	3	0.65	3	0.60
Poblocka 1999		80	0.18	29	0.00	82	0.03	82	0.03	82	0.03	71	0.03
Rabcewiczowa 1932		33	0.37	72	0.00	32	0.07	29	0.27	67	0.04	36	0.10
Rachmaninoff 1923		84	0.16	32	0.00	67	0.04	69	0.04	79	0.03	74	0.03
Rangell 2001		5	0.44	26	0.00	5	0.11	4	0.54	22	0.44	4	0.49
Richter 1976		39	0.35	80	0.00	49	0.06	46	0.06	78	0.03	56	0.04
Rosen 1989		19	0.40	39	0.00	45	0.05	56	0.05	72	0.04	65	0.04
Rosenthal 1930		85	0.16	76	0.00	85	0.02	85	0.02	88	0.01	89	0.01
Rosenthal 1931		77	0.21	88	0.00	84	0.04	71	0.04	77	0.03	76	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		73	0.22	73	0.00	83	0.03	78	0.03	79	0.03	84	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		70	0.24	89	0.00	77	0.03	80	0.03	84	0.02	87	0.02
Rosenthal 1931d		76	0.21	90	0.00	69	0.03	75	0.03	78	0.03	80	0.03
Rossi 2007		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rubinstein 1939		43	0.34	37	0.00	28	0.07	34	0.21	72	0.04	38	0.09
Rubinstein 1952		13	0.42	3	0.05	11	0.14	8	0.51	66	0.04	24	0.14
Rubinstein 1966		9	0.42	41	0.00	22	0.10	14	0.45	60	0.05	21	0.15
Schilhawsky 1960		35	0.36	66	0.00	47	0.06	49	0.06	56	0.04	50	0.05
Shebanova 2002		50	0.32	58	0.00	65	0.05	61	0.05	81	0.04	63	0.04
Smith 1975		78	0.20	44	0.00	79	0.03	79	0.03	78	0.03	75	0.03
Sokolov 2002		72	0.23	45	0.00	58	0.05	54	0.05	85	0.02	72	0.03
Sztompka 1959		37	0.35	50	0.00	43	0.04	41	0.11	71	0.04	43	0.07
Tomsic 1995		6	0.44	4	0.04	10	0.13	18	0.42	32	0.25	8	0.32
Uninsky 1932		41	0.34	36	0.00	35	0.08	31	0.24	36	0.23	13	0.23
Uninsky 1971		30	0.37	59	0.00	44	0.06	42	0.11	69	0.04	44	0.07
Wasowski 1980		57	0.29	82	0.00	62	0.06	50	0.06	59	0.06	47	0.06
Zak 1937		18	0.41	42	0.00	19	0.09	17	0.44	46	0.06	18	0.16
Zak 1951		20	0.40	18	0.01	18	0.07	15	0.44	42	0.09	14	0.20
Random 1		90	-0.17	77	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	90	0.01	90	0.01
Random 2		89	-0.04	67	0.00	89	0.02	86	0.02	34	0.16	48	0.06
Random 3		88	-0.02	13	0.01	86	0.02	87	0.02	23	0.27	46	0.07

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).