Rosenthal 1931d

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		22	0.39	29	0.00	32	0.07	32	0.29	33	0.22	13	0.25
Anderszewski 2003		43	0.32	56	0.00	47	0.06	51	0.06	86	0.02	70	0.03
Ashkenazy 1981		53	0.28	57	0.00	46	0.05	58	0.05	74	0.03	61	0.04
Bacha 2000		52	0.29	43	0.00	42	0.06	42	0.13	52	0.04	42	0.07
Badura 1965		56	0.28	13	0.00	62	0.04	66	0.04	76	0.03	76	0.03
Barbosa 1983		57	0.28	22	0.00	48	0.05	56	0.05	74	0.03	56	0.04
Biret 1990		17	0.41	47	0.00	22	0.12	17	0.47	69	0.04	25	0.14
Blet 2003		20	0.39	7	0.00	13	0.08	13	0.50	25	0.24	8	0.35
Block 1995		45	0.31	58	0.00	31	0.08	26	0.35	63	0.04	31	0.12
Blumental 1952		7	0.44	34	0.00	7	0.22	9	0.59	37	0.19	9	0.33
Boshniakovich 1969		60	0.27	48	0.00	64	0.04	69	0.04	80	0.03	77	0.03
Brailowsky 1960		5	0.50	5	0.00	5	0.32	5	0.74	20	0.52	5	0.62
Bunin 1987		34	0.34	73	0.00	39	0.06	40	0.14	64	0.04	45	0.07
Bunin 1987b		39	0.33	35	0.00	36	0.08	36	0.21	73	0.04	36	0.09
Chiu 1999		51	0.29	31	0.00	49	0.06	49	0.06	66	0.04	49	0.05
Cohen 1997		68	0.24	32	0.00	54	0.06	52	0.06	86	0.02	78	0.03
Cortot 1951		72	0.23	59	0.00	70	0.03	75	0.03	61	0.04	79	0.03
Csalog 1996		10	0.44	74	0.00	8	0.16	10	0.57	41	0.14	11	0.28
Czerny 1949		66	0.24	75	0.00	74	0.04	68	0.04	70	0.04	58	0.04
Czerny 1990		44	0.32	76	0.00	34	0.09	30	0.31	85	0.03	35	0.10
Duchoud 2007		82	0.17	77	0.00	79	0.03	83	0.03	70	0.04	75	0.03
Ezaki 2006		29	0.36	60	0.00	33	0.09	34	0.27	57	0.06	26	0.13
Falvay 1989		12	0.43	16	0.00	15	0.10	15	0.49	75	0.04	20	0.14
Farrell 1958		64	0.25	36	0.00	63	0.04	62	0.04	82	0.03	64	0.03
Ferenczy 1958		11	0.43	17	0.00	16	0.12	11	0.56	25	0.43	7	0.49
Fliere 1977		13	0.43	37	0.00	11	0.13	19	0.46	61	0.05	18	0.15
Fou 1978		14	0.41	33	0.00	19	0.13	14	0.50	69	0.04	21	0.14
Francois 1956		76	0.22	61	0.00	69	0.03	76	0.03	81	0.03	80	0.03
Friedman 1923		59	0.27	25	0.00	45	0.08	45	0.08	57	0.05	48	0.06
Friedman 1923b		58	0.27	62	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.10	58	0.05	46	0.07
Friedman 1930		63	0.26	30	0.00	60	0.04	65	0.04	83	0.03	73	0.03
Garcia 2007		73	0.23	78	0.00	76	0.05	53	0.05	76	0.04	59	0.04
Garcia 2007b		69	0.24	63	0.00	67	0.03	77	0.03	83	0.02	90	0.02
Gierzod 1998		28	0.37	64	0.00	21	0.11	27	0.34	73	0.04	30	0.12
Gornostaeva 1994		54	0.28	8	0.00	57	0.05	57	0.05	82	0.03	62	0.04
Groot 1988		8	0.44	9	0.00	10	0.16	8	0.59	42	0.10	14	0.24
Harasiewicz 1955		40	0.32	65	0.00	35	0.08	35	0.22	73	0.04	38	0.09
Hatto 1993		19	0.40	14	0.00	18	0.11	16	0.47	81	0.03	32	0.12
Hatto 1997		23	0.39	79	0.00	27	0.07	23	0.37	75	0.04	29	0.12
Horowitz 1949		41	0.32	20	0.00	43	0.06	43	0.12	37	0.17	22	0.14
Indjic 1988		21	0.39	49	0.00	24	0.15	22	0.39	81	0.03	33	0.11
Kapell 1951		31	0.35	66	0.00	37	0.06	39	0.17	77	0.03	44	0.07
Kissin 1993		83	0.17	80	0.00	84	0.02	84	0.02	87	0.02	86	0.02
Kushner 1989		38	0.33	50	0.00	55	0.05	55	0.05	84	0.03	55	0.04
Luisada 1991		24	0.39	81	0.00	30	0.08	29	0.31	47	0.06	19	0.14
Lushtak 2004		61	0.27	67	0.00	56	0.04	59	0.04	74	0.04	60	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961		32	0.34	11	0.00	26	0.08	33	0.28	73	0.03	37	0.09
Magaloff 1978		16	0.41	18	0.00	23	0.10	21	0.44	46	0.08	16	0.19
Magin 1975		18	0.40	51	0.00	28	0.10	24	0.36	83	0.03	34	0.10
Michalowski 1933		77	0.21	19	0.00	65	0.04	63	0.04	61	0.03	68	0.03
Milkina 1970		46	0.30	52	0.00	61	0.04	61	0.04	87	0.02	65	0.03
Mohovich 1999		15	0.41	23	0.00	12	0.10	12	0.51	68	0.04	24	0.14
Moravec 1969		26	0.38	82	0.00	20	0.11	18	0.46	46	0.09	15	0.20
Morozova 2008		55	0.28	83	0.00	59	0.04	67	0.04	82	0.03	72	0.03
Neighaus 1950		86	0.15	44	0.00	85	0.02	85	0.02	74	0.03	89	0.02
Niedzielski 1931		48	0.29	84	0.00	25	0.09	31	0.29	28	0.26	12	0.27
Ohlsson 1999		62	0.26	68	0.00	68	0.03	74	0.03	86	0.02	85	0.02
Osinska 1989		37	0.33	24	0.00	40	0.06	41	0.13	71	0.04	43	0.07
Pachmann 1927		84	0.15	38	0.00	87	0.02	86	0.02	83	0.02	84	0.02
Paderewski 1930		85	0.15	69	0.00	86	0.02	87	0.02	74	0.03	83	0.02
Perlemuter 1992		67	0.24	21	0.00	72	0.05	54	0.05	79	0.03	51	0.04
Pierdomenico 2008		65	0.25	15	0.00	75	0.04	70	0.04	66	0.04	53	0.04
Poblocka 1999		27	0.37	85	0.00	14	0.09	20	0.45	64	0.06	17	0.16
Rabcewiczowa 1932		9	0.44	26	0.00	9	0.17	7	0.60	40	0.13	10	0.28
Rachmaninoff 1923		6	0.45	6	0.00	6	0.27	6	0.66	14	0.50	6	0.57
Rangell 2001		87	0.13	86	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	88	0.02	88	0.02
Richter 1976		75	0.22	42	0.00	78	0.03	79	0.03	85	0.02	82	0.02
Rosen 1989		47	0.30	45	0.00	50	0.07	47	0.07	57	0.04	50	0.05
Rosenthal 1930		4	0.69	4	0.03	4	0.81	4	0.90	2	0.87	4	0.88
Rosenthal 1931		3	0.75	3	0.07	3	0.84	2	0.95	2	0.93	2	0.94
Rosenthal 1931b		1	0.79	1	0.67	1	0.66	1	0.95	1	0.95	1	0.95
Rosenthal 1931c		2	0.75	2	0.21	2	0.57	3	0.94	2	0.94	3	0.94
Rosenthal 1931d		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rossi 2007		80	0.21	27	0.00	80	0.03	78	0.03	75	0.03	63	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		36	0.33	10	0.00	51	0.06	48	0.06	75	0.03	54	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		33	0.34	70	0.00	38	0.06	37	0.20	71	0.03	41	0.08
Rubinstein 1966		49	0.29	71	0.00	66	0.03	82	0.03	84	0.03	71	0.03
Schilhawsky 1960		25	0.38	39	0.00	29	0.07	28	0.34	46	0.06	23	0.14
Shebanova 2002		74	0.23	87	0.00	73	0.03	80	0.03	86	0.03	74	0.03
Smith 1975		30	0.35	53	0.00	17	0.12	25	0.35	66	0.04	28	0.12
Sokolov 2002		50	0.29	12	0.00	53	0.06	50	0.06	68	0.03	52	0.04
Sztompka 1959		81	0.18	40	0.00	82	0.04	72	0.04	83	0.03	67	0.03
Tomsic 1995		78	0.21	46	0.00	81	0.03	73	0.03	81	0.03	66	0.03
Uninsky 1932		70	0.23	54	0.00	58	0.04	60	0.04	56	0.04	57	0.04
Uninsky 1971		71	0.23	88	0.00	77	0.04	64	0.04	87	0.02	69	0.03
Wasowski 1980		79	0.21	41	0.00	83	0.03	81	0.03	88	0.02	81	0.02
Zak 1937		42	0.32	28	0.00	52	0.08	46	0.08	76	0.04	47	0.06
Zak 1951		35	0.33	89	0.00	41	0.07	38	0.17	69	0.04	39	0.08
Random 1		89	-0.01	72	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	25	0.30	40	0.08
Random 2		88	0.07	55	0.00	71	0.04	71	0.04	11	0.43	27	0.13
Random 3		90	-0.05	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	66	0.03	87	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).