Rosen 1989

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		18	0.51	31	0.00	39	0.07	35	0.26	7	0.54	21	0.37
Anderszewski 2003		49	0.42	61	0.00	41	0.07	39	0.23	62	0.05	47	0.11
Ashkenazy 1981		56	0.40	87	0.00	76	0.03	79	0.03	49	0.05	78	0.04
Bacha 2000		73	0.35	76	0.00	74	0.03	82	0.03	54	0.04	81	0.03
Badura 1965		60	0.39	21	0.00	27	0.06	41	0.20	22	0.36	30	0.27
Barbosa 1983		36	0.45	68	0.00	33	0.05	34	0.27	55	0.07	41	0.14
Biret 1990		44	0.43	43	0.00	32	0.05	30	0.31	61	0.05	45	0.12
Blet 2003		74	0.35	82	0.00	77	0.03	83	0.03	74	0.03	85	0.03
Block 1995		69	0.36	65	0.00	30	0.05	37	0.25	34	0.26	31	0.25
Blumental 1952		31	0.46	13	0.01	18	0.09	17	0.47	32	0.35	18	0.41
Boshniakovich 1969		9	0.53	25	0.00	19	0.08	18	0.45	26	0.29	23	0.36
Brailowsky 1960		55	0.40	77	0.00	54	0.04	66	0.04	60	0.06	66	0.05
Bunin 1987		71	0.35	83	0.00	52	0.06	47	0.06	48	0.06	64	0.06
Bunin 1987b		67	0.36	69	0.00	51	0.05	54	0.05	39	0.13	56	0.08
Chiu 1999		30	0.47	37	0.00	37	0.08	28	0.32	6	0.49	20	0.40
Cohen 1997		75	0.34	40	0.00	72	0.04	61	0.04	38	0.11	60	0.07
Cortot 1951		87	0.18	78	0.00	87	0.02	87	0.02	81	0.02	90	0.02
Csalog 1996		34	0.46	33	0.00	28	0.07	32	0.29	35	0.19	34	0.23
Czerny 1949		58	0.40	56	0.00	71	0.04	64	0.04	62	0.05	76	0.04
Czerny 1990		38	0.45	20	0.01	58	0.03	75	0.03	77	0.03	87	0.03
Duchoud 2007		25	0.48	27	0.00	25	0.06	21	0.40	1	0.78	5	0.56
Ezaki 2006		14	0.52	24	0.00	23	0.06	24	0.35	49	0.06	39	0.14
Falvay 1989		5	0.56	6	0.07	8	0.21	5	0.64	27	0.47	7	0.55
Farrell 1958		66	0.36	54	0.00	61	0.03	74	0.03	63	0.04	83	0.03
Ferenczy 1958		45	0.43	32	0.00	43	0.08	44	0.19	19	0.51	28	0.31
Fliere 1977		2	0.60	1	0.15	1	0.15	3	0.68	10	0.53	2	0.60
Fou 1978		12	0.52	34	0.00	24	0.07	31	0.31	42	0.12	35	0.19
Francois 1956		65	0.37	57	0.00	57	0.04	73	0.04	38	0.19	54	0.09
Friedman 1923		70	0.35	74	0.00	69	0.07	45	0.07	32	0.28	42	0.14
Friedman 1923b		72	0.35	63	0.00	68	0.04	65	0.04	32	0.27	51	0.10
Friedman 1930		53	0.42	44	0.00	29	0.05	42	0.20	15	0.47	27	0.31
Garcia 2007		61	0.38	70	0.00	50	0.04	59	0.04	29	0.35	44	0.12
Garcia 2007b		52	0.42	79	0.00	48	0.06	48	0.06	44	0.11	58	0.08
Gierzod 1998		1	0.62	4	0.10	4	0.17	2	0.68	28	0.35	13	0.49
Gornostaeva 1994		13	0.52	41	0.00	17	0.09	14	0.49	21	0.41	16	0.45
Groot 1988		48	0.43	12	0.01	11	0.12	16	0.47	18	0.35	19	0.41
Harasiewicz 1955		27	0.47	48	0.00	44	0.10	43	0.19	55	0.05	52	0.10
Hatto 1993		17	0.52	16	0.01	14	0.19	11	0.58	24	0.41	14	0.49
Hatto 1997		11	0.53	19	0.01	13	0.14	9	0.58	24	0.42	12	0.49
Horowitz 1949		83	0.29	66	0.00	67	0.05	51	0.05	18	0.39	40	0.14
Indjic 1988		10	0.53	11	0.02	12	0.13	8	0.58	24	0.42	11	0.49
Kapell 1951		37	0.45	62	0.00	47	0.06	46	0.06	61	0.06	62	0.06
Kissin 1993		29	0.47	8	0.04	16	0.11	38	0.24	43	0.23	33	0.23
Kushner 1989		4	0.57	3	0.13	3	0.19	6	0.64	24	0.42	8	0.52
Luisada 1991		26	0.47	30	0.00	26	0.05	20	0.43	14	0.50	15	0.46
Lushtak 2004		43	0.44	52	0.00	38	0.06	36	0.26	55	0.05	48	0.11
Malcuzynski 1961		33	0.46	39	0.00	40	0.08	33	0.28	65	0.04	46	0.11
Magaloff 1978		46	0.43	49	0.00	65	0.04	56	0.04	63	0.04	71	0.04
Magin 1975		6	0.55	9	0.03	6	0.17	12	0.55	20	0.47	9	0.51
Michalowski 1933		84	0.28	38	0.00	85	0.03	84	0.03	32	0.20	57	0.08
Milkina 1970		8	0.54	22	0.00	10	0.17	13	0.54	41	0.16	29	0.29
Mohovich 1999		22	0.50	2	0.14	2	0.18	4	0.65	15	0.53	3	0.59
Moravec 1969		28	0.47	58	0.00	34	0.06	27	0.33	38	0.17	32	0.24
Morozova 2008		62	0.38	75	0.00	64	0.04	62	0.04	47	0.08	63	0.06
Neighaus 1950		82	0.30	88	0.00	84	0.04	63	0.04	81	0.02	88	0.03
Niedzielski 1931		63	0.38	15	0.01	42	0.06	40	0.21	1	0.52	25	0.33
Ohlsson 1999		20	0.51	10	0.03	15	0.10	15	0.48	12	0.52	10	0.50
Osinska 1989		3	0.59	14	0.01	7	0.16	1	0.68	31	0.45	6	0.55
Pachmann 1927		64	0.38	28	0.00	75	0.03	80	0.03	31	0.31	49	0.10
Paderewski 1930		86	0.24	84	0.00	86	0.03	86	0.03	68	0.04	84	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		47	0.43	17	0.01	45	0.05	49	0.05	9	0.47	37	0.15
Pierdomenico 2008		39	0.44	67	0.00	70	0.04	67	0.04	30	0.34	43	0.12
Poblocka 1999		42	0.44	80	0.00	49	0.05	50	0.05	52	0.08	61	0.06
Rabcewiczowa 1932		51	0.42	73	0.00	31	0.05	26	0.34	44	0.10	36	0.18
Rachmaninoff 1923		79	0.32	51	0.00	55	0.05	53	0.05	68	0.04	72	0.04
Rangell 2001		76	0.33	26	0.00	78	0.04	69	0.04	70	0.05	79	0.04
Richter 1976		40	0.44	36	0.00	60	0.03	76	0.03	50	0.05	73	0.04
Rosen 1989		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rosenthal 1930		78	0.32	50	0.00	80	0.03	81	0.03	46	0.06	77	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		80	0.32	71	0.00	83	0.04	55	0.04	51	0.05	75	0.04
Rosenthal 1931b		77	0.32	89	0.00	79	0.03	85	0.03	48	0.05	80	0.04
Rosenthal 1931c		68	0.36	53	0.00	66	0.05	52	0.05	52	0.07	65	0.06
Rosenthal 1931d		81	0.30	59	0.00	81	0.04	57	0.04	47	0.07	69	0.05
Rossi 2007		57	0.40	29	0.00	73	0.04	72	0.04	56	0.05	70	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		54	0.41	47	0.00	59	0.03	77	0.03	73	0.04	82	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		21	0.50	42	0.00	22	0.06	29	0.31	45	0.07	38	0.15
Rubinstein 1966		24	0.48	81	0.00	46	0.04	58	0.04	50	0.07	68	0.05
Schilhawsky 1960		32	0.46	72	0.00	53	0.04	70	0.04	38	0.23	50	0.10
Shebanova 2002		15	0.52	5	0.08	9	0.22	10	0.58	9	0.57	4	0.57
Smith 1975		35	0.45	35	0.00	62	0.04	68	0.04	50	0.07	67	0.05
Sokolov 2002		59	0.39	55	0.00	56	0.04	71	0.04	41	0.16	55	0.08
Sztompka 1959		50	0.42	60	0.00	63	0.04	60	0.04	60	0.05	74	0.04
Tomsic 1995		7	0.55	7	0.06	5	0.17	7	0.62	2	0.64	1	0.63
Uninsky 1932		85	0.24	85	0.00	82	0.03	78	0.03	74	0.03	86	0.03
Uninsky 1971		23	0.50	86	0.00	36	0.08	23	0.36	35	0.31	26	0.33
Wasowski 1980		41	0.44	46	0.00	21	0.07	25	0.34	33	0.32	24	0.33
Zak 1937		19	0.51	23	0.00	35	0.06	22	0.36	33	0.37	22	0.36
Zak 1951		16	0.52	64	0.00	20	0.08	19	0.43	23	0.41	17	0.42
Random 1		89	-0.01	90	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	12	0.42	53	0.09
Random 2		88	0.01	18	0.01	89	0.02	89	0.02	27	0.26	59	0.07
Random 3		90	-0.06	45	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	51	0.04	89	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).