Rabcewiczowa 1932

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		76	0.31	70	0.00	81	0.02	84	0.02	59	0.04	88	0.03
Anderszewski 2003		57	0.38	75	0.00	46	0.05	54	0.05	48	0.08	72	0.06
Ashkenazy 1981		75	0.32	61	0.00	64	0.04	64	0.04	25	0.27	58	0.10
Bacha 2000		67	0.35	64	0.00	71	0.04	69	0.04	40	0.18	65	0.08
Badura 1965		73	0.33	24	0.01	70	0.04	70	0.04	42	0.10	73	0.06
Barbosa 1983		23	0.46	25	0.01	8	0.14	8	0.48	27	0.38	16	0.43
Biret 1990		4	0.51	2	0.11	2	0.27	5	0.54	15	0.50	5	0.52
Blet 2003		87	0.23	84	0.00	86	0.03	77	0.03	65	0.04	87	0.03
Block 1995		47	0.41	10	0.02	27	0.09	25	0.32	14	0.50	19	0.40
Blumental 1952		11	0.48	27	0.00	9	0.11	11	0.45	26	0.47	12	0.46
Boshniakovich 1969		51	0.40	30	0.00	50	0.05	52	0.05	48	0.07	74	0.06
Brailowsky 1960		63	0.37	57	0.00	49	0.06	45	0.06	41	0.19	51	0.11
Bunin 1987		34	0.44	71	0.00	53	0.05	59	0.05	20	0.32	45	0.13
Bunin 1987b		42	0.42	51	0.00	54	0.05	55	0.05	27	0.28	48	0.12
Chiu 1999		53	0.40	39	0.00	41	0.05	42	0.11	17	0.38	39	0.20
Cohen 1997		68	0.34	66	0.00	73	0.03	75	0.03	25	0.21	68	0.08
Cortot 1951		79	0.30	67	0.00	80	0.03	80	0.03	25	0.38	54	0.11
Csalog 1996		58	0.38	48	0.00	57	0.06	46	0.06	49	0.06	71	0.06
Czerny 1949		31	0.44	44	0.00	51	0.04	62	0.04	42	0.16	66	0.08
Czerny 1990		40	0.43	58	0.00	39	0.06	39	0.14	52	0.06	64	0.09
Duchoud 2007		70	0.33	59	0.00	75	0.03	76	0.03	21	0.45	50	0.12
Ezaki 2006		19	0.46	33	0.00	29	0.06	26	0.32	42	0.17	37	0.23
Falvay 1989		29	0.44	12	0.01	26	0.08	22	0.36	41	0.19	32	0.26
Farrell 1958		10	0.49	62	0.00	18	0.07	16	0.41	16	0.56	8	0.48
Ferenczy 1958		74	0.33	40	0.00	76	0.03	72	0.03	51	0.06	83	0.04
Fliere 1977		2	0.52	1	0.28	1	0.28	3	0.57	11	0.52	3	0.54
Fou 1978		39	0.43	77	0.00	33	0.07	30	0.28	29	0.27	30	0.27
Francois 1956		80	0.29	68	0.00	59	0.04	63	0.04	27	0.29	55	0.11
Friedman 1923		84	0.26	85	0.00	82	0.03	79	0.03	39	0.13	75	0.06
Friedman 1923b		85	0.25	53	0.00	78	0.03	82	0.03	41	0.16	69	0.07
Friedman 1930		69	0.34	60	0.00	61	0.04	65	0.04	25	0.35	49	0.12
Garcia 2007		33	0.44	37	0.00	52	0.05	51	0.05	12	0.51	42	0.16
Garcia 2007b		14	0.48	35	0.00	23	0.09	23	0.34	9	0.59	14	0.45
Gierzod 1998		8	0.50	23	0.01	13	0.08	14	0.43	40	0.21	27	0.30
Gornostaeva 1994		9	0.49	46	0.00	20	0.08	18	0.41	18	0.45	17	0.43
Groot 1988		54	0.39	43	0.00	25	0.09	32	0.24	25	0.28	33	0.26
Harasiewicz 1955		17	0.47	8	0.02	12	0.08	9	0.48	37	0.34	20	0.40
Hatto 1993		25	0.45	29	0.00	19	0.07	20	0.39	31	0.31	22	0.35
Hatto 1997		37	0.43	47	0.00	31	0.06	31	0.27	37	0.22	35	0.24
Horowitz 1949		83	0.26	81	0.00	87	0.03	71	0.03	60	0.05	81	0.04
Indjic 1988		35	0.44	14	0.01	28	0.06	28	0.31	37	0.23	31	0.27
Kapell 1951		1	0.57	4	0.08	3	0.20	1	0.59	15	0.58	1	0.58
Kissin 1993		77	0.31	72	0.00	77	0.02	83	0.02	64	0.05	86	0.03
Kushner 1989		5	0.51	3	0.11	4	0.20	2	0.59	26	0.41	7	0.49
Luisada 1991		78	0.30	36	0.00	84	0.03	81	0.03	71	0.04	84	0.03
Lushtak 2004		13	0.48	11	0.01	7	0.11	7	0.50	20	0.50	6	0.50
Malcuzynski 1961		3	0.52	21	0.01	10	0.11	6	0.51	26	0.42	11	0.46
Magaloff 1978		18	0.47	42	0.00	34	0.07	34	0.24	29	0.36	28	0.29
Magin 1975		22	0.46	22	0.01	24	0.09	15	0.41	22	0.44	18	0.42
Michalowski 1933		86	0.24	19	0.01	85	0.02	85	0.02	17	0.43	61	0.09
Milkina 1970		26	0.45	49	0.00	36	0.08	27	0.31	45	0.08	41	0.16
Mohovich 1999		48	0.40	73	0.00	43	0.05	41	0.12	51	0.05	67	0.08
Moravec 1969		6	0.51	32	0.00	16	0.08	13	0.44	16	0.50	9	0.47
Morozova 2008		38	0.43	38	0.00	45	0.04	60	0.04	32	0.25	57	0.10
Neighaus 1950		60	0.37	18	0.01	66	0.03	73	0.03	16	0.43	53	0.11
Niedzielski 1931		82	0.27	63	0.00	83	0.02	86	0.02	64	0.05	85	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		71	0.33	78	0.00	72	0.03	74	0.03	56	0.05	82	0.04
Osinska 1989		30	0.44	50	0.00	37	0.07	35	0.20	46	0.07	47	0.12
Pachmann 1927		50	0.40	5	0.08	11	0.09	38	0.15	6	0.59	24	0.30
Paderewski 1930		81	0.28	17	0.01	79	0.02	87	0.02	33	0.18	70	0.06
Perlemuter 1992		64	0.37	15	0.01	63	0.04	61	0.04	19	0.41	44	0.13
Pierdomenico 2008		66	0.35	76	0.00	74	0.03	78	0.03	35	0.28	59	0.09
Poblocka 1999		21	0.46	54	0.00	35	0.08	33	0.24	40	0.20	38	0.22
Rabcewiczowa 1932		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rachmaninoff 1923		46	0.41	6	0.06	6	0.14	17	0.41	13	0.51	10	0.46
Rangell 2001		41	0.43	26	0.01	58	0.06	47	0.06	32	0.28	46	0.13
Richter 1976		59	0.38	86	0.00	65	0.05	53	0.05	47	0.06	79	0.05
Rosen 1989		44	0.42	82	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.10	26	0.34	40	0.18
Rosenthal 1930		20	0.46	34	0.00	17	0.08	24	0.34	12	0.56	15	0.44
Rosenthal 1931		27	0.45	13	0.01	38	0.07	37	0.15	7	0.60	25	0.30
Rosenthal 1931b		55	0.39	41	0.00	48	0.05	49	0.05	11	0.53	43	0.16
Rosenthal 1931c		12	0.48	16	0.01	15	0.08	12	0.44	8	0.63	4	0.53
Rosenthal 1931d		32	0.44	45	0.00	40	0.04	40	0.13	7	0.60	29	0.28
Rossi 2007		62	0.37	20	0.01	69	0.04	67	0.04	29	0.27	56	0.10
Rubinstein 1939		7	0.51	7	0.04	5	0.16	4	0.56	8	0.58	2	0.57
Rubinstein 1952		15	0.48	65	0.00	14	0.11	10	0.45	30	0.33	21	0.39
Rubinstein 1966		16	0.47	52	0.00	22	0.07	19	0.40	40	0.23	26	0.30
Schilhawsky 1960		24	0.46	9	0.02	21	0.07	21	0.36	9	0.56	13	0.45
Shebanova 2002		28	0.45	55	0.00	30	0.06	29	0.29	19	0.41	23	0.34
Smith 1975		65	0.36	79	0.00	56	0.05	50	0.05	38	0.24	52	0.11
Sokolov 2002		72	0.33	80	0.00	67	0.04	68	0.04	57	0.05	80	0.04
Sztompka 1959		49	0.40	56	0.00	60	0.04	66	0.04	38	0.22	60	0.09
Tomsic 1995		56	0.39	89	0.00	68	0.05	57	0.05	72	0.05	78	0.05
Uninsky 1932		43	0.42	28	0.00	42	0.04	43	0.11	22	0.51	36	0.24
Uninsky 1971		45	0.41	69	0.00	47	0.05	58	0.05	43	0.16	62	0.09
Wasowski 1980		36	0.44	31	0.00	32	0.07	36	0.17	27	0.38	34	0.25
Zak 1937		61	0.37	90	0.00	62	0.05	56	0.05	55	0.05	76	0.05
Zak 1951		52	0.40	87	0.00	55	0.06	48	0.06	62	0.04	77	0.05
Random 1		89	-0.01	88	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	16	0.37	63	0.09
Random 2		88	0.02	74	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	65	0.03	89	0.02
Random 3		90	-0.06	83	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	47	0.05	90	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).