Ohlsson 1999

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		21	0.47	17	0.01	19	0.07	23	0.40	8	0.52	15	0.46
Anderszewski 2003		42	0.42	36	0.00	18	0.08	27	0.38	41	0.17	24	0.25
Ashkenazy 1981		37	0.44	23	0.00	48	0.05	48	0.05	27	0.26	51	0.11
Bacha 2000		50	0.39	79	0.00	55	0.04	69	0.04	20	0.39	44	0.12
Badura 1965		25	0.46	5	0.06	5	0.21	8	0.58	2	0.61	2	0.59
Barbosa 1983		23	0.46	52	0.00	33	0.08	28	0.36	50	0.08	32	0.17
Biret 1990		7	0.50	20	0.01	10	0.10	7	0.58	26	0.38	13	0.47
Blet 2003		47	0.39	24	0.00	47	0.06	46	0.06	26	0.24	46	0.12
Block 1995		75	0.30	72	0.00	65	0.05	53	0.05	60	0.05	64	0.05
Blumental 1952		74	0.30	82	0.00	74	0.03	76	0.03	74	0.04	83	0.03
Boshniakovich 1969		14	0.48	10	0.02	14	0.14	21	0.43	39	0.14	25	0.25
Brailowsky 1960		78	0.28	83	0.00	81	0.02	84	0.02	52	0.06	76	0.03
Bunin 1987		56	0.36	41	0.00	32	0.07	37	0.23	25	0.28	26	0.25
Bunin 1987b		55	0.37	25	0.00	28	0.09	33	0.31	14	0.44	17	0.37
Chiu 1999		44	0.41	45	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.12	30	0.23	31	0.17
Cohen 1997		64	0.33	22	0.01	56	0.04	66	0.04	18	0.27	55	0.10
Cortot 1951		80	0.26	37	0.00	78	0.02	83	0.02	59	0.05	85	0.03
Csalog 1996		70	0.31	80	0.00	60	0.04	65	0.04	57	0.05	72	0.04
Czerny 1949		27	0.45	53	0.00	41	0.06	40	0.18	53	0.07	50	0.11
Czerny 1990		15	0.48	59	0.00	38	0.07	34	0.29	47	0.09	34	0.16
Duchoud 2007		8	0.49	6	0.04	7	0.12	15	0.48	2	0.77	1	0.61
Ezaki 2006		34	0.45	42	0.00	17	0.08	16	0.46	40	0.17	21	0.28
Falvay 1989		20	0.47	27	0.00	27	0.08	25	0.39	65	0.04	45	0.12
Farrell 1958		36	0.44	49	0.00	37	0.06	35	0.27	47	0.09	33	0.16
Ferenczy 1958		77	0.28	84	0.00	83	0.03	74	0.03	75	0.03	80	0.03
Fliere 1977		30	0.45	67	0.00	26	0.07	22	0.42	77	0.04	39	0.13
Fou 1978		45	0.40	62	0.00	59	0.05	61	0.05	71	0.04	69	0.04
Francois 1956		48	0.39	26	0.00	51	0.04	68	0.04	26	0.29	53	0.11
Friedman 1923		59	0.35	76	0.00	64	0.05	59	0.05	28	0.32	43	0.13
Friedman 1923b		61	0.35	28	0.00	63	0.05	62	0.05	30	0.27	48	0.12
Friedman 1930		51	0.38	38	0.00	57	0.05	49	0.05	27	0.31	47	0.12
Garcia 2007		73	0.30	77	0.00	53	0.04	71	0.04	36	0.24	54	0.10
Garcia 2007b		63	0.33	55	0.00	35	0.08	41	0.17	40	0.14	36	0.15
Gierzod 1998		4	0.53	15	0.01	6	0.10	6	0.58	45	0.08	28	0.22
Gornostaeva 1994		60	0.35	63	0.00	70	0.05	52	0.05	86	0.02	84	0.03
Groot 1988		65	0.33	31	0.00	43	0.06	43	0.13	52	0.05	57	0.08
Harasiewicz 1955		16	0.47	60	0.00	34	0.11	29	0.36	53	0.05	42	0.13
Hatto 1993		17	0.47	32	0.00	21	0.07	20	0.44	41	0.17	23	0.27
Hatto 1997		24	0.46	61	0.00	29	0.09	26	0.39	44	0.09	30	0.19
Horowitz 1949		86	0.22	64	0.00	86	0.02	87	0.02	70	0.04	77	0.03
Indjic 1988		22	0.47	39	0.00	22	0.10	19	0.44	41	0.16	22	0.27
Kapell 1951		46	0.40	33	0.00	54	0.04	67	0.04	56	0.06	63	0.05
Kissin 1993		28	0.45	43	0.00	40	0.08	38	0.22	50	0.08	41	0.13
Kushner 1989		1	0.57	4	0.11	4	0.23	1	0.72	25	0.42	5	0.55
Luisada 1991		40	0.42	12	0.02	31	0.08	30	0.33	25	0.37	18	0.35
Lushtak 2004		10	0.49	1	0.18	1	0.17	3	0.64	17	0.52	3	0.58
Malcuzynski 1961		32	0.45	68	0.00	42	0.07	42	0.15	62	0.05	56	0.09
Magaloff 1978		38	0.44	7	0.04	20	0.08	31	0.32	42	0.16	27	0.23
Magin 1975		49	0.39	57	0.00	58	0.05	55	0.05	67	0.04	67	0.04
Michalowski 1933		87	0.19	73	0.00	84	0.02	85	0.02	48	0.04	79	0.03
Milkina 1970		6	0.50	2	0.15	2	0.20	5	0.61	26	0.41	9	0.50
Mohovich 1999		41	0.42	34	0.00	25	0.07	24	0.40	43	0.10	29	0.20
Moravec 1969		62	0.35	85	0.00	76	0.03	73	0.03	76	0.03	75	0.03
Morozova 2008		26	0.46	44	0.00	16	0.09	13	0.50	20	0.44	12	0.47
Neighaus 1950		52	0.37	56	0.00	67	0.05	60	0.05	43	0.10	59	0.07
Niedzielski 1931		71	0.31	50	0.00	71	0.05	54	0.05	49	0.07	61	0.06
Ohlsson 1999		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Osinska 1989		3	0.54	3	0.15	3	0.25	2	0.67	26	0.49	4	0.57
Pachmann 1927		84	0.25	74	0.00	80	0.03	82	0.03	53	0.05	70	0.04
Paderewski 1930		82	0.25	81	0.00	79	0.03	78	0.03	62	0.04	78	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		54	0.37	46	0.00	49	0.05	58	0.05	16	0.42	37	0.14
Pierdomenico 2008		58	0.36	58	0.00	62	0.05	51	0.05	31	0.33	40	0.13
Poblocka 1999		53	0.37	30	0.00	66	0.05	57	0.05	59	0.07	60	0.06
Rabcewiczowa 1932		66	0.33	71	0.00	61	0.05	56	0.05	74	0.03	68	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		85	0.23	78	0.00	73	0.03	77	0.03	59	0.05	65	0.04
Rangell 2001		39	0.43	40	0.00	46	0.05	47	0.05	34	0.24	52	0.11
Richter 1976		29	0.45	51	0.00	45	0.08	45	0.08	45	0.07	58	0.07
Rosen 1989		5	0.51	9	0.03	13	0.11	12	0.52	15	0.48	10	0.50
Rosenthal 1930		69	0.32	65	0.00	72	0.03	80	0.03	68	0.04	82	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		72	0.31	48	0.00	77	0.03	79	0.03	49	0.05	71	0.04
Rosenthal 1931b		81	0.26	89	0.00	87	0.03	75	0.03	71	0.04	86	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		76	0.29	54	0.00	82	0.03	81	0.03	67	0.04	87	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		79	0.26	75	0.00	85	0.02	86	0.02	74	0.03	90	0.02
Rossi 2007		67	0.33	14	0.01	52	0.04	70	0.04	28	0.29	49	0.11
Rubinstein 1939		43	0.41	47	0.00	50	0.04	63	0.04	55	0.05	66	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		19	0.47	35	0.00	24	0.06	17	0.45	52	0.06	35	0.16
Rubinstein 1966		2	0.54	13	0.02	8	0.12	4	0.64	35	0.33	14	0.46
Schilhawsky 1960		57	0.36	69	0.00	69	0.04	64	0.04	65	0.04	73	0.04
Shebanova 2002		12	0.49	18	0.01	15	0.08	14	0.49	14	0.47	11	0.48
Smith 1975		68	0.33	86	0.00	68	0.05	50	0.05	58	0.05	62	0.05
Sokolov 2002		11	0.49	19	0.01	39	0.08	39	0.21	24	0.43	19	0.30
Sztompka 1959		31	0.45	8	0.03	36	0.06	36	0.26	33	0.34	20	0.30
Tomsic 1995		18	0.47	16	0.01	9	0.10	10	0.53	14	0.49	7	0.51
Uninsky 1932		83	0.25	87	0.00	75	0.04	72	0.04	62	0.04	74	0.04
Uninsky 1971		33	0.45	66	0.00	23	0.09	18	0.44	28	0.37	16	0.40
Wasowski 1980		35	0.44	21	0.01	30	0.07	32	0.32	65	0.05	38	0.13
Zak 1937		13	0.48	11	0.02	12	0.15	11	0.52	17	0.48	8	0.50
Zak 1951		9	0.49	29	0.00	11	0.12	9	0.56	20	0.50	6	0.53
Random 1		89	-0.07	70	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	60	0.03	88	0.02
Random 2		88	0.00	90	0.00	88	0.01	88	0.01	42	0.08	81	0.03
Random 3		90	-0.10	88	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	60	0.03	89	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).