Mohovich 1999

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		50	0.43	36	0.00	38	0.08	40	0.14	14	0.44	39	0.25
Anderszewski 2003		21	0.53	43	0.00	27	0.10	25	0.42	30	0.36	28	0.39
Ashkenazy 1981		54	0.43	25	0.00	58	0.04	66	0.04	16	0.43	53	0.13
Bacha 2000		79	0.33	55	0.00	68	0.04	75	0.04	42	0.17	64	0.08
Badura 1965		68	0.37	45	0.00	65	0.04	78	0.04	39	0.14	74	0.07
Barbosa 1983		16	0.55	74	0.00	25	0.11	26	0.40	31	0.30	31	0.35
Biret 1990		9	0.58	7	0.04	10	0.14	8	0.62	8	0.56	12	0.59
Blet 2003		60	0.41	22	0.01	43	0.05	44	0.10	10	0.43	42	0.21
Block 1995		15	0.55	19	0.01	12	0.12	13	0.56	3	0.72	6	0.63
Blumental 1952		11	0.57	1	0.15	1	0.15	20	0.49	20	0.54	19	0.51
Boshniakovich 1969		43	0.45	34	0.00	32	0.07	33	0.26	34	0.24	40	0.25
Brailowsky 1960		10	0.57	8	0.04	11	0.12	19	0.50	9	0.64	13	0.57
Bunin 1987		46	0.44	42	0.00	41	0.06	42	0.11	15	0.38	44	0.20
Bunin 1987b		55	0.42	65	0.00	51	0.06	45	0.06	21	0.38	46	0.15
Chiu 1999		64	0.39	60	0.00	63	0.04	59	0.04	37	0.18	66	0.08
Cohen 1997		74	0.36	56	0.00	71	0.03	85	0.03	43	0.08	80	0.05
Cortot 1951		85	0.22	78	0.00	70	0.04	64	0.04	56	0.06	81	0.05
Csalog 1996		29	0.52	18	0.01	13	0.12	11	0.58	3	0.66	9	0.62
Czerny 1949		51	0.43	66	0.00	53	0.04	60	0.04	55	0.07	79	0.05
Czerny 1990		42	0.46	87	0.00	47	0.05	54	0.05	49	0.07	75	0.06
Duchoud 2007		82	0.28	53	0.00	78	0.04	74	0.04	30	0.41	52	0.13
Ezaki 2006		6	0.60	13	0.03	9	0.13	9	0.62	11	0.58	10	0.60
Falvay 1989		7	0.58	9	0.04	8	0.14	7	0.64	14	0.61	8	0.62
Farrell 1958		49	0.43	54	0.00	37	0.06	37	0.19	25	0.40	36	0.28
Ferenczy 1958		38	0.46	57	0.00	46	0.05	55	0.05	14	0.57	45	0.17
Fliere 1977		1	0.62	6	0.04	7	0.16	6	0.65	7	0.59	7	0.62
Fou 1978		17	0.55	33	0.00	24	0.09	22	0.48	11	0.49	22	0.48
Francois 1956		77	0.35	79	0.00	81	0.04	58	0.04	49	0.06	82	0.05
Friedman 1923		71	0.36	83	0.00	66	0.04	67	0.04	24	0.37	56	0.12
Friedman 1923b		78	0.33	67	0.00	76	0.04	69	0.04	36	0.20	63	0.09
Friedman 1930		76	0.35	26	0.00	55	0.04	70	0.04	33	0.24	61	0.10
Garcia 2007		48	0.43	49	0.00	40	0.08	38	0.18	6	0.63	33	0.34
Garcia 2007b		44	0.45	84	0.00	39	0.06	39	0.18	23	0.42	37	0.27
Gierzod 1998		19	0.54	15	0.02	16	0.11	23	0.46	32	0.34	26	0.40
Gornostaeva 1994		39	0.46	72	0.00	50	0.05	48	0.05	34	0.25	57	0.11
Groot 1988		20	0.54	37	0.00	22	0.09	17	0.51	3	0.57	15	0.54
Harasiewicz 1955		30	0.51	52	0.00	35	0.07	32	0.27	42	0.21	41	0.24
Hatto 1993		26	0.52	88	0.00	21	0.12	21	0.48	17	0.49	23	0.48
Hatto 1997		23	0.53	58	0.00	20	0.11	18	0.51	14	0.52	18	0.51
Horowitz 1949		67	0.37	62	0.00	69	0.04	77	0.04	13	0.47	48	0.14
Indjic 1988		27	0.52	16	0.02	18	0.10	16	0.52	14	0.54	17	0.53
Kapell 1951		13	0.56	14	0.02	23	0.09	30	0.35	33	0.37	30	0.36
Kissin 1993		53	0.43	68	0.00	59	0.04	62	0.04	45	0.11	73	0.07
Kushner 1989		14	0.55	20	0.01	17	0.12	12	0.58	23	0.42	21	0.49
Luisada 1991		12	0.56	21	0.01	30	0.09	29	0.37	4	0.65	20	0.49
Lushtak 2004		33	0.50	23	0.01	28	0.09	24	0.43	23	0.45	25	0.44
Malcuzynski 1961		25	0.52	46	0.00	19	0.09	14	0.54	16	0.52	16	0.53
Magaloff 1978		63	0.40	89	0.00	75	0.04	72	0.04	59	0.04	83	0.04
Magin 1975		22	0.53	44	0.00	26	0.10	28	0.38	23	0.40	27	0.39
Michalowski 1933		86	0.10	69	0.00	86	0.02	86	0.02	82	0.02	88	0.02
Milkina 1970		5	0.60	5	0.07	2	0.13	1	0.72	7	0.63	4	0.67
Mohovich 1999		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Moravec 1969		24	0.53	50	0.00	29	0.09	27	0.39	12	0.51	24	0.45
Morozova 2008		65	0.38	80	0.00	57	0.05	50	0.05	58	0.05	77	0.05
Neighaus 1950		84	0.25	85	0.00	85	0.04	61	0.04	61	0.04	85	0.04
Niedzielski 1931		75	0.35	75	0.00	73	0.03	81	0.03	22	0.33	60	0.10
Ohlsson 1999		58	0.42	59	0.00	44	0.05	43	0.10	24	0.40	43	0.20
Osinska 1989		18	0.54	11	0.03	14	0.12	10	0.60	25	0.52	14	0.56
Pachmann 1927		81	0.30	64	0.00	83	0.03	84	0.03	37	0.22	69	0.08
Paderewski 1930		88	0.04	81	0.00	87	0.02	87	0.02	83	0.02	87	0.02
Perlemuter 1992		72	0.36	29	0.00	80	0.03	79	0.03	36	0.22	65	0.08
Pierdomenico 2008		83	0.26	30	0.00	84	0.04	76	0.04	41	0.16	67	0.08
Poblocka 1999		2	0.61	4	0.07	5	0.11	4	0.68	4	0.67	3	0.67
Rabcewiczowa 1932		62	0.40	70	0.00	49	0.05	51	0.05	41	0.12	68	0.08
Rachmaninoff 1923		34	0.50	17	0.02	31	0.10	34	0.24	16	0.49	32	0.34
Rangell 2001		73	0.36	24	0.00	79	0.03	82	0.03	52	0.06	84	0.04
Richter 1976		45	0.45	71	0.00	56	0.04	73	0.04	39	0.20	62	0.09
Rosen 1989		31	0.50	10	0.03	15	0.10	15	0.53	4	0.65	11	0.59
Rosenthal 1930		52	0.43	47	0.00	67	0.04	57	0.04	30	0.35	55	0.12
Rosenthal 1931		61	0.40	39	0.00	62	0.05	53	0.05	26	0.39	49	0.14
Rosenthal 1931b		66	0.38	48	0.00	74	0.03	80	0.03	22	0.37	58	0.11
Rosenthal 1931c		56	0.42	90	0.00	60	0.05	56	0.05	25	0.36	54	0.13
Rosenthal 1931d		59	0.41	61	0.00	61	0.04	68	0.04	12	0.51	50	0.14
Rossi 2007		80	0.30	40	0.00	82	0.05	52	0.05	44	0.10	72	0.07
Rubinstein 1939		35	0.49	73	0.00	33	0.07	31	0.31	18	0.47	29	0.38
Rubinstein 1952		4	0.61	12	0.03	6	0.14	2	0.71	5	0.67	2	0.69
Rubinstein 1966		3	0.61	3	0.11	4	0.13	3	0.69	17	0.62	5	0.65
Schilhawsky 1960		40	0.46	76	0.00	54	0.04	63	0.04	42	0.17	70	0.08
Shebanova 2002		37	0.47	35	0.00	36	0.08	36	0.21	16	0.44	35	0.30
Smith 1975		57	0.42	28	0.00	64	0.04	71	0.04	53	0.06	76	0.05
Sokolov 2002		47	0.44	38	0.00	42	0.05	41	0.12	7	0.56	38	0.26
Sztompka 1959		70	0.37	41	0.00	72	0.03	83	0.03	69	0.04	86	0.03
Tomsic 1995		8	0.58	2	0.13	3	0.12	5	0.67	1	0.74	1	0.70
Uninsky 1932		69	0.37	86	0.00	77	0.04	65	0.04	46	0.07	78	0.05
Uninsky 1971		36	0.48	31	0.00	48	0.06	47	0.06	38	0.27	51	0.13
Wasowski 1980		41	0.46	63	0.00	52	0.06	46	0.06	41	0.17	59	0.10
Zak 1937		32	0.50	27	0.00	45	0.05	49	0.05	29	0.39	47	0.14
Zak 1951		28	0.52	32	0.00	34	0.08	35	0.21	22	0.42	34	0.30
Random 1		90	-0.08	82	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	79	0.02	90	0.01
Random 2		87	0.07	51	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	19	0.32	71	0.08
Random 3		89	-0.07	77	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	72	0.03	89	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).