Malcuzynski 1961

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		76	0.33	57	0.00	86	0.02	82	0.02	81	0.03	90	0.02
Anderszewski 2003		9	0.57	6	0.03	3	0.22	5	0.64	9	0.63	5	0.63
Ashkenazy 1981		69	0.35	88	0.00	75	0.04	67	0.04	76	0.03	84	0.03
Bacha 2000		49	0.45	51	0.00	56	0.04	69	0.04	8	0.51	55	0.14
Badura 1965		59	0.41	62	0.00	39	0.08	42	0.16	15	0.45	42	0.27
Barbosa 1983		12	0.56	45	0.00	15	0.13	17	0.52	21	0.48	24	0.50
Biret 1990		37	0.49	52	0.00	38	0.09	34	0.30	35	0.28	39	0.29
Blet 2003		75	0.33	63	0.00	84	0.02	87	0.02	70	0.03	88	0.02
Block 1995		57	0.41	42	0.00	53	0.05	58	0.05	29	0.31	57	0.12
Blumental 1952		44	0.46	14	0.01	47	0.07	50	0.07	35	0.28	56	0.14
Boshniakovich 1969		7	0.59	17	0.00	8	0.12	8	0.62	4	0.65	6	0.63
Brailowsky 1960		64	0.39	48	0.00	68	0.03	72	0.03	55	0.06	76	0.04
Bunin 1987		27	0.51	27	0.00	31	0.06	25	0.42	2	0.70	17	0.54
Bunin 1987b		29	0.50	25	0.00	33	0.07	27	0.41	2	0.71	16	0.54
Chiu 1999		66	0.37	41	0.00	70	0.04	64	0.04	47	0.06	74	0.05
Cohen 1997		81	0.29	68	0.00	78	0.02	79	0.02	64	0.04	85	0.03
Cortot 1951		43	0.47	11	0.01	29	0.08	39	0.23	2	0.73	34	0.41
Csalog 1996		60	0.40	39	0.00	54	0.05	59	0.05	39	0.16	65	0.09
Czerny 1949		1	0.70	1	0.51	1	0.51	1	0.72	2	0.79	1	0.75
Czerny 1990		4	0.61	13	0.01	6	0.11	7	0.63	15	0.68	4	0.65
Duchoud 2007		71	0.34	54	0.00	63	0.09	46	0.09	10	0.55	44	0.22
Ezaki 2006		3	0.61	36	0.00	5	0.21	4	0.64	5	0.67	3	0.65
Falvay 1989		31	0.50	35	0.00	37	0.09	30	0.38	36	0.36	38	0.37
Farrell 1958		15	0.55	18	0.00	19	0.14	18	0.52	5	0.71	9	0.61
Ferenczy 1958		65	0.37	50	0.00	71	0.04	66	0.04	68	0.04	77	0.04
Fliere 1977		13	0.56	2	0.09	12	0.12	15	0.53	18	0.47	22	0.50
Fou 1978		48	0.45	77	0.00	51	0.05	60	0.05	44	0.10	70	0.07
Francois 1956		62	0.39	21	0.00	64	0.08	48	0.08	23	0.35	50	0.17
Friedman 1923		82	0.29	83	0.00	80	0.03	77	0.03	45	0.07	75	0.05
Friedman 1923b		84	0.27	72	0.00	81	0.02	83	0.02	75	0.04	86	0.03
Friedman 1930		83	0.27	55	0.00	79	0.02	81	0.02	80	0.03	89	0.02
Garcia 2007		46	0.46	65	0.00	41	0.10	38	0.27	3	0.68	30	0.43
Garcia 2007b		53	0.45	34	0.00	42	0.08	43	0.16	15	0.51	40	0.29
Gierzod 1998		17	0.54	24	0.00	21	0.08	21	0.48	31	0.34	36	0.40
Gornostaeva 1994		14	0.55	58	0.00	18	0.14	12	0.56	2	0.66	11	0.61
Groot 1988		58	0.41	59	0.00	50	0.06	57	0.06	41	0.11	67	0.08
Harasiewicz 1955		5	0.60	16	0.01	9	0.15	13	0.55	19	0.57	15	0.56
Hatto 1993		34	0.50	84	0.00	35	0.07	31	0.38	22	0.44	33	0.41
Hatto 1997		32	0.50	69	0.00	32	0.07	28	0.40	19	0.45	32	0.42
Horowitz 1949		86	0.26	23	0.00	87	0.02	80	0.02	69	0.04	83	0.03
Indjic 1988		30	0.50	85	0.00	24	0.09	23	0.43	21	0.48	27	0.45
Kapell 1951		2	0.63	4	0.05	2	0.21	2	0.70	3	0.73	2	0.71
Kissin 1993		41	0.48	46	0.00	26	0.07	32	0.37	23	0.51	29	0.43
Kushner 1989		10	0.57	8	0.03	4	0.19	6	0.63	11	0.59	10	0.61
Luisada 1991		77	0.33	86	0.00	85	0.02	84	0.02	80	0.03	87	0.02
Lushtak 2004		33	0.50	70	0.00	30	0.09	33	0.37	27	0.41	37	0.39
Malcuzynski 1961		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Magaloff 1978		36	0.49	66	0.00	45	0.06	53	0.06	28	0.36	53	0.15
Magin 1975		55	0.44	80	0.00	62	0.09	45	0.09	51	0.05	69	0.07
Michalowski 1933		87	0.23	81	0.00	83	0.02	88	0.02	33	0.20	72	0.06
Milkina 1970		6	0.59	31	0.00	7	0.12	10	0.58	15	0.56	12	0.57
Mohovich 1999		21	0.52	26	0.00	17	0.11	16	0.52	14	0.54	20	0.53
Moravec 1969		23	0.52	20	0.00	23	0.08	22	0.45	8	0.59	21	0.52
Morozova 2008		24	0.52	30	0.00	25	0.06	19	0.49	9	0.58	19	0.53
Neighaus 1950		74	0.33	49	0.00	82	0.03	78	0.03	51	0.05	80	0.04
Niedzielski 1931		63	0.39	43	0.00	69	0.04	68	0.04	23	0.32	58	0.11
Ohlsson 1999		51	0.45	53	0.00	57	0.05	62	0.05	42	0.15	64	0.09
Osinska 1989		16	0.55	5	0.05	13	0.14	9	0.59	23	0.53	14	0.56
Pachmann 1927		68	0.36	73	0.00	58	0.07	51	0.07	9	0.55	47	0.20
Paderewski 1930		73	0.33	89	0.00	66	0.03	71	0.03	15	0.39	59	0.11
Perlemuter 1992		80	0.30	74	0.00	77	0.02	85	0.02	48	0.06	81	0.03
Pierdomenico 2008		61	0.40	22	0.00	61	0.07	49	0.07	8	0.57	46	0.20
Poblocka 1999		40	0.48	78	0.00	43	0.08	41	0.17	35	0.25	45	0.21
Rabcewiczowa 1932		26	0.52	37	0.00	27	0.06	26	0.42	6	0.51	26	0.46
Rachmaninoff 1923		54	0.44	3	0.06	16	0.11	40	0.19	25	0.39	41	0.27
Rangell 2001		22	0.52	33	0.00	22	0.07	20	0.48	2	0.68	13	0.57
Richter 1976		20	0.52	56	0.00	20	0.08	29	0.39	15	0.59	25	0.48
Rosen 1989		47	0.46	60	0.00	52	0.04	65	0.04	33	0.28	61	0.11
Rosenthal 1930		72	0.34	75	0.00	74	0.03	76	0.03	45	0.06	79	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		79	0.31	82	0.00	73	0.03	75	0.03	40	0.13	73	0.06
Rosenthal 1931b		85	0.26	71	0.00	72	0.03	70	0.03	37	0.20	68	0.08
Rosenthal 1931c		67	0.37	12	0.01	65	0.05	63	0.05	35	0.21	63	0.10
Rosenthal 1931d		70	0.34	64	0.00	67	0.03	73	0.03	33	0.28	66	0.09
Rossi 2007		56	0.42	44	0.00	60	0.06	56	0.06	9	0.50	49	0.17
Rubinstein 1939		8	0.58	10	0.01	10	0.17	11	0.58	4	0.67	7	0.62
Rubinstein 1952		18	0.53	9	0.02	14	0.13	14	0.55	17	0.54	18	0.54
Rubinstein 1966		11	0.57	15	0.01	11	0.19	3	0.65	19	0.59	8	0.62
Schilhawsky 1960		25	0.52	28	0.00	36	0.08	35	0.30	8	0.58	31	0.42
Shebanova 2002		52	0.45	29	0.00	55	0.05	61	0.05	33	0.25	60	0.11
Smith 1975		78	0.32	87	0.00	76	0.03	74	0.03	82	0.03	82	0.03
Sokolov 2002		50	0.45	38	0.00	59	0.06	54	0.06	25	0.42	51	0.16
Sztompka 1959		19	0.53	7	0.03	28	0.06	36	0.29	18	0.56	35	0.40
Tomsic 1995		28	0.51	40	0.00	34	0.07	24	0.43	8	0.58	23	0.50
Uninsky 1932		42	0.48	19	0.00	40	0.08	37	0.28	3	0.71	28	0.45
Uninsky 1971		39	0.48	61	0.00	48	0.06	52	0.06	27	0.38	54	0.15
Wasowski 1980		35	0.49	32	0.00	46	0.08	47	0.08	28	0.37	48	0.17
Zak 1937		45	0.46	90	0.00	49	0.06	55	0.06	25	0.41	52	0.16
Zak 1951		38	0.48	67	0.00	44	0.08	44	0.15	21	0.45	43	0.26
Random 1		90	0.00	47	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	9	0.45	71	0.07
Random 2		88	0.04	76	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	32	0.20	78	0.04
Random 3		89	0.03	79	0.00	88	0.02	86	0.02	2	0.59	62	0.11

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).