Magin 1975

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		36	0.46	28	0.00	62	0.05	53	0.05	27	0.31	51	0.12
Anderszewski 2003		38	0.46	68	0.00	34	0.06	35	0.20	63	0.05	55	0.10
Ashkenazy 1981		60	0.42	58	0.00	70	0.04	73	0.04	31	0.25	57	0.10
Bacha 2000		84	0.27	88	0.00	86	0.03	81	0.03	64	0.03	85	0.03
Badura 1965		65	0.40	83	0.00	58	0.04	76	0.04	47	0.07	75	0.05
Barbosa 1983		19	0.53	26	0.01	14	0.07	13	0.57	30	0.33	19	0.43
Biret 1990		30	0.48	8	0.03	22	0.10	21	0.47	31	0.35	22	0.41
Blet 2003		48	0.45	36	0.00	61	0.04	61	0.04	19	0.27	56	0.10
Block 1995		80	0.34	41	0.00	66	0.03	84	0.03	53	0.05	82	0.04
Blumental 1952		40	0.46	84	0.00	50	0.05	50	0.05	55	0.06	76	0.05
Boshniakovich 1969		12	0.56	24	0.01	13	0.09	7	0.61	15	0.43	13	0.51
Brailowsky 1960		41	0.46	14	0.01	26	0.08	36	0.19	36	0.29	33	0.23
Bunin 1987		53	0.43	85	0.00	55	0.04	64	0.04	40	0.11	65	0.07
Bunin 1987b		61	0.41	34	0.00	60	0.04	69	0.04	46	0.07	72	0.05
Chiu 1999		68	0.40	37	0.00	54	0.04	58	0.04	31	0.22	59	0.09
Cohen 1997		74	0.37	61	0.00	76	0.05	54	0.05	40	0.09	64	0.07
Cortot 1951		87	0.21	75	0.00	87	0.04	75	0.04	68	0.03	88	0.03
Csalog 1996		17	0.54	2	0.13	5	0.14	14	0.54	10	0.54	11	0.54
Czerny 1949		22	0.51	51	0.00	27	0.07	24	0.40	33	0.43	21	0.41
Czerny 1990		29	0.49	80	0.00	29	0.09	26	0.35	45	0.10	39	0.19
Duchoud 2007		81	0.32	57	0.00	75	0.03	79	0.03	33	0.39	53	0.11
Ezaki 2006		15	0.55	20	0.01	18	0.10	17	0.53	28	0.30	23	0.40
Falvay 1989		3	0.59	6	0.06	4	0.15	4	0.66	20	0.57	4	0.61
Farrell 1958		52	0.44	50	0.00	44	0.07	41	0.13	35	0.29	38	0.19
Ferenczy 1958		72	0.37	74	0.00	80	0.04	57	0.04	58	0.06	74	0.05
Fliere 1977		5	0.58	11	0.02	10	0.12	15	0.53	29	0.39	16	0.45
Fou 1978		20	0.52	22	0.01	28	0.07	31	0.30	37	0.18	34	0.23
Francois 1956		51	0.44	9	0.02	43	0.06	42	0.13	12	0.46	32	0.24
Friedman 1923		83	0.31	63	0.00	81	0.04	74	0.04	56	0.05	84	0.04
Friedman 1923b		82	0.31	30	0.00	82	0.04	70	0.04	69	0.04	83	0.04
Friedman 1930		58	0.42	18	0.01	39	0.06	40	0.15	6	0.59	30	0.30
Garcia 2007		57	0.42	81	0.00	48	0.08	46	0.08	14	0.51	37	0.20
Garcia 2007b		21	0.51	5	0.07	9	0.12	11	0.58	3	0.68	2	0.63
Gierzod 1998		1	0.61	1	0.17	1	0.17	1	0.72	16	0.52	5	0.61
Gornostaeva 1994		7	0.57	10	0.02	11	0.12	10	0.59	6	0.60	6	0.59
Groot 1988		31	0.48	21	0.01	20	0.08	25	0.38	14	0.39	27	0.38
Harasiewicz 1955		14	0.55	15	0.01	12	0.10	18	0.51	35	0.38	18	0.44
Hatto 1993		46	0.45	77	0.00	47	0.07	48	0.07	49	0.05	71	0.06
Hatto 1997		39	0.46	69	0.00	36	0.06	33	0.24	56	0.05	52	0.11
Horowitz 1949		78	0.35	45	0.00	79	0.03	77	0.03	33	0.19	60	0.08
Indjic 1988		49	0.44	76	0.00	45	0.09	45	0.09	49	0.05	63	0.07
Kapell 1951		25	0.49	54	0.00	35	0.07	34	0.22	37	0.25	35	0.23
Kissin 1993		26	0.49	31	0.00	31	0.11	28	0.34	35	0.36	29	0.35
Kushner 1989		2	0.60	3	0.13	2	0.18	2	0.67	16	0.51	8	0.58
Luisada 1991		27	0.49	55	0.00	53	0.05	52	0.05	29	0.30	50	0.12
Lushtak 2004		24	0.50	38	0.00	24	0.13	19	0.49	29	0.39	17	0.44
Malcuzynski 1961		50	0.44	89	0.00	51	0.05	51	0.05	45	0.09	62	0.07
Magaloff 1978		42	0.46	64	0.00	56	0.05	56	0.05	49	0.07	68	0.06
Magin 1975		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Michalowski 1933		73	0.37	12	0.01	77	0.04	62	0.04	3	0.62	43	0.16
Milkina 1970		11	0.56	40	0.00	15	0.07	9	0.60	28	0.40	14	0.49
Mohovich 1999		18	0.53	65	0.00	21	0.09	23	0.40	28	0.38	24	0.39
Moravec 1969		33	0.47	42	0.00	38	0.08	37	0.18	39	0.17	41	0.17
Morozova 2008		34	0.47	49	0.00	32	0.10	27	0.35	21	0.41	26	0.38
Neighaus 1950		79	0.34	48	0.00	83	0.04	68	0.04	41	0.11	66	0.07
Niedzielski 1931		86	0.26	78	0.00	84	0.03	78	0.03	53	0.06	79	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		70	0.39	66	0.00	72	0.04	67	0.04	55	0.05	80	0.04
Osinska 1989		6	0.58	35	0.00	8	0.17	3	0.67	34	0.43	10	0.54
Pachmann 1927		59	0.42	23	0.01	52	0.05	55	0.05	4	0.64	40	0.18
Paderewski 1930		85	0.27	86	0.00	85	0.02	87	0.02	44	0.12	73	0.05
Perlemuter 1992		45	0.45	27	0.00	42	0.06	39	0.15	11	0.45	31	0.26
Pierdomenico 2008		77	0.36	52	0.00	78	0.04	60	0.04	48	0.05	78	0.04
Poblocka 1999		32	0.48	25	0.01	33	0.06	32	0.27	56	0.07	44	0.14
Rabcewiczowa 1932		43	0.46	19	0.01	23	0.12	22	0.44	15	0.41	20	0.42
Rachmaninoff 1923		76	0.37	70	0.00	68	0.03	82	0.03	71	0.04	86	0.03
Rangell 2001		64	0.40	13	0.01	41	0.06	44	0.10	37	0.21	46	0.14
Richter 1976		23	0.50	29	0.00	25	0.08	29	0.34	23	0.42	25	0.38
Rosen 1989		13	0.55	17	0.01	19	0.08	20	0.47	12	0.55	12	0.51
Rosenthal 1930		56	0.43	43	0.00	65	0.04	71	0.04	34	0.29	54	0.11
Rosenthal 1931		55	0.43	46	0.00	59	0.04	65	0.04	17	0.45	49	0.13
Rosenthal 1931b		54	0.43	39	0.00	57	0.04	72	0.04	13	0.50	47	0.14
Rosenthal 1931c		66	0.40	53	0.00	64	0.04	59	0.04	59	0.06	77	0.05
Rosenthal 1931d		63	0.40	67	0.00	67	0.03	83	0.03	24	0.36	58	0.10
Rossi 2007		71	0.38	87	0.00	74	0.03	86	0.03	36	0.15	61	0.07
Rubinstein 1939		35	0.47	79	0.00	49	0.06	49	0.06	34	0.27	48	0.13
Rubinstein 1952		4	0.58	4	0.09	3	0.19	6	0.64	15	0.54	7	0.59
Rubinstein 1966		9	0.56	32	0.00	16	0.08	12	0.58	33	0.41	15	0.49
Schilhawsky 1960		28	0.49	71	0.00	30	0.07	30	0.31	25	0.43	28	0.37
Shebanova 2002		44	0.45	72	0.00	46	0.08	47	0.08	34	0.25	45	0.14
Smith 1975		8	0.57	7	0.04	6	0.13	5	0.64	2	0.71	1	0.67
Sokolov 2002		69	0.40	60	0.00	63	0.04	66	0.04	45	0.08	67	0.06
Sztompka 1959		62	0.41	62	0.00	69	0.03	80	0.03	74	0.04	87	0.03
Tomsic 1995		47	0.45	44	0.00	37	0.06	38	0.16	25	0.31	36	0.22
Uninsky 1932		75	0.37	56	0.00	71	0.03	85	0.03	42	0.11	69	0.06
Uninsky 1971		67	0.40	73	0.00	73	0.04	63	0.04	71	0.04	81	0.04
Wasowski 1980		37	0.46	47	0.00	40	0.06	43	0.12	38	0.21	42	0.16
Zak 1937		16	0.54	33	0.00	17	0.09	16	0.53	11	0.59	9	0.56
Zak 1951		10	0.56	16	0.01	7	0.12	8	0.61	9	0.64	3	0.62
Random 1		89	-0.02	90	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	34	0.19	70	0.06
Random 2		88	-0.02	82	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	82	0.02	90	0.01
Random 3		90	-0.11	59	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	71	0.03	89	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).