Magaloff 1978

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		43	0.46	72	0.00	48	0.07	48	0.07	11	0.50	37	0.19
Anderszewski 2003		16	0.53	26	0.01	20	0.10	18	0.47	36	0.29	25	0.37
Ashkenazy 1981		69	0.37	70	0.00	76	0.03	82	0.03	66	0.03	87	0.03
Bacha 2000		51	0.44	16	0.01	50	0.06	53	0.06	15	0.42	41	0.16
Badura 1965		61	0.39	63	0.00	63	0.05	57	0.05	50	0.06	68	0.05
Barbosa 1983		1	0.57	6	0.05	7	0.17	6	0.64	24	0.41	7	0.51
Biret 1990		15	0.53	23	0.01	8	0.16	12	0.51	29	0.36	17	0.43
Blet 2003		75	0.33	86	0.00	81	0.03	72	0.03	68	0.03	84	0.03
Block 1995		62	0.39	47	0.00	67	0.03	76	0.03	66	0.04	86	0.03
Blumental 1952		9	0.55	27	0.00	19	0.09	14	0.50	29	0.44	12	0.47
Boshniakovich 1969		49	0.44	10	0.03	13	0.12	33	0.30	51	0.06	46	0.13
Brailowsky 1960		2	0.57	11	0.02	9	0.15	11	0.54	17	0.54	6	0.54
Bunin 1987		68	0.37	51	0.00	60	0.06	55	0.06	55	0.05	69	0.05
Bunin 1987b		71	0.36	77	0.00	59	0.04	66	0.04	63	0.05	75	0.04
Chiu 1999		47	0.45	18	0.01	38	0.07	38	0.20	15	0.40	32	0.28
Cohen 1997		77	0.31	56	0.00	75	0.03	73	0.03	55	0.04	88	0.03
Cortot 1951		46	0.45	73	0.00	47	0.06	52	0.06	9	0.61	39	0.19
Csalog 1996		65	0.38	30	0.00	56	0.04	62	0.04	59	0.05	77	0.04
Czerny 1949		22	0.51	57	0.00	26	0.08	16	0.49	30	0.46	11	0.47
Czerny 1990		14	0.53	12	0.02	10	0.13	7	0.59	38	0.40	8	0.49
Duchoud 2007		74	0.33	52	0.00	77	0.03	69	0.03	43	0.17	61	0.07
Ezaki 2006		8	0.55	4	0.08	14	0.11	19	0.45	36	0.21	27	0.31
Falvay 1989		21	0.51	80	0.00	41	0.08	39	0.20	46	0.06	50	0.11
Farrell 1958		45	0.45	60	0.00	45	0.09	45	0.09	36	0.28	42	0.16
Ferenczy 1958		63	0.39	59	0.00	65	0.04	65	0.04	63	0.05	79	0.04
Fliere 1977		5	0.56	2	0.11	4	0.15	10	0.55	28	0.39	13	0.46
Fou 1978		32	0.48	22	0.01	43	0.06	43	0.15	52	0.05	54	0.09
Francois 1956		70	0.36	40	0.00	58	0.04	60	0.04	36	0.21	55	0.09
Friedman 1923		76	0.31	65	0.00	78	0.03	78	0.03	53	0.05	82	0.04
Friedman 1923b		78	0.30	68	0.00	79	0.03	70	0.03	44	0.10	70	0.05
Friedman 1930		83	0.27	81	0.00	80	0.03	74	0.03	54	0.06	78	0.04
Garcia 2007		86	0.22	84	0.00	87	0.03	75	0.03	80	0.03	85	0.03
Garcia 2007b		67	0.38	39	0.00	30	0.06	44	0.13	42	0.12	48	0.12
Gierzod 1998		3	0.57	5	0.06	6	0.13	5	0.64	36	0.28	19	0.42
Gornostaeva 1994		41	0.47	55	0.00	46	0.07	51	0.07	50	0.05	64	0.06
Groot 1988		35	0.48	3	0.10	5	0.15	22	0.41	15	0.39	22	0.40
Harasiewicz 1955		11	0.54	66	0.00	21	0.14	9	0.56	38	0.32	20	0.42
Hatto 1993		4	0.57	1	0.18	1	0.18	1	0.67	13	0.53	1	0.60
Hatto 1997		7	0.56	17	0.01	3	0.15	3	0.65	17	0.51	3	0.58
Horowitz 1949		73	0.35	87	0.00	71	0.02	83	0.02	22	0.36	56	0.08
Indjic 1988		6	0.56	9	0.04	2	0.17	2	0.66	16	0.52	2	0.59
Kapell 1951		40	0.47	28	0.00	51	0.07	47	0.07	50	0.07	59	0.07
Kissin 1993		33	0.48	53	0.00	42	0.08	41	0.16	44	0.20	40	0.18
Kushner 1989		28	0.49	74	0.00	40	0.07	37	0.25	59	0.05	51	0.11
Luisada 1991		48	0.44	29	0.00	53	0.06	54	0.06	34	0.22	49	0.11
Lushtak 2004		26	0.50	34	0.00	18	0.09	20	0.45	34	0.33	24	0.39
Malcuzynski 1961		30	0.49	82	0.00	32	0.06	28	0.36	53	0.06	44	0.15
Magaloff 1978		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Magin 1975		44	0.46	69	0.00	49	0.07	49	0.07	56	0.05	63	0.06
Michalowski 1933		85	0.24	67	0.00	83	0.02	84	0.02	23	0.32	57	0.08
Milkina 1970		10	0.54	7	0.05	11	0.14	4	0.64	37	0.24	23	0.39
Mohovich 1999		60	0.40	88	0.00	62	0.04	59	0.04	72	0.04	81	0.04
Moravec 1969		18	0.53	25	0.01	31	0.06	30	0.34	30	0.27	28	0.30
Morozova 2008		37	0.47	43	0.00	37	0.06	35	0.26	30	0.29	34	0.27
Neighaus 1950		72	0.36	58	0.00	74	0.03	67	0.03	39	0.12	65	0.06
Niedzielski 1931		82	0.27	78	0.00	86	0.03	80	0.03	65	0.05	73	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		50	0.44	21	0.01	44	0.08	42	0.16	31	0.32	36	0.23
Osinska 1989		29	0.49	79	0.00	33	0.07	31	0.33	49	0.07	43	0.15
Pachmann 1927		81	0.28	38	0.00	64	0.04	64	0.04	34	0.28	52	0.11
Paderewski 1930		87	0.20	35	0.00	70	0.02	86	0.02	27	0.24	60	0.07
Perlemuter 1992		84	0.25	75	0.00	84	0.02	87	0.02	74	0.03	89	0.02
Pierdomenico 2008		80	0.28	89	0.00	82	0.03	81	0.03	56	0.05	72	0.04
Poblocka 1999		12	0.54	19	0.01	16	0.09	13	0.50	28	0.39	14	0.44
Rabcewiczowa 1932		42	0.47	33	0.00	23	0.07	29	0.36	34	0.24	31	0.29
Rachmaninoff 1923		20	0.51	41	0.00	15	0.09	23	0.41	8	0.55	10	0.47
Rangell 2001		64	0.39	36	0.00	73	0.03	71	0.03	45	0.08	71	0.05
Richter 1976		38	0.47	42	0.00	39	0.06	40	0.18	25	0.41	33	0.27
Rosen 1989		52	0.43	49	0.00	57	0.04	63	0.04	56	0.04	80	0.04
Rosenthal 1930		31	0.49	71	0.00	35	0.05	34	0.29	9	0.65	16	0.43
Rosenthal 1931		56	0.41	61	0.00	54	0.05	56	0.05	27	0.37	45	0.14
Rosenthal 1931b		66	0.38	76	0.00	68	0.03	68	0.03	40	0.18	62	0.07
Rosenthal 1931c		27	0.50	13	0.02	27	0.08	27	0.36	9	0.63	9	0.48
Rosenthal 1931d		58	0.41	44	0.00	55	0.08	46	0.08	21	0.44	38	0.19
Rossi 2007		79	0.30	46	0.00	85	0.02	85	0.02	63	0.04	83	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		34	0.48	62	0.00	36	0.06	36	0.25	30	0.33	30	0.29
Rubinstein 1952		19	0.52	24	0.01	24	0.09	21	0.41	41	0.16	35	0.26
Rubinstein 1966		13	0.54	37	0.00	22	0.11	15	0.49	42	0.22	26	0.33
Schilhawsky 1960		23	0.51	83	0.00	34	0.08	26	0.36	21	0.49	18	0.42
Shebanova 2002		24	0.51	15	0.02	28	0.07	25	0.37	18	0.43	21	0.40
Smith 1975		25	0.50	54	0.00	29	0.08	24	0.39	16	0.47	15	0.43
Sokolov 2002		54	0.42	31	0.00	61	0.04	61	0.04	50	0.06	66	0.05
Sztompka 1959		55	0.41	32	0.00	52	0.07	50	0.07	40	0.21	47	0.12
Tomsic 1995		53	0.42	48	0.00	66	0.05	58	0.05	59	0.06	67	0.05
Uninsky 1932		39	0.47	14	0.02	17	0.08	17	0.48	4	0.70	4	0.58
Uninsky 1971		17	0.53	8	0.04	12	0.11	8	0.57	14	0.54	5	0.55
Wasowski 1980		36	0.47	20	0.01	25	0.08	32	0.32	36	0.27	29	0.29
Zak 1937		57	0.41	45	0.00	69	0.03	79	0.03	49	0.05	74	0.04
Zak 1951		59	0.40	50	0.00	72	0.03	77	0.03	60	0.05	76	0.04
Random 1		90	-0.12	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	72	0.02	90	0.01
Random 2		88	0.12	64	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	2	0.52	53	0.10
Random 3		89	-0.02	85	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	16	0.32	58	0.08

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).