Indjic 1988

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		50	0.43	20	0.00	69	0.04	71	0.04	22	0.40	59	0.13
Anderszewski 2003		20	0.53	21	0.00	14	0.08	20	0.49	25	0.45	21	0.47
Ashkenazy 1981		73	0.35	9	0.00	83	0.03	83	0.03	75	0.03	87	0.03
Bacha 2000		58	0.41	22	0.00	75	0.04	58	0.04	14	0.43	55	0.13
Badura 1965		45	0.45	3	0.00	49	0.05	48	0.05	9	0.47	51	0.15
Barbosa 1983		22	0.53	13	0.00	35	0.08	32	0.29	52	0.08	50	0.15
Biret 1990		12	0.55	23	0.00	11	0.08	10	0.57	13	0.53	14	0.55
Blet 2003		70	0.37	24	0.00	47	0.05	56	0.05	15	0.33	57	0.13
Block 1995		64	0.39	25	0.00	64	0.04	76	0.04	42	0.14	78	0.07
Blumental 1952		9	0.57	26	0.00	17	0.09	11	0.56	12	0.63	11	0.59
Boshniakovich 1969		43	0.46	27	0.00	29	0.09	28	0.34	31	0.27	35	0.30
Brailowsky 1960		34	0.50	6	0.00	41	0.07	40	0.17	34	0.33	43	0.24
Bunin 1987		51	0.43	28	0.00	55	0.04	61	0.04	18	0.35	65	0.12
Bunin 1987b		54	0.42	29	0.00	59	0.04	65	0.04	22	0.37	61	0.12
Chiu 1999		59	0.41	30	0.00	70	0.04	68	0.04	38	0.18	74	0.08
Cohen 1997		72	0.36	31	0.00	58	0.05	55	0.05	6	0.53	47	0.16
Cortot 1951		74	0.35	32	0.00	76	0.04	69	0.04	16	0.47	54	0.14
Csalog 1996		40	0.47	33	0.00	25	0.10	33	0.29	15	0.41	31	0.34
Czerny 1949		18	0.53	4	0.00	9	0.15	9	0.63	15	0.67	7	0.65
Czerny 1990		8	0.57	34	0.00	7	0.16	7	0.68	22	0.64	6	0.66
Duchoud 2007		80	0.31	35	0.00	84	0.04	59	0.04	39	0.25	71	0.10
Ezaki 2006		16	0.54	36	0.00	27	0.09	29	0.33	33	0.25	36	0.29
Falvay 1989		11	0.56	14	0.00	20	0.10	17	0.51	26	0.47	18	0.49
Farrell 1958		52	0.43	37	0.00	43	0.07	42	0.16	27	0.39	42	0.25
Ferenczy 1958		25	0.51	38	0.00	45	0.08	45	0.08	10	0.63	44	0.22
Fliere 1977		14	0.55	39	0.00	26	0.09	23	0.44	31	0.37	25	0.40
Fou 1978		47	0.44	40	0.00	61	0.05	54	0.05	53	0.05	80	0.05
Francois 1956		77	0.33	41	0.00	78	0.04	63	0.04	35	0.23	72	0.10
Friedman 1923		62	0.39	42	0.00	54	0.05	57	0.05	9	0.55	45	0.17
Friedman 1923b		66	0.38	43	0.00	63	0.04	70	0.04	14	0.53	52	0.15
Friedman 1930		71	0.37	44	0.00	65	0.04	75	0.04	18	0.44	58	0.13
Garcia 2007		79	0.32	45	0.00	77	0.04	64	0.04	28	0.36	64	0.12
Garcia 2007b		56	0.41	5	0.00	32	0.08	35	0.27	16	0.51	30	0.37
Gierzod 1998		4	0.64	15	0.00	4	0.34	4	0.73	6	0.63	4	0.68
Gornostaeva 1994		53	0.42	16	0.00	60	0.04	67	0.04	62	0.04	85	0.04
Groot 1988		24	0.52	46	0.00	16	0.09	19	0.49	5	0.55	17	0.52
Harasiewicz 1955		5	0.60	47	0.00	8	0.15	6	0.69	12	0.62	8	0.65
Hatto 1993		2	0.98	1	0.55	1	0.55	2	0.99	1	1.00	2	0.99
Hatto 1997		1	0.98	2	0.44	2	0.97	1	1.00	1	1.00	1	1.00
Horowitz 1949		81	0.30	48	0.00	82	0.04	74	0.04	23	0.36	62	0.12
Indjic 1988		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Kapell 1951		48	0.44	49	0.00	51	0.05	50	0.05	68	0.04	83	0.04
Kissin 1993		37	0.48	50	0.00	30	0.09	34	0.28	32	0.40	32	0.33
Kushner 1989		15	0.54	51	0.00	22	0.13	13	0.55	27	0.38	22	0.46
Luisada 1991		38	0.48	17	0.00	38	0.06	43	0.15	17	0.49	38	0.27
Lushtak 2004		13	0.55	52	0.00	19	0.08	15	0.53	13	0.55	15	0.54
Malcuzynski 1961		29	0.50	53	0.00	21	0.09	21	0.48	23	0.43	23	0.45
Magaloff 1978		10	0.56	7	0.00	12	0.09	16	0.52	2	0.66	9	0.59
Magin 1975		46	0.44	54	0.00	53	0.05	49	0.05	45	0.09	76	0.07
Michalowski 1933		87	0.14	55	0.00	87	0.03	86	0.03	67	0.03	86	0.03
Milkina 1970		6	0.59	56	0.00	6	0.13	8	0.64	21	0.47	13	0.55
Mohovich 1999		23	0.52	57	0.00	13	0.07	14	0.54	16	0.52	16	0.53
Moravec 1969		30	0.50	58	0.00	33	0.10	26	0.37	19	0.47	24	0.42
Morozova 2008		61	0.39	59	0.00	56	0.04	60	0.04	57	0.06	81	0.05
Neighaus 1950		78	0.33	60	0.00	62	0.03	79	0.03	21	0.41	70	0.11
Niedzielski 1931		82	0.29	61	0.00	80	0.03	85	0.03	37	0.13	79	0.06
Ohlsson 1999		42	0.47	10	0.00	42	0.07	41	0.16	19	0.44	40	0.27
Osinska 1989		3	0.67	62	0.00	3	0.33	3	0.79	7	0.69	3	0.74
Pachmann 1927		86	0.19	63	0.00	86	0.02	88	0.02	74	0.03	88	0.02
Paderewski 1930		85	0.21	64	0.00	79	0.03	84	0.03	17	0.38	66	0.11
Perlemuter 1992		75	0.35	65	0.00	57	0.05	53	0.05	18	0.41	53	0.14
Pierdomenico 2008		68	0.38	8	0.00	50	0.05	52	0.05	17	0.50	46	0.16
Poblocka 1999		21	0.53	66	0.00	23	0.11	22	0.47	17	0.49	20	0.48
Rabcewiczowa 1932		49	0.44	67	0.00	34	0.07	37	0.23	28	0.31	39	0.27
Rachmaninoff 1923		41	0.47	68	0.00	18	0.08	27	0.34	17	0.47	26	0.40
Rangell 2001		69	0.38	18	0.00	72	0.03	78	0.03	33	0.24	75	0.08
Richter 1976		76	0.34	69	0.00	81	0.04	73	0.04	61	0.04	84	0.04
Rosen 1989		19	0.53	19	0.00	24	0.10	24	0.42	8	0.58	19	0.49
Rosenthal 1930		55	0.41	11	0.00	67	0.03	80	0.03	27	0.39	68	0.11
Rosenthal 1931		60	0.40	70	0.00	68	0.03	77	0.03	21	0.41	67	0.11
Rosenthal 1931b		65	0.39	71	0.00	74	0.04	72	0.04	19	0.42	60	0.13
Rosenthal 1931c		44	0.45	72	0.00	52	0.05	51	0.05	15	0.50	48	0.16
Rosenthal 1931d		63	0.39	73	0.00	71	0.03	81	0.03	22	0.39	69	0.11
Rossi 2007		83	0.26	74	0.00	85	0.04	62	0.04	68	0.04	82	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		35	0.49	75	0.00	31	0.08	30	0.30	20	0.45	29	0.37
Rubinstein 1952		36	0.49	76	0.00	28	0.07	25	0.38	26	0.39	28	0.38
Rubinstein 1966		7	0.59	77	0.00	5	0.18	5	0.70	15	0.65	5	0.67
Schilhawsky 1960		27	0.51	78	0.00	36	0.08	31	0.29	16	0.50	27	0.38
Shebanova 2002		32	0.50	79	0.00	15	0.09	18	0.50	4	0.62	12	0.56
Smith 1975		28	0.51	80	0.00	44	0.08	44	0.15	19	0.45	41	0.26
Sokolov 2002		39	0.47	81	0.00	39	0.08	39	0.19	14	0.50	34	0.31
Sztompka 1959		67	0.38	82	0.00	37	0.07	38	0.20	29	0.41	37	0.29
Tomsic 1995		57	0.41	83	0.00	66	0.04	66	0.04	37	0.19	73	0.09
Uninsky 1932		84	0.26	84	0.00	73	0.03	82	0.03	38	0.16	77	0.07
Uninsky 1971		17	0.54	85	0.00	10	0.08	12	0.55	6	0.63	10	0.59
Wasowski 1980		33	0.50	12	0.00	40	0.08	36	0.25	23	0.42	33	0.32
Zak 1937		26	0.51	86	0.00	46	0.06	46	0.06	32	0.38	49	0.15
Zak 1951		31	0.50	87	0.00	48	0.06	47	0.06	30	0.29	56	0.13
Random 1		89	-0.09	88	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	68	0.02	89	0.01
Random 2		88	0.06	89	0.00	88	0.03	87	0.03	5	0.47	63	0.12
Random 3		90	-0.09	90	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	77	0.02	90	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).