Hatto 1993

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		56	0.41	38	0.00	70	0.03	83	0.03	18	0.42	69	0.11
Anderszewski 2003		16	0.54	39	0.00	13	0.10	15	0.50	23	0.48	17	0.49
Ashkenazy 1981		71	0.36	40	0.00	82	0.04	66	0.04	48	0.05	84	0.04
Bacha 2000		55	0.43	22	0.00	74	0.05	56	0.05	11	0.47	47	0.15
Badura 1965		51	0.44	23	0.00	54	0.05	53	0.05	16	0.45	48	0.15
Barbosa 1983		17	0.54	41	0.00	32	0.07	29	0.33	61	0.06	55	0.14
Biret 1990		11	0.55	42	0.00	14	0.09	12	0.54	14	0.51	15	0.52
Blet 2003		70	0.37	43	0.00	48	0.04	65	0.04	17	0.30	68	0.11
Block 1995		63	0.39	16	0.00	58	0.04	72	0.04	38	0.17	76	0.08
Blumental 1952		6	0.59	44	0.00	9	0.14	8	0.62	6	0.70	8	0.66
Boshniakovich 1969		42	0.46	3	0.00	27	0.08	30	0.33	33	0.25	36	0.29
Brailowsky 1960		25	0.51	45	0.00	35	0.09	34	0.25	30	0.40	33	0.32
Bunin 1987		50	0.44	46	0.00	55	0.04	77	0.04	17	0.36	65	0.12
Bunin 1987b		54	0.43	17	0.00	62	0.04	64	0.04	20	0.39	60	0.12
Chiu 1999		59	0.40	47	0.00	73	0.04	73	0.04	39	0.17	74	0.08
Cohen 1997		73	0.36	48	0.00	47	0.04	60	0.04	4	0.54	49	0.15
Cortot 1951		74	0.35	9	0.00	78	0.05	55	0.05	15	0.47	50	0.15
Csalog 1996		45	0.45	24	0.00	29	0.08	35	0.23	24	0.33	38	0.28
Czerny 1949		23	0.52	25	0.00	12	0.13	10	0.58	21	0.63	10	0.60
Czerny 1990		9	0.58	26	0.00	7	0.21	6	0.69	20	0.66	6	0.67
Duchoud 2007		82	0.30	49	0.00	84	0.04	58	0.04	42	0.17	75	0.08
Ezaki 2006		15	0.54	50	0.00	31	0.07	26	0.37	34	0.24	35	0.30
Falvay 1989		12	0.55	10	0.00	21	0.12	20	0.47	30	0.46	21	0.46
Farrell 1958		41	0.46	27	0.00	39	0.06	43	0.16	24	0.41	40	0.26
Ferenczy 1958		27	0.50	51	0.00	37	0.06	38	0.20	8	0.63	29	0.35
Fliere 1977		13	0.54	4	0.00	25	0.09	23	0.43	26	0.40	24	0.41
Fou 1978		48	0.44	12	0.00	67	0.04	74	0.04	66	0.04	82	0.04
Francois 1956		79	0.33	52	0.00	71	0.03	82	0.03	31	0.26	73	0.09
Friedman 1923		65	0.39	53	0.00	57	0.04	68	0.04	4	0.57	51	0.15
Friedman 1923b		67	0.38	28	0.00	64	0.06	45	0.06	9	0.54	44	0.18
Friedman 1930		62	0.40	54	0.00	63	0.05	52	0.05	10	0.52	46	0.16
Garcia 2007		78	0.33	55	0.00	79	0.04	70	0.04	33	0.29	70	0.11
Garcia 2007b		57	0.41	29	0.00	36	0.09	36	0.23	17	0.48	32	0.33
Gierzod 1998		4	0.63	56	0.00	4	0.29	5	0.72	8	0.62	5	0.67
Gornostaeva 1994		53	0.43	57	0.00	66	0.04	67	0.04	55	0.05	85	0.04
Groot 1988		19	0.53	18	0.00	16	0.11	18	0.49	4	0.56	16	0.52
Harasiewicz 1955		5	0.62	58	0.00	5	0.20	4	0.73	5	0.67	4	0.70
Hatto 1993		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Hatto 1997		2	0.97	2	0.22	2	0.96	2	0.99	2	0.99	2	0.99
Horowitz 1949		81	0.31	59	0.00	80	0.03	80	0.03	17	0.42	67	0.11
Indjic 1988		1	0.98	1	0.77	1	0.77	1	1.00	2	0.99	1	0.99
Kapell 1951		52	0.43	8	0.00	51	0.05	54	0.05	65	0.05	79	0.05
Kissin 1993		43	0.45	19	0.00	42	0.07	37	0.21	40	0.30	42	0.25
Kushner 1989		18	0.53	60	0.00	23	0.08	19	0.49	33	0.34	25	0.41
Luisada 1991		40	0.47	13	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.12	20	0.46	43	0.23
Lushtak 2004		14	0.54	61	0.00	19	0.10	16	0.50	14	0.54	14	0.52
Malcuzynski 1961		30	0.50	30	0.00	24	0.08	22	0.44	31	0.38	26	0.41
Magaloff 1978		10	0.57	5	0.00	11	0.12	13	0.53	1	0.67	9	0.60
Magin 1975		46	0.45	62	0.00	61	0.05	49	0.05	48	0.07	78	0.06
Michalowski 1933		87	0.11	63	0.00	87	0.02	88	0.02	81	0.02	88	0.02
Milkina 1970		7	0.59	31	0.00	8	0.16	9	0.59	23	0.46	13	0.52
Mohovich 1999		22	0.52	64	0.00	17	0.09	17	0.49	21	0.48	19	0.48
Moravec 1969		26	0.51	65	0.00	26	0.09	25	0.41	15	0.50	22	0.45
Morozova 2008		66	0.39	14	0.00	60	0.04	71	0.04	59	0.05	83	0.04
Neighaus 1950		77	0.33	66	0.00	68	0.04	57	0.04	18	0.43	59	0.13
Niedzielski 1931		80	0.31	20	0.00	69	0.03	85	0.03	27	0.28	72	0.09
Ohlsson 1999		39	0.47	67	0.00	38	0.06	41	0.17	20	0.44	39	0.27
Osinska 1989		3	0.66	21	0.00	3	0.22	3	0.75	10	0.66	3	0.70
Pachmann 1927		86	0.20	68	0.00	86	0.03	87	0.03	67	0.03	87	0.03
Paderewski 1930		85	0.21	69	0.00	83	0.04	69	0.04	22	0.35	62	0.12
Perlemuter 1992		75	0.34	70	0.00	53	0.04	62	0.04	17	0.42	57	0.13
Pierdomenico 2008		72	0.36	6	0.00	50	0.04	59	0.04	20	0.49	53	0.14
Poblocka 1999		21	0.52	71	0.00	20	0.10	21	0.47	19	0.48	20	0.47
Rabcewiczowa 1932		44	0.45	32	0.00	30	0.08	31	0.31	20	0.39	28	0.35
Rachmaninoff 1923		38	0.48	72	0.00	18	0.10	27	0.36	11	0.52	23	0.43
Rangell 2001		69	0.37	73	0.00	75	0.03	84	0.03	35	0.22	77	0.08
Richter 1976		76	0.34	74	0.00	81	0.03	78	0.03	54	0.04	86	0.03
Rosen 1989		24	0.52	33	0.00	22	0.09	24	0.41	11	0.58	18	0.49
Rosenthal 1930		49	0.44	75	0.00	56	0.03	79	0.03	20	0.48	64	0.12
Rosenthal 1931		58	0.41	76	0.00	65	0.04	61	0.04	18	0.44	58	0.13
Rosenthal 1931b		64	0.39	34	0.00	76	0.04	75	0.04	17	0.46	56	0.14
Rosenthal 1931c		47	0.44	77	0.00	52	0.06	46	0.06	14	0.52	45	0.18
Rosenthal 1931d		60	0.40	78	0.00	72	0.03	81	0.03	16	0.47	66	0.12
Rossi 2007		84	0.24	79	0.00	85	0.04	63	0.04	58	0.05	81	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		37	0.48	15	0.00	33	0.08	33	0.27	21	0.43	31	0.34
Rubinstein 1952		36	0.48	11	0.00	28	0.08	28	0.35	29	0.36	30	0.35
Rubinstein 1966		8	0.58	80	0.00	6	0.14	7	0.68	16	0.64	7	0.66
Schilhawsky 1960		32	0.50	81	0.00	34	0.08	32	0.30	19	0.49	27	0.38
Shebanova 2002		28	0.50	35	0.00	15	0.09	14	0.51	5	0.61	12	0.56
Smith 1975		35	0.48	82	0.00	46	0.05	51	0.05	24	0.40	52	0.14
Sokolov 2002		34	0.49	83	0.00	41	0.06	39	0.20	18	0.49	34	0.31
Sztompka 1959		68	0.38	84	0.00	43	0.08	40	0.19	28	0.41	37	0.28
Tomsic 1995		61	0.40	85	0.00	77	0.05	50	0.05	66	0.05	80	0.05
Uninsky 1932		83	0.27	86	0.00	59	0.04	76	0.04	34	0.23	71	0.10
Uninsky 1971		20	0.53	87	0.00	10	0.11	11	0.55	7	0.63	11	0.59
Wasowski 1980		33	0.49	36	0.00	40	0.07	42	0.17	29	0.36	41	0.25
Zak 1937		29	0.50	37	0.00	45	0.05	47	0.05	28	0.39	54	0.14
Zak 1951		31	0.50	7	0.00	49	0.05	48	0.05	32	0.27	61	0.12
Random 1		89	-0.10	88	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	71	0.02	90	0.01
Random 2		88	0.08	89	0.00	88	0.03	86	0.03	4	0.49	63	0.12
Random 3		90	-0.10	90	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	68	0.03	89	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).