Groot 1988

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		26	0.44	34	0.00	12	0.11	23	0.29	5	0.54	15	0.40
Anderszewski 2003		35	0.42	35	0.00	28	0.05	31	0.20	46	0.08	44	0.13
Ashkenazy 1981		65	0.36	48	0.00	69	0.04	66	0.04	44	0.12	64	0.07
Bacha 2000		40	0.42	79	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.10	13	0.46	35	0.21
Badura 1965		60	0.38	29	0.00	67	0.06	47	0.06	43	0.10	63	0.08
Barbosa 1983		12	0.48	50	0.00	18	0.08	16	0.38	44	0.13	34	0.22
Biret 1990		2	0.54	9	0.02	6	0.13	2	0.57	16	0.48	7	0.52
Blet 2003		29	0.43	21	0.00	37	0.06	38	0.14	8	0.47	27	0.26
Block 1995		63	0.36	26	0.00	62	0.06	51	0.06	43	0.14	57	0.09
Blumental 1952		8	0.53	2	0.18	3	0.18	7	0.54	14	0.58	3	0.56
Boshniakovich 1969		50	0.40	20	0.01	43	0.05	43	0.10	46	0.08	58	0.09
Brailowsky 1960		3	0.54	7	0.03	7	0.15	8	0.53	10	0.63	1	0.58
Bunin 1987		37	0.42	36	0.00	50	0.05	59	0.05	19	0.33	45	0.13
Bunin 1987b		34	0.42	60	0.00	41	0.06	40	0.11	19	0.40	36	0.21
Chiu 1999		59	0.38	15	0.01	35	0.06	32	0.19	7	0.48	23	0.30
Cohen 1997		54	0.39	12	0.02	32	0.05	29	0.22	3	0.57	21	0.35
Cortot 1951		73	0.29	54	0.00	77	0.03	81	0.03	32	0.31	54	0.10
Csalog 1996		16	0.48	45	0.00	33	0.06	28	0.24	30	0.23	32	0.23
Czerny 1949		71	0.32	28	0.00	72	0.05	63	0.05	65	0.04	78	0.04
Czerny 1990		36	0.42	10	0.02	24	0.06	17	0.36	42	0.19	28	0.26
Duchoud 2007		74	0.28	74	0.00	75	0.03	79	0.03	35	0.33	53	0.10
Ezaki 2006		41	0.42	85	0.00	56	0.05	65	0.05	63	0.05	65	0.05
Falvay 1989		19	0.45	22	0.00	34	0.07	24	0.28	57	0.05	47	0.12
Farrell 1958		49	0.40	37	0.00	53	0.04	69	0.04	34	0.29	48	0.11
Ferenczy 1958		44	0.41	5	0.05	36	0.06	39	0.14	21	0.51	25	0.27
Fliere 1977		1	0.54	3	0.11	2	0.23	10	0.52	21	0.44	10	0.48
Fou 1978		23	0.44	42	0.00	22	0.08	30	0.21	39	0.17	37	0.19
Francois 1956		67	0.36	56	0.00	66	0.07	46	0.07	22	0.37	40	0.16
Friedman 1923		80	0.26	43	0.00	73	0.04	77	0.04	58	0.05	82	0.04
Friedman 1923b		82	0.25	51	0.00	74	0.04	78	0.04	72	0.04	79	0.04
Friedman 1930		64	0.36	47	0.00	51	0.04	76	0.04	16	0.46	43	0.14
Garcia 2007		77	0.27	63	0.00	79	0.03	85	0.03	66	0.04	88	0.03
Garcia 2007b		48	0.40	49	0.00	26	0.08	27	0.26	25	0.38	22	0.31
Gierzod 1998		30	0.43	68	0.00	38	0.05	37	0.16	56	0.05	56	0.09
Gornostaeva 1994		69	0.34	86	0.00	64	0.06	50	0.06	54	0.05	72	0.05
Groot 1988		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Harasiewicz 1955		56	0.38	75	0.00	63	0.05	53	0.05	54	0.05	73	0.05
Hatto 1993		9	0.53	55	0.00	8	0.15	4	0.56	18	0.49	8	0.52
Hatto 1997		6	0.53	8	0.03	5	0.14	1	0.60	16	0.51	4	0.55
Horowitz 1949		45	0.41	14	0.01	45	0.05	60	0.05	5	0.56	38	0.17
Indjic 1988		10	0.52	24	0.00	9	0.15	5	0.55	19	0.49	6	0.52
Kapell 1951		43	0.42	52	0.00	59	0.05	57	0.05	66	0.05	68	0.05
Kissin 1993		75	0.28	81	0.00	81	0.05	64	0.05	61	0.05	70	0.05
Kushner 1989		32	0.42	72	0.00	29	0.05	36	0.16	57	0.05	55	0.09
Luisada 1991		53	0.39	41	0.00	46	0.05	56	0.05	36	0.20	49	0.10
Lushtak 2004		24	0.44	46	0.00	17	0.08	12	0.42	25	0.42	12	0.42
Malcuzynski 1961		47	0.41	53	0.00	30	0.06	41	0.11	57	0.06	59	0.08
Magaloff 1978		15	0.48	32	0.00	14	0.11	15	0.39	22	0.41	14	0.40
Magin 1975		14	0.48	27	0.00	13	0.09	14	0.39	25	0.38	16	0.38
Michalowski 1933		86	0.18	25	0.00	86	0.03	87	0.03	51	0.04	86	0.03
Milkina 1970		7	0.53	16	0.01	10	0.18	6	0.54	40	0.23	19	0.35
Mohovich 1999		5	0.54	4	0.06	4	0.16	3	0.57	17	0.51	5	0.54
Moravec 1969		27	0.44	59	0.00	58	0.04	68	0.04	54	0.06	66	0.05
Morozova 2008		62	0.37	13	0.01	49	0.06	48	0.06	43	0.10	62	0.08
Neighaus 1950		76	0.27	80	0.00	78	0.03	82	0.03	46	0.06	81	0.04
Niedzielski 1931		68	0.34	23	0.00	47	0.05	58	0.05	15	0.41	42	0.14
Ohlsson 1999		70	0.33	18	0.01	65	0.05	52	0.05	43	0.13	61	0.08
Osinska 1989		38	0.42	31	0.00	39	0.06	34	0.17	54	0.06	50	0.10
Pachmann 1927		87	0.15	82	0.00	87	0.03	86	0.03	73	0.03	84	0.03
Paderewski 1930		85	0.18	64	0.00	85	0.04	75	0.04	64	0.04	77	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		79	0.26	61	0.00	82	0.04	74	0.04	65	0.04	74	0.04
Pierdomenico 2008		78	0.27	73	0.00	71	0.04	72	0.04	50	0.05	75	0.04
Poblocka 1999		21	0.44	87	0.00	20	0.06	20	0.34	34	0.25	24	0.29
Rabcewiczowa 1932		52	0.39	38	0.00	25	0.07	25	0.28	32	0.24	26	0.26
Rachmaninoff 1923		4	0.54	1	0.28	1	0.27	9	0.53	5	0.62	2	0.57
Rangell 2001		83	0.24	76	0.00	83	0.04	71	0.04	71	0.05	80	0.04
Richter 1976		51	0.39	39	0.00	52	0.04	73	0.04	36	0.26	52	0.10
Rosen 1989		31	0.43	19	0.01	19	0.08	18	0.35	16	0.47	13	0.41
Rosenthal 1930		13	0.48	44	0.00	21	0.06	22	0.30	8	0.67	11	0.45
Rosenthal 1931		57	0.38	58	0.00	61	0.06	49	0.06	15	0.47	39	0.17
Rosenthal 1931b		25	0.44	83	0.00	54	0.04	70	0.04	9	0.56	41	0.15
Rosenthal 1931c		39	0.42	67	0.00	55	0.05	62	0.05	24	0.36	46	0.13
Rosenthal 1931d		22	0.44	17	0.01	42	0.05	42	0.10	8	0.59	30	0.24
Rossi 2007		84	0.22	88	0.00	84	0.03	84	0.03	74	0.03	83	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		58	0.38	62	0.00	60	0.05	54	0.05	37	0.20	51	0.10
Rubinstein 1952		18	0.45	6	0.03	16	0.08	19	0.35	38	0.20	29	0.26
Rubinstein 1966		17	0.47	71	0.00	15	0.09	13	0.40	36	0.31	20	0.35
Schilhawsky 1960		20	0.45	33	0.00	23	0.07	26	0.27	17	0.50	17	0.37
Shebanova 2002		28	0.43	57	0.00	27	0.09	21	0.32	17	0.43	18	0.37
Smith 1975		33	0.42	65	0.00	40	0.06	35	0.16	29	0.34	31	0.23
Sokolov 2002		66	0.36	66	0.00	70	0.05	61	0.05	55	0.05	67	0.05
Sztompka 1959		81	0.25	70	0.00	80	0.03	80	0.03	72	0.04	85	0.03
Tomsic 1995		61	0.38	77	0.00	68	0.08	45	0.08	46	0.08	60	0.08
Uninsky 1932		72	0.31	69	0.00	76	0.03	83	0.03	59	0.04	87	0.03
Uninsky 1971		11	0.50	40	0.00	11	0.14	11	0.50	15	0.53	9	0.51
Wasowski 1980		46	0.41	11	0.02	31	0.05	33	0.18	35	0.28	33	0.22
Zak 1937		55	0.38	89	0.00	57	0.04	67	0.04	59	0.04	76	0.04
Zak 1951		42	0.42	30	0.00	48	0.05	55	0.05	59	0.05	69	0.05
Random 1		90	-0.14	90	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	64	0.03	90	0.02
Random 2		89	-0.07	84	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	77	0.03	89	0.02
Random 3		88	-0.01	78	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	37	0.15	71	0.05

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).