Garcia 2007

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		74	0.20	61	0.00	76	0.03	79	0.03	76	0.03	77	0.03
Anderszewski 2003		33	0.34	77	0.00	30	0.06	31	0.33	53	0.06	25	0.14
Ashkenazy 1981		76	0.18	81	0.00	80	0.03	78	0.03	81	0.03	78	0.03
Bacha 2000		68	0.22	54	0.00	73	0.04	72	0.04	70	0.03	69	0.03
Badura 1965		63	0.25	45	0.00	38	0.06	42	0.14	88	0.02	53	0.05
Barbosa 1983		57	0.28	37	0.00	43	0.08	41	0.16	67	0.05	40	0.09
Biret 1990		38	0.33	40	0.00	41	0.07	39	0.20	76	0.03	44	0.08
Blet 2003		47	0.30	43	0.00	61	0.05	51	0.05	62	0.04	62	0.04
Block 1995		66	0.24	12	0.00	24	0.08	43	0.11	82	0.03	46	0.06
Blumental 1952		56	0.28	82	0.00	62	0.05	50	0.05	75	0.04	65	0.04
Boshniakovich 1969		15	0.40	2	0.03	11	0.22	17	0.49	47	0.07	16	0.19
Brailowsky 1960		86	0.14	66	0.00	87	0.02	85	0.02	82	0.03	83	0.02
Bunin 1987		29	0.35	38	0.00	40	0.08	37	0.24	60	0.04	39	0.10
Bunin 1987b		28	0.36	33	0.00	39	0.07	34	0.27	56	0.05	32	0.12
Chiu 1999		54	0.29	67	0.00	46	0.05	53	0.05	54	0.06	49	0.05
Cohen 1997		42	0.31	27	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.11	45	0.06	43	0.08
Cortot 1951		72	0.21	78	0.00	67	0.05	56	0.05	45	0.08	47	0.06
Csalog 1996		11	0.43	16	0.00	8	0.16	5	0.63	28	0.30	7	0.43
Czerny 1949		23	0.38	22	0.00	23	0.12	24	0.42	58	0.06	21	0.16
Czerny 1990		51	0.29	47	0.00	59	0.05	60	0.05	73	0.03	66	0.04
Duchoud 2007		45	0.31	25	0.00	47	0.05	55	0.05	31	0.40	26	0.14
Ezaki 2006		32	0.34	57	0.00	32	0.06	35	0.25	60	0.05	36	0.11
Falvay 1989		19	0.38	34	0.00	19	0.10	23	0.42	70	0.04	29	0.13
Farrell 1958		18	0.39	9	0.01	18	0.09	13	0.51	40	0.22	10	0.33
Ferenczy 1958		60	0.27	72	0.00	69	0.06	47	0.06	70	0.04	51	0.05
Fliere 1977		14	0.42	8	0.01	12	0.14	15	0.50	57	0.05	19	0.16
Fou 1978		35	0.34	28	0.00	45	0.05	59	0.05	85	0.03	59	0.04
Francois 1956		55	0.29	62	0.00	58	0.05	61	0.05	66	0.04	68	0.04
Friedman 1923		79	0.17	68	0.00	79	0.04	75	0.04	85	0.03	82	0.03
Friedman 1923b		85	0.15	58	0.00	83	0.02	83	0.02	82	0.03	89	0.02
Friedman 1930		52	0.29	7	0.01	50	0.04	62	0.04	77	0.03	75	0.03
Garcia 2007		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Garcia 2007b		1	0.69	1	0.82	1	0.81	1	0.88	1	0.86	1	0.87
Gierzod 1998		12	0.43	31	0.00	17	0.08	21	0.44	58	0.05	22	0.15
Gornostaeva 1994		3	0.46	23	0.00	10	0.17	10	0.54	36	0.24	8	0.36
Groot 1988		59	0.27	50	0.00	54	0.04	66	0.04	85	0.03	79	0.03
Harasiewicz 1955		30	0.35	32	0.00	29	0.07	30	0.34	69	0.04	35	0.12
Hatto 1993		37	0.33	48	0.00	36	0.07	33	0.29	70	0.04	37	0.11
Hatto 1997		34	0.34	46	0.00	26	0.09	20	0.45	67	0.04	31	0.13
Horowitz 1949		83	0.17	70	0.00	82	0.02	84	0.02	78	0.03	84	0.02
Indjic 1988		39	0.32	79	0.00	31	0.06	28	0.36	64	0.04	33	0.12
Kapell 1951		5	0.46	14	0.00	6	0.19	7	0.63	31	0.38	5	0.49
Kissin 1993		64	0.24	83	0.00	64	0.04	68	0.04	77	0.04	60	0.04
Kushner 1989		8	0.44	35	0.00	9	0.19	9	0.55	45	0.10	13	0.23
Luisada 1991		71	0.21	84	0.00	77	0.04	73	0.04	75	0.04	55	0.04
Lushtak 2004		43	0.31	73	0.00	55	0.04	64	0.04	59	0.05	64	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961		6	0.46	3	0.02	4	0.17	3	0.68	38	0.27	6	0.43
Magaloff 1978		69	0.22	71	0.00	70	0.03	80	0.03	75	0.03	70	0.03
Magin 1975		13	0.42	21	0.00	16	0.08	14	0.51	46	0.08	15	0.20
Michalowski 1933		87	0.11	20	0.00	78	0.04	70	0.04	73	0.03	74	0.03
Milkina 1970		21	0.38	55	0.00	22	0.15	16	0.49	76	0.04	24	0.14
Mohovich 1999		10	0.43	13	0.00	5	0.19	6	0.63	38	0.18	9	0.34
Moravec 1969		31	0.35	59	0.00	53	0.05	49	0.05	67	0.04	54	0.04
Morozova 2008		27	0.36	63	0.00	25	0.08	22	0.44	42	0.11	14	0.22
Neighaus 1950		82	0.17	24	0.00	81	0.02	82	0.02	78	0.03	90	0.02
Niedzielski 1931		65	0.24	6	0.01	51	0.05	58	0.05	68	0.04	58	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		49	0.30	74	0.00	35	0.06	36	0.24	71	0.04	38	0.10
Osinska 1989		17	0.39	42	0.00	14	0.08	11	0.52	51	0.06	17	0.18
Pachmann 1927		53	0.29	41	0.00	60	0.04	67	0.04	43	0.13	45	0.07
Paderewski 1930		44	0.31	4	0.01	37	0.06	38	0.22	18	0.37	12	0.29
Perlemuter 1992		24	0.37	19	0.00	34	0.07	32	0.30	28	0.32	11	0.31
Pierdomenico 2008		4	0.46	5	0.01	2	0.21	4	0.64	1	0.73	3	0.68
Poblocka 1999		61	0.26	85	0.00	63	0.05	52	0.05	63	0.06	48	0.05
Rabcewiczowa 1932		9	0.44	36	0.00	13	0.14	12	0.51	51	0.05	20	0.16
Rachmaninoff 1923		78	0.17	26	0.00	74	0.03	77	0.03	80	0.03	71	0.03
Rangell 2001		22	0.38	39	0.00	33	0.07	26	0.38	57	0.06	23	0.15
Richter 1976		46	0.31	60	0.00	52	0.04	65	0.04	72	0.03	73	0.03
Rosen 1989		20	0.38	51	0.00	15	0.07	29	0.35	59	0.04	34	0.12
Rosenthal 1930		77	0.18	86	0.00	86	0.02	86	0.02	85	0.02	87	0.02
Rosenthal 1931		84	0.16	87	0.00	85	0.02	87	0.02	87	0.02	85	0.02
Rosenthal 1931b		80	0.17	56	0.00	84	0.03	81	0.03	80	0.03	80	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		75	0.19	52	0.00	75	0.04	63	0.04	80	0.03	81	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		67	0.23	64	0.00	72	0.04	76	0.04	53	0.05	67	0.04
Rossi 2007		2	0.50	11	0.00	3	0.23	2	0.74	1	0.71	2	0.72
Rubinstein 1939		36	0.34	53	0.00	27	0.10	25	0.41	61	0.04	30	0.13
Rubinstein 1952		26	0.36	29	0.00	20	0.09	19	0.47	65	0.04	27	0.14
Rubinstein 1966		16	0.39	49	0.00	21	0.11	18	0.48	57	0.06	18	0.17
Schilhawsky 1960		48	0.30	18	0.00	57	0.04	69	0.04	63	0.04	63	0.04
Shebanova 2002		50	0.29	75	0.00	48	0.06	45	0.06	66	0.04	52	0.05
Smith 1975		73	0.21	10	0.01	68	0.06	48	0.06	76	0.03	57	0.04
Sokolov 2002		70	0.22	17	0.00	65	0.05	57	0.05	73	0.03	56	0.04
Sztompka 1959		41	0.32	88	0.00	42	0.06	40	0.17	65	0.04	41	0.08
Tomsic 1995		7	0.44	44	0.00	7	0.16	8	0.58	13	0.52	4	0.55
Uninsky 1932		81	0.17	89	0.00	71	0.04	74	0.04	77	0.03	76	0.03
Uninsky 1971		62	0.26	15	0.00	66	0.05	54	0.05	80	0.03	61	0.04
Wasowski 1980		25	0.37	80	0.00	28	0.08	27	0.36	64	0.05	28	0.13
Zak 1937		58	0.27	65	0.00	56	0.04	71	0.04	81	0.03	72	0.03
Zak 1951		40	0.32	69	0.00	49	0.06	46	0.06	54	0.05	50	0.05
Random 1		90	-0.10	76	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	49	0.04	88	0.02
Random 2		89	-0.03	90	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	54	0.04	86	0.02
Random 3		88	0.04	30	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	13	0.35	42	0.08

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).