Friedman 1923

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		42	0.31	15	0.00	43	0.05	42	0.10	39	0.15	28	0.12
Anderszewski 2003		34	0.33	23	0.00	40	0.06	40	0.13	75	0.03	43	0.06
Ashkenazy 1981		23	0.36	60	0.00	14	0.14	15	0.51	12	0.45	5	0.48
Bacha 2000		64	0.25	61	0.00	65	0.05	65	0.05	73	0.03	56	0.04
Badura 1965		7	0.41	12	0.00	6	0.11	11	0.53	14	0.45	4	0.49
Barbosa 1983		37	0.33	42	0.00	37	0.06	37	0.19	70	0.04	38	0.09
Biret 1990		31	0.34	24	0.00	31	0.06	25	0.36	86	0.02	41	0.08
Blet 2003		52	0.28	6	0.00	58	0.06	47	0.06	77	0.03	68	0.04
Block 1995		38	0.32	62	0.00	26	0.07	30	0.30	51	0.05	29	0.12
Blumental 1952		22	0.36	30	0.00	25	0.06	26	0.33	45	0.08	17	0.16
Boshniakovich 1969		32	0.34	63	0.00	18	0.11	16	0.51	63	0.04	25	0.14
Brailowsky 1960		16	0.37	10	0.00	22	0.11	23	0.40	64	0.05	23	0.14
Bunin 1987		73	0.21	64	0.00	47	0.05	62	0.05	73	0.04	71	0.04
Bunin 1987b		85	0.14	65	0.00	73	0.04	77	0.04	80	0.03	77	0.03
Chiu 1999		68	0.24	43	0.00	76	0.04	72	0.04	75	0.03	75	0.03
Cohen 1997		74	0.21	9	0.00	59	0.06	48	0.06	68	0.04	53	0.05
Cortot 1951		86	0.12	66	0.00	86	0.04	81	0.04	83	0.02	83	0.03
Csalog 1996		72	0.21	67	0.00	77	0.03	84	0.03	78	0.04	79	0.03
Czerny 1949		45	0.30	13	0.00	46	0.05	63	0.05	69	0.04	69	0.04
Czerny 1990		10	0.40	68	0.00	15	0.15	7	0.56	65	0.04	20	0.15
Duchoud 2007		75	0.20	21	0.00	74	0.04	71	0.04	51	0.06	51	0.05
Ezaki 2006		65	0.25	69	0.00	72	0.04	69	0.04	73	0.04	55	0.04
Falvay 1989		26	0.35	70	0.00	29	0.07	34	0.23	71	0.04	34	0.10
Farrell 1958		70	0.23	71	0.00	69	0.05	54	0.05	80	0.03	62	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		47	0.30	16	0.00	39	0.06	38	0.15	60	0.05	39	0.09
Fliere 1977		33	0.34	72	0.00	44	0.04	44	0.08	86	0.03	47	0.05
Fou 1978		15	0.37	44	0.00	16	0.13	18	0.49	59	0.05	16	0.16
Francois 1956		29	0.35	7	0.00	5	0.21	14	0.51	11	0.46	6	0.48
Friedman 1923		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Friedman 1923b		1	0.95	1	0.98	1	0.97	1	0.99	1	0.99	1	0.99
Friedman 1930		2	0.62	2	0.01	2	0.64	2	0.84	1	0.85	2	0.84
Garcia 2007		80	0.17	17	0.00	83	0.03	85	0.03	75	0.04	82	0.03
Garcia 2007b		56	0.27	5	0.00	63	0.04	70	0.04	77	0.03	84	0.03
Gierzod 1998		39	0.32	73	0.00	48	0.06	51	0.06	82	0.03	70	0.04
Gornostaeva 1994		17	0.37	74	0.00	13	0.14	12	0.52	53	0.05	18	0.16
Groot 1988		61	0.26	14	0.00	55	0.05	58	0.05	77	0.04	72	0.04
Harasiewicz 1955		18	0.37	75	0.00	28	0.07	29	0.31	80	0.03	36	0.10
Hatto 1993		13	0.39	76	0.00	9	0.13	4	0.57	68	0.04	21	0.15
Hatto 1997		9	0.40	77	0.00	10	0.19	6	0.57	52	0.05	14	0.17
Horowitz 1949		51	0.29	35	0.00	53	0.04	75	0.04	27	0.31	31	0.11
Indjic 1988		11	0.39	45	0.00	11	0.12	9	0.55	57	0.05	13	0.17
Kapell 1951		78	0.19	46	0.00	82	0.03	86	0.03	82	0.02	85	0.02
Kissin 1993		54	0.28	25	0.00	64	0.05	64	0.05	70	0.04	65	0.04
Kushner 1989		30	0.34	47	0.00	38	0.08	36	0.19	75	0.04	37	0.09
Luisada 1991		28	0.35	48	0.00	23	0.11	22	0.41	46	0.06	15	0.16
Lushtak 2004		19	0.36	49	0.00	27	0.07	27	0.32	79	0.04	32	0.11
Malcuzynski 1961		49	0.29	78	0.00	60	0.07	45	0.07	77	0.03	48	0.05
Magaloff 1978		43	0.31	22	0.00	49	0.05	53	0.05	78	0.03	60	0.04
Magin 1975		44	0.31	26	0.00	51	0.05	56	0.05	74	0.04	61	0.04
Michalowski 1933		87	0.10	79	0.00	87	0.04	80	0.04	47	0.04	64	0.04
Milkina 1970		20	0.36	80	0.00	20	0.15	19	0.47	81	0.03	27	0.12
Mohovich 1999		21	0.36	11	0.00	24	0.08	24	0.37	67	0.04	30	0.12
Moravec 1969		69	0.24	81	0.00	71	0.04	76	0.04	81	0.03	73	0.03
Morozova 2008		76	0.20	31	0.00	75	0.04	73	0.04	76	0.03	81	0.03
Neighaus 1950		3	0.46	82	0.00	3	0.48	13	0.52	8	0.55	3	0.53
Niedzielski 1931		62	0.26	32	0.00	35	0.06	41	0.12	52	0.06	40	0.08
Ohlsson 1999		27	0.35	50	0.00	32	0.07	28	0.32	59	0.05	26	0.13
Osinska 1989		36	0.33	8	0.00	36	0.07	35	0.21	66	0.05	33	0.10
Pachmann 1927		79	0.19	51	0.00	80	0.04	79	0.04	77	0.03	78	0.03
Paderewski 1930		77	0.20	36	0.00	50	0.05	52	0.05	46	0.06	50	0.05
Perlemuter 1992		67	0.24	37	0.00	56	0.05	55	0.05	70	0.04	57	0.04
Pierdomenico 2008		82	0.16	83	0.00	85	0.04	78	0.04	70	0.03	76	0.03
Poblocka 1999		53	0.28	52	0.00	68	0.04	74	0.04	78	0.04	58	0.04
Rabcewiczowa 1932		60	0.26	84	0.00	41	0.06	39	0.13	79	0.03	42	0.06
Rachmaninoff 1923		24	0.35	38	0.00	21	0.12	21	0.45	33	0.25	8	0.34
Rangell 2001		63	0.26	33	0.00	70	0.06	49	0.06	55	0.06	44	0.06
Richter 1976		66	0.24	3	0.00	42	0.05	43	0.09	70	0.03	49	0.05
Rosen 1989		25	0.35	53	0.00	34	0.08	32	0.28	45	0.07	24	0.14
Rosenthal 1930		50	0.29	39	0.00	67	0.06	50	0.06	56	0.05	52	0.05
Rosenthal 1931		58	0.27	54	0.00	61	0.04	67	0.04	75	0.04	67	0.04
Rosenthal 1931b		59	0.27	55	0.00	66	0.05	59	0.05	45	0.06	54	0.05
Rosenthal 1931c		48	0.29	85	0.00	52	0.04	66	0.04	46	0.10	46	0.06
Rosenthal 1931d		57	0.27	56	0.00	62	0.05	57	0.05	45	0.08	45	0.06
Rossi 2007		81	0.17	40	0.00	79	0.03	82	0.03	83	0.03	74	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		14	0.38	41	0.00	19	0.12	20	0.46	53	0.05	19	0.15
Rubinstein 1952		5	0.43	4	0.00	4	0.32	3	0.66	43	0.14	9	0.30
Rubinstein 1966		4	0.44	27	0.00	7	0.14	5	0.57	55	0.06	12	0.18
Schilhawsky 1960		71	0.22	57	0.00	78	0.04	68	0.04	82	0.03	80	0.03
Shebanova 2002		41	0.32	18	0.00	33	0.08	33	0.27	68	0.04	35	0.10
Smith 1975		6	0.42	28	0.00	12	0.19	10	0.54	36	0.27	7	0.38
Sokolov 2002		55	0.27	86	0.00	57	0.06	46	0.06	75	0.03	59	0.04
Sztompka 1959		40	0.32	87	0.00	45	0.05	60	0.05	68	0.04	63	0.04
Tomsic 1995		83	0.16	34	0.00	81	0.02	88	0.02	79	0.03	86	0.02
Uninsky 1932		84	0.15	88	0.00	84	0.03	83	0.03	83	0.02	87	0.02
Uninsky 1971		46	0.30	58	0.00	54	0.05	61	0.05	78	0.04	66	0.04
Wasowski 1980		35	0.33	19	0.00	30	0.06	31	0.28	49	0.07	22	0.14
Zak 1937		8	0.41	20	0.00	8	0.13	8	0.55	40	0.14	10	0.28
Zak 1951		12	0.39	29	0.00	17	0.16	17	0.51	38	0.10	11	0.23
Random 1		89	-0.09	89	0.00	88	0.02	87	0.02	67	0.02	88	0.02
Random 2		88	-0.08	59	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	84	0.02	89	0.01
Random 3		90	-0.14	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	88	0.01	90	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).