Francois 1956

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		40	0.34	63	0.00	54	0.04	61	0.04	52	0.05	70	0.04
Anderszewski 2003		73	0.24	80	0.00	63	0.05	60	0.05	83	0.03	68	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981		17	0.40	45	0.00	33	0.06	30	0.27	19	0.37	10	0.32
Bacha 2000		50	0.31	33	0.00	39	0.06	40	0.16	25	0.32	13	0.23
Badura 1965		72	0.24	54	0.00	71	0.05	54	0.05	68	0.03	73	0.04
Barbosa 1983		59	0.30	72	0.00	65	0.05	59	0.05	76	0.03	67	0.04
Biret 1990		19	0.39	4	0.07	3	0.13	4	0.56	51	0.06	18	0.18
Blet 2003		35	0.36	26	0.00	53	0.05	57	0.05	60	0.05	53	0.05
Block 1995		86	0.14	71	0.00	86	0.03	73	0.03	85	0.03	81	0.03
Blumental 1952		66	0.28	73	0.00	55	0.04	67	0.04	80	0.03	82	0.03
Boshniakovich 1969		14	0.40	34	0.00	27	0.08	16	0.40	83	0.03	31	0.11
Brailowsky 1960		78	0.22	81	0.00	81	0.03	75	0.03	59	0.06	60	0.04
Bunin 1987		60	0.29	82	0.00	48	0.07	45	0.07	71	0.04	57	0.05
Bunin 1987b		69	0.26	78	0.00	57	0.05	56	0.05	68	0.04	65	0.04
Chiu 1999		68	0.26	28	0.00	76	0.03	83	0.03	81	0.02	87	0.02
Cohen 1997		41	0.34	42	0.00	46	0.06	47	0.06	32	0.16	38	0.10
Cortot 1951		67	0.27	74	0.00	70	0.05	55	0.05	47	0.07	50	0.06
Csalog 1996		83	0.19	37	0.00	74	0.03	77	0.03	82	0.03	80	0.03
Czerny 1949		6	0.43	14	0.02	14	0.08	20	0.38	60	0.06	24	0.15
Czerny 1990		25	0.39	20	0.01	29	0.07	28	0.28	70	0.04	32	0.11
Duchoud 2007		57	0.30	59	0.00	58	0.04	62	0.04	45	0.07	55	0.05
Ezaki 2006		63	0.29	36	0.00	62	0.04	71	0.04	86	0.02	74	0.03
Falvay 1989		76	0.24	83	0.00	79	0.03	76	0.03	83	0.03	76	0.03
Farrell 1958		18	0.39	8	0.03	4	0.12	5	0.55	33	0.32	6	0.42
Ferenczy 1958		87	0.12	57	0.00	87	0.02	87	0.02	83	0.03	89	0.02
Fliere 1977		13	0.41	24	0.00	21	0.08	15	0.42	58	0.05	26	0.14
Fou 1978		23	0.39	49	0.00	34	0.05	42	0.14	70	0.04	46	0.07
Francois 1956		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Friedman 1923		38	0.35	32	0.00	10	0.09	11	0.46	14	0.51	4	0.48
Friedman 1923b		48	0.32	29	0.00	11	0.09	19	0.38	21	0.43	7	0.40
Friedman 1930		42	0.33	35	0.00	28	0.06	33	0.25	30	0.28	11	0.26
Garcia 2007		64	0.29	64	0.00	59	0.04	66	0.04	61	0.05	71	0.04
Garcia 2007b		20	0.39	25	0.00	15	0.08	10	0.48	34	0.28	9	0.37
Gierzod 1998		7	0.43	19	0.01	26	0.07	29	0.27	75	0.03	40	0.09
Gornostaeva 1994		11	0.41	13	0.02	12	0.07	13	0.43	65	0.04	27	0.13
Groot 1988		36	0.36	10	0.02	23	0.07	22	0.37	46	0.07	23	0.16
Harasiewicz 1955		22	0.39	65	0.00	32	0.07	32	0.25	58	0.05	34	0.11
Hatto 1993		45	0.33	27	0.00	37	0.06	31	0.26	82	0.03	42	0.09
Hatto 1997		47	0.32	60	0.00	40	0.06	37	0.20	81	0.03	44	0.08
Horowitz 1949		80	0.21	62	0.00	80	0.03	84	0.03	74	0.03	78	0.03
Indjic 1988		44	0.33	84	0.00	38	0.06	35	0.23	63	0.04	36	0.10
Kapell 1951		43	0.33	55	0.00	60	0.06	48	0.06	80	0.03	64	0.04
Kissin 1993		49	0.32	66	0.00	66	0.05	58	0.05	62	0.05	51	0.05
Kushner 1989		12	0.41	85	0.00	18	0.09	9	0.49	49	0.07	14	0.19
Luisada 1991		51	0.31	46	0.00	69	0.04	68	0.04	49	0.05	58	0.04
Lushtak 2004		10	0.42	17	0.01	9	0.10	8	0.52	54	0.05	22	0.16
Malcuzynski 1961		24	0.39	23	0.01	25	0.09	23	0.35	48	0.08	19	0.17
Magaloff 1978		33	0.36	58	0.00	35	0.05	36	0.21	60	0.04	39	0.09
Magin 1975		3	0.44	3	0.09	7	0.10	12	0.46	42	0.13	12	0.24
Michalowski 1933		61	0.29	11	0.02	50	0.05	51	0.05	9	0.52	21	0.16
Milkina 1970		1	0.49	1	0.25	1	0.24	1	0.63	54	0.06	15	0.19
Mohovich 1999		39	0.35	69	0.00	52	0.06	49	0.06	58	0.04	56	0.05
Moravec 1969		82	0.20	47	0.00	84	0.03	79	0.03	85	0.02	86	0.02
Morozova 2008		54	0.31	44	0.00	51	0.06	50	0.06	69	0.04	54	0.05
Neighaus 1950		2	0.44	5	0.06	6	0.11	3	0.56	7	0.55	2	0.55
Niedzielski 1931		75	0.24	48	0.00	72	0.04	72	0.04	66	0.05	63	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		26	0.39	30	0.00	31	0.07	26	0.29	68	0.04	29	0.11
Osinska 1989		16	0.40	39	0.00	44	0.07	44	0.13	73	0.04	45	0.07
Pachmann 1927		71	0.24	53	0.00	75	0.03	74	0.03	50	0.06	66	0.04
Paderewski 1930		37	0.35	9	0.02	16	0.07	17	0.40	6	0.58	3	0.48
Perlemuter 1992		4	0.44	2	0.16	2	0.21	2	0.58	1	0.60	1	0.59
Pierdomenico 2008		27	0.38	16	0.01	17	0.07	21	0.37	16	0.51	5	0.43
Poblocka 1999		74	0.24	79	0.00	82	0.03	80	0.03	81	0.03	75	0.03
Rabcewiczowa 1932		62	0.29	22	0.01	20	0.09	27	0.29	63	0.04	28	0.11
Rachmaninoff 1923		55	0.30	18	0.01	42	0.06	43	0.13	75	0.03	48	0.06
Rangell 2001		32	0.36	40	0.00	43	0.07	41	0.16	47	0.07	33	0.11
Richter 1976		53	0.31	75	0.00	61	0.04	65	0.04	75	0.03	79	0.03
Rosen 1989		30	0.37	7	0.04	24	0.08	38	0.19	73	0.04	41	0.09
Rosenthal 1930		58	0.30	41	0.00	67	0.04	70	0.04	58	0.04	72	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		85	0.15	86	0.00	85	0.02	86	0.02	86	0.02	88	0.02
Rosenthal 1931b		81	0.21	56	0.00	73	0.03	82	0.03	62	0.04	84	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		84	0.19	87	0.00	83	0.03	85	0.03	74	0.04	85	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		79	0.22	67	0.00	78	0.03	81	0.03	76	0.03	83	0.03
Rossi 2007		46	0.33	21	0.01	49	0.05	53	0.05	40	0.12	43	0.08
Rubinstein 1939		52	0.31	76	0.00	47	0.05	52	0.05	57	0.04	62	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		9	0.42	31	0.00	8	0.09	7	0.53	68	0.04	25	0.15
Rubinstein 1966		5	0.44	6	0.04	5	0.15	6	0.53	53	0.06	17	0.18
Schilhawsky 1960		8	0.42	15	0.01	13	0.08	24	0.31	66	0.04	30	0.11
Shebanova 2002		31	0.37	70	0.00	41	0.07	39	0.19	60	0.05	37	0.10
Smith 1975		65	0.29	51	0.00	64	0.04	63	0.04	73	0.04	61	0.04
Sokolov 2002		21	0.39	12	0.02	19	0.08	14	0.43	30	0.34	8	0.38
Sztompka 1959		15	0.40	50	0.00	30	0.06	25	0.30	42	0.11	16	0.18
Tomsic 1995		77	0.23	88	0.00	77	0.03	78	0.03	75	0.04	77	0.03
Uninsky 1932		70	0.26	68	0.00	56	0.04	69	0.04	69	0.04	69	0.04
Uninsky 1971		29	0.37	43	0.00	45	0.06	46	0.06	62	0.05	52	0.05
Wasowski 1980		56	0.30	89	0.00	68	0.04	64	0.04	62	0.05	59	0.04
Zak 1937		34	0.36	52	0.00	36	0.05	34	0.23	60	0.04	35	0.10
Zak 1951		28	0.38	38	0.00	22	0.09	18	0.38	44	0.07	20	0.16
Random 1		90	-0.06	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	69	0.02	90	0.01
Random 2		88	0.04	61	0.00	89	0.02	88	0.02	30	0.22	47	0.07
Random 3		89	-0.04	77	0.00	88	0.02	89	0.02	31	0.18	49	0.06

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).