Fou 1978

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		43	0.46	45	0.00	54	0.07	45	0.07	17	0.42	44	0.17
Anderszewski 2003		19	0.53	48	0.00	19	0.09	17	0.44	27	0.44	18	0.44
Ashkenazy 1981		21	0.53	17	0.01	43	0.07	41	0.13	3	0.57	37	0.27
Bacha 2000		63	0.40	54	0.00	51	0.05	60	0.05	26	0.32	51	0.13
Badura 1965		56	0.42	67	0.00	62	0.04	63	0.04	27	0.28	62	0.11
Barbosa 1983		13	0.56	27	0.01	20	0.09	22	0.39	32	0.29	28	0.34
Biret 1990		20	0.53	16	0.01	16	0.07	19	0.41	28	0.36	25	0.38
Blet 2003		39	0.47	49	0.00	49	0.06	49	0.06	7	0.47	43	0.17
Block 1995		27	0.51	36	0.00	18	0.08	16	0.44	6	0.66	7	0.54
Blumental 1952		18	0.54	34	0.00	24	0.07	26	0.32	23	0.47	21	0.39
Boshniakovich 1969		30	0.50	19	0.01	23	0.10	20	0.40	30	0.27	30	0.33
Brailowsky 1960		23	0.52	8	0.02	29	0.07	25	0.33	22	0.49	20	0.40
Bunin 1987		85	0.24	84	0.00	86	0.02	87	0.02	87	0.02	90	0.02
Bunin 1987b		84	0.25	86	0.00	87	0.03	82	0.03	82	0.03	85	0.03
Chiu 1999		60	0.41	32	0.00	60	0.05	61	0.05	28	0.25	60	0.11
Cohen 1997		79	0.34	69	0.00	81	0.05	55	0.05	49	0.05	76	0.05
Cortot 1951		76	0.36	85	0.00	68	0.03	80	0.03	21	0.45	57	0.12
Csalog 1996		45	0.46	14	0.01	30	0.08	27	0.28	20	0.35	31	0.31
Czerny 1949		44	0.46	76	0.00	25	0.07	35	0.22	36	0.35	34	0.28
Czerny 1990		10	0.57	23	0.01	7	0.12	9	0.52	26	0.58	4	0.55
Duchoud 2007		81	0.29	81	0.00	84	0.04	74	0.04	46	0.07	75	0.05
Ezaki 2006		4	0.60	12	0.01	9	0.12	8	0.54	23	0.49	9	0.51
Falvay 1989		8	0.58	50	0.00	17	0.08	21	0.40	37	0.36	23	0.38
Farrell 1958		64	0.40	87	0.00	53	0.06	50	0.06	44	0.14	66	0.09
Ferenczy 1958		47	0.45	35	0.00	39	0.06	43	0.11	18	0.52	39	0.24
Fliere 1977		3	0.62	4	0.06	3	0.24	2	0.65	9	0.56	2	0.60
Fou 1978		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Francois 1956		68	0.39	65	0.00	72	0.04	70	0.04	42	0.14	70	0.07
Friedman 1923		71	0.37	77	0.00	63	0.05	59	0.05	18	0.49	45	0.16
Friedman 1923b		66	0.39	59	0.00	58	0.04	65	0.04	13	0.53	46	0.15
Friedman 1930		83	0.28	78	0.00	82	0.03	83	0.03	69	0.04	86	0.03
Garcia 2007		78	0.34	52	0.00	77	0.03	85	0.03	59	0.05	82	0.04
Garcia 2007b		70	0.37	68	0.00	66	0.04	73	0.04	54	0.05	84	0.04
Gierzod 1998		2	0.62	3	0.09	2	0.18	5	0.57	18	0.51	6	0.54
Gornostaeva 1994		28	0.51	31	0.00	35	0.06	33	0.24	29	0.36	33	0.29
Groot 1988		51	0.44	43	0.00	36	0.05	39	0.17	30	0.21	42	0.19
Harasiewicz 1955		1	0.63	1	0.35	1	0.34	1	0.70	7	0.66	1	0.68
Hatto 1993		53	0.44	56	0.00	56	0.04	66	0.04	74	0.04	83	0.04
Hatto 1997		46	0.45	57	0.00	50	0.06	51	0.06	48	0.05	74	0.05
Horowitz 1949		80	0.30	55	0.00	75	0.04	72	0.04	29	0.27	63	0.10
Indjic 1988		50	0.44	82	0.00	57	0.05	53	0.05	54	0.05	73	0.05
Kapell 1951		15	0.55	7	0.04	10	0.14	10	0.50	22	0.51	12	0.50
Kissin 1993		12	0.57	37	0.00	13	0.06	13	0.48	13	0.58	8	0.53
Kushner 1989		14	0.55	44	0.00	14	0.08	14	0.46	36	0.32	24	0.38
Luisada 1991		35	0.48	74	0.00	55	0.05	58	0.05	31	0.26	59	0.11
Lushtak 2004		55	0.43	88	0.00	37	0.06	36	0.19	45	0.07	56	0.12
Malcuzynski 1961		48	0.45	83	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.10	60	0.05	69	0.07
Magaloff 1978		34	0.48	29	0.00	48	0.05	52	0.05	43	0.15	65	0.09
Magin 1975		25	0.52	28	0.01	40	0.06	37	0.18	31	0.30	40	0.23
Michalowski 1933		87	0.21	71	0.00	85	0.02	86	0.02	62	0.03	88	0.02
Milkina 1970		5	0.60	2	0.10	4	0.15	7	0.55	25	0.42	14	0.48
Mohovich 1999		16	0.55	33	0.00	12	0.11	11	0.49	22	0.48	15	0.48
Moravec 1969		37	0.47	20	0.01	46	0.06	47	0.06	43	0.14	64	0.09
Morozova 2008		42	0.46	26	0.01	28	0.07	28	0.28	23	0.40	29	0.33
Neighaus 1950		72	0.37	79	0.00	67	0.04	62	0.04	14	0.45	53	0.13
Niedzielski 1931		82	0.28	60	0.00	83	0.03	78	0.03	55	0.05	79	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		65	0.40	63	0.00	69	0.04	71	0.04	61	0.05	80	0.04
Osinska 1989		6	0.59	25	0.01	11	0.18	6	0.56	30	0.45	11	0.50
Pachmann 1927		73	0.37	41	0.00	76	0.03	77	0.03	19	0.46	55	0.12
Paderewski 1930		86	0.22	46	0.00	71	0.04	67	0.04	24	0.33	61	0.11
Perlemuter 1992		75	0.36	51	0.00	78	0.03	84	0.03	40	0.14	71	0.06
Pierdomenico 2008		77	0.35	58	0.00	80	0.04	76	0.04	46	0.05	78	0.04
Poblocka 1999		11	0.57	5	0.05	8	0.13	12	0.49	15	0.50	13	0.49
Rabcewiczowa 1932		54	0.43	42	0.00	27	0.07	29	0.27	30	0.28	36	0.27
Rachmaninoff 1923		49	0.45	39	0.00	31	0.09	32	0.25	15	0.49	26	0.35
Rangell 2001		67	0.39	47	0.00	70	0.04	68	0.04	50	0.06	77	0.05
Richter 1976		24	0.52	24	0.01	32	0.06	34	0.24	20	0.51	27	0.35
Rosen 1989		22	0.52	21	0.01	42	0.06	42	0.12	31	0.31	41	0.19
Rosenthal 1930		58	0.42	30	0.00	64	0.05	56	0.05	26	0.39	49	0.14
Rosenthal 1931		52	0.44	38	0.00	61	0.04	64	0.04	14	0.47	48	0.14
Rosenthal 1931b		74	0.37	61	0.00	73	0.03	81	0.03	38	0.20	68	0.08
Rosenthal 1931c		57	0.42	53	0.00	65	0.07	46	0.07	33	0.21	58	0.12
Rosenthal 1931d		59	0.41	62	0.00	59	0.04	69	0.04	14	0.50	50	0.14
Rossi 2007		62	0.41	11	0.01	52	0.05	57	0.05	23	0.35	52	0.13
Rubinstein 1939		32	0.49	13	0.01	15	0.07	18	0.42	15	0.49	17	0.45
Rubinstein 1952		7	0.58	9	0.01	5	0.13	3	0.62	19	0.53	3	0.57
Rubinstein 1966		9	0.57	6	0.04	6	0.13	4	0.60	25	0.48	5	0.54
Schilhawsky 1960		61	0.41	66	0.00	79	0.04	75	0.04	48	0.05	81	0.04
Shebanova 2002		69	0.38	89	0.00	74	0.03	79	0.03	78	0.04	87	0.03
Smith 1975		29	0.50	10	0.01	38	0.06	40	0.16	21	0.45	35	0.27
Sokolov 2002		36	0.48	72	0.00	34	0.06	30	0.26	6	0.57	22	0.38
Sztompka 1959		31	0.49	18	0.01	22	0.10	15	0.45	16	0.57	10	0.51
Tomsic 1995		38	0.47	15	0.01	45	0.06	48	0.06	22	0.35	47	0.14
Uninsky 1932		41	0.46	40	0.00	21	0.08	24	0.34	9	0.65	16	0.47
Uninsky 1971		33	0.48	22	0.01	33	0.06	31	0.25	29	0.37	32	0.30
Wasowski 1980		40	0.47	80	0.00	47	0.05	54	0.05	34	0.29	54	0.12
Zak 1937		17	0.54	73	0.00	26	0.07	23	0.35	19	0.47	19	0.41
Zak 1951		26	0.52	64	0.00	41	0.07	38	0.17	27	0.34	38	0.24
Random 1		88	-0.01	75	0.00	89	0.02	88	0.02	32	0.21	72	0.06
Random 2		90	-0.06	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	75	0.03	89	0.02
Random 3		89	-0.02	70	0.00	88	0.02	89	0.02	17	0.31	67	0.08

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).