Duchoud 2007

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		48	0.25	5	0.03	52	0.05	55	0.05	79	0.03	59	0.04
Anderszewski 2003		49	0.25	6	0.03	25	0.07	29	0.43	72	0.04	28	0.13
Ashkenazy 1981		6	0.39	12	0.01	8	0.08	18	0.50	32	0.24	9	0.35
Bacha 2000		8	0.38	18	0.01	20	0.09	19	0.48	28	0.30	6	0.38
Badura 1965		39	0.30	15	0.01	12	0.08	15	0.53	29	0.27	7	0.38
Barbosa 1983		63	0.21	84	0.00	72	0.04	66	0.04	87	0.02	72	0.03
Biret 1990		52	0.25	85	0.00	49	0.05	59	0.05	79	0.03	62	0.04
Blet 2003		59	0.22	57	0.00	57	0.05	63	0.05	81	0.03	56	0.04
Block 1995		76	0.15	58	0.00	58	0.06	49	0.06	84	0.03	60	0.04
Blumental 1952		84	0.10	50	0.00	87	0.02	88	0.02	87	0.02	87	0.02
Boshniakovich 1969		23	0.34	8	0.02	39	0.08	40	0.23	71	0.03	42	0.08
Brailowsky 1960		87	0.06	73	0.00	88	0.02	87	0.02	86	0.01	90	0.01
Bunin 1987		54	0.24	38	0.00	26	0.07	34	0.37	54	0.05	25	0.14
Bunin 1987b		53	0.24	31	0.00	24	0.07	27	0.44	40	0.13	13	0.24
Chiu 1999		17	0.35	28	0.00	13	0.08	13	0.53	35	0.20	10	0.33
Cohen 1997		55	0.24	40	0.00	51	0.06	54	0.06	56	0.04	50	0.05
Cortot 1951		86	0.09	59	0.00	85	0.02	82	0.02	64	0.03	89	0.02
Csalog 1996		46	0.28	23	0.00	32	0.08	36	0.32	56	0.05	27	0.13
Czerny 1949		42	0.29	86	0.00	48	0.06	48	0.06	72	0.03	58	0.04
Czerny 1990		62	0.21	87	0.00	69	0.04	68	0.04	82	0.03	74	0.03
Duchoud 2007		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Ezaki 2006		56	0.23	60	0.00	50	0.07	47	0.07	83	0.03	46	0.05
Falvay 1989		51	0.25	45	0.00	56	0.06	53	0.06	82	0.04	47	0.05
Farrell 1958		13	0.36	9	0.02	6	0.13	9	0.57	46	0.09	14	0.23
Ferenczy 1958		82	0.10	56	0.00	79	0.02	80	0.02	76	0.03	84	0.02
Fliere 1977		22	0.34	24	0.00	14	0.09	14	0.53	75	0.04	21	0.15
Fou 1978		41	0.29	78	0.00	55	0.07	46	0.07	74	0.04	48	0.05
Francois 1956		38	0.30	34	0.00	45	0.07	45	0.07	62	0.04	51	0.05
Friedman 1923		64	0.20	74	0.00	61	0.06	51	0.06	71	0.04	52	0.05
Friedman 1923b		67	0.20	61	0.00	60	0.05	60	0.05	65	0.04	61	0.04
Friedman 1930		47	0.27	29	0.00	44	0.08	44	0.15	61	0.05	40	0.09
Garcia 2007		34	0.31	32	0.00	33	0.07	31	0.40	55	0.05	24	0.14
Garcia 2007b		14	0.36	16	0.01	15	0.10	12	0.54	56	0.05	20	0.16
Gierzod 1998		9	0.38	79	0.00	38	0.10	38	0.27	71	0.04	38	0.10
Gornostaeva 1994		31	0.32	53	0.00	21	0.07	28	0.43	71	0.03	35	0.11
Groot 1988		45	0.28	36	0.00	37	0.12	35	0.33	79	0.03	39	0.10
Harasiewicz 1955		71	0.17	80	0.00	78	0.03	75	0.03	85	0.03	76	0.03
Hatto 1993		36	0.30	75	0.00	43	0.07	42	0.17	58	0.04	44	0.08
Hatto 1997		35	0.31	88	0.00	42	0.07	41	0.22	68	0.04	41	0.09
Horowitz 1949		83	0.10	69	0.00	84	0.02	81	0.02	82	0.03	82	0.02
Indjic 1988		33	0.31	81	0.00	40	0.08	39	0.25	59	0.04	37	0.10
Kapell 1951		19	0.35	76	0.00	29	0.08	24	0.44	53	0.06	18	0.16
Kissin 1993		37	0.30	62	0.00	53	0.05	56	0.05	63	0.05	49	0.05
Kushner 1989		5	0.40	27	0.00	9	0.08	8	0.57	72	0.04	22	0.15
Luisada 1991		74	0.16	49	0.00	76	0.02	84	0.02	85	0.03	78	0.02
Lushtak 2004		27	0.33	13	0.01	5	0.13	4	0.59	60	0.05	16	0.17
Malcuzynski 1961		25	0.34	4	0.04	11	0.08	10	0.55	46	0.09	15	0.22
Magaloff 1978		28	0.33	37	0.00	41	0.07	43	0.17	69	0.03	45	0.07
Magin 1975		30	0.32	43	0.00	35	0.09	33	0.39	79	0.03	34	0.11
Michalowski 1933		85	0.10	47	0.00	64	0.05	61	0.05	60	0.03	55	0.04
Milkina 1970		16	0.35	41	0.00	22	0.07	16	0.52	64	0.05	19	0.16
Mohovich 1999		44	0.28	39	0.00	23	0.07	30	0.41	74	0.04	30	0.13
Moravec 1969		68	0.19	63	0.00	83	0.02	78	0.02	86	0.02	77	0.02
Morozova 2008		11	0.37	11	0.01	4	0.13	6	0.58	39	0.14	12	0.28
Neighaus 1950		66	0.20	17	0.01	62	0.05	57	0.05	71	0.03	63	0.04
Niedzielski 1931		77	0.15	70	0.00	81	0.02	83	0.02	83	0.02	81	0.02
Ohlsson 1999		1	0.49	1	0.36	1	0.36	2	0.77	15	0.48	1	0.61
Osinska 1989		20	0.35	42	0.00	27	0.11	17	0.51	70	0.04	23	0.14
Pachmann 1927		12	0.36	26	0.00	17	0.07	25	0.44	20	0.44	5	0.44
Paderewski 1930		78	0.14	77	0.00	82	0.03	76	0.03	75	0.03	69	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		57	0.22	54	0.00	63	0.05	62	0.05	77	0.03	53	0.04
Pierdomenico 2008		4	0.41	14	0.01	10	0.09	7	0.57	15	0.52	3	0.54
Poblocka 1999		75	0.16	82	0.00	75	0.03	77	0.03	85	0.02	79	0.02
Rabcewiczowa 1932		26	0.33	65	0.00	28	0.07	21	0.45	76	0.03	32	0.12
Rachmaninoff 1923		81	0.12	66	0.00	74	0.04	65	0.04	84	0.02	68	0.03
Rangell 2001		15	0.36	10	0.01	30	0.09	20	0.47	54	0.06	17	0.17
Richter 1976		43	0.29	22	0.00	47	0.06	52	0.06	84	0.03	54	0.04
Rosen 1989		2	0.48	3	0.16	2	0.37	1	0.78	21	0.40	2	0.56
Rosenthal 1930		72	0.17	55	0.00	80	0.02	85	0.02	86	0.02	86	0.02
Rosenthal 1931		80	0.13	89	0.00	77	0.02	79	0.02	84	0.02	83	0.02
Rosenthal 1931b		69	0.19	90	0.00	66	0.03	72	0.03	54	0.05	64	0.04
Rosenthal 1931c		58	0.22	20	0.00	59	0.05	64	0.05	81	0.03	65	0.04
Rosenthal 1931d		73	0.17	64	0.00	73	0.04	70	0.04	83	0.03	75	0.03
Rossi 2007		21	0.34	21	0.00	18	0.08	26	0.44	35	0.19	11	0.29
Rubinstein 1939		24	0.34	44	0.00	19	0.09	22	0.45	69	0.04	26	0.13
Rubinstein 1952		10	0.38	33	0.00	16	0.10	11	0.54	75	0.03	31	0.13
Rubinstein 1966		18	0.35	71	0.00	36	0.14	32	0.40	73	0.04	29	0.13
Schilhawsky 1960		50	0.25	67	0.00	46	0.05	58	0.05	74	0.03	57	0.04
Shebanova 2002		3	0.43	2	0.16	3	0.35	3	0.66	25	0.33	4	0.47
Smith 1975		65	0.20	30	0.00	65	0.03	74	0.03	86	0.02	80	0.02
Sokolov 2002		40	0.29	51	0.00	54	0.06	50	0.06	78	0.02	67	0.03
Sztompka 1959		61	0.21	52	0.00	70	0.03	71	0.03	85	0.03	70	0.03
Tomsic 1995		7	0.39	7	0.02	7	0.15	5	0.58	36	0.21	8	0.35
Uninsky 1932		79	0.13	35	0.00	68	0.04	69	0.04	87	0.02	73	0.03
Uninsky 1971		60	0.22	46	0.00	67	0.04	67	0.04	84	0.03	71	0.03
Wasowski 1980		70	0.18	19	0.01	71	0.03	73	0.03	84	0.03	66	0.03
Zak 1937		32	0.31	72	0.00	34	0.08	37	0.32	83	0.03	36	0.10
Zak 1951		29	0.32	68	0.00	31	0.10	23	0.45	80	0.03	33	0.12
Random 1		90	-0.09	25	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	63	0.03	88	0.02
Random 2		89	-0.06	83	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	61	0.03	85	0.02
Random 3		88	0.01	48	0.00	86	0.02	86	0.02	20	0.29	43	0.08

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).