Czerny 1949

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		67	0.33	73	0.00	75	0.02	83	0.02	61	0.04	83	0.03
Anderszewski 2003		24	0.54	33	0.00	14	0.14	14	0.67	13	0.57	19	0.62
Ashkenazy 1981		64	0.34	57	0.00	78	0.02	84	0.02	88	0.02	88	0.02
Bacha 2000		58	0.39	79	0.00	58	0.07	48	0.07	18	0.40	45	0.17
Badura 1965		65	0.34	80	0.00	59	0.07	57	0.07	51	0.06	61	0.06
Barbosa 1983		15	0.59	22	0.00	18	0.17	16	0.66	20	0.48	26	0.56
Biret 1990		46	0.44	35	0.00	45	0.08	47	0.08	57	0.05	63	0.06
Blet 2003		74	0.31	67	0.00	76	0.03	74	0.03	76	0.03	82	0.03
Block 1995		73	0.32	81	0.00	68	0.04	71	0.04	50	0.06	66	0.05
Blumental 1952		48	0.43	29	0.00	46	0.06	59	0.06	64	0.05	67	0.05
Boshniakovich 1969		16	0.58	24	0.00	17	0.17	17	0.66	7	0.59	20	0.62
Brailowsky 1960		66	0.34	54	0.00	74	0.03	80	0.03	58	0.06	69	0.04
Bunin 1987		40	0.47	46	0.00	47	0.07	56	0.07	16	0.36	48	0.16
Bunin 1987b		45	0.45	64	0.00	50	0.07	52	0.07	24	0.32	50	0.15
Chiu 1999		63	0.35	68	0.00	69	0.05	64	0.05	68	0.04	70	0.04
Cohen 1997		71	0.32	74	0.00	72	0.03	78	0.03	46	0.06	76	0.04
Cortot 1951		35	0.48	16	0.00	27	0.13	32	0.44	1	0.76	23	0.58
Csalog 1996		75	0.31	40	0.00	61	0.05	61	0.05	51	0.05	65	0.05
Czerny 1949		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Czerny 1990		1	0.75	1	0.46	1	0.46	1	0.89	2	0.85	1	0.87
Duchoud 2007		79	0.29	75	0.00	71	0.03	72	0.03	48	0.06	74	0.04
Ezaki 2006		21	0.56	43	0.00	19	0.14	25	0.59	16	0.53	25	0.56
Falvay 1989		41	0.47	61	0.00	44	0.07	44	0.13	62	0.04	57	0.07
Farrell 1958		9	0.61	3	0.07	4	0.21	3	0.77	1	0.79	2	0.78
Ferenczy 1958		70	0.32	82	0.00	80	0.03	79	0.03	65	0.05	72	0.04
Fliere 1977		37	0.48	62	0.00	34	0.08	31	0.44	51	0.06	46	0.16
Fou 1978		43	0.46	76	0.00	35	0.08	36	0.35	35	0.22	38	0.28
Francois 1956		49	0.43	69	0.00	51	0.06	60	0.06	20	0.38	51	0.15
Friedman 1923		76	0.30	47	0.00	67	0.04	69	0.04	63	0.05	79	0.04
Friedman 1923b		77	0.30	58	0.00	66	0.05	63	0.05	46	0.07	62	0.06
Friedman 1930		81	0.26	36	0.00	79	0.02	82	0.02	84	0.03	87	0.02
Garcia 2007		60	0.38	48	0.00	53	0.06	58	0.06	24	0.42	47	0.16
Garcia 2007b		53	0.41	59	0.00	38	0.06	40	0.18	30	0.32	40	0.24
Gierzod 1998		6	0.63	18	0.00	10	0.12	8	0.70	15	0.52	21	0.60
Gornostaeva 1994		25	0.53	20	0.00	32	0.11	35	0.40	23	0.41	33	0.40
Groot 1988		72	0.32	65	0.00	65	0.04	65	0.04	63	0.05	78	0.04
Harasiewicz 1955		3	0.67	10	0.01	3	0.30	4	0.77	9	0.64	8	0.70
Hatto 1993		27	0.52	25	0.00	24	0.17	21	0.63	10	0.58	22	0.60
Hatto 1997		29	0.51	34	0.00	25	0.23	23	0.61	11	0.54	24	0.57
Horowitz 1949		85	0.20	83	0.00	86	0.02	86	0.02	84	0.03	86	0.02
Indjic 1988		26	0.53	8	0.02	21	0.20	15	0.67	9	0.63	13	0.65
Kapell 1951		17	0.58	11	0.01	6	0.16	18	0.65	11	0.60	18	0.62
Kissin 1993		20	0.57	44	0.00	22	0.14	24	0.60	8	0.68	16	0.64
Kushner 1989		11	0.61	14	0.00	7	0.19	7	0.75	10	0.61	10	0.68
Luisada 1991		61	0.35	84	0.00	73	0.03	76	0.03	79	0.03	80	0.03
Lushtak 2004		31	0.50	41	0.00	31	0.12	29	0.50	35	0.31	34	0.39
Malcuzynski 1961		2	0.70	2	0.23	2	0.47	2	0.79	1	0.72	3	0.75
Magaloff 1978		28	0.51	13	0.01	29	0.10	30	0.46	16	0.49	30	0.47
Magin 1975		30	0.51	37	0.00	33	0.10	33	0.43	24	0.40	32	0.41
Michalowski 1933		83	0.25	70	0.00	70	0.04	67	0.04	16	0.43	52	0.13
Milkina 1970		4	0.66	9	0.01	5	0.26	5	0.76	10	0.60	11	0.68
Mohovich 1999		50	0.43	77	0.00	48	0.07	55	0.07	60	0.04	68	0.05
Moravec 1969		39	0.47	42	0.00	43	0.07	41	0.16	42	0.15	49	0.15
Morozova 2008		18	0.57	45	0.00	23	0.17	22	0.63	3	0.65	17	0.64
Neighaus 1950		38	0.48	17	0.00	41	0.07	43	0.15	9	0.54	39	0.28
Niedzielski 1931		87	0.12	51	0.00	87	0.01	88	0.01	85	0.02	90	0.01
Ohlsson 1999		44	0.45	30	0.00	49	0.07	53	0.07	40	0.18	53	0.11
Osinska 1989		13	0.60	85	0.00	16	0.17	11	0.69	17	0.59	15	0.64
Pachmann 1927		59	0.38	56	0.00	54	0.07	51	0.07	12	0.52	44	0.19
Paderewski 1930		62	0.35	71	0.00	56	0.09	45	0.09	4	0.60	41	0.23
Perlemuter 1992		68	0.33	21	0.00	82	0.03	81	0.03	69	0.04	81	0.03
Pierdomenico 2008		55	0.40	86	0.00	55	0.07	50	0.07	19	0.49	43	0.19
Poblocka 1999		22	0.54	87	0.00	28	0.12	28	0.51	27	0.41	31	0.46
Rabcewiczowa 1932		47	0.44	28	0.00	42	0.07	42	0.16	62	0.04	55	0.08
Rachmaninoff 1923		69	0.33	88	0.00	62	0.04	66	0.04	49	0.06	64	0.05
Rangell 2001		12	0.60	31	0.00	15	0.15	19	0.64	1	0.77	7	0.70
Richter 1976		19	0.57	27	0.00	20	0.18	20	0.64	7	0.67	12	0.65
Rosen 1989		56	0.40	32	0.00	64	0.05	62	0.05	64	0.04	75	0.04
Rosenthal 1930		78	0.30	39	0.00	81	0.03	77	0.03	59	0.04	84	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		82	0.26	72	0.00	83	0.03	73	0.03	54	0.05	71	0.04
Rosenthal 1931b		86	0.19	89	0.00	85	0.02	85	0.02	83	0.02	89	0.02
Rosenthal 1931c		80	0.27	38	0.00	77	0.03	75	0.03	66	0.04	85	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		84	0.24	49	0.00	84	0.04	70	0.04	68	0.04	77	0.04
Rossi 2007		51	0.42	66	0.00	52	0.08	46	0.08	11	0.47	42	0.19
Rubinstein 1939		7	0.62	4	0.03	8	0.19	13	0.68	2	0.70	9	0.69
Rubinstein 1952		14	0.60	6	0.02	9	0.15	12	0.69	11	0.62	14	0.65
Rubinstein 1966		8	0.62	15	0.00	13	0.16	6	0.75	12	0.66	6	0.70
Schilhawsky 1960		10	0.61	12	0.01	12	0.14	10	0.69	1	0.76	5	0.72
Shebanova 2002		54	0.41	23	0.00	63	0.04	68	0.04	72	0.04	73	0.04
Smith 1975		32	0.50	7	0.02	26	0.14	26	0.51	8	0.59	27	0.55
Sokolov 2002		52	0.42	60	0.00	57	0.07	49	0.07	46	0.07	56	0.07
Sztompka 1959		5	0.64	5	0.03	11	0.14	9	0.70	2	0.78	4	0.74
Tomsic 1995		57	0.40	90	0.00	60	0.07	54	0.07	52	0.07	58	0.07
Uninsky 1932		42	0.46	19	0.00	36	0.11	34	0.41	13	0.62	29	0.50
Uninsky 1971		23	0.54	26	0.00	30	0.15	27	0.51	18	0.52	28	0.51
Wasowski 1980		33	0.49	52	0.00	37	0.09	37	0.34	25	0.41	35	0.37
Zak 1937		34	0.49	53	0.00	39	0.08	38	0.33	31	0.38	36	0.35
Zak 1951		36	0.48	50	0.00	40	0.12	39	0.32	29	0.29	37	0.30
Random 1		89	0.02	55	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	7	0.48	59	0.07
Random 2		88	0.11	78	0.00	88	0.02	87	0.02	10	0.43	54	0.09
Random 3		90	-0.04	63	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	6	0.48	60	0.07

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).