Chiu 1999

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		41	0.38	15	0.02	27	0.07	44	0.11	41	0.13	31	0.12
Anderszewski 2003		47	0.37	38	0.00	40	0.05	42	0.13	65	0.05	44	0.08
Ashkenazy 1981		67	0.29	79	0.00	75	0.03	77	0.03	86	0.02	87	0.02
Bacha 2000		71	0.28	19	0.02	53	0.06	52	0.06	60	0.04	51	0.05
Badura 1965		50	0.36	10	0.03	26	0.07	40	0.15	33	0.21	19	0.18
Barbosa 1983		9	0.47	1	0.12	1	0.12	5	0.51	57	0.07	14	0.19
Biret 1990		14	0.45	31	0.01	13	0.08	16	0.40	45	0.07	22	0.17
Blet 2003		74	0.26	63	0.00	80	0.02	82	0.02	86	0.02	84	0.02
Block 1995		48	0.37	34	0.00	23	0.07	24	0.30	40	0.15	12	0.21
Blumental 1952		32	0.40	59	0.00	35	0.05	29	0.24	49	0.06	32	0.12
Boshniakovich 1969		56	0.34	80	0.00	61	0.06	51	0.06	66	0.04	63	0.05
Brailowsky 1960		60	0.33	83	0.00	64	0.04	70	0.04	67	0.04	66	0.04
Bunin 1987		65	0.31	47	0.00	58	0.05	60	0.05	77	0.03	76	0.04
Bunin 1987b		58	0.33	43	0.00	44	0.07	41	0.13	51	0.06	41	0.09
Chiu 1999		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Cohen 1997		64	0.31	25	0.01	60	0.07	46	0.07	35	0.13	38	0.10
Cortot 1951		85	0.17	58	0.00	85	0.02	87	0.02	72	0.03	89	0.02
Csalog 1996		28	0.41	21	0.01	21	0.07	20	0.34	54	0.05	30	0.13
Czerny 1949		55	0.35	65	0.00	63	0.04	68	0.04	64	0.05	73	0.04
Czerny 1990		11	0.46	20	0.01	22	0.07	21	0.33	55	0.06	27	0.14
Duchoud 2007		54	0.35	9	0.03	25	0.07	35	0.20	13	0.53	5	0.33
Ezaki 2006		10	0.47	11	0.02	9	0.09	10	0.45	43	0.12	10	0.23
Falvay 1989		2	0.50	28	0.01	7	0.07	2	0.54	48	0.06	16	0.18
Farrell 1958		61	0.32	77	0.00	52	0.05	59	0.05	75	0.04	69	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		22	0.41	12	0.02	16	0.08	12	0.43	16	0.54	1	0.48
Fliere 1977		3	0.48	23	0.01	8	0.09	8	0.46	67	0.05	24	0.15
Fou 1978		24	0.41	32	0.01	36	0.06	28	0.25	61	0.05	34	0.11
Francois 1956		72	0.26	40	0.00	82	0.02	81	0.02	83	0.03	90	0.02
Friedman 1923		80	0.24	53	0.00	70	0.03	75	0.03	72	0.04	81	0.03
Friedman 1923b		81	0.24	18	0.02	71	0.03	72	0.03	68	0.04	79	0.03
Friedman 1930		42	0.38	26	0.01	46	0.05	61	0.05	31	0.26	36	0.11
Garcia 2007		68	0.29	71	0.00	59	0.06	54	0.06	53	0.05	62	0.05
Garcia 2007b		40	0.38	35	0.00	37	0.06	33	0.20	41	0.12	25	0.15
Gierzod 1998		1	0.51	5	0.07	3	0.10	4	0.52	52	0.06	18	0.18
Gornostaeva 1994		49	0.36	72	0.00	38	0.05	36	0.19	58	0.05	39	0.10
Groot 1988		43	0.38	3	0.09	2	0.11	7	0.48	32	0.19	7	0.30
Harasiewicz 1955		26	0.41	54	0.00	39	0.05	43	0.13	87	0.03	50	0.06
Hatto 1993		29	0.40	81	0.00	42	0.06	39	0.17	73	0.04	47	0.08
Hatto 1997		20	0.42	45	0.00	29	0.06	27	0.25	70	0.04	37	0.10
Horowitz 1949		78	0.25	49	0.00	74	0.03	74	0.03	63	0.05	70	0.04
Indjic 1988		27	0.41	84	0.00	43	0.08	38	0.18	68	0.04	43	0.08
Kapell 1951		17	0.43	30	0.01	18	0.08	18	0.35	42	0.15	11	0.23
Kissin 1993		38	0.39	48	0.00	55	0.06	56	0.06	66	0.05	59	0.05
Kushner 1989		31	0.40	87	0.00	47	0.05	62	0.05	54	0.06	55	0.05
Luisada 1991		63	0.32	68	0.00	62	0.05	63	0.05	53	0.05	52	0.05
Lushtak 2004		19	0.42	29	0.01	33	0.06	34	0.20	77	0.04	42	0.09
Malcuzynski 1961		46	0.37	33	0.00	56	0.06	47	0.06	64	0.04	56	0.05
Magaloff 1978		15	0.45	4	0.07	6	0.09	15	0.40	38	0.20	8	0.28
Magin 1975		33	0.40	41	0.00	30	0.05	31	0.22	58	0.04	40	0.09
Michalowski 1933		87	0.14	73	0.00	87	0.03	78	0.03	42	0.10	58	0.05
Milkina 1970		18	0.43	62	0.00	32	0.05	22	0.33	69	0.05	29	0.13
Mohovich 1999		35	0.39	78	0.00	41	0.06	37	0.18	59	0.04	45	0.08
Moravec 1969		30	0.40	7	0.06	20	0.07	26	0.25	44	0.12	20	0.17
Morozova 2008		16	0.44	22	0.01	10	0.07	1	0.55	29	0.29	2	0.40
Neighaus 1950		77	0.25	60	0.00	81	0.02	84	0.02	73	0.03	88	0.02
Niedzielski 1931		84	0.19	88	0.00	83	0.03	73	0.03	59	0.05	68	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		23	0.41	36	0.00	24	0.07	30	0.23	44	0.12	21	0.17
Osinska 1989		6	0.48	39	0.00	15	0.09	13	0.42	52	0.06	23	0.16
Pachmann 1927		82	0.24	66	0.00	84	0.04	69	0.04	61	0.04	71	0.04
Paderewski 1930		86	0.14	64	0.00	86	0.02	86	0.02	76	0.03	83	0.02
Perlemuter 1992		59	0.33	57	0.00	69	0.05	57	0.05	54	0.05	53	0.05
Pierdomenico 2008		66	0.30	89	0.00	76	0.02	80	0.02	61	0.05	77	0.03
Poblocka 1999		12	0.46	6	0.06	4	0.10	14	0.41	53	0.08	15	0.18
Rabcewiczowa 1932		34	0.40	42	0.00	17	0.07	17	0.38	42	0.11	13	0.20
Rachmaninoff 1923		69	0.29	27	0.01	48	0.05	65	0.05	64	0.04	67	0.04
Rangell 2001		62	0.32	82	0.00	68	0.06	49	0.06	48	0.07	49	0.06
Richter 1976		44	0.38	56	0.00	57	0.07	45	0.07	68	0.03	57	0.05
Rosen 1989		8	0.47	17	0.02	14	0.10	6	0.49	28	0.32	4	0.40
Rosenthal 1930		73	0.26	67	0.00	72	0.03	76	0.03	51	0.05	74	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		79	0.25	74	0.00	73	0.03	71	0.03	46	0.07	60	0.05
Rosenthal 1931b		76	0.25	69	0.00	79	0.02	85	0.02	57	0.05	80	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		52	0.35	46	0.00	50	0.06	48	0.06	43	0.10	48	0.08
Rosenthal 1931d		70	0.29	70	0.00	66	0.04	66	0.04	49	0.06	64	0.05
Rossi 2007		39	0.38	37	0.00	49	0.05	64	0.05	30	0.26	33	0.11
Rubinstein 1939		57	0.33	90	0.00	65	0.04	67	0.04	77	0.03	78	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		21	0.42	51	0.00	45	0.06	53	0.06	64	0.04	65	0.05
Rubinstein 1966		13	0.46	13	0.02	19	0.08	23	0.31	76	0.04	35	0.11
Schilhawsky 1960		45	0.38	55	0.00	54	0.06	50	0.06	60	0.04	61	0.05
Shebanova 2002		5	0.48	2	0.09	5	0.09	3	0.52	27	0.31	3	0.40
Smith 1975		53	0.35	85	0.00	67	0.06	55	0.06	67	0.04	54	0.05
Sokolov 2002		75	0.25	44	0.00	78	0.03	79	0.03	86	0.02	82	0.02
Sztompka 1959		51	0.36	50	0.00	51	0.05	58	0.05	73	0.04	72	0.04
Tomsic 1995		36	0.39	24	0.01	34	0.05	32	0.22	43	0.14	17	0.18
Uninsky 1932		83	0.22	75	0.00	77	0.02	83	0.02	80	0.03	85	0.02
Uninsky 1971		25	0.41	76	0.00	28	0.06	19	0.35	55	0.06	26	0.14
Wasowski 1980		37	0.39	16	0.02	31	0.06	25	0.29	55	0.06	28	0.13
Zak 1937		7	0.47	8	0.05	11	0.07	11	0.45	38	0.23	6	0.32
Zak 1951		4	0.48	14	0.02	12	0.07	9	0.45	35	0.16	9	0.27
Random 1		90	-0.07	86	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	36	0.18	75	0.04
Random 2		89	-0.03	52	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	67	0.03	86	0.02
Random 3		88	0.00	61	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	18	0.30	46	0.08

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).