Blumental 1952

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		45	0.44	64	0.00	43	0.07	42	0.13	9	0.52	35	0.26
Anderszewski 2003		43	0.45	76	0.00	46	0.06	56	0.06	58	0.06	61	0.06
Ashkenazy 1981		69	0.35	22	0.01	77	0.03	82	0.03	56	0.03	86	0.03
Bacha 2000		47	0.44	41	0.00	48	0.05	63	0.05	10	0.49	43	0.16
Badura 1965		77	0.29	65	0.00	75	0.03	83	0.03	72	0.03	85	0.03
Barbosa 1983		2	0.61	2	0.12	2	0.20	2	0.74	9	0.65	3	0.69
Biret 1990		8	0.58	21	0.01	7	0.12	4	0.72	5	0.58	8	0.65
Blet 2003		60	0.38	42	0.00	42	0.06	43	0.12	18	0.30	39	0.19
Block 1995		33	0.49	79	0.00	29	0.10	24	0.47	11	0.54	24	0.50
Blumental 1952		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Boshniakovich 1969		50	0.43	60	0.00	54	0.06	50	0.06	57	0.06	65	0.06
Brailowsky 1960		1	0.65	1	0.26	1	0.26	1	0.76	1	0.76	1	0.76
Bunin 1987		54	0.40	72	0.00	62	0.06	54	0.06	58	0.05	72	0.05
Bunin 1987b		62	0.38	69	0.00	64	0.05	70	0.05	57	0.05	67	0.05
Chiu 1999		56	0.40	47	0.00	59	0.06	49	0.06	29	0.24	51	0.12
Cohen 1997		71	0.35	73	0.00	68	0.06	51	0.06	24	0.22	55	0.11
Cortot 1951		59	0.39	37	0.00	37	0.07	40	0.17	8	0.62	32	0.32
Csalog 1996		52	0.41	62	0.00	36	0.07	36	0.23	31	0.23	36	0.23
Czerny 1949		48	0.43	81	0.00	47	0.05	64	0.05	59	0.06	70	0.05
Czerny 1990		12	0.57	5	0.06	3	0.14	3	0.73	21	0.65	4	0.69
Duchoud 2007		87	0.10	66	0.00	87	0.02	87	0.02	88	0.02	89	0.02
Ezaki 2006		3	0.60	3	0.10	4	0.14	10	0.66	17	0.53	12	0.59
Falvay 1989		6	0.58	12	0.02	14	0.09	7	0.70	21	0.55	9	0.62
Farrell 1958		63	0.37	70	0.00	67	0.05	65	0.05	69	0.04	76	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		16	0.55	9	0.02	18	0.13	13	0.60	3	0.74	6	0.67
Fliere 1977		10	0.57	8	0.04	10	0.13	15	0.58	20	0.46	18	0.52
Fou 1978		21	0.54	39	0.00	28	0.07	23	0.47	26	0.32	30	0.39
Francois 1956		79	0.28	71	0.00	76	0.03	80	0.03	67	0.04	88	0.03
Friedman 1923		67	0.36	36	0.00	66	0.08	45	0.08	26	0.33	45	0.16
Friedman 1923b		66	0.36	46	0.00	65	0.06	52	0.06	27	0.36	49	0.15
Friedman 1930		68	0.35	57	0.00	57	0.06	58	0.06	22	0.38	48	0.15
Garcia 2007		78	0.28	77	0.00	79	0.04	75	0.04	50	0.05	79	0.04
Garcia 2007b		75	0.33	50	0.00	74	0.04	78	0.04	76	0.04	80	0.04
Gierzod 1998		22	0.53	18	0.01	21	0.11	22	0.48	42	0.19	33	0.30
Gornostaeva 1994		42	0.45	55	0.00	51	0.05	69	0.05	40	0.10	58	0.07
Groot 1988		23	0.53	24	0.00	20	0.14	14	0.58	7	0.54	17	0.56
Harasiewicz 1955		18	0.55	38	0.00	19	0.15	18	0.55	30	0.43	25	0.49
Hatto 1993		4	0.59	11	0.02	8	0.14	6	0.70	8	0.62	7	0.66
Hatto 1997		9	0.57	49	0.00	15	0.12	9	0.67	9	0.55	10	0.61
Horowitz 1949		64	0.37	27	0.00	49	0.05	61	0.05	8	0.54	44	0.16
Indjic 1988		11	0.57	31	0.00	16	0.12	12	0.63	11	0.56	13	0.59
Kapell 1951		36	0.47	43	0.00	38	0.06	39	0.17	55	0.06	56	0.10
Kissin 1993		65	0.36	67	0.00	73	0.04	76	0.04	55	0.06	68	0.05
Kushner 1989		35	0.48	48	0.00	33	0.11	34	0.31	56	0.05	52	0.12
Luisada 1991		20	0.54	10	0.02	23	0.11	19	0.55	3	0.65	11	0.60
Lushtak 2004		49	0.43	84	0.00	58	0.05	60	0.05	57	0.05	71	0.05
Malcuzynski 1961		37	0.46	20	0.01	34	0.09	35	0.28	50	0.07	50	0.14
Magaloff 1978		17	0.55	29	0.00	25	0.09	29	0.44	14	0.50	27	0.47
Magin 1975		41	0.46	85	0.00	52	0.06	55	0.06	50	0.05	66	0.05
Michalowski 1933		85	0.18	78	0.00	85	0.03	84	0.03	49	0.04	84	0.03
Milkina 1970		14	0.56	26	0.00	11	0.10	11	0.65	30	0.38	22	0.50
Mohovich 1999		13	0.57	7	0.05	5	0.12	20	0.54	20	0.49	20	0.51
Moravec 1969		7	0.58	35	0.00	9	0.12	5	0.71	3	0.67	2	0.69
Morozova 2008		70	0.35	40	0.00	69	0.05	66	0.05	61	0.05	69	0.05
Neighaus 1950		80	0.25	82	0.00	80	0.03	86	0.03	69	0.04	87	0.03
Niedzielski 1931		74	0.33	15	0.01	50	0.05	68	0.05	8	0.45	46	0.15
Ohlsson 1999		76	0.30	86	0.00	78	0.04	74	0.04	76	0.03	83	0.03
Osinska 1989		29	0.50	17	0.01	26	0.09	30	0.44	45	0.08	38	0.19
Pachmann 1927		84	0.22	87	0.00	86	0.04	77	0.04	62	0.03	82	0.03
Paderewski 1930		86	0.12	51	0.00	82	0.03	79	0.03	38	0.16	57	0.07
Perlemuter 1992		82	0.24	59	0.00	81	0.03	85	0.03	51	0.05	74	0.04
Pierdomenico 2008		83	0.23	88	0.00	83	0.03	81	0.03	71	0.03	81	0.03
Poblocka 1999		5	0.58	6	0.05	6	0.18	21	0.51	14	0.50	21	0.50
Rabcewiczowa 1932		34	0.48	4	0.07	12	0.09	26	0.47	11	0.45	28	0.46
Rachmaninoff 1923		15	0.56	19	0.01	13	0.09	8	0.68	4	0.67	5	0.67
Rangell 2001		72	0.34	56	0.00	72	0.04	73	0.04	60	0.06	73	0.05
Richter 1976		58	0.39	30	0.00	63	0.04	72	0.04	48	0.05	77	0.04
Rosen 1989		38	0.46	23	0.01	32	0.10	32	0.35	17	0.47	29	0.41
Rosenthal 1930		28	0.50	58	0.00	30	0.11	25	0.47	7	0.68	15	0.57
Rosenthal 1931		53	0.40	68	0.00	55	0.06	53	0.06	13	0.48	42	0.17
Rosenthal 1931b		55	0.40	53	0.00	61	0.06	57	0.06	10	0.54	41	0.18
Rosenthal 1931c		32	0.49	32	0.00	31	0.09	31	0.41	5	0.66	19	0.52
Rosenthal 1931d		44	0.44	61	0.00	39	0.06	37	0.19	9	0.59	31	0.33
Rossi 2007		81	0.25	80	0.00	84	0.05	71	0.05	65	0.04	75	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		51	0.42	63	0.00	60	0.07	47	0.07	48	0.05	59	0.06
Rubinstein 1952		27	0.50	44	0.00	35	0.08	33	0.33	42	0.15	37	0.22
Rubinstein 1966		46	0.44	74	0.00	53	0.07	48	0.07	62	0.05	62	0.06
Schilhawsky 1960		24	0.52	25	0.00	24	0.11	28	0.44	10	0.56	23	0.50
Shebanova 2002		39	0.46	14	0.01	41	0.06	41	0.14	30	0.27	40	0.19
Smith 1975		25	0.52	16	0.01	27	0.07	27	0.45	14	0.52	26	0.48
Sokolov 2002		40	0.46	33	0.00	40	0.06	38	0.17	16	0.50	34	0.29
Sztompka 1959		57	0.39	13	0.01	56	0.06	59	0.06	39	0.22	54	0.11
Tomsic 1995		61	0.38	83	0.00	70	0.05	62	0.05	53	0.07	60	0.06
Uninsky 1932		73	0.34	45	0.00	71	0.05	67	0.05	45	0.08	63	0.06
Uninsky 1971		19	0.54	28	0.00	17	0.14	16	0.57	11	0.59	14	0.58
Wasowski 1980		26	0.52	34	0.00	22	0.14	17	0.57	8	0.55	16	0.56
Zak 1937		31	0.50	52	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.10	35	0.24	47	0.15
Zak 1951		30	0.50	54	0.00	45	0.08	46	0.08	36	0.15	53	0.11
Random 1		89	-0.07	89	0.00	89	0.02	88	0.02	39	0.17	64	0.06
Random 2		88	0.03	90	0.00	88	0.01	89	0.01	35	0.16	78	0.04
Random 3		90	-0.09	75	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	81	0.02	90	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).