Blet 2003

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		27	0.40	50	0.00	50	0.05	55	0.05	36	0.18	42	0.09
Anderszewski 2003		35	0.39	78	0.00	53	0.07	45	0.07	64	0.05	50	0.06
Ashkenazy 1981		18	0.41	73	0.00	46	0.06	50	0.06	23	0.29	30	0.13
Bacha 2000		47	0.37	31	0.00	21	0.06	23	0.25	32	0.26	13	0.25
Badura 1965		21	0.41	23	0.01	28	0.06	29	0.22	37	0.14	21	0.18
Barbosa 1983		36	0.39	41	0.00	63	0.03	71	0.03	80	0.03	74	0.03
Biret 1990		12	0.43	57	0.00	9	0.07	9	0.45	50	0.06	25	0.16
Blet 2003		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Block 1995		66	0.32	19	0.01	26	0.06	40	0.14	52	0.05	47	0.08
Blumental 1952		37	0.38	39	0.00	23	0.09	18	0.30	43	0.12	20	0.19
Boshniakovich 1969		3	0.48	5	0.06	4	0.16	3	0.53	61	0.05	24	0.16
Brailowsky 1960		24	0.40	51	0.00	39	0.06	36	0.16	51	0.06	36	0.10
Bunin 1987		52	0.36	43	0.00	34	0.06	24	0.25	35	0.16	19	0.20
Bunin 1987b		48	0.37	44	0.00	35	0.06	20	0.26	32	0.23	14	0.24
Chiu 1999		78	0.26	72	0.00	78	0.02	86	0.02	82	0.02	83	0.02
Cohen 1997		71	0.30	62	0.00	33	0.04	31	0.20	23	0.22	18	0.21
Cortot 1951		85	0.18	68	0.00	85	0.02	85	0.02	82	0.02	88	0.02
Csalog 1996		5	0.45	3	0.12	3	0.24	4	0.51	17	0.39	3	0.45
Czerny 1949		68	0.31	75	0.00	66	0.03	76	0.03	74	0.03	79	0.03
Czerny 1990		56	0.35	76	0.00	61	0.04	61	0.04	84	0.03	81	0.03
Duchoud 2007		83	0.22	81	0.00	81	0.03	81	0.03	63	0.05	65	0.04
Ezaki 2006		14	0.42	77	0.00	40	0.06	38	0.15	72	0.04	44	0.08
Falvay 1989		22	0.41	52	0.00	30	0.06	43	0.13	84	0.03	48	0.06
Farrell 1958		86	0.18	83	0.00	86	0.03	78	0.03	85	0.02	85	0.02
Ferenczy 1958		51	0.37	9	0.02	22	0.06	32	0.19	35	0.27	15	0.23
Fliere 1977		2	0.49	2	0.12	2	0.21	2	0.60	39	0.18	7	0.33
Fou 1978		4	0.47	7	0.04	6	0.10	7	0.47	49	0.06	22	0.17
Francois 1956		55	0.36	53	0.00	59	0.05	60	0.05	57	0.05	61	0.05
Friedman 1923		74	0.28	48	0.00	69	0.03	77	0.03	47	0.06	69	0.04
Friedman 1923b		72	0.30	63	0.00	60	0.05	58	0.05	64	0.05	59	0.05
Friedman 1930		75	0.26	54	0.00	74	0.03	80	0.03	62	0.04	76	0.03
Garcia 2007		70	0.30	55	0.00	76	0.04	62	0.04	51	0.05	66	0.04
Garcia 2007b		73	0.29	69	0.00	71	0.03	72	0.03	74	0.04	82	0.03
Gierzod 1998		7	0.43	70	0.00	37	0.06	22	0.26	83	0.03	43	0.09
Gornostaeva 1994		8	0.43	29	0.00	15	0.08	12	0.39	49	0.05	27	0.14
Groot 1988		9	0.43	24	0.01	10	0.10	8	0.47	38	0.14	12	0.26
Harasiewicz 1955		16	0.41	27	0.00	54	0.07	46	0.07	81	0.03	60	0.05
Hatto 1993		49	0.37	30	0.00	20	0.07	17	0.30	65	0.04	34	0.11
Hatto 1997		42	0.38	74	0.00	19	0.07	16	0.33	62	0.04	33	0.11
Horowitz 1949		39	0.38	6	0.04	24	0.06	28	0.22	14	0.45	9	0.31
Indjic 1988		43	0.37	22	0.01	18	0.08	15	0.33	56	0.05	28	0.13
Kapell 1951		50	0.37	28	0.00	47	0.06	52	0.06	63	0.05	55	0.05
Kissin 1993		38	0.38	60	0.00	55	0.05	54	0.05	60	0.05	57	0.05
Kushner 1989		17	0.41	40	0.00	49	0.06	49	0.06	77	0.04	54	0.05
Luisada 1991		1	0.51	1	0.23	1	0.22	1	0.62	10	0.58	1	0.60
Lushtak 2004		25	0.40	79	0.00	29	0.05	21	0.26	73	0.04	38	0.10
Malcuzynski 1961		62	0.33	21	0.01	72	0.03	70	0.03	87	0.02	86	0.02
Magaloff 1978		63	0.33	84	0.00	75	0.03	68	0.03	72	0.03	70	0.03
Magin 1975		6	0.45	8	0.03	11	0.08	19	0.27	61	0.04	37	0.10
Michalowski 1933		44	0.37	12	0.02	25	0.06	35	0.16	10	0.52	10	0.29
Milkina 1970		11	0.43	33	0.00	16	0.09	13	0.39	60	0.05	26	0.14
Mohovich 1999		19	0.41	25	0.01	17	0.08	10	0.43	44	0.10	17	0.21
Moravec 1969		41	0.38	67	0.00	52	0.06	47	0.06	64	0.05	52	0.05
Morozova 2008		61	0.33	34	0.00	57	0.06	48	0.06	65	0.05	58	0.05
Neighaus 1950		15	0.42	13	0.02	5	0.10	6	0.47	10	0.52	2	0.49
Niedzielski 1931		29	0.39	14	0.01	12	0.06	14	0.36	9	0.45	5	0.40
Ohlsson 1999		28	0.39	10	0.02	13	0.06	26	0.24	46	0.06	32	0.12
Osinska 1989		26	0.40	61	0.00	41	0.07	33	0.19	67	0.04	39	0.09
Pachmann 1927		87	0.11	80	0.00	87	0.02	87	0.02	88	0.01	89	0.01
Paderewski 1930		84	0.21	82	0.00	84	0.03	69	0.03	56	0.05	63	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		53	0.36	15	0.01	45	0.05	56	0.05	30	0.27	31	0.12
Pierdomenico 2008		79	0.26	38	0.00	77	0.03	82	0.03	80	0.03	72	0.03
Poblocka 1999		58	0.34	58	0.00	56	0.05	53	0.05	60	0.06	53	0.05
Rabcewiczowa 1932		82	0.23	89	0.00	62	0.04	65	0.04	77	0.03	73	0.03
Rachmaninoff 1923		67	0.32	64	0.00	73	0.03	73	0.03	74	0.03	71	0.03
Rangell 2001		77	0.26	35	0.00	80	0.03	83	0.03	58	0.06	67	0.04
Richter 1976		33	0.39	4	0.08	8	0.09	34	0.17	52	0.04	46	0.08
Rosen 1989		57	0.35	71	0.00	70	0.03	74	0.03	83	0.03	80	0.03
Rosenthal 1930		45	0.37	42	0.00	48	0.05	57	0.05	31	0.35	29	0.13
Rosenthal 1931		46	0.37	18	0.01	32	0.05	44	0.10	33	0.25	23	0.16
Rosenthal 1931b		34	0.39	32	0.00	31	0.05	30	0.21	14	0.50	8	0.32
Rosenthal 1931c		23	0.40	49	0.00	36	0.06	27	0.23	34	0.21	16	0.22
Rosenthal 1931d		31	0.39	20	0.01	27	0.07	25	0.24	13	0.50	6	0.35
Rossi 2007		69	0.31	56	0.00	67	0.03	79	0.03	57	0.05	62	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		76	0.26	45	0.00	79	0.03	84	0.03	88	0.02	84	0.02
Rubinstein 1952		65	0.32	90	0.00	65	0.04	63	0.04	69	0.04	68	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		60	0.34	85	0.00	68	0.04	64	0.04	80	0.03	75	0.03
Schilhawsky 1960		59	0.34	11	0.02	38	0.07	37	0.15	49	0.05	41	0.09
Shebanova 2002		80	0.25	47	0.00	82	0.03	67	0.03	83	0.03	78	0.03
Smith 1975		10	0.43	17	0.01	14	0.07	11	0.40	43	0.17	11	0.26
Sokolov 2002		13	0.42	16	0.01	7	0.09	5	0.49	27	0.40	4	0.44
Sztompka 1959		64	0.33	26	0.00	58	0.05	59	0.05	59	0.05	56	0.05
Tomsic 1995		40	0.38	59	0.00	51	0.06	51	0.06	55	0.06	49	0.06
Uninsky 1932		81	0.25	86	0.00	83	0.03	75	0.03	58	0.04	77	0.03
Uninsky 1971		54	0.36	65	0.00	64	0.04	66	0.04	68	0.04	64	0.04
Wasowski 1980		32	0.39	36	0.00	44	0.07	42	0.13	48	0.07	35	0.10
Zak 1937		20	0.41	37	0.00	42	0.05	39	0.15	66	0.04	45	0.08
Zak 1951		30	0.39	46	0.00	43	0.06	41	0.13	47	0.06	40	0.09
Random 1		89	-0.06	87	0.00	88	0.02	89	0.02	33	0.20	51	0.06
Random 2		90	-0.09	88	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	86	0.02	90	0.01
Random 3		88	-0.04	66	0.00	89	0.02	88	0.02	73	0.03	87	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).