Ashkenazy 1981

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		4	0.51	4	0.10	2	0.23	9	0.46	6	0.54	4	0.50
Anderszewski 2003		44	0.36	81	0.00	42	0.05	40	0.13	71	0.04	44	0.07
Ashkenazy 1981		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Bacha 2000		6	0.49	8	0.03	7	0.11	5	0.51	9	0.50	3	0.50
Badura 1965		55	0.35	25	0.00	39	0.05	36	0.19	46	0.07	26	0.12
Barbosa 1983		36	0.38	53	0.00	80	0.02	83	0.02	78	0.03	86	0.02
Biret 1990		12	0.45	19	0.01	12	0.09	8	0.47	62	0.05	20	0.15
Blet 2003		27	0.41	58	0.00	32	0.07	23	0.29	50	0.06	22	0.13
Block 1995		79	0.27	86	0.00	71	0.03	60	0.03	73	0.04	78	0.03
Blumental 1952		53	0.35	23	0.00	73	0.03	56	0.03	82	0.03	79	0.03
Boshniakovich 1969		17	0.43	36	0.00	18	0.08	17	0.42	59	0.06	19	0.16
Brailowsky 1960		73	0.31	43	0.00	58	0.03	77	0.03	75	0.04	62	0.03
Bunin 1987		40	0.37	50	0.00	26	0.07	24	0.29	61	0.04	31	0.11
Bunin 1987b		63	0.34	65	0.00	49	0.07	45	0.07	71	0.04	52	0.05
Chiu 1999		76	0.29	87	0.00	79	0.02	86	0.02	77	0.03	85	0.02
Cohen 1997		80	0.27	60	0.00	74	0.03	57	0.03	57	0.04	81	0.03
Cortot 1951		86	0.21	66	0.00	87	0.04	52	0.04	70	0.03	84	0.03
Csalog 1996		71	0.32	82	0.00	65	0.04	54	0.04	74	0.04	54	0.04
Czerny 1949		61	0.34	67	0.00	78	0.02	88	0.02	84	0.02	87	0.02
Czerny 1990		56	0.35	40	0.00	60	0.04	55	0.04	74	0.03	82	0.03
Duchoud 2007		33	0.39	26	0.00	28	0.05	32	0.24	18	0.50	11	0.35
Ezaki 2006		22	0.42	79	0.00	54	0.03	69	0.03	79	0.03	58	0.03
Falvay 1989		26	0.41	61	0.00	57	0.03	71	0.03	72	0.04	64	0.03
Farrell 1958		74	0.31	47	0.00	63	0.03	79	0.03	76	0.04	67	0.03
Ferenczy 1958		81	0.27	83	0.00	85	0.02	84	0.02	73	0.04	75	0.03
Fliere 1977		28	0.41	84	0.00	43	0.07	37	0.19	59	0.05	33	0.10
Fou 1978		2	0.53	10	0.02	5	0.15	3	0.57	41	0.13	14	0.27
Francois 1956		31	0.40	21	0.00	24	0.06	19	0.37	30	0.27	12	0.32
Friedman 1923		49	0.36	69	0.00	16	0.09	12	0.45	15	0.51	6	0.48
Friedman 1923b		50	0.36	52	0.00	8	0.12	7	0.48	16	0.51	5	0.49
Friedman 1930		65	0.33	11	0.01	17	0.08	15	0.43	23	0.37	9	0.40
Garcia 2007		87	0.18	88	0.00	86	0.03	81	0.03	78	0.03	77	0.03
Garcia 2007b		84	0.24	73	0.00	82	0.03	70	0.03	88	0.02	88	0.02
Gierzod 1998		3	0.51	18	0.01	13	0.08	14	0.44	78	0.03	30	0.11
Gornostaeva 1994		32	0.39	28	0.00	31	0.06	29	0.26	67	0.04	38	0.10
Groot 1988		48	0.36	37	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.12	66	0.04	45	0.07
Harasiewicz 1955		30	0.40	7	0.04	20	0.08	33	0.23	66	0.04	39	0.10
Hatto 1993		46	0.36	55	0.00	46	0.05	48	0.05	66	0.04	57	0.04
Hatto 1997		59	0.35	32	0.00	69	0.03	72	0.03	85	0.03	74	0.03
Horowitz 1949		18	0.43	3	0.10	3	0.25	2	0.59	1	0.68	1	0.63
Indjic 1988		52	0.35	44	0.00	68	0.03	75	0.03	83	0.03	71	0.03
Kapell 1951		77	0.28	64	0.00	64	0.03	73	0.03	71	0.04	68	0.03
Kissin 1993		1	0.53	16	0.01	11	0.10	6	0.49	41	0.26	10	0.36
Kushner 1989		16	0.43	80	0.00	41	0.05	39	0.16	76	0.04	43	0.08
Luisada 1991		20	0.43	62	0.00	33	0.09	26	0.27	73	0.04	32	0.10
Lushtak 2004		72	0.32	29	0.00	23	0.07	28	0.26	78	0.04	37	0.10
Malcuzynski 1961		51	0.35	89	0.00	53	0.03	76	0.03	67	0.04	69	0.03
Magaloff 1978		41	0.37	56	0.00	72	0.03	66	0.03	82	0.03	63	0.03
Magin 1975		21	0.42	27	0.00	36	0.05	31	0.25	73	0.04	34	0.10
Michalowski 1933		85	0.24	14	0.01	27	0.06	41	0.13	21	0.38	17	0.22
Milkina 1970		14	0.45	48	0.00	21	0.07	22	0.34	73	0.04	25	0.12
Mohovich 1999		19	0.43	20	0.00	14	0.08	16	0.43	66	0.04	24	0.13
Moravec 1969		70	0.32	85	0.00	81	0.03	80	0.03	72	0.04	59	0.03
Morozova 2008		23	0.42	5	0.05	19	0.07	18	0.40	40	0.12	18	0.22
Neighaus 1950		5	0.49	1	0.34	1	0.33	1	0.60	2	0.65	2	0.62
Niedzielski 1931		35	0.38	15	0.01	9	0.13	10	0.46	4	0.49	7	0.47
Ohlsson 1999		15	0.44	30	0.00	29	0.06	27	0.26	48	0.05	29	0.11
Osinska 1989		47	0.36	77	0.00	62	0.03	67	0.03	84	0.03	61	0.03
Pachmann 1927		54	0.35	38	0.00	52	0.03	62	0.03	35	0.25	42	0.09
Paderewski 1930		82	0.25	51	0.00	77	0.02	85	0.02	32	0.19	47	0.06
Perlemuter 1992		60	0.35	70	0.00	48	0.06	47	0.06	59	0.04	50	0.05
Pierdomenico 2008		68	0.33	42	0.00	84	0.03	82	0.03	76	0.03	65	0.03
Poblocka 1999		67	0.33	41	0.00	59	0.03	59	0.03	69	0.05	53	0.04
Rabcewiczowa 1932		69	0.32	71	0.00	25	0.08	25	0.27	64	0.04	35	0.10
Rachmaninoff 1923		42	0.37	6	0.04	6	0.11	11	0.45	37	0.22	13	0.31
Rangell 2001		62	0.34	63	0.00	70	0.03	78	0.03	74	0.04	83	0.03
Richter 1976		7	0.49	2	0.11	10	0.11	21	0.35	40	0.18	15	0.25
Rosen 1989		29	0.40	68	0.00	45	0.05	49	0.05	79	0.03	55	0.04
Rosenthal 1930		58	0.35	57	0.00	67	0.03	61	0.03	42	0.12	48	0.06
Rosenthal 1931		75	0.30	90	0.00	75	0.03	58	0.03	69	0.04	72	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		57	0.35	59	0.00	47	0.06	46	0.06	27	0.32	21	0.14
Rosenthal 1931c		38	0.38	74	0.00	50	0.05	50	0.05	49	0.08	49	0.06
Rosenthal 1931d		78	0.28	75	0.00	66	0.03	74	0.03	58	0.05	56	0.04
Rossi 2007		66	0.33	35	0.00	51	0.04	51	0.04	45	0.06	51	0.05
Rubinstein 1939		34	0.39	45	0.00	61	0.03	65	0.03	70	0.04	66	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		24	0.42	13	0.01	35	0.05	38	0.18	80	0.03	46	0.07
Rubinstein 1966		13	0.45	12	0.01	15	0.08	13	0.45	68	0.04	23	0.13
Schilhawsky 1960		37	0.38	24	0.00	76	0.04	53	0.04	77	0.03	73	0.03
Shebanova 2002		8	0.48	9	0.03	4	0.22	4	0.55	22	0.35	8	0.44
Smith 1975		39	0.37	34	0.00	38	0.05	42	0.13	45	0.09	27	0.11
Sokolov 2002		11	0.45	33	0.00	22	0.08	20	0.37	42	0.14	16	0.23
Sztompka 1959		25	0.41	39	0.00	37	0.06	34	0.21	49	0.05	36	0.10
Tomsic 1995		43	0.37	22	0.00	40	0.04	43	0.12	49	0.07	41	0.09
Uninsky 1932		64	0.33	54	0.00	56	0.03	68	0.03	61	0.04	76	0.03
Uninsky 1971		45	0.36	46	0.00	55	0.03	64	0.03	72	0.04	70	0.03
Wasowski 1980		83	0.24	72	0.00	83	0.03	63	0.03	82	0.03	60	0.03
Zak 1937		9	0.46	17	0.01	34	0.06	35	0.21	69	0.04	40	0.09
Zak 1951		10	0.46	49	0.00	30	0.06	30	0.26	51	0.05	28	0.11
Random 1		89	-0.10	31	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	87	0.02	90	0.01
Random 2		90	-0.10	76	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	83	0.02	89	0.01
Random 3		88	-0.10	78	0.00	88	0.02	87	0.02	55	0.04	80	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).