Osinska 1989

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		18	0.76	29	0.00	24	0.10	20	0.42	37	0.26	29	0.33
Anderszewski 2003		5	0.82	6	0.04	6	0.13	5	0.61	1	0.61	3	0.61
Ashkenazy 1981		63	0.64	86	0.00	54	0.04	75	0.04	50	0.05	86	0.04
Bacha 2000		57	0.66	80	0.00	34	0.06	41	0.15	14	0.38	40	0.24
Badura 1965		71	0.59	72	0.00	83	0.04	60	0.04	66	0.04	85	0.04
Barbosa 1983		79	0.54	74	0.00	61	0.03	80	0.03	23	0.23	69	0.08
Biret 1990		14	0.77	4	0.07	3	0.15	7	0.57	3	0.63	5	0.60
Blet 2003		53	0.68	78	0.00	53	0.04	70	0.04	35	0.18	70	0.08
Block 1995		45	0.69	64	0.00	41	0.08	36	0.20	7	0.43	32	0.29
Blumental 1952		62	0.65	31	0.00	13	0.08	31	0.25	17	0.24	41	0.24
Boshniakovich 1969		32	0.72	46	0.00	52	0.04	66	0.04	39	0.20	67	0.09
Brailowsky 1960		33	0.72	81	0.00	55	0.04	78	0.04	14	0.40	50	0.13
Bunin 1987		87	0.38	75	0.00	88	0.04	73	0.04	73	0.04	87	0.04
Bunin 1987b		88	0.37	88	0.00	87	0.04	69	0.04	68	0.04	79	0.04
Chiu 1999		68	0.60	82	0.00	66	0.04	64	0.04	69	0.03	88	0.03
Cohen 1997		86	0.40	89	0.00	84	0.03	86	0.03	43	0.10	76	0.05
Cortot 1951		37	0.71	56	0.00	58	0.06	49	0.06	21	0.41	46	0.16
Csalog 1996		82	0.50	76	0.00	73	0.05	56	0.05	31	0.26	60	0.11
Czerny 1949		25	0.75	16	0.01	36	0.05	32	0.25	39	0.28	38	0.26
Czerny 1990		6	0.81	3	0.07	9	0.14	14	0.48	8	0.50	11	0.49
Duchoud 2007		85	0.48	83	0.00	77	0.03	88	0.03	57	0.05	84	0.04
Ezaki 2006		8	0.79	12	0.01	14	0.08	16	0.45	10	0.52	12	0.48
Falvay 1989		64	0.62	33	0.00	75	0.03	82	0.03	25	0.43	58	0.11
Farrell 1958		26	0.75	21	0.01	8	0.20	4	0.62	2	0.64	1	0.63
Ferenczy 1958		51	0.68	41	0.00	64	0.04	58	0.04	22	0.31	61	0.11
Fliere 1977		4	0.82	5	0.05	5	0.14	6	0.60	18	0.39	13	0.48
Fou 1978		30	0.73	42	0.00	21	0.07	19	0.44	9	0.47	19	0.45
Francois 1956		34	0.72	15	0.01	35	0.06	40	0.16	9	0.50	34	0.28
Friedman 1923		41	0.71	50	0.00	51	0.04	62	0.04	31	0.37	57	0.12
Friedman 1923b		43	0.70	20	0.01	50	0.06	50	0.06	30	0.38	47	0.15
Friedman 1930		31	0.73	38	0.00	56	0.05	55	0.05	30	0.39	49	0.14
Garcia 2007		19	0.76	60	0.00	22	0.09	22	0.41	8	0.54	16	0.47
Garcia 2007b		27	0.74	10	0.02	18	0.09	15	0.47	7	0.55	10	0.51
Gierzod 1998		3	0.83	2	0.08	4	0.14	3	0.62	13	0.48	7	0.55
Gornostaeva 1994		23	0.75	22	0.01	40	0.06	39	0.16	9	0.44	36	0.27
Groot 1988		46	0.69	40	0.00	31	0.10	30	0.30	5	0.53	23	0.40
Harasiewicz 1955		22	0.76	24	0.01	28	0.08	27	0.34	30	0.22	37	0.27
Hatto 1993		49	0.68	52	0.00	46	0.06	48	0.06	29	0.28	54	0.13
Hatto 1997		42	0.70	36	0.00	47	0.07	46	0.07	32	0.24	52	0.13
Horowitz 1949		48	0.69	43	0.00	59	0.04	71	0.04	37	0.32	59	0.11
Indjic 1988		40	0.71	66	0.00	43	0.06	42	0.14	31	0.25	42	0.19
Kapell 1951		44	0.70	27	0.00	27	0.08	24	0.36	24	0.18	39	0.25
Kissin 1993		21	0.76	47	0.00	17	0.08	12	0.50	18	0.43	17	0.46
Kushner 1989		20	0.76	13	0.01	26	0.09	23	0.36	12	0.48	22	0.42
Luisada 1991		24	0.75	68	0.00	20	0.07	18	0.44	9	0.42	21	0.43
Lushtak 2004		50	0.68	44	0.00	42	0.06	43	0.13	19	0.28	43	0.19
Malcuzynski 1961		69	0.60	45	0.00	71	0.04	72	0.04	29	0.23	63	0.10
Magaloff 1978		28	0.74	48	0.00	38	0.07	35	0.21	3	0.54	26	0.34
Magin 1975		56	0.67	49	0.00	48	0.05	52	0.05	71	0.04	78	0.04
Michalowski 1933		70	0.59	26	0.00	76	0.03	84	0.03	56	0.05	82	0.04
Milkina 1970		2	0.83	14	0.01	2	0.14	2	0.62	4	0.62	2	0.62
Mohovich 1999		11	0.78	7	0.03	7	0.13	11	0.53	5	0.66	6	0.59
Moravec 1969		72	0.58	53	0.00	74	0.03	87	0.03	26	0.34	62	0.10
Morozova 2008		60	0.65	65	0.00	57	0.04	59	0.04	59	0.04	83	0.04
Neighaus 1950		15	0.77	61	0.00	25	0.09	25	0.36	26	0.38	25	0.37
Niedzielski 1931		39	0.71	70	0.00	33	0.05	37	0.20	23	0.43	30	0.29
Ohlsson 1999		47	0.69	34	0.00	49	0.06	47	0.06	36	0.17	64	0.10
Osinska 1989		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Pachmann 1927		66	0.62	58	0.00	86	0.04	67	0.04	57	0.04	81	0.04
Paderewski 1930		61	0.65	90	0.00	62	0.04	76	0.04	22	0.34	56	0.12
Perlemuter 1992		17	0.76	18	0.01	19	0.08	17	0.44	12	0.46	18	0.45
Pierdomenico 2008		77	0.56	28	0.00	63	0.04	63	0.04	11	0.44	51	0.13
Poblocka 1999		54	0.67	55	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.13	36	0.19	44	0.16
Rabcewiczowa 1932		58	0.66	63	0.00	60	0.04	77	0.04	45	0.08	72	0.06
Rachmaninoff 1923		16	0.76	17	0.01	23	0.08	29	0.33	18	0.34	28	0.33
Rangell 2001		83	0.49	84	0.00	67	0.05	51	0.05	20	0.36	53	0.13
Richter 1976		84	0.49	77	0.00	85	0.03	83	0.03	60	0.05	80	0.04
Rosen 1989		9	0.78	51	0.00	10	0.13	10	0.54	7	0.55	8	0.54
Rosenthal 1930		73	0.58	57	0.00	78	0.03	85	0.03	35	0.12	73	0.06
Rosenthal 1931		76	0.56	32	0.00	79	0.04	79	0.04	28	0.25	65	0.10
Rosenthal 1931b		75	0.57	39	0.00	80	0.03	81	0.03	29	0.21	71	0.08
Rosenthal 1931c		80	0.53	71	0.00	82	0.04	68	0.04	33	0.19	68	0.09
Rosenthal 1931d		74	0.57	87	0.00	81	0.04	74	0.04	25	0.25	66	0.10
Rossi 2007		35	0.72	11	0.01	32	0.06	34	0.22	2	0.61	24	0.37
Rubinstein 1939		52	0.68	30	0.00	45	0.06	45	0.13	3	0.55	35	0.27
Rubinstein 1952		81	0.50	37	0.00	68	0.04	61	0.04	25	0.40	55	0.13
Rubinstein 1966		36	0.72	35	0.00	39	0.08	33	0.23	7	0.51	27	0.34
Schilhawsky 1960		55	0.67	19	0.01	37	0.06	38	0.19	45	0.14	45	0.16
Shebanova 2002		13	0.78	9	0.02	12	0.12	9	0.55	22	0.36	20	0.44
Smith 1975		12	0.78	23	0.01	15	0.10	21	0.41	3	0.53	14	0.47
Sokolov 2002		78	0.54	73	0.00	72	0.05	53	0.05	54	0.04	77	0.04
Sztompka 1959		7	0.79	8	0.02	11	0.20	8	0.56	19	0.40	15	0.47
Tomsic 1995		65	0.62	59	0.00	70	0.04	57	0.04	13	0.52	48	0.14
Uninsky 1932		59	0.66	69	0.00	65	0.04	65	0.04	55	0.06	75	0.05
Uninsky 1971		67	0.60	79	0.00	69	0.05	54	0.05	59	0.06	74	0.05
Wasowski 1980		10	0.78	25	0.01	16	0.08	13	0.49	2	0.54	9	0.51
Zak 1937		29	0.73	67	0.00	29	0.11	26	0.34	25	0.24	31	0.29
Zak 1951		38	0.71	54	0.00	30	0.10	28	0.33	26	0.24	33	0.28
Average		1	0.88	1	0.42	1	0.42	1	0.75	7	0.50	4	0.61
Random 1		91	-0.23	62	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	46	0.06	89	0.02
Random 2		89	-0.23	85	0.00	91	0.01	91	0.01	83	0.02	90	0.01
Random 3		90	-0.23	91	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	83	0.02	91	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).