Average

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		2	0.91	6	0.05	4	0.22	2	0.64	1	0.71	4	0.67
Anderszewski 2003		16	0.85	34	0.00	33	0.06	34	0.24	2	0.60	35	0.38
Ashkenazy 1981		36	0.81	40	0.00	29	0.07	24	0.30	1	0.64	25	0.44
Bacha 2000		60	0.74	88	0.00	52	0.04	55	0.04	1	0.59	54	0.15
Badura 1965		54	0.76	8	0.02	57	0.04	61	0.04	8	0.57	60	0.15
Barbosa 1983		76	0.61	43	0.00	71	0.05	54	0.05	9	0.44	57	0.15
Biret 1990		34	0.81	36	0.00	35	0.06	36	0.22	1	0.74	34	0.40
Blet 2003		48	0.78	79	0.00	56	0.04	57	0.04	2	0.50	68	0.14
Block 1995		68	0.67	75	0.00	67	0.04	62	0.04	1	0.57	61	0.15
Blumental 1952		50	0.78	16	0.00	34	0.07	38	0.17	2	0.57	39	0.31
Boshniakovich 1969		28	0.82	26	0.00	14	0.08	31	0.26	1	0.63	33	0.40
Brailowsky 1960		52	0.77	27	0.00	70	0.06	50	0.06	2	0.65	47	0.20
Bunin 1987		83	0.57	89	0.00	78	0.03	82	0.03	23	0.39	82	0.11
Bunin 1987b		86	0.55	83	0.00	77	0.03	79	0.03	23	0.39	79	0.11
Chiu 1999		57	0.75	60	0.00	49	0.04	71	0.04	1	0.59	55	0.15
Cohen 1997		88	0.51	55	0.00	88	0.04	65	0.04	22	0.30	81	0.11
Cortot 1951		44	0.79	65	0.00	55	0.06	48	0.06	2	0.62	49	0.19
Csalog 1996		85	0.56	69	0.00	63	0.04	69	0.04	10	0.41	74	0.13
Czerny 1949		25	0.83	10	0.01	18	0.06	20	0.35	1	0.68	20	0.49
Czerny 1990		6	0.88	42	0.00	21	0.06	15	0.41	1	0.68	15	0.53
Duchoud 2007		69	0.67	61	0.00	68	0.05	53	0.05	5	0.50	52	0.16
Ezaki 2006		8	0.88	72	0.00	24	0.07	26	0.30	1	0.69	23	0.45
Falvay 1989		74	0.63	57	0.00	87	0.03	77	0.03	34	0.37	78	0.11
Farrell 1958		46	0.79	12	0.01	19	0.07	35	0.22	1	0.72	32	0.40
Ferenczy 1958		61	0.74	29	0.00	60	0.04	64	0.04	6	0.49	69	0.14
Fliere 1977		1	0.92	2	0.20	3	0.32	1	0.68	1	0.76	1	0.72
Fou 1978		22	0.84	52	0.00	25	0.08	32	0.26	1	0.66	28	0.41
Francois 1956		56	0.75	25	0.00	61	0.04	73	0.04	3	0.56	63	0.15
Friedman 1923		32	0.81	71	0.00	51	0.05	51	0.05	10	0.53	53	0.16
Friedman 1923b		38	0.81	38	0.00	48	0.04	67	0.04	10	0.55	62	0.15
Friedman 1930		30	0.82	80	0.00	54	0.04	58	0.04	10	0.53	59	0.15
Garcia 2007		20	0.84	50	0.00	36	0.06	37	0.19	2	0.66	37	0.35
Garcia 2007b		37	0.81	76	0.00	32	0.06	29	0.27	3	0.66	27	0.42
Gierzod 1998		7	0.88	14	0.01	6	0.15	5	0.54	1	0.74	6	0.63
Gornostaeva 1994		49	0.78	18	0.00	42	0.05	45	0.13	1	0.66	44	0.29
Groot 1988		65	0.72	7	0.04	17	0.06	40	0.15	2	0.62	41	0.30
Harasiewicz 1955		13	0.86	15	0.01	13	0.10	11	0.45	1	0.68	13	0.55
Hatto 1993		41	0.80	56	0.00	39	0.13	28	0.29	5	0.60	26	0.42
Hatto 1997		29	0.82	47	0.00	38	0.11	25	0.30	6	0.56	31	0.41
Horowitz 1949		58	0.75	84	0.00	66	0.03	74	0.03	4	0.56	72	0.13
Indjic 1988		27	0.82	53	0.00	37	0.08	27	0.30	6	0.57	29	0.41
Kapell 1951		40	0.80	4	0.06	5	0.17	8	0.50	1	0.63	10	0.56
Kissin 1993		11	0.86	11	0.01	9	0.13	6	0.53	1	0.74	5	0.63
Kushner 1989		12	0.86	13	0.01	27	0.07	19	0.35	1	0.71	17	0.50
Luisada 1991		10	0.86	17	0.00	11	0.11	13	0.42	1	0.72	11	0.55
Lushtak 2004		33	0.81	77	0.00	45	0.07	44	0.13	1	0.54	45	0.26
Malcuzynski 1961		72	0.65	70	0.00	73	0.04	70	0.04	5	0.50	65	0.14
Magaloff 1978		62	0.74	32	0.00	65	0.04	60	0.04	2	0.57	56	0.15
Magin 1975		35	0.81	28	0.00	22	0.06	14	0.41	1	0.72	14	0.54
Michalowski 1933		59	0.75	81	0.00	59	0.04	72	0.04	12	0.50	67	0.14
Milkina 1970		17	0.85	37	0.00	20	0.08	23	0.32	1	0.70	22	0.47
Mohovich 1999		23	0.83	19	0.00	31	0.08	16	0.41	1	0.75	12	0.55
Moravec 1969		75	0.62	35	0.00	85	0.02	85	0.02	19	0.44	86	0.09
Morozova 2008		24	0.83	48	0.00	26	0.06	30	0.26	1	0.66	30	0.41
Neighaus 1950		18	0.85	24	0.00	15	0.11	12	0.43	3	0.60	16	0.51
Niedzielski 1931		45	0.79	58	0.00	44	0.05	41	0.14	4	0.60	43	0.29
Ohlsson 1999		31	0.82	31	0.00	28	0.06	21	0.33	3	0.62	24	0.45
Osinska 1989		5	0.88	22	0.00	12	0.11	7	0.50	1	0.75	7	0.61
Pachmann 1927		67	0.71	78	0.00	80	0.03	83	0.03	10	0.42	80	0.11
Paderewski 1930		53	0.77	86	0.00	58	0.03	76	0.03	1	0.61	66	0.14
Perlemuter 1992		19	0.84	46	0.00	16	0.07	22	0.32	1	0.68	21	0.47
Pierdomenico 2008		84	0.57	73	0.00	79	0.02	87	0.02	13	0.42	87	0.09
Poblocka 1999		51	0.77	59	0.00	30	0.06	33	0.25	7	0.55	36	0.37
Rabcewiczowa 1932		47	0.78	33	0.00	53	0.04	56	0.04	2	0.52	64	0.14
Rachmaninoff 1923		15	0.85	5	0.06	10	0.11	17	0.39	1	0.62	19	0.49
Rangell 2001		87	0.52	87	0.00	74	0.04	63	0.04	5	0.49	70	0.14
Richter 1976		73	0.63	62	0.00	75	0.03	81	0.03	22	0.46	76	0.12
Rosen 1989		21	0.84	66	0.00	23	0.06	18	0.38	1	0.67	18	0.50
Rosenthal 1930		71	0.66	63	0.00	72	0.06	49	0.06	6	0.54	50	0.18
Rosenthal 1931		78	0.61	67	0.00	84	0.03	75	0.03	11	0.50	77	0.12
Rosenthal 1931b		77	0.61	85	0.00	83	0.02	84	0.02	10	0.52	85	0.10
Rosenthal 1931c		81	0.59	39	0.00	76	0.03	78	0.03	14	0.43	83	0.11
Rosenthal 1931d		79	0.60	68	0.00	82	0.02	88	0.02	11	0.51	84	0.10
Rossi 2007		70	0.66	23	0.00	81	0.02	86	0.02	22	0.33	88	0.08
Rubinstein 1939		63	0.73	64	0.00	69	0.05	52	0.05	5	0.51	51	0.16
Rubinstein 1952		82	0.58	20	0.00	64	0.04	68	0.04	12	0.49	71	0.14
Rubinstein 1966		55	0.75	21	0.00	62	0.04	66	0.04	3	0.56	58	0.15
Schilhawsky 1960		43	0.80	30	0.00	40	0.05	39	0.17	1	0.66	38	0.33
Shebanova 2002		4	0.89	3	0.19	2	0.23	3	0.63	1	0.75	2	0.69
Smith 1975		39	0.81	54	0.00	43	0.05	43	0.13	1	0.71	40	0.30
Sokolov 2002		64	0.73	9	0.01	47	0.06	47	0.06	1	0.63	48	0.19
Sztompka 1959		3	0.90	1	0.23	1	0.23	4	0.62	1	0.73	3	0.67
Tomsic 1995		80	0.59	51	0.00	86	0.03	80	0.03	19	0.45	75	0.12
Uninsky 1932		42	0.80	74	0.00	46	0.08	46	0.08	6	0.53	46	0.21
Uninsky 1971		66	0.72	44	0.00	50	0.04	59	0.04	21	0.42	73	0.13
Wasowski 1980		26	0.82	49	0.00	41	0.05	42	0.14	1	0.60	42	0.29
Zak 1937		9	0.87	45	0.00	7	0.12	9	0.47	2	0.70	8	0.57
Zak 1951		14	0.85	41	0.00	8	0.16	10	0.46	2	0.70	9	0.57
Average		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Random 1		91	-0.28	82	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	80	0.02	90	0.01
Random 2		89	-0.12	90	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	49	0.04	89	0.02
Random 3		90	-0.20	91	0.00	91	0.01	91	0.01	77	0.02	91	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).