Zak 1937

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		3	0.81	11	0.00	8	0.09	7	0.49	18	0.40	8	0.44
Anderszewski 2003		40	0.70	47	0.00	45	0.05	49	0.05	25	0.25	56	0.11
Ashkenazy 1981		10	0.78	24	0.00	6	0.09	12	0.38	6	0.48	10	0.43
Bacha 2000		72	0.56	48	0.00	64	0.03	74	0.03	56	0.04	85	0.03
Badura 1965		48	0.68	25	0.00	46	0.06	46	0.06	18	0.50	45	0.17
Barbosa 1983		71	0.56	13	0.00	47	0.04	59	0.04	13	0.36	51	0.12
Biret 1990		42	0.69	49	0.00	37	0.04	34	0.16	20	0.33	38	0.23
Blet 2003		52	0.66	50	0.00	66	0.03	83	0.03	36	0.16	70	0.07
Block 1995		67	0.59	26	0.00	58	0.04	58	0.04	19	0.26	60	0.10
Blumental 1952		46	0.68	51	0.00	57	0.06	45	0.06	71	0.04	75	0.05
Boshniakovich 1969		20	0.74	16	0.00	16	0.08	11	0.40	5	0.57	5	0.48
Brailowsky 1960		66	0.59	12	0.00	68	0.03	79	0.03	31	0.23	63	0.08
Bunin 1987		62	0.62	52	0.00	60	0.04	60	0.04	9	0.49	48	0.14
Bunin 1987b		63	0.61	53	0.00	59	0.04	71	0.04	10	0.49	46	0.14
Chiu 1999		50	0.67	27	0.00	31	0.05	38	0.15	5	0.45	32	0.26
Cohen 1997		86	0.41	28	0.00	82	0.03	77	0.03	47	0.06	81	0.04
Cortot 1951		44	0.68	54	0.00	55	0.04	57	0.04	21	0.40	50	0.13
Csalog 1996		76	0.52	17	0.00	70	0.03	82	0.03	22	0.31	59	0.10
Czerny 1949		30	0.71	29	0.00	29	0.05	30	0.20	26	0.43	28	0.29
Czerny 1990		16	0.76	10	0.00	35	0.05	32	0.18	21	0.29	37	0.23
Duchoud 2007		68	0.58	14	0.00	74	0.04	63	0.04	31	0.19	62	0.09
Ezaki 2006		5	0.80	30	0.00	9	0.11	8	0.46	6	0.56	4	0.51
Falvay 1989		77	0.51	31	0.00	80	0.04	54	0.04	46	0.12	67	0.07
Farrell 1958		54	0.65	55	0.00	49	0.04	56	0.04	41	0.16	64	0.08
Ferenczy 1958		58	0.63	56	0.00	71	0.03	72	0.03	25	0.27	61	0.09
Fliere 1977		4	0.81	57	0.00	4	0.12	5	0.50	19	0.38	7	0.44
Fou 1978		33	0.71	32	0.00	48	0.04	61	0.04	35	0.15	65	0.08
Francois 1956		64	0.59	58	0.00	76	0.04	65	0.04	59	0.04	84	0.04
Friedman 1923		22	0.74	59	0.00	33	0.06	29	0.21	16	0.49	24	0.32
Friedman 1923b		21	0.74	18	0.00	28	0.05	26	0.22	15	0.51	23	0.33
Friedman 1930		27	0.72	60	0.00	40	0.05	36	0.16	10	0.52	27	0.29
Garcia 2007		51	0.67	33	0.00	73	0.04	66	0.04	58	0.05	79	0.04
Garcia 2007b		56	0.64	61	0.00	65	0.03	84	0.03	75	0.04	89	0.03
Gierzod 1998		14	0.77	5	0.00	25	0.06	13	0.34	23	0.36	18	0.35
Gornostaeva 1994		74	0.55	34	0.00	62	0.04	69	0.04	47	0.06	76	0.05
Groot 1988		55	0.65	62	0.00	30	0.04	37	0.15	10	0.48	31	0.27
Harasiewicz 1955		8	0.78	63	0.00	2	0.24	2	0.64	1	0.58	2	0.61
Hatto 1993		15	0.76	64	0.00	13	0.09	14	0.33	16	0.38	19	0.35
Hatto 1997		12	0.77	65	0.00	15	0.13	16	0.33	16	0.39	17	0.36
Horowitz 1949		36	0.70	66	0.00	44	0.06	43	0.11	18	0.46	40	0.22
Indjic 1988		11	0.77	67	0.00	14	0.11	15	0.33	17	0.39	15	0.36
Kapell 1951		17	0.75	35	0.00	3	0.13	4	0.50	4	0.43	6	0.46
Kissin 1993		2	0.82	68	0.00	5	0.11	3	0.54	6	0.53	3	0.53
Kushner 1989		18	0.75	36	0.00	36	0.05	27	0.22	23	0.35	29	0.28
Luisada 1991		6	0.80	69	0.00	10	0.12	9	0.43	9	0.41	11	0.42
Lushtak 2004		13	0.77	6	0.00	11	0.13	10	0.40	3	0.45	12	0.42
Malcuzynski 1961		79	0.48	70	0.00	61	0.03	78	0.03	35	0.16	68	0.07
Magaloff 1978		59	0.63	71	0.00	63	0.04	70	0.04	27	0.24	58	0.10
Magin 1975		28	0.72	19	0.00	41	0.05	39	0.14	24	0.32	41	0.21
Michalowski 1933		69	0.58	72	0.00	69	0.03	81	0.03	42	0.13	71	0.06
Milkina 1970		39	0.70	20	0.00	23	0.06	33	0.17	19	0.40	33	0.26
Mohovich 1999		37	0.70	73	0.00	43	0.06	41	0.13	20	0.45	35	0.24
Moravec 1969		81	0.43	37	0.00	84	0.02	86	0.02	73	0.04	86	0.03
Morozova 2008		7	0.79	74	0.00	12	0.07	22	0.25	18	0.38	25	0.31
Neighaus 1950		32	0.71	75	0.00	17	0.10	17	0.31	22	0.38	22	0.34
Niedzielski 1931		53	0.65	76	0.00	53	0.04	62	0.04	29	0.31	54	0.11
Ohlsson 1999		31	0.71	21	0.00	26	0.06	19	0.29	13	0.41	20	0.34
Osinska 1989		23	0.73	38	0.00	34	0.05	24	0.24	25	0.34	26	0.29
Pachmann 1927		70	0.58	77	0.00	77	0.05	53	0.05	20	0.33	49	0.13
Paderewski 1930		60	0.62	78	0.00	75	0.04	64	0.04	36	0.14	69	0.07
Perlemuter 1992		24	0.73	3	0.00	32	0.05	28	0.22	22	0.29	34	0.25
Pierdomenico 2008		75	0.53	39	0.00	18	0.06	44	0.10	29	0.28	44	0.17
Poblocka 1999		34	0.71	40	0.00	24	0.06	18	0.31	19	0.42	14	0.36
Rabcewiczowa 1932		57	0.63	79	0.00	72	0.03	73	0.03	48	0.06	78	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		35	0.71	41	0.00	38	0.05	35	0.16	19	0.34	36	0.23
Rangell 2001		82	0.43	42	0.00	79	0.06	47	0.06	34	0.20	57	0.11
Richter 1976		61	0.62	15	0.00	54	0.04	67	0.04	19	0.47	47	0.14
Rosen 1989		43	0.69	80	0.00	50	0.04	55	0.04	34	0.18	66	0.08
Rosenthal 1930		78	0.51	22	0.00	78	0.05	51	0.05	46	0.05	74	0.05
Rosenthal 1931		85	0.41	81	0.00	85	0.02	87	0.02	81	0.03	90	0.02
Rosenthal 1931b		84	0.42	82	0.00	86	0.03	75	0.03	64	0.05	83	0.04
Rosenthal 1931c		83	0.42	7	0.00	83	0.03	80	0.03	62	0.04	88	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		87	0.40	4	0.00	87	0.04	68	0.04	73	0.04	82	0.04
Rossi 2007		80	0.46	83	0.00	81	0.03	76	0.03	66	0.05	77	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		29	0.72	8	0.00	22	0.06	40	0.13	15	0.37	39	0.22
Rubinstein 1952		65	0.59	43	0.00	21	0.07	42	0.13	37	0.30	42	0.20
Rubinstein 1966		26	0.72	2	0.00	20	0.06	23	0.25	4	0.53	16	0.36
Schilhawsky 1960		19	0.75	84	0.00	27	0.05	21	0.26	24	0.44	21	0.34
Shebanova 2002		9	0.78	85	0.00	7	0.09	6	0.49	15	0.38	9	0.43
Smith 1975		49	0.68	44	0.00	51	0.05	50	0.05	22	0.25	53	0.11
Sokolov 2002		47	0.68	9	0.00	19	0.06	20	0.27	3	0.50	13	0.37
Sztompka 1959		25	0.72	45	0.00	42	0.08	25	0.23	38	0.16	43	0.19
Tomsic 1995		73	0.56	86	0.00	67	0.03	85	0.03	22	0.42	55	0.11
Uninsky 1932		45	0.68	87	0.00	52	0.05	48	0.05	28	0.31	52	0.12
Uninsky 1971		41	0.69	46	0.00	39	0.04	31	0.19	26	0.38	30	0.27
Wasowski 1980		38	0.70	88	0.00	56	0.05	52	0.05	54	0.06	72	0.05
Zak 1937		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Zak 1951		1	0.99	1	0.99	1	0.98	1	1.00	1	1.00	1	1.00
Random 1		90	-0.17	89	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	38	0.12	87	0.03
Random 2		88	-0.03	90	0.00	88	0.01	88	0.01	24	0.22	73	0.05
Random 3		89	-0.14	23	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	42	0.13	80	0.04

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).