Uninsky 1971

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		6	0.76	22	0.00	5	0.14	10	0.47	12	0.44	15	0.45
Anderszewski 2003		55	0.50	86	0.00	54	0.06	59	0.06	70	0.04	58	0.05
Ashkenazy 1981		54	0.52	58	0.00	38	0.10	41	0.22	43	0.09	40	0.14
Bacha 2000		74	0.36	32	0.00	63	0.07	47	0.07	78	0.03	52	0.05
Badura 1965		26	0.68	3	0.03	7	0.12	11	0.46	1	0.62	6	0.53
Barbosa 1983		79	0.31	16	0.01	67	0.04	70	0.04	66	0.04	70	0.04
Biret 1990		65	0.43	74	0.00	61	0.07	50	0.07	74	0.03	62	0.05
Blet 2003		15	0.71	15	0.01	34	0.08	31	0.36	5	0.46	23	0.41
Block 1995		45	0.57	59	0.00	47	0.08	46	0.08	40	0.11	46	0.09
Blumental 1952		66	0.43	66	0.00	52	0.04	65	0.04	55	0.05	73	0.04
Boshniakovich 1969		4	0.77	5	0.02	9	0.07	8	0.47	14	0.53	10	0.50
Brailowsky 1960		72	0.37	41	0.00	74	0.04	79	0.04	78	0.03	76	0.03
Bunin 1987		29	0.65	75	0.00	30	0.08	30	0.37	6	0.51	21	0.43
Bunin 1987b		30	0.64	64	0.00	29	0.08	29	0.37	6	0.52	16	0.44
Chiu 1999		67	0.42	8	0.01	60	0.06	57	0.06	54	0.04	54	0.05
Cohen 1997		87	0.11	76	0.00	75	0.03	81	0.03	79	0.03	83	0.03
Cortot 1951		22	0.69	79	0.00	36	0.07	36	0.32	12	0.46	30	0.38
Csalog 1996		59	0.49	40	0.00	55	0.04	75	0.04	40	0.12	48	0.07
Czerny 1949		5	0.77	50	0.00	4	0.23	3	0.52	6	0.55	5	0.53
Czerny 1990		38	0.60	9	0.01	44	0.06	44	0.12	75	0.03	50	0.06
Duchoud 2007		57	0.50	46	0.00	51	0.06	55	0.06	39	0.13	45	0.09
Ezaki 2006		46	0.57	69	0.00	49	0.07	49	0.07	72	0.03	51	0.05
Falvay 1989		86	0.20	77	0.00	87	0.02	87	0.02	81	0.02	89	0.02
Farrell 1958		76	0.34	82	0.00	71	0.04	71	0.04	86	0.03	79	0.03
Ferenczy 1958		17	0.70	43	0.00	31	0.09	18	0.43	3	0.54	12	0.48
Fliere 1977		10	0.74	30	0.00	12	0.08	21	0.42	21	0.36	27	0.39
Fou 1978		49	0.55	65	0.00	42	0.08	42	0.18	37	0.13	38	0.15
Francois 1956		61	0.49	88	0.00	64	0.06	52	0.06	62	0.04	63	0.05
Friedman 1923		32	0.64	10	0.01	16	0.09	12	0.46	7	0.59	8	0.52
Friedman 1923b		34	0.63	6	0.01	15	0.09	7	0.47	7	0.59	7	0.53
Friedman 1930		33	0.64	55	0.00	33	0.09	34	0.33	15	0.49	26	0.40
Garcia 2007		28	0.66	83	0.00	37	0.08	37	0.28	29	0.25	37	0.26
Garcia 2007b		16	0.71	70	0.00	19	0.10	25	0.40	13	0.48	20	0.44
Gierzod 1998		13	0.72	12	0.01	20	0.14	20	0.42	16	0.41	25	0.41
Gornostaeva 1994		56	0.50	48	0.00	65	0.06	53	0.06	78	0.03	74	0.04
Groot 1988		70	0.39	38	0.00	70	0.03	80	0.03	76	0.04	86	0.03
Harasiewicz 1955		23	0.69	28	0.00	17	0.10	6	0.47	13	0.42	19	0.44
Hatto 1993		41	0.60	27	0.00	11	0.08	23	0.42	9	0.51	13	0.46
Hatto 1997		37	0.61	53	0.00	10	0.07	22	0.42	11	0.46	17	0.44
Horowitz 1949		14	0.72	13	0.01	24	0.10	16	0.43	5	0.54	11	0.48
Indjic 1988		36	0.61	17	0.01	8	0.08	17	0.43	11	0.48	14	0.45
Kapell 1951		8	0.75	26	0.00	21	0.16	9	0.47	13	0.31	28	0.38
Kissin 1993		12	0.74	20	0.00	23	0.10	24	0.40	22	0.37	29	0.38
Kushner 1989		43	0.59	60	0.00	53	0.04	67	0.04	61	0.05	68	0.04
Luisada 1991		42	0.59	18	0.00	41	0.07	40	0.22	52	0.06	42	0.11
Lushtak 2004		63	0.46	63	0.00	58	0.04	66	0.04	61	0.04	72	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961		48	0.55	14	0.01	46	0.06	60	0.06	25	0.24	41	0.12
Magaloff 1978		77	0.34	42	0.00	80	0.05	62	0.05	70	0.04	65	0.04
Magin 1975		24	0.68	54	0.00	40	0.10	39	0.26	51	0.05	43	0.11
Michalowski 1933		9	0.75	2	0.03	6	0.14	5	0.49	3	0.61	3	0.55
Milkina 1970		44	0.57	4	0.02	50	0.07	48	0.07	81	0.03	57	0.05
Mohovich 1999		51	0.53	24	0.00	59	0.06	56	0.06	69	0.04	61	0.05
Moravec 1969		68	0.41	44	0.00	77	0.04	78	0.04	51	0.05	64	0.04
Morozova 2008		31	0.64	67	0.00	39	0.07	38	0.26	43	0.09	39	0.15
Neighaus 1950		27	0.67	39	0.00	13	0.09	14	0.44	17	0.45	18	0.44
Niedzielski 1931		18	0.70	61	0.00	35	0.09	35	0.32	24	0.40	32	0.36
Ohlsson 1999		47	0.56	29	0.00	27	0.08	32	0.34	32	0.24	33	0.29
Osinska 1989		39	0.60	80	0.00	48	0.06	58	0.06	53	0.05	53	0.05
Pachmann 1927		53	0.53	35	0.00	66	0.05	61	0.05	54	0.04	69	0.04
Paderewski 1930		50	0.54	89	0.00	56	0.04	76	0.04	43	0.09	49	0.06
Perlemuter 1992		40	0.60	62	0.00	32	0.10	33	0.33	28	0.24	34	0.28
Pierdomenico 2008		78	0.34	71	0.00	78	0.04	77	0.04	81	0.03	78	0.03
Poblocka 1999		2	0.85	36	0.00	2	0.21	4	0.49	8	0.54	9	0.51
Rabcewiczowa 1932		52	0.53	51	0.00	57	0.05	63	0.05	46	0.06	56	0.05
Rachmaninoff 1923		60	0.49	19	0.00	62	0.09	45	0.09	77	0.03	55	0.05
Rangell 2001		73	0.37	49	0.00	73	0.04	74	0.04	78	0.03	84	0.03
Richter 1976		7	0.75	7	0.01	22	0.13	13	0.45	3	0.62	4	0.53
Rosen 1989		35	0.62	81	0.00	45	0.07	51	0.07	64	0.04	60	0.05
Rosenthal 1930		62	0.48	90	0.00	69	0.04	69	0.04	64	0.04	71	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		81	0.31	31	0.00	84	0.03	84	0.03	79	0.03	81	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		83	0.30	85	0.00	85	0.03	86	0.03	83	0.03	87	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		75	0.34	87	0.00	83	0.04	72	0.04	85	0.03	88	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		84	0.28	52	0.00	86	0.03	85	0.03	79	0.03	85	0.03
Rossi 2007		85	0.23	72	0.00	81	0.03	83	0.03	75	0.04	77	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		69	0.39	45	0.00	72	0.05	64	0.05	81	0.03	67	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		82	0.30	84	0.00	79	0.04	68	0.04	78	0.04	75	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		80	0.31	73	0.00	76	0.04	73	0.04	87	0.03	82	0.03
Schilhawsky 1960		3	0.80	23	0.00	3	0.22	2	0.53	4	0.59	2	0.56
Shebanova 2002		11	0.74	34	0.00	14	0.10	15	0.44	13	0.39	24	0.41
Smith 1975		58	0.49	11	0.01	68	0.06	54	0.06	82	0.03	66	0.04
Sokolov 2002		64	0.44	33	0.00	43	0.06	43	0.12	45	0.06	47	0.08
Sztompka 1959		19	0.70	25	0.00	18	0.11	19	0.42	24	0.32	31	0.37
Tomsic 1995		71	0.38	47	0.00	82	0.03	82	0.03	80	0.03	80	0.03
Uninsky 1932		1	0.91	1	0.70	1	0.70	1	0.81	1	0.86	1	0.83
Uninsky 1971		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Wasowski 1980		21	0.69	21	0.00	25	0.07	27	0.38	7	0.44	22	0.41
Zak 1937		20	0.69	56	0.00	26	0.09	26	0.38	31	0.19	35	0.27
Zak 1951		25	0.68	57	0.00	28	0.10	28	0.38	34	0.18	36	0.26
Random 1		88	-0.07	37	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	10	0.46	44	0.10
Random 2		90	-0.16	68	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	21	0.25	59	0.05
Random 3		89	-0.16	78	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	48	0.05	90	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).