Uninsky 1932

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		2	0.80	67	0.00	7	0.10	5	0.53	15	0.40	12	0.46
Anderszewski 2003		51	0.58	28	0.00	58	0.05	65	0.05	71	0.03	72	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981		48	0.61	20	0.00	34	0.06	39	0.21	35	0.19	37	0.20
Bacha 2000		68	0.51	84	0.00	61	0.06	53	0.06	49	0.05	52	0.05
Badura 1965		30	0.70	3	0.04	14	0.09	21	0.41	17	0.51	13	0.46
Barbosa 1983		74	0.45	29	0.00	68	0.05	67	0.05	50	0.05	58	0.05
Biret 1990		54	0.57	39	0.00	53	0.05	58	0.05	58	0.05	63	0.05
Blet 2003		19	0.72	8	0.01	41	0.10	33	0.27	8	0.39	30	0.32
Block 1995		47	0.62	78	0.00	57	0.05	64	0.05	62	0.04	74	0.04
Blumental 1952		60	0.56	56	0.00	50	0.05	59	0.05	62	0.04	75	0.04
Boshniakovich 1969		18	0.73	58	0.00	28	0.08	22	0.38	22	0.44	19	0.41
Brailowsky 1960		64	0.53	41	0.00	69	0.04	72	0.04	60	0.04	67	0.04
Bunin 1987		56	0.57	66	0.00	52	0.07	48	0.07	19	0.43	42	0.17
Bunin 1987b		59	0.56	44	0.00	51	0.07	51	0.07	19	0.44	40	0.18
Chiu 1999		53	0.58	85	0.00	54	0.06	56	0.06	64	0.03	68	0.04
Cohen 1997		87	0.25	80	0.00	75	0.03	85	0.03	74	0.03	87	0.03
Cortot 1951		16	0.74	25	0.00	36	0.06	31	0.28	5	0.53	22	0.39
Csalog 1996		72	0.46	62	0.00	64	0.04	71	0.04	64	0.04	71	0.04
Czerny 1949		6	0.77	31	0.00	2	0.16	4	0.55	5	0.55	5	0.55
Czerny 1990		35	0.67	43	0.00	42	0.10	40	0.20	61	0.04	48	0.09
Duchoud 2007		62	0.54	68	0.00	60	0.06	57	0.06	36	0.14	47	0.09
Ezaki 2006		31	0.70	7	0.01	30	0.06	30	0.29	37	0.18	35	0.23
Falvay 1989		86	0.32	86	0.00	87	0.03	86	0.03	85	0.02	90	0.02
Farrell 1958		70	0.48	72	0.00	70	0.05	63	0.05	64	0.05	55	0.05
Ferenczy 1958		22	0.72	14	0.01	18	0.10	27	0.31	6	0.48	21	0.39
Fliere 1977		15	0.74	36	0.00	22	0.13	17	0.44	32	0.20	31	0.30
Fou 1978		37	0.66	45	0.00	43	0.07	43	0.16	30	0.20	39	0.18
Francois 1956		63	0.54	87	0.00	66	0.05	68	0.05	47	0.05	66	0.05
Friedman 1923		20	0.72	88	0.00	13	0.09	13	0.47	9	0.56	7	0.51
Friedman 1923b		24	0.71	54	0.00	8	0.10	11	0.48	9	0.56	6	0.52
Friedman 1930		29	0.70	82	0.00	27	0.10	23	0.37	12	0.51	17	0.43
Garcia 2007		17	0.73	81	0.00	37	0.08	36	0.25	24	0.34	32	0.29
Garcia 2007b		9	0.76	26	0.00	11	0.11	10	0.49	8	0.52	9	0.50
Gierzod 1998		25	0.71	30	0.00	20	0.10	18	0.43	25	0.33	23	0.38
Gornostaeva 1994		52	0.58	12	0.01	59	0.05	61	0.05	57	0.05	62	0.05
Groot 1988		73	0.45	69	0.00	73	0.04	74	0.04	75	0.04	77	0.04
Harasiewicz 1955		11	0.76	16	0.00	16	0.11	7	0.52	16	0.39	15	0.45
Hatto 1993		45	0.62	70	0.00	26	0.08	26	0.32	19	0.34	26	0.33
Hatto 1997		42	0.64	50	0.00	25	0.08	25	0.32	19	0.34	25	0.33
Horowitz 1949		13	0.75	32	0.00	23	0.11	19	0.42	13	0.49	14	0.45
Indjic 1988		41	0.64	52	0.00	24	0.09	24	0.33	19	0.35	24	0.34
Kapell 1951		21	0.72	11	0.01	17	0.10	16	0.44	18	0.24	27	0.32
Kissin 1993		8	0.77	40	0.00	21	0.12	14	0.47	20	0.40	16	0.43
Kushner 1989		44	0.63	27	0.00	56	0.07	49	0.07	68	0.04	56	0.05
Luisada 1991		27	0.70	21	0.00	39	0.08	35	0.25	45	0.07	43	0.13
Lushtak 2004		66	0.52	73	0.00	65	0.05	62	0.05	52	0.05	61	0.05
Malcuzynski 1961		49	0.60	5	0.02	6	0.13	37	0.24	9	0.42	28	0.32
Magaloff 1978		75	0.44	23	0.00	77	0.03	84	0.03	71	0.04	80	0.03
Magin 1975		23	0.72	57	0.00	32	0.05	29	0.29	33	0.21	34	0.25
Michalowski 1933		12	0.75	19	0.00	4	0.15	8	0.52	4	0.58	4	0.55
Milkina 1970		39	0.66	17	0.00	46	0.07	47	0.07	65	0.04	57	0.05
Mohovich 1999		50	0.59	63	0.00	62	0.09	46	0.09	79	0.04	51	0.06
Moravec 1969		57	0.56	4	0.03	29	0.06	44	0.13	28	0.28	38	0.19
Morozova 2008		26	0.71	6	0.02	40	0.08	38	0.24	30	0.23	36	0.23
Neighaus 1950		34	0.68	49	0.00	19	0.09	20	0.42	26	0.38	20	0.40
Niedzielski 1931		10	0.76	9	0.01	5	0.12	2	0.56	3	0.61	2	0.58
Ohlsson 1999		55	0.57	46	0.00	33	0.05	41	0.20	37	0.15	41	0.17
Osinska 1989		40	0.66	64	0.00	48	0.06	54	0.06	64	0.04	53	0.05
Pachmann 1927		65	0.53	38	0.00	76	0.03	77	0.03	70	0.03	84	0.03
Paderewski 1930		58	0.56	59	0.00	63	0.04	69	0.04	56	0.03	83	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		32	0.69	51	0.00	31	0.05	34	0.26	26	0.25	33	0.25
Pierdomenico 2008		84	0.35	60	0.00	79	0.02	87	0.02	70	0.04	81	0.03
Poblocka 1999		3	0.80	13	0.01	12	0.11	9	0.50	17	0.44	10	0.47
Rabcewiczowa 1932		43	0.64	10	0.01	47	0.07	50	0.07	39	0.12	46	0.09
Rachmaninoff 1923		46	0.62	18	0.00	49	0.06	52	0.06	47	0.06	50	0.06
Rangell 2001		82	0.38	35	0.00	74	0.03	82	0.03	55	0.04	88	0.03
Richter 1976		28	0.70	24	0.00	44	0.10	42	0.19	11	0.53	29	0.32
Rosen 1989		36	0.67	22	0.00	45	0.10	45	0.10	58	0.05	49	0.07
Rosenthal 1930		67	0.51	34	0.00	71	0.05	60	0.05	47	0.05	60	0.05
Rosenthal 1931		77	0.41	65	0.00	78	0.03	79	0.03	45	0.08	59	0.05
Rosenthal 1931b		78	0.40	74	0.00	84	0.04	73	0.04	45	0.07	65	0.05
Rosenthal 1931c		79	0.39	42	0.00	83	0.03	78	0.03	73	0.04	89	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		81	0.39	71	0.00	85	0.04	70	0.04	47	0.07	64	0.05
Rossi 2007		76	0.42	79	0.00	80	0.03	83	0.03	70	0.04	79	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		71	0.47	15	0.00	72	0.04	75	0.04	69	0.04	70	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		83	0.36	37	0.00	81	0.03	81	0.03	61	0.05	78	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		80	0.39	47	0.00	82	0.03	76	0.03	86	0.03	85	0.03
Schilhawsky 1960		4	0.78	2	0.04	3	0.21	3	0.56	9	0.56	3	0.56
Shebanova 2002		14	0.74	33	0.00	10	0.10	15	0.46	22	0.36	18	0.41
Smith 1975		61	0.56	53	0.00	67	0.05	66	0.05	84	0.03	69	0.04
Sokolov 2002		69	0.49	48	0.00	55	0.06	55	0.06	51	0.05	54	0.05
Sztompka 1959		7	0.77	55	0.00	9	0.08	6	0.52	19	0.40	11	0.46
Tomsic 1995		85	0.34	89	0.00	86	0.03	80	0.03	78	0.03	82	0.03
Uninsky 1932		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Uninsky 1971		1	0.91	1	0.70	1	0.69	1	0.86	1	0.81	1	0.83
Wasowski 1980		5	0.78	75	0.00	15	0.09	12	0.48	4	0.52	8	0.50
Zak 1937		33	0.68	90	0.00	35	0.06	28	0.31	48	0.05	44	0.12
Zak 1951		38	0.66	61	0.00	38	0.06	32	0.28	55	0.05	45	0.12
Random 1		89	-0.16	76	0.00	88	0.01	89	0.01	30	0.19	76	0.04
Random 2		88	-0.13	83	0.00	89	0.01	88	0.01	35	0.13	73	0.04
Random 3		90	-0.18	77	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	43	0.10	86	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).