Sokolov 2002

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		10	0.65	18	0.01	21	0.10	11	0.38	45	0.06	29	0.15
Anderszewski 2003		22	0.61	27	0.01	12	0.12	12	0.38	33	0.23	12	0.30
Ashkenazy 1981		8	0.68	13	0.01	14	0.07	14	0.35	32	0.21	14	0.27
Bacha 2000		44	0.54	19	0.01	61	0.03	60	0.03	75	0.03	77	0.03
Badura 1965		42	0.54	41	0.00	40	0.07	33	0.18	36	0.30	19	0.23
Barbosa 1983		85	0.36	52	0.00	59	0.03	71	0.03	55	0.05	71	0.04
Biret 1990		9	0.66	29	0.01	23	0.04	26	0.22	52	0.05	39	0.10
Blet 2003		78	0.43	54	0.00	73	0.03	81	0.03	66	0.04	82	0.03
Block 1995		83	0.40	83	0.00	54	0.03	75	0.03	59	0.04	86	0.03
Blumental 1952		52	0.52	34	0.00	66	0.03	64	0.03	82	0.03	87	0.03
Boshniakovich 1969		15	0.64	30	0.01	8	0.14	8	0.41	27	0.35	3	0.38
Brailowsky 1960		65	0.49	89	0.00	65	0.04	54	0.04	46	0.06	60	0.05
Bunin 1987		46	0.53	61	0.00	27	0.04	35	0.16	17	0.45	15	0.27
Bunin 1987b		56	0.52	67	0.00	28	0.07	36	0.16	17	0.45	13	0.27
Chiu 1999		72	0.46	74	0.00	37	0.05	44	0.11	67	0.03	57	0.06
Cohen 1997		84	0.37	76	0.00	85	0.03	82	0.03	44	0.10	64	0.05
Cortot 1951		45	0.53	79	0.00	44	0.06	42	0.12	38	0.14	33	0.13
Csalog 1996		74	0.46	45	0.00	57	0.03	74	0.03	62	0.04	81	0.03
Czerny 1949		37	0.56	56	0.00	35	0.04	32	0.19	45	0.07	34	0.12
Czerny 1990		48	0.53	71	0.00	51	0.05	48	0.05	85	0.03	75	0.04
Duchoud 2007		2	0.70	17	0.01	5	0.11	7	0.42	4	0.53	2	0.47
Ezaki 2006		30	0.58	5	0.04	13	0.07	15	0.35	36	0.19	16	0.26
Falvay 1989		80	0.43	10	0.02	52	0.04	57	0.04	53	0.07	61	0.05
Farrell 1958		34	0.57	23	0.01	42	0.06	43	0.11	52	0.06	44	0.08
Ferenczy 1958		81	0.42	68	0.00	70	0.03	80	0.03	55	0.05	72	0.04
Fliere 1977		18	0.63	35	0.00	20	0.07	18	0.33	54	0.05	31	0.13
Fou 1978		25	0.60	24	0.01	38	0.04	39	0.14	62	0.04	47	0.07
Francois 1956		63	0.51	47	0.00	76	0.03	69	0.03	61	0.04	89	0.03
Friedman 1923		69	0.48	46	0.00	71	0.04	55	0.04	71	0.04	76	0.04
Friedman 1923b		70	0.47	58	0.00	72	0.03	76	0.03	53	0.05	74	0.04
Friedman 1930		73	0.46	77	0.00	74	0.03	79	0.03	80	0.03	84	0.03
Garcia 2007		20	0.62	64	0.00	33	0.05	31	0.20	52	0.06	36	0.11
Garcia 2007b		21	0.61	72	0.00	36	0.06	30	0.21	57	0.05	40	0.10
Gierzod 1998		5	0.69	3	0.07	7	0.14	2	0.50	30	0.26	7	0.36
Gornostaeva 1994		24	0.60	8	0.02	18	0.06	20	0.31	12	0.35	8	0.33
Groot 1988		47	0.53	86	0.00	45	0.05	49	0.05	47	0.07	58	0.06
Harasiewicz 1955		26	0.60	6	0.03	2	0.16	5	0.48	28	0.28	6	0.37
Hatto 1993		58	0.52	84	0.00	64	0.05	47	0.05	51	0.06	65	0.05
Hatto 1997		59	0.52	80	0.00	62	0.03	63	0.03	70	0.04	85	0.03
Horowitz 1949		61	0.51	88	0.00	58	0.03	65	0.03	49	0.08	62	0.05
Indjic 1988		55	0.52	85	0.00	63	0.05	52	0.05	70	0.04	70	0.04
Kapell 1951		19	0.63	36	0.00	11	0.09	13	0.37	40	0.10	24	0.19
Kissin 1993		16	0.64	21	0.01	22	0.05	16	0.34	46	0.05	32	0.13
Kushner 1989		13	0.64	22	0.01	24	0.05	21	0.28	39	0.14	20	0.20
Luisada 1991		32	0.58	25	0.01	41	0.06	38	0.15	55	0.05	41	0.09
Lushtak 2004		36	0.56	14	0.01	39	0.05	37	0.16	50	0.05	43	0.09
Malcuzynski 1961		62	0.51	33	0.00	55	0.03	59	0.03	33	0.17	48	0.07
Magaloff 1978		39	0.55	11	0.02	17	0.05	41	0.12	44	0.16	30	0.14
Magin 1975		14	0.64	20	0.01	9	0.14	10	0.39	27	0.26	9	0.32
Michalowski 1933		28	0.60	31	0.01	32	0.04	27	0.22	31	0.26	18	0.24
Milkina 1970		12	0.64	32	0.00	25	0.06	23	0.26	42	0.15	21	0.20
Mohovich 1999		23	0.61	55	0.00	34	0.05	24	0.24	51	0.06	35	0.12
Moravec 1969		86	0.36	37	0.00	86	0.03	62	0.03	71	0.04	78	0.03
Morozova 2008		35	0.56	49	0.00	43	0.06	40	0.13	67	0.04	51	0.07
Neighaus 1950		11	0.65	81	0.00	19	0.06	19	0.32	38	0.13	22	0.20
Niedzielski 1931		79	0.43	60	0.00	69	0.02	86	0.02	55	0.04	79	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		1	0.77	1	0.40	1	0.40	1	0.61	9	0.51	1	0.56
Osinska 1989		41	0.54	69	0.00	47	0.05	53	0.05	52	0.05	59	0.05
Pachmann 1927		76	0.44	28	0.01	53	0.03	67	0.03	19	0.34	37	0.10
Paderewski 1930		54	0.52	70	0.00	68	0.02	84	0.02	73	0.03	90	0.02
Perlemuter 1992		31	0.58	42	0.00	26	0.06	28	0.21	64	0.04	42	0.09
Pierdomenico 2008		66	0.49	75	0.00	80	0.03	78	0.03	62	0.05	68	0.04
Poblocka 1999		38	0.55	50	0.00	29	0.05	22	0.28	43	0.12	25	0.18
Rabcewiczowa 1932		60	0.52	62	0.00	75	0.03	61	0.03	72	0.04	80	0.03
Rachmaninoff 1923		17	0.63	16	0.01	15	0.06	17	0.33	29	0.20	17	0.26
Rangell 2001		40	0.55	39	0.00	56	0.03	66	0.03	24	0.33	38	0.10
Richter 1976		68	0.48	15	0.01	50	0.06	46	0.06	31	0.37	27	0.15
Rosen 1989		29	0.59	48	0.00	46	0.05	50	0.05	76	0.04	73	0.04
Rosenthal 1930		27	0.60	40	0.00	30	0.05	25	0.24	8	0.44	11	0.32
Rosenthal 1931		53	0.52	90	0.00	77	0.03	72	0.03	34	0.17	50	0.07
Rosenthal 1931b		51	0.52	82	0.00	78	0.03	70	0.03	35	0.16	55	0.07
Rosenthal 1931c		50	0.53	43	0.00	67	0.02	85	0.02	27	0.23	56	0.07
Rosenthal 1931d		57	0.52	38	0.00	79	0.03	58	0.03	29	0.21	46	0.08
Rossi 2007		87	0.34	65	0.00	87	0.03	77	0.03	61	0.05	67	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		71	0.47	59	0.00	83	0.03	68	0.03	55	0.05	69	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		75	0.45	12	0.01	82	0.03	83	0.03	73	0.04	88	0.03
Rubinstein 1966		67	0.48	57	0.00	81	0.02	87	0.02	62	0.04	83	0.03
Schilhawsky 1960		43	0.54	26	0.01	31	0.05	34	0.18	40	0.18	26	0.18
Shebanova 2002		3	0.69	66	0.00	6	0.13	6	0.45	36	0.23	10	0.32
Smith 1975		33	0.57	4	0.05	16	0.06	29	0.21	32	0.17	23	0.19
Sokolov 2002		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Sztompka 1959		4	0.69	7	0.02	10	0.10	9	0.39	53	0.06	28	0.15
Tomsic 1995		82	0.40	44	0.00	84	0.04	56	0.04	43	0.11	49	0.07
Uninsky 1932		64	0.49	51	0.00	48	0.05	51	0.05	55	0.06	63	0.05
Uninsky 1971		77	0.44	53	0.00	49	0.06	45	0.06	43	0.12	45	0.08
Wasowski 1980		49	0.53	73	0.00	60	0.03	73	0.03	62	0.05	66	0.04
Zak 1937		7	0.68	2	0.08	3	0.12	3	0.50	20	0.27	4	0.37
Zak 1951		6	0.68	9	0.02	4	0.16	4	0.50	20	0.28	5	0.37
Random 1		90	-0.18	63	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	7	0.50	53	0.07
Random 2		88	0.08	87	0.00	88	0.01	88	0.01	5	0.48	52	0.07
Random 3		89	-0.03	78	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	10	0.47	54	0.07

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).