Rubinstein 1966

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		46	0.60	49	0.00	56	0.05	52	0.05	65	0.04	66	0.04
Anderszewski 2003		24	0.67	56	0.00	42	0.12	37	0.24	59	0.04	39	0.10
Ashkenazy 1981		42	0.61	53	0.00	46	0.04	64	0.04	70	0.04	71	0.04
Bacha 2000		23	0.67	23	0.01	28	0.05	20	0.37	30	0.15	24	0.24
Badura 1965		66	0.46	45	0.00	81	0.04	80	0.04	64	0.05	69	0.04
Barbosa 1983		22	0.67	29	0.00	14	0.08	14	0.42	6	0.49	7	0.45
Biret 1990		8	0.72	33	0.00	17	0.08	18	0.39	29	0.20	21	0.28
Blet 2003		31	0.64	65	0.00	22	0.07	16	0.40	30	0.22	17	0.30
Block 1995		75	0.42	31	0.00	13	0.07	42	0.17	53	0.05	42	0.09
Blumental 1952		19	0.68	76	0.00	23	0.07	26	0.33	42	0.09	33	0.17
Boshniakovich 1969		64	0.46	46	0.00	59	0.04	77	0.04	75	0.04	70	0.04
Brailowsky 1960		18	0.69	88	0.00	34	0.06	31	0.29	24	0.28	18	0.28
Bunin 1987		86	0.19	57	0.00	87	0.03	82	0.03	80	0.02	89	0.02
Bunin 1987b		87	0.17	69	0.00	86	0.03	83	0.03	83	0.02	86	0.02
Chiu 1999		16	0.70	7	0.02	15	0.10	19	0.38	18	0.29	14	0.33
Cohen 1997		36	0.62	20	0.01	20	0.06	23	0.36	9	0.44	8	0.40
Cortot 1951		54	0.55	85	0.00	62	0.06	45	0.06	80	0.03	72	0.04
Csalog 1996		71	0.44	21	0.01	27	0.07	38	0.23	19	0.34	20	0.28
Czerny 1949		62	0.47	28	0.00	68	0.04	71	0.04	75	0.03	83	0.03
Czerny 1990		7	0.72	8	0.01	31	0.07	24	0.36	65	0.03	40	0.10
Duchoud 2007		76	0.42	74	0.00	75	0.05	61	0.05	74	0.03	67	0.04
Ezaki 2006		13	0.70	60	0.00	41	0.10	39	0.22	44	0.08	35	0.13
Falvay 1989		45	0.60	15	0.01	30	0.07	40	0.19	27	0.42	19	0.28
Farrell 1958		5	0.74	32	0.00	5	0.09	9	0.46	15	0.45	6	0.45
Ferenczy 1958		67	0.46	72	0.00	76	0.04	79	0.04	83	0.03	81	0.03
Fliere 1977		20	0.68	37	0.00	39	0.09	28	0.31	69	0.04	37	0.11
Fou 1978		30	0.65	13	0.01	18	0.07	17	0.40	40	0.11	28	0.21
Francois 1956		52	0.56	79	0.00	53	0.04	70	0.04	51	0.05	73	0.04
Friedman 1923		37	0.62	24	0.01	50	0.06	48	0.06	64	0.04	56	0.05
Friedman 1923b		40	0.62	26	0.00	49	0.05	54	0.05	66	0.05	52	0.05
Friedman 1930		44	0.60	55	0.00	60	0.04	72	0.04	58	0.05	65	0.04
Garcia 2007		55	0.55	42	0.00	58	0.04	65	0.04	62	0.04	68	0.04
Garcia 2007b		59	0.50	66	0.00	66	0.04	76	0.04	77	0.04	74	0.04
Gierzod 1998		43	0.60	16	0.01	43	0.07	43	0.13	66	0.04	47	0.07
Gornostaeva 1994		60	0.49	80	0.00	65	0.04	75	0.04	79	0.03	85	0.03
Groot 1988		25	0.67	5	0.02	12	0.08	3	0.53	6	0.51	3	0.52
Harasiewicz 1955		53	0.56	77	0.00	63	0.04	63	0.04	43	0.09	50	0.06
Hatto 1993		17	0.69	18	0.01	33	0.06	32	0.27	42	0.12	32	0.18
Hatto 1997		11	0.71	17	0.01	37	0.07	33	0.27	43	0.12	31	0.18
Horowitz 1949		69	0.44	47	0.00	69	0.04	67	0.04	67	0.05	60	0.04
Indjic 1988		12	0.70	43	0.00	38	0.08	36	0.27	43	0.12	30	0.18
Kapell 1951		56	0.54	41	0.00	35	0.07	35	0.27	76	0.03	41	0.09
Kissin 1993		41	0.61	3	0.04	25	0.06	25	0.35	41	0.10	29	0.19
Kushner 1989		15	0.70	12	0.01	16	0.08	13	0.46	42	0.11	27	0.22
Luisada 1991		3	0.74	36	0.00	6	0.10	8	0.49	31	0.21	16	0.32
Lushtak 2004		2	0.77	34	0.00	3	0.16	12	0.46	13	0.31	10	0.38
Malcuzynski 1961		84	0.26	25	0.01	83	0.03	85	0.03	62	0.04	76	0.03
Magaloff 1978		28	0.66	63	0.00	32	0.07	30	0.29	29	0.24	22	0.26
Magin 1975		63	0.47	22	0.01	57	0.05	51	0.05	82	0.03	59	0.04
Michalowski 1933		82	0.31	81	0.00	84	0.03	84	0.03	83	0.03	79	0.03
Milkina 1970		27	0.66	10	0.01	11	0.10	10	0.46	30	0.26	12	0.35
Mohovich 1999		4	0.74	14	0.01	4	0.09	7	0.51	15	0.47	4	0.49
Moravec 1969		74	0.42	70	0.00	77	0.04	78	0.04	41	0.13	45	0.07
Morozova 2008		29	0.65	50	0.00	36	0.07	34	0.27	42	0.10	34	0.16
Neighaus 1950		47	0.59	30	0.00	48	0.05	49	0.05	59	0.05	54	0.05
Niedzielski 1931		57	0.52	51	0.00	61	0.05	57	0.05	67	0.04	58	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		38	0.62	11	0.01	45	0.05	50	0.05	82	0.03	63	0.04
Osinska 1989		9	0.72	44	0.00	9	0.08	6	0.51	32	0.23	13	0.34
Pachmann 1927		65	0.46	86	0.00	82	0.04	81	0.04	76	0.03	77	0.03
Paderewski 1930		51	0.56	61	0.00	54	0.06	47	0.06	81	0.03	62	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		21	0.68	40	0.00	26	0.07	22	0.36	39	0.14	26	0.22
Pierdomenico 2008		73	0.43	59	0.00	51	0.05	59	0.05	45	0.08	49	0.06
Poblocka 1999		79	0.37	19	0.01	70	0.04	66	0.04	69	0.04	57	0.04
Rabcewiczowa 1932		39	0.62	82	0.00	29	0.06	29	0.30	55	0.05	36	0.12
Rachmaninoff 1923		34	0.63	6	0.02	44	0.06	44	0.11	67	0.04	46	0.07
Rangell 2001		81	0.32	35	0.00	52	0.06	46	0.06	58	0.04	53	0.05
Richter 1976		85	0.25	71	0.00	85	0.04	68	0.04	68	0.04	61	0.04
Rosen 1989		33	0.63	52	0.00	21	0.06	15	0.41	36	0.14	25	0.24
Rosenthal 1930		80	0.36	75	0.00	78	0.04	74	0.04	77	0.03	84	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		68	0.45	90	0.00	71	0.05	60	0.05	42	0.13	43	0.08
Rosenthal 1931b		70	0.44	67	0.00	73	0.05	58	0.05	51	0.06	55	0.05
Rosenthal 1931c		77	0.42	27	0.00	72	0.04	69	0.04	42	0.13	48	0.07
Rosenthal 1931d		72	0.43	87	0.00	74	0.05	56	0.05	40	0.13	44	0.08
Rossi 2007		35	0.62	64	0.00	24	0.05	41	0.18	18	0.35	23	0.25
Rubinstein 1939		1	0.85	1	0.39	1	0.39	1	0.67	1	0.68	1	0.67
Rubinstein 1952		14	0.70	2	0.24	2	0.43	2	0.59	2	0.61	2	0.60
Rubinstein 1966		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Schilhawsky 1960		58	0.51	38	0.00	64	0.05	53	0.05	66	0.04	64	0.04
Shebanova 2002		32	0.64	39	0.00	40	0.09	27	0.33	69	0.04	38	0.11
Smith 1975		26	0.66	54	0.00	19	0.06	11	0.46	23	0.24	15	0.33
Sokolov 2002		61	0.48	62	0.00	67	0.04	62	0.04	87	0.02	75	0.03
Sztompka 1959		48	0.59	89	0.00	47	0.04	73	0.04	82	0.03	78	0.03
Tomsic 1995		50	0.58	48	0.00	10	0.08	21	0.37	6	0.60	5	0.47
Uninsky 1932		78	0.39	73	0.00	79	0.03	86	0.03	76	0.03	82	0.03
Uninsky 1971		83	0.31	83	0.00	80	0.03	87	0.03	73	0.04	80	0.03
Wasowski 1980		49	0.58	58	0.00	55	0.05	55	0.05	71	0.05	51	0.05
Zak 1937		6	0.72	9	0.01	8	0.12	4	0.53	23	0.25	11	0.36
Zak 1951		10	0.71	4	0.03	7	0.11	5	0.53	22	0.27	9	0.38
Random 1		90	-0.26	68	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	83	0.02	90	0.01
Random 2		88	-0.06	84	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	52	0.04	87	0.02
Random 3		89	-0.18	78	0.00	88	0.01	88	0.01	60	0.04	88	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).