Rosenthal 1931d

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		40	0.48	29	0.00	47	0.07	45	0.07	78	0.03	46	0.05
Anderszewski 2003		30	0.51	40	0.00	39	0.07	36	0.16	76	0.03	37	0.07
Ashkenazy 1981		64	0.37	54	0.00	48	0.05	56	0.05	86	0.02	76	0.03
Bacha 2000		44	0.46	33	0.00	22	0.06	26	0.24	85	0.03	30	0.08
Badura 1965		83	0.18	13	0.00	84	0.03	81	0.03	85	0.02	87	0.02
Barbosa 1983		87	0.10	55	0.00	66	0.04	66	0.04	84	0.02	71	0.03
Biret 1990		19	0.55	34	0.00	21	0.06	20	0.35	75	0.03	27	0.10
Blet 2003		55	0.41	56	0.00	58	0.04	70	0.04	69	0.04	57	0.04
Block 1995		77	0.28	35	0.00	72	0.05	58	0.05	84	0.02	75	0.03
Blumental 1952		29	0.51	57	0.00	12	0.15	11	0.49	45	0.08	12	0.20
Boshniakovich 1969		61	0.38	58	0.00	78	0.03	80	0.03	87	0.02	89	0.02
Brailowsky 1960		23	0.53	36	0.00	23	0.06	16	0.38	55	0.04	18	0.12
Bunin 1987		85	0.15	66	0.00	87	0.04	75	0.04	85	0.02	77	0.03
Bunin 1987b		86	0.14	37	0.00	86	0.03	84	0.03	84	0.02	85	0.02
Chiu 1999		80	0.25	41	0.00	63	0.05	61	0.05	82	0.03	49	0.04
Cohen 1997		81	0.24	67	0.00	27	0.07	33	0.17	33	0.24	13	0.20
Cortot 1951		43	0.46	68	0.00	61	0.05	59	0.05	84	0.03	65	0.04
Csalog 1996		33	0.50	69	0.00	34	0.05	34	0.17	43	0.09	21	0.12
Czerny 1949		47	0.45	70	0.00	56	0.04	69	0.04	66	0.04	60	0.04
Czerny 1990		11	0.61	19	0.00	10	0.13	10	0.52	60	0.04	17	0.14
Duchoud 2007		68	0.34	59	0.00	43	0.05	43	0.09	78	0.03	47	0.05
Ezaki 2006		36	0.49	71	0.00	19	0.07	18	0.37	71	0.03	22	0.11
Falvay 1989		21	0.54	42	0.00	15	0.16	14	0.40	21	0.44	6	0.42
Farrell 1958		51	0.43	72	0.00	29	0.08	22	0.33	79	0.04	24	0.11
Ferenczy 1958		67	0.35	43	0.00	73	0.06	48	0.06	75	0.03	59	0.04
Fliere 1977		25	0.53	24	0.00	17	0.07	35	0.17	64	0.04	31	0.08
Fou 1978		49	0.44	20	0.00	32	0.06	32	0.18	54	0.04	33	0.08
Francois 1956		34	0.50	73	0.00	40	0.05	39	0.13	70	0.04	39	0.07
Friedman 1923		73	0.31	7	0.00	76	0.03	82	0.03	74	0.04	84	0.03
Friedman 1923b		74	0.30	21	0.00	75	0.03	77	0.03	75	0.04	78	0.03
Friedman 1930		65	0.36	74	0.00	74	0.02	87	0.02	71	0.04	72	0.03
Garcia 2007		37	0.49	22	0.00	46	0.05	51	0.05	75	0.03	63	0.04
Garcia 2007b		42	0.46	44	0.00	53	0.05	55	0.05	79	0.04	66	0.04
Gierzod 1998		20	0.54	75	0.00	45	0.05	52	0.05	69	0.04	62	0.04
Gornostaeva 1994		5	0.67	16	0.00	7	0.18	12	0.48	20	0.26	8	0.35
Groot 1988		69	0.34	30	0.00	62	0.04	68	0.04	81	0.03	80	0.03
Harasiewicz 1955		66	0.35	45	0.00	55	0.04	65	0.04	81	0.03	83	0.03
Hatto 1993		82	0.23	14	0.00	80	0.03	76	0.03	78	0.04	82	0.03
Hatto 1997		79	0.25	76	0.00	79	0.03	85	0.03	76	0.04	73	0.03
Horowitz 1949		75	0.30	25	0.00	82	0.04	72	0.04	82	0.03	69	0.03
Indjic 1988		78	0.25	6	0.00	81	0.05	53	0.05	76	0.04	56	0.04
Kapell 1951		13	0.58	31	0.00	36	0.06	28	0.21	69	0.04	28	0.09
Kissin 1993		22	0.53	77	0.00	26	0.07	25	0.25	70	0.03	29	0.09
Kushner 1989		16	0.57	60	0.00	38	0.05	31	0.19	80	0.03	34	0.08
Luisada 1991		54	0.42	38	0.00	42	0.06	41	0.12	81	0.03	40	0.06
Lushtak 2004		72	0.31	78	0.00	59	0.04	71	0.04	63	0.04	64	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961		18	0.56	8	0.00	16	0.07	27	0.24	73	0.03	35	0.08
Magaloff 1978		10	0.61	32	0.00	14	0.14	13	0.48	28	0.24	9	0.34
Magin 1975		15	0.57	23	0.00	18	0.06	17	0.38	64	0.04	20	0.12
Michalowski 1933		32	0.50	12	0.00	50	0.05	60	0.05	73	0.04	55	0.04
Milkina 1970		7	0.67	79	0.00	11	0.16	9	0.53	55	0.04	16	0.15
Mohovich 1999		28	0.52	80	0.00	33	0.05	38	0.14	76	0.04	38	0.07
Moravec 1969		6	0.67	61	0.00	5	0.36	5	0.59	8	0.55	5	0.57
Morozova 2008		59	0.38	62	0.00	60	0.06	50	0.06	81	0.03	58	0.04
Neighaus 1950		62	0.37	81	0.00	77	0.03	83	0.03	83	0.03	81	0.03
Niedzielski 1931		24	0.53	5	0.00	24	0.06	19	0.37	66	0.04	19	0.12
Ohlsson 1999		53	0.42	46	0.00	52	0.04	63	0.04	66	0.04	54	0.04
Osinska 1989		17	0.57	47	0.00	31	0.05	24	0.25	73	0.04	26	0.10
Pachmann 1927		45	0.46	48	0.00	68	0.07	46	0.07	72	0.03	42	0.05
Paderewski 1930		35	0.49	49	0.00	54	0.06	49	0.06	75	0.03	53	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		52	0.42	82	0.00	35	0.05	37	0.16	87	0.02	41	0.06
Pierdomenico 2008		71	0.32	63	0.00	71	0.04	67	0.04	76	0.04	50	0.04
Poblocka 1999		41	0.47	83	0.00	57	0.05	57	0.05	74	0.04	48	0.04
Rabcewiczowa 1932		9	0.63	17	0.00	6	0.22	6	0.57	22	0.28	7	0.40
Rachmaninoff 1923		12	0.59	15	0.00	9	0.17	7	0.57	54	0.04	15	0.15
Rangell 2001		46	0.45	64	0.00	49	0.04	62	0.04	82	0.03	79	0.03
Richter 1976		84	0.17	50	0.00	85	0.03	86	0.03	81	0.02	86	0.02
Rosen 1989		14	0.58	18	0.00	20	0.06	23	0.29	63	0.04	25	0.11
Rosenthal 1930		4	0.84	4	0.01	4	0.57	4	0.85	4	0.81	4	0.83
Rosenthal 1931		2	0.97	2	0.08	2	0.87	2	0.97	2	0.97	2	0.97
Rosenthal 1931b		1	0.98	1	0.85	1	0.84	1	0.98	1	0.98	1	0.98
Rosenthal 1931c		3	0.94	3	0.05	3	0.87	3	0.95	2	0.94	3	0.94
Rosenthal 1931d		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rossi 2007		48	0.44	84	0.00	28	0.07	30	0.20	31	0.19	14	0.19
Rubinstein 1939		39	0.48	26	0.00	25	0.07	21	0.33	65	0.04	23	0.11
Rubinstein 1952		38	0.48	85	0.00	13	0.15	15	0.39	38	0.28	10	0.33
Rubinstein 1966		50	0.43	27	0.00	41	0.05	40	0.13	56	0.05	36	0.08
Schilhawsky 1960		58	0.39	9	0.00	30	0.05	42	0.10	80	0.03	44	0.05
Shebanova 2002		31	0.50	86	0.00	51	0.04	64	0.04	82	0.03	74	0.03
Smith 1975		8	0.63	87	0.00	8	0.18	8	0.56	44	0.07	11	0.20
Sokolov 2002		27	0.52	10	0.00	37	0.06	29	0.21	58	0.03	32	0.08
Sztompka 1959		26	0.52	51	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.09	79	0.03	43	0.05
Tomsic 1995		63	0.37	88	0.00	67	0.05	54	0.05	67	0.04	52	0.04
Uninsky 1932		57	0.39	52	0.00	69	0.07	47	0.07	70	0.04	45	0.05
Uninsky 1971		76	0.28	89	0.00	83	0.03	79	0.03	85	0.03	70	0.03
Wasowski 1980		70	0.34	28	0.00	70	0.04	74	0.04	82	0.03	67	0.03
Zak 1937		56	0.40	11	0.00	64	0.04	73	0.04	68	0.04	51	0.04
Zak 1951		60	0.38	53	0.00	65	0.03	78	0.03	68	0.04	68	0.03
Random 1		90	-0.24	39	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	59	0.03	88	0.02
Random 2		88	-0.12	90	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	43	0.08	61	0.04
Random 3		89	-0.22	65	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	54	0.04	90	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).