Rosenthal 1931c

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		36	0.48	79	0.00	36	0.05	36	0.18	83	0.03	43	0.07
Anderszewski 2003		43	0.45	34	0.00	45	0.05	51	0.05	52	0.05	46	0.05
Ashkenazy 1981		68	0.33	26	0.00	62	0.04	63	0.04	81	0.03	79	0.03
Bacha 2000		53	0.41	16	0.00	27	0.05	34	0.19	86	0.03	32	0.08
Badura 1965		84	0.19	35	0.00	68	0.04	71	0.04	79	0.03	77	0.03
Barbosa 1983		87	0.09	46	0.00	73	0.04	72	0.04	86	0.02	69	0.03
Biret 1990		35	0.49	47	0.00	34	0.05	30	0.22	69	0.04	31	0.09
Blet 2003		44	0.44	51	0.00	49	0.05	52	0.05	78	0.03	52	0.04
Block 1995		86	0.18	43	0.00	82	0.02	87	0.02	86	0.02	88	0.02
Blumental 1952		26	0.52	6	0.00	8	0.13	12	0.47	38	0.11	14	0.23
Boshniakovich 1969		55	0.40	82	0.00	67	0.03	79	0.03	80	0.03	78	0.03
Brailowsky 1960		42	0.46	63	0.00	29	0.05	38	0.16	52	0.04	34	0.08
Bunin 1987		81	0.23	22	0.00	85	0.03	82	0.03	75	0.03	80	0.03
Bunin 1987b		82	0.22	11	0.00	84	0.03	84	0.03	76	0.03	63	0.03
Chiu 1999		85	0.19	44	0.00	66	0.04	70	0.04	72	0.03	60	0.03
Cohen 1997		78	0.26	10	0.00	18	0.11	24	0.28	15	0.35	12	0.31
Cortot 1951		41	0.46	67	0.00	64	0.04	66	0.04	56	0.04	57	0.04
Csalog 1996		13	0.58	39	0.00	20	0.07	18	0.33	28	0.27	13	0.30
Czerny 1949		39	0.47	28	0.00	46	0.04	65	0.04	60	0.04	55	0.04
Czerny 1990		11	0.61	52	0.00	9	0.19	11	0.47	47	0.04	18	0.14
Duchoud 2007		70	0.32	29	0.00	51	0.04	57	0.04	88	0.02	75	0.03
Ezaki 2006		46	0.44	23	0.00	25	0.07	25	0.26	70	0.03	28	0.09
Falvay 1989		30	0.50	83	0.00	15	0.13	17	0.37	28	0.42	7	0.39
Farrell 1958		59	0.38	25	0.00	33	0.05	26	0.24	76	0.04	25	0.10
Ferenczy 1958		65	0.35	48	0.00	74	0.04	64	0.04	78	0.03	72	0.03
Fliere 1977		17	0.56	68	0.00	26	0.07	20	0.32	74	0.04	22	0.11
Fou 1978		52	0.41	15	0.00	32	0.05	37	0.17	85	0.03	39	0.07
Francois 1956		38	0.47	69	0.00	52	0.04	58	0.04	72	0.04	58	0.04
Friedman 1923		74	0.28	53	0.00	80	0.03	75	0.03	81	0.03	86	0.03
Friedman 1923b		73	0.28	17	0.00	79	0.04	60	0.04	79	0.03	81	0.03
Friedman 1930		64	0.35	57	0.00	71	0.04	74	0.04	74	0.03	71	0.03
Garcia 2007		40	0.47	70	0.00	48	0.04	55	0.04	69	0.03	76	0.03
Garcia 2007b		45	0.44	71	0.00	59	0.04	69	0.04	87	0.02	85	0.03
Gierzod 1998		14	0.58	14	0.00	23	0.08	21	0.31	76	0.03	26	0.10
Gornostaeva 1994		8	0.63	8	0.00	11	0.12	8	0.51	30	0.20	10	0.32
Groot 1988		72	0.29	58	0.00	72	0.03	86	0.03	84	0.03	82	0.03
Harasiewicz 1955		71	0.31	40	0.00	60	0.05	54	0.05	85	0.02	84	0.03
Hatto 1993		80	0.25	59	0.00	76	0.04	67	0.04	80	0.03	83	0.03
Hatto 1997		75	0.27	72	0.00	77	0.05	48	0.05	82	0.03	53	0.04
Horowitz 1949		77	0.27	54	0.00	86	0.03	78	0.03	78	0.04	65	0.03
Indjic 1988		76	0.27	36	0.00	78	0.05	49	0.05	81	0.03	51	0.04
Kapell 1951		6	0.64	80	0.00	19	0.08	19	0.32	54	0.05	19	0.13
Kissin 1993		20	0.55	37	0.00	21	0.10	23	0.31	47	0.05	21	0.12
Kushner 1989		16	0.56	49	0.00	37	0.05	29	0.23	77	0.03	36	0.08
Luisada 1991		56	0.39	55	0.00	38	0.05	35	0.19	85	0.03	33	0.08
Lushtak 2004		67	0.33	84	0.00	41	0.05	39	0.16	74	0.03	44	0.07
Malcuzynski 1961		22	0.54	38	0.00	12	0.13	31	0.22	40	0.14	15	0.18
Magaloff 1978		10	0.62	7	0.00	14	0.13	13	0.46	22	0.29	9	0.37
Magin 1975		19	0.55	50	0.00	24	0.07	22	0.31	76	0.03	24	0.10
Michalowski 1933		33	0.50	20	0.00	55	0.05	47	0.05	82	0.03	50	0.04
Milkina 1970		9	0.63	12	0.00	13	0.15	10	0.47	47	0.06	16	0.17
Mohovich 1999		28	0.51	64	0.00	30	0.05	33	0.19	73	0.04	30	0.09
Moravec 1969		5	0.66	19	0.00	5	0.31	6	0.54	9	0.54	5	0.54
Morozova 2008		62	0.37	45	0.00	56	0.04	59	0.04	87	0.02	70	0.03
Neighaus 1950		63	0.36	56	0.00	70	0.03	80	0.03	86	0.02	89	0.02
Niedzielski 1931		21	0.54	41	0.00	22	0.10	15	0.38	68	0.03	23	0.11
Ohlsson 1999		51	0.42	27	0.00	54	0.04	56	0.04	85	0.03	67	0.03
Osinska 1989		23	0.53	30	0.00	39	0.05	32	0.19	67	0.04	29	0.09
Pachmann 1927		37	0.47	85	0.00	58	0.04	61	0.04	49	0.05	48	0.04
Paderewski 1930		27	0.52	60	0.00	43	0.06	40	0.15	82	0.03	40	0.07
Perlemuter 1992		58	0.38	73	0.00	42	0.06	41	0.14	58	0.04	37	0.07
Pierdomenico 2008		79	0.26	86	0.00	83	0.03	83	0.03	82	0.03	61	0.03
Poblocka 1999		34	0.50	32	0.00	47	0.04	68	0.04	80	0.03	59	0.03
Rabcewiczowa 1932		7	0.64	9	0.00	6	0.19	5	0.54	16	0.31	6	0.41
Rachmaninoff 1923		15	0.57	5	0.01	10	0.15	7	0.53	72	0.04	17	0.15
Rangell 2001		48	0.43	61	0.00	63	0.05	53	0.05	76	0.03	56	0.04
Richter 1976		83	0.21	87	0.00	87	0.03	76	0.03	77	0.03	66	0.03
Rosen 1989		18	0.56	88	0.00	35	0.05	28	0.23	66	0.04	27	0.10
Rosenthal 1930		4	0.88	4	0.02	4	0.69	4	0.86	1	0.86	4	0.86
Rosenthal 1931		2	0.95	2	0.24	2	0.59	3	0.93	3	0.95	2	0.94
Rosenthal 1931b		1	0.95	1	0.47	1	0.47	1	0.95	3	0.95	1	0.95
Rosenthal 1931c		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rosenthal 1931d		3	0.94	3	0.22	3	0.85	2	0.94	3	0.95	3	0.94
Rossi 2007		60	0.37	81	0.00	44	0.06	43	0.11	52	0.06	35	0.08
Rubinstein 1939		31	0.50	65	0.00	17	0.14	16	0.38	26	0.25	11	0.31
Rubinstein 1952		24	0.53	74	0.00	7	0.12	14	0.43	30	0.36	8	0.39
Rubinstein 1966		50	0.42	75	0.00	40	0.04	42	0.13	69	0.04	41	0.07
Schilhawsky 1960		47	0.44	13	0.00	28	0.05	44	0.11	72	0.04	42	0.07
Shebanova 2002		29	0.51	31	0.00	53	0.05	46	0.05	85	0.03	54	0.04
Smith 1975		12	0.58	76	0.00	16	0.17	9	0.50	76	0.03	20	0.12
Sokolov 2002		25	0.53	18	0.00	31	0.05	27	0.23	85	0.02	38	0.07
Sztompka 1959		32	0.50	33	0.00	50	0.05	45	0.05	83	0.03	49	0.04
Tomsic 1995		61	0.37	66	0.00	69	0.03	81	0.03	73	0.04	64	0.03
Uninsky 1932		57	0.39	24	0.00	65	0.04	73	0.04	78	0.03	73	0.03
Uninsky 1971		66	0.34	89	0.00	81	0.03	85	0.03	72	0.04	68	0.03
Wasowski 1980		69	0.32	62	0.00	75	0.03	77	0.03	87	0.02	87	0.02
Zak 1937		49	0.42	77	0.00	57	0.04	62	0.04	80	0.03	62	0.03
Zak 1951		54	0.40	21	0.00	61	0.05	50	0.05	79	0.03	47	0.04
Random 1		89	-0.19	78	0.00	88	0.02	89	0.02	24	0.23	45	0.07
Random 2		88	-0.13	90	0.00	89	0.02	88	0.02	51	0.04	74	0.03
Random 3		90	-0.29	42	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	88	0.02	90	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).